JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
-
Upload
farahazura -
Category
Documents
-
view
280 -
download
8
Transcript of JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
1/42
SITE SAFETY ,ENVIRONMENTAND QUALITY IN
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Ir.M.RAMUSERENSENIOR MANAGER CIDBB.Eng (Hons)., M.I.E.M., P.Eng ( M )., CCPM., CPESC.,
B.Jur ( Hons ) Malaya., CLP
Tel : 0162200200 / 03-26170360
E-mail : [email protected]
10thAugust 2009
Quality Hotel, Shah Alam
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
2/42
Topics That Will Be Covered
Today
Site SafetyHIRARC and
SHASSIC
EnvironmentWaste
Management and SEC
Workmanship Quality - QLASSIC
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
3/42
OSH Management System
There is no OSH Management System
without HIRARC
HIRARC is the key process for managingOSH Management System
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
4/42
HIRARC - WHAT IS THIS ?
HAZARD INDENTIFICATION ,
RISK ANALYSIS OR ASSESSMENT
RISK CONTROL MEASURES
- in short we call HIRARC
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
5/42
HAZARD INDENTIFICATION
EACH ACTIVITITY HAS ITS OWN HAZARD
FOR EXAMPLECONCRETING WORKS
WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE HAZARDS ? - NO PROPER WORKING PLATFORM
WHICH MAY CAUSE WORKER FALL
FROM HEIGHT
- HIT BY CONCRETE BUCKET
- CONCRETE DROPS FROM HEIGHTETC
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
6/42
RISK ANALYSIS- HIT BY CONCRETE BUCKET
( LIKELIHOOD VS SEVERITY )
LIKELIHOOD
SEVERITY
1VERY UNLIKELY
2UNLIKELY
3LIKELY
4VERY LIKELY
1ACCEPTABLE
1 2 3 4
2NOT SERIOUS
2 4 6 8
3SERIOUS
3 6 9 12
4VERY SERIOUS
4 8 12 16
6
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
7/42
RISK RANKING
SCORE( LIKELIHOOD VS SEVERITY)
LEVEL
7 - 16HIGH
3 - 6 MEDIUM
1 - 2 LOW
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
8/42
RISK CONTROLMEASURES
SCORE( LIKELIHOOD VS
SEVERITY)
LEVEL CONTROL
7 - 16 HIGH ENGINEERINGSOLUTION
3 - 6 MEDIUM TRAINING TO
WORKERS AND
CRANE
OPERATOR
1 - 2 LOW WARNING
SIGNAGE
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
9/42
I have finished on HIRARC
NOWI AM GOING TO COVER
SHASSIC
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
10/42
WHAT IS SHASSIC ?
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ASSESSMENT
SYSTEM INCONSTRUCTION
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
11/42
SHASSIC OBJECTIVES
To benchmarkthe level of safety and health
performance of construction industry in
Malaysia
To have a common standardon safety and
health assessment system for contractor (s)
in construction industry
To assess safety and health performanceof contractorbased on approved standard
by the industry stakeholders
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
12/42
SHASSIC OBJECTIVES
Continue.
To evaluate the performanceof
contractor(s) based on the safety and health
practices; and
To compile data for statistical analysison
contractors safety and health management
and performance at sites
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
13/42
SHASSIC OBJECTIVES ( con..)
To study on which area contractors has failed
or could not score higher points so that
appropriate trainingcan be organized
Part of preparation for OSH management
systemin long run
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
14/42
CRITERIA CONSIDERED FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF SHASSIC
Compliance to legal requirements
- OHSA 1994, FMA, BOWEC Reg,
Safety,Health & Welfare Reg,etc
Based on approved Standard & good practice
- OSH MS such as OHSAS 18001 AND MS
1722 etc
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
15/42
COMPONENT OF
ASSESSMENT & WEIGHTAGE
Divided into 3 categories:-
DOCUMENT CHECK - 40% WORKPLACE INSPECTION - 40%
EMPLOYEE INTERVIEW - 20%
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
16/42
SHASSIC REQUIREMENT
Work Progresshas to be within 25% to
75%
WHY ?
