Introduction of Ford case
-
date post
12-Sep-2014 -
Category
Business
-
view
2.722 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Introduction of Ford case
1
S
FORD Motor Company
One FordGroup 5
DU Chuhan 10811338DLI Yifan
JIN Luchun SHEN Congxiang 10819489D
WANG Yuan 10806365DYUE Pujue 09815346D
Outline
Company and Industry Background
PEST, Five Forces
Resources Based View and Value Chain Analysis
SWOT
How to Compete?
What has been done? Challenges Remain
2
Company Background -- Ford
The second-largest U.S.-based automaker and the fifth-largest in the world based on 2010 vehicle sales
Founded in 1903 by Henry Ford
First car produced: Ford Model A
3
Company Background -- Ford
History
4
Automotive Industry Crisis (2008–2010)
2009 Financial Crisis severely hurt the industry, especially the American ‘Big Three’
Big Three: Originally focus on SUV and Pickup Trucks
Higher Fuel Price Reduced Sales
5
Company Background -- Ford
During the Financial Crisis Corporate bonds had been downgraded to junk
status Declining sales and profit margin, 14.9 billion loss in
2008
Survived the Financial Crisis The only one among “Big Three” to survive Constant revenue growth after the crisis
6
Alan Mulally and “One Ford”
Former head of commercial airplanes at Boeing
Elected as president and CEO of Ford in Sept 2006
Apply “One Ford” to reshape the company
7
Q1
What are key forces in the general and industry environments that affect Ford’s choice of strategy?
8
General Environment
9
PEST Model
Political Government’s new policy
New federal gas mileage standard 25miles→35.5 miles per gallon in 2016
New safety standards New pollution control policy
Eco-friendly automobiles Government discourage fully automating operations
Provide more local jobs
10
PEST Model
Economic Global economic downturn and financial crisis in
2008 Weak economy Volatile financial markets Lack of liquidity in the market
11
12
PEST Model
Social Pollutions Oil prices increase
A shift in consumer’s car-buying habits Fuel-efficient models
13
PEST Model
Technological Intelligence system Fuel-efficient models Electrocar
14
Industry Environment
15
Five Forces Model
Rivalry among existing competitors (Extremely High)
16
Auto Manufacturer Market Share in USA November
2011
17
Five Forces Model
Threats of New Entrants (Low) High barrier to entry Capital intensive business
substantial fixed costs
Influence of brand names upon sales Dealership model
Threats of Substitutes (Low) imperfect substitutes
public transportation motorcycle
18
Five Forces Model
Bargaining Power of Suppliers (Low to Moderate) Metal/ Body part supplier
A good amount of rivalry 3,300 to 1,600
IT/ITES suppliers regular research and development mode depend upon the
requirements of the car manufacturer
Engine and auto part suppliers Critical part a good amount of leverage over the car manufacturer
19
Five Forces Model
Bargaining Power of Buyers (Moderate) Plenty of options in the market place High customer loyalty
47.4% of Ford owners purchase another Ford vehicle *
*Data from data from Experian Automotive
20
Key Forces
General environment Law and regulations Economic factors Fuel price increases
Industry environment Competitors in the industry
Similar technology Customer preferences
21
Q2
What internal resources and assets does Ford have that may give it a competitive advantage?
22
Internal Resources
Value Chain Analysis
Resource Based View
23
Value Chain Analysis
24
Resource Based View
Core Competenci
es
Key Activities
Competitive Advantages
Superior Firm
Performance
Resources
Capabilities
Reinforce
Leverage
Orchestrate
25
Tangible resources
Physical Resources Strong Manufacturing capacity
Four manufacturing segments over the world 10 vehicle assembly plants & 24 powertrain,
stamping, and components plants Standardized Facilities State-of-the-art machinery and equipment
Flexible engine & transmission plants modern, numerically controlled machine tools
26
Tangible resources
Financial Resources- Strong borrowing capacity for operation
- Obtain access to $2.3 billion of Temporary Asset Account during financial crisis.
- Borrow $10.1 billion under secured revolving credit facility in 2008
- Receive $2 billion from European Investment Bank over the 2008 to 2012 period
27
Intangible Resources
Reputation The second largest automobile manufacturer in
U.S.A and the fifth largest in the world Build brand power with tradition, trust and safety Strategic alliance with suppliers and dealers A heritage of operating responsibly and sustainably
Affordable fuel economy product Environmentