January 18,2008 Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

67
January 18,2008 Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

description

How to Start Doing Research. January 18,2008 Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D. Objective (s). Concept Clarify Stimulate Formulate. Why Starting Point is Important?. Good Start Past Half “เริ่มต้นดี มีชัยไปกว่าครึ่ง”. Causes of Manuscript Rejection. Research Design. Methodology. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of January 18,2008 Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Page 1: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

January 18,2008Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich,

MD., Ph.D

Page 2: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

• Concept

• Clarify

• Stimulate

• Formulate

Objective (s)

Page 3: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Why Starting Point is Important?

Good Start Past Half

“ ”เริ่��มต้�นดี มชั�ยไปกว่�าคริ่��ง

Page 4: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Causes of Manuscript Rejection

Research Design

Methodology

Poor conceptualization

Inadequate control

DuplicationStatistical analysis

Poor literature

Number of response

0 2 4 6 8 10

Page 5: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Source of Human Knowledge

• Authority

• Tradition

• Intuitive

• Trial & error

• Reasoning

• Research

Page 6: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Why Have to Do Research

•Degree

•Learning

•Promotion

•Improve quality of care

Page 7: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

What is Research?

A class of activity designed to develop

or contribute generalization knowledge

Last JM. Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2001

Page 8: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

What is Research

• Tool for exploring truth

• Tool for learning

• Improve quality of care

Page 9: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Concept of Health

Genetic

Health care service

Environment

Behavior

- Biological- Psychological- Social

- Biological- Psychological- Social

Page 10: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

PhilosophyTruth in

the universe

Research Question

StudyPlan

Actual Study

FindingTruth

in Study

Page 11: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Result of Research

Truth+

Systematic error+

Random error

Page 12: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

ErrorRandom error = Chance

Systemic error = Bias

Valid, Precise Invalid, Precise

Valid, Imprecise Invalid, Imprecise

Page 13: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Step in Doing Research (І)

Research• Research question generation • Objectives• Rational (gap of knowledge)• Design type of research• Set hypothesis• Draft research proposal

Page 14: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Step in Doing Research (2)

Research plan - Materials and methods

• Define target population• Calculate sample size• Instrument• Statistical use• Data collection/analysis• Academic writing

Page 15: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Good Research Questions(FINER)

• Feasibility

• Interesting

• Novel

• Ethical

• Relevant

Page 16: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Component of Component of Research Research QuestionQuestionP=PopulationP=Population

I=InterventionI=Intervention

C=ComparisonC=Comparison

O=OutcomeO=Outcome

Page 17: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Process in Developing ResearchQuestion

Need

extensive

review

Select Topic of Interest

Define Research Problem

Evaluate; target, background

Research Objectives

Page 18: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Common Problems in ResearchQuestion Development

• Unclear

• Not feasible

- Too broad

- Sophisticate

- Repeat the same thing

• Ethical issue

Page 19: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Common Research Questions

Issue Question

Abnormality

Diagnosis

Frequency

Risk

Is the patient sick or well?

How accurate are test used todiagnose disease?

How often does a disease occur?

What factors are associated with increase risk of disease?

Page 20: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Common Research Question (П)

Issue Question

Prognosis What are the consequence of having a disease?

Treatment How does treatment changethe course of disease?

Prevention Does an intervention keepdisease from arising?

Page 21: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Common Research Question (Ш)

Issue Question

Cause What conditions lead to disease?

What are the pathogenesis of disease?

Cost How much will care for an illness cost?