Construction at peak
Many activities
Workers at full Strength Potential accidents
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
17/42
DOCUMENT CHECK
Checking on documents and records - to
determine the compliance of establishment of
OSH program and activities
There are 63 questions/checklists
Weightage is 40% of the total marks of 100
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
18/42
WORKPLACE INSPECTION
This assessment shall provide visualcomparison of evidence on the OSH programthat being implementation, enforced and
practiced at site. There are 62 questions/checklists
5 (five) high risk areas shall be assessedwithin the site ( areas to be decided byAssessor)
It carries 40% of overall weightage
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
19/42
EMPLOYEES INTERVIEW
Employees shall be randomly selected forinterview purpose
Divided into 3 categories of Employees,
namely, management personal ( 1), safety &health personals (3) and finally workers(10)from various trades
The set of questions are different for eachcategories
There are 48 questions all together(12, 6, 30)
It carries weightage of 20%
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
20/42
METHOD TO CALCULATE
SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT
Document Check
Total compliance in the checklist / ( 63
minus Number of Not applicable items) X
40% = A ( score for document check )
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
21/42
METHOD TO CALCULATE
SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT
Workplace Inspect ion
Total compliance in the checklist / (
62X5=310 minus Number of Not applicable
items) X 40% = B ( score for Workplace
Inspection )
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
22/42
METHOD TO CALCULATE
SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT
Employees Interv iew
Total compliance in the checklist / ( 330
minus Number of Not applicable items) X
20% = C ( score for Employees
Interview )
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
23/42
TOTAL CHECKLISTS
Document Check 63
Workplace Inspection 310 ( 62 X 5 )
Employee Interviews 330 ( 12(x1) +6(x3)+ 30 (x10)
TOTAL = 63 + 310 + 330703 / site
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
24/42
SCORE STARS( RATING )
85 - 100
70 - 84
55 - 69
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
25/42
SCORE STARS
( RATING )
40 - 54
39 and
less
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
26/42
ASSESSOR
Who can be the SHASSIC Assessor (s) ?
A person who has attended one day training and
passed exam and must have 5 years woking
experience in construction industry Attended and passed Lead Auditor OHSAS
18001/MS 1722 course and with 3 years working
experience in Construction Industry
CSHO with 2 years working experience inconstruction industry
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
27/42
ENVIRONMENTAL
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
28/42
ENVIRONMENTAL
TWO IMPORTANT MATTERS TO
CONSIDER
1. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT
2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
3. GREEN BUIDING INDEX
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
29/42
CONSTRUCTION WASTE
MANAGEMENT
EXTRA ORDERS
CONVENTIONAL TYPE OF
CONSTRUCTION USING A LOT OF
TIMBER FORMWORKS ETC
BREAKAGE / POOR HANDLING
- ONE WAY TO CONTROL CONSTRUTION
WASTE IS BY ADOPTING IBS
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
30/42
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
SITE CLEARING CAN CAUSE IMMEDIATEAND HUGE SOIL LOST IF NOTPROTECTED IMMEDIATELY
PROPER PLANNING IS REQUIREDBEFORE THE EXECUTION OF SITECLEARING
VEGITATION REMOVED MUST BEIMMEDIATELY COVERED BY SUITABLEMATERIAL OR CONSTRUCTION MUSTTAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
31/42
GREEN BUIDING INDEX
IT IS A RATING SYSTEM FOR GREEN
BUIDING
A CERTIFICATE WILL BE ISSUED FOR
BUIDING WHICH HAS COMPLIED THE
GREEN BUILDINGS REQUIREMENTS
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
32/42
GREEN BUILDING
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
In USA it is known as LEED
AustraliaGreen Star
SingaporeGreen Mark UKBREEAM
MalaysiaGBI ( by PAM & ACEM )
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
33/42
GREEN BUILDING RATING
Developed by PAM & ACEM
CIDB having discussion with PAM & ACEM
to convert GBI to Construction Industry
Standard
Ratingwill take consideration of the
following:-
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
34/42
GREEN BUILDING
RATINGcontinue
Energy Efficiency
Indoor environmental Quality
Sustainable site & Management Material & Resources
Water Efficiency
Innovation
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
35/42
QLASSIC
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
36/42
QLASSIC
Quality Assessment System In Construction
Was developed in 2006 as Construction
Industry Standard ( CIS )
This is workmanship quality assessment
standard
CIDB is providing free assessment service for
contractors
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
37/42
How QLASSIC can help CIDB
to improve ConstructionsWorkmanship Quality ?
Base on score Contractor failed or score less in certain
areas could be identified
CIDB could arrange proper training program
for contractor
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
38/42
ASSESSMENT APPROACH
Assessor determines the samples to be
assessed prior to asssessment
Samples are selected from drawings and
plans
Samples shall be distributed uniformly
Scoring will be done on the works that are
inspected for the first time
Rectified works would not be assessed
COMPONENTS TO BE
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
39/42
COMPONENTS TO BE
ASSESSED
STRUCTURAL WORKS
ARCHITECTURAL WORKS
MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL WORKS EXTERNAL WORKS
All ti f W i ht F
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
40/42
Allocation of Weightage For
Components ( % )CATEGORIES
COMPONENTS
Landed
Housing
Stratified
Housing
PublicBuilding
SpecialPublic
Building
Structural 25 30 30 30
Architect 60 50 45 35
M & E 5 10 15 25
Ext.
works
10 10 10 10
T. Score 100 100 100 100
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
41/42
CONCLUSION
SAFETYLESS ACCIDENT AT SITE IFIBS ADOPTED AS WE WILL BE DEALINGWITH LESS WORKERS AND PROCESSES
ENVIROMENTVERY LITTLECONSTRUCTION WASTE IF IBS METHODADOPTED
QUALITY- WORKMANSHIPS QUALITYDEFINITELY IMPROVED IF IBS METHODOF CONSTRUCTION IS ADOPTED
-
7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt
42/42
THANK YOU