Page 22: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Literature Review

Objectives

• Source of research ideas

• Orientation of what already known

• Provision conceptual frame work

• Information for the research

Page 23: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Tasks on Literature Reviews

• Identification

• Detection

• Critical analysis

• Written description of existing information

Page 24: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

core y

z x•Dynamic Static

•Black - grey - white

KA P

Knowledge

Frontier

Page 25: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Level of Evidence

RealityTruthInformationData

Knowledge

Feeling

Believe, thought, common sense

Page 26: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Strength of Evidence

Study design• RCT

• Controlled trial

• Case-control, cohort

• Cross-sectional

• Case series, expert opinion

Bias

Page 27: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Commonly Used Website for Reference Research

• http:// www.cochranelibrary.com

• http://gateway.ovid.com

• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

• http://202.28.30.163/medline

• http://www.sciencedirect.com

Page 28: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Useful Thai Web Site

• http://md3.md.chula.ac.th

• http://www.si.mahidol.ac.th

• http://thesis.tiac.or.th

• http://202.28.30.163/dao

• http//www.riclib.nrct.go.th

Page 29: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

How to Choose the LiteratureHow to Choose the Literature

1. Look at the title: Useful ?

2. Review the authors: good record ?

3. Read summary: valid ?

4. Site: applicable ?

Read Materials and MethodRead Materials and MethodRead Materials and MethodRead Materials and Method

CMA 1981; 15: 703-710

Page 30: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Search Strategies for Systemic Reviews

• http://nhscrd.york.ac.uk

• http://www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au

• http://clinicalevidence.com

• http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com

• http://www.tripdatabase.com

Page 31: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Types of Research

• Basic science• Clinical•Qualitative

Page 32: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Types of Clinical Research

• Burden of illness, natural history

• Therapeutic

• Etiologic or risk factor

• Diagnostic

• Clinical economic

• Quality of care

Page 33: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Quality of Care Research

• Care: Holistic, multidisciplinary

• Quality: Efficiency, effectiveness,

accessibility, satisfaction, safety, equity

• Design: Descriptive, RCT

• Point: Care Map, CPG, CAI, QA, UR

• Indicator: Input, process, output, outcome

Page 34: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Examples of Quality of Care Research

• Result of using care map in femoral fracture

• Factor affecting satisfaction in orthopaedic patient

• Cost analysis in hip fracture using CPG

• Randomized controlled in HNP between with and without care map

Page 35: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Example of Cost Analysis Research

• Cost analysis of closed tibial fracture treatment

• Cost analysis of MRI in HNP

• Cost - utility of radiotherapy in metastasis spine

• Cost - effective analysis of deep vein

thrombosis prophylaxis in hip surgery

Page 36: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Research Design

• Descriptive study - Ecological

- Case series - Cross - sectional• Cohort study• Case - control study• Intervention study

Page 37: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Descriptive Study

• Hypothesis generation

• Effect of placebo, co intervention,

natural history

• Bias, confounder

• For fetal, rare, dramatic response disease

Page 38: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Cross - Sectional Study(Prevalence Study)

Reference PopulationReference Population

Cause+

Disease

Cause+

No Disease

No Cause+

Disease

No cause+

No disease

Descriptive or Analytic

Page 39: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantagesof Cross-Sectional Studyof Cross-Sectional Study

Advantages Disadvantages

• Short period of time

• Save cost

• Less recall bias

• No temporal relationship

• Not possible for rare

disease

• Bias

Page 40: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Case - ControlCase - Control

ExposedExposed

No Exposed

No Exposed

ExposedExposed

No Exposed

No Exposed

CasesCasesCasesCases

ControlsControlsControlsControls

Page 41: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Advantages and Disadvantages of Case - Control Study

Advantages Disadvantages

• Efficient

• Smaller sample size

• Less expensive

• Less time consuming

• Bias, confounder

• Temporal relationship

• Less accurate

Rare disease, long incubation

Page 42: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Randomized Control Trial

Treatment ATreatment A Treatment BTreatment B

Success Failure Success Failure

Defined PopulationDefined Population

Page 43: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Advantage and Disadvantages of RCT Study

Advantages Disadvantages

• Evidence - based

• Least bias, confounder

• Short duration

• Cost

• Ethic

• Limited application

Prevention and treatment

Page 44: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Study Design and Time

Past Present Future

Cohort, Control trial

Historical prospective

Cross-sectional

Case - control

Page 45: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

What is the Characteristics of Good Paper?

• Relevant

• New information

• Valid

• Useful

• Interesting

• Easy to understand

Page 46: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Title

•Concise•Clear•Specific •Interesting

What, who, where

What is to come

Page 47: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Abstract

• Background

• Question

• What was done

• What was found

• Answer

• Implication

To provide an overview

Page 48: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Introduction (I)

• “Why you have to do”

• Significant of problems• High risk, high volume, high cost, high variation

• What is the gap of knowledge?

Need extensive review

Page 49: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Introduction (II)

• Background (should be short)

• Known unknown (funelization)

• Connectivity

• Why you are interested

• Signaling the question

To awaken interest !

Page 50: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Objectives

• The question) you want to know

• Should be concise and sensitive

• “Who , what , how”

• Major / minor

Plan

Page 51: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Materials and Methods (I)

• How you did your research/project ?

• Simplify, clarify, step by step

• Repeatability

• Picture or figure is better

To provide detail to enable to evaluate your workprovide detail to enable to evaluate your work

Page 52: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Materials and Methods (II)

• Materials» What was examined (material, animal,

human)

• Methods» Experimental protocol : variable » Purpose» Number» Evaluation criteria » Analysis

DoDo

Page 53: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Result (I)

• “What you have found”

• Only data that pertinent to question

• Table or graph

• Should not repeat

• Clear / easy to understand

• Chronologically

To state the outcome of the study / project

Page 54: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Result (II)

• Indicators / variables

• Accuracy and consistency

• Statistical analysis

• Most to least important

Check

Page 55: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Discussion (I)

• What is/are the result mean?

• “What is the benefit / new knowledge?”

• Explanation the discrepancy with other result

• Hit to the point

• SWOT

To answer the question and result

Page 56: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Discussion (II)

• Telling a story

• Focus on the question

• Signaling discuss answer

• Data information knowledge

• Step by step

• Make a point (implication)Fully, clearly, precisely and thoroughly

Page 57: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

References

• Good reference ; valid, available, accurate, relevant, fewest

• Where ; introduction, discussion

• Style

• Detail; name, title, journal, year and page

Give credit to source of information

Page 58: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Anatomy and Function of Each Part of Medical Paper

Anatomy Function Anatomy Function

• AbstractAbstract What is to come What is to come

• IntroductionIntroduction Awake interest Awake interest

• Materials and methodsMaterials and methods What they did What they did

• Result Result What they found What they found

• DiscussionDiscussion Answerer the question Answerer the question

• ReferenceReference Give credit to source of Give credit to source of

informationinformation

Page 59: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Is the Study Worth Doing?

• What research questions are to the addressed?

• What do existing studies show?• Is a new study warranted?• Is the study design : appropriate?

: biased?

: sufficiently large?Carpinter LM., Lancet 1993

Page 60: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Common Problems for the Beginner

•Poor literature review• Poor research question generation (gap of knowledge)• Jumping• Poor research methodology

Page 61: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Pitfalls in Start Doing ResearchPitfalls in Start Doing Research

• Start from simple research

• Benchmarking

• Mentor

Page 62: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Obstacles in Doing Research

• Attitudes- Negativism- Reluctant- Fast food

- No curiosity

•Knowledge- Quantity- Quality

• Practice

Page 63: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

กาลามสู�ต้ริ่กาลามสู�ต้ริ่อย�าปลงใจเชั��อโดียง�าย

•ฟั งต้ามก�นมา•ถื�อสู�บก�นมา•เล�าล�อ•อ�างต้#าริ่า•ต้ริ่ริ่ก

•อน$มาน•ค�ดีต้ามเหต้$ผล•เข้�าไดี�ก�บทฤษฎีต้น

•ล�กษณะน�าเชั��อ•เป.นคริ่�เริ่า

“ พุ�ทธธรรม : พุระ”ธรรมปิฏก

Page 64: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Set a Goal for Set a Goal for YourselfYourself

Page 65: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Be ConfidentBe Confident

Page 66: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

Everything is Everything is Possible If you TRY!Possible If you TRY!

Page 67: January 18,2008 Boonsin  Tangtrakulwanich, MD., Ph.D

SUMMARY

•Attitude Knowledge Practice Learning

•Plan Do Study Act

•Evidence-based > Commonsense-based

•Why,who,what,when,where,HOW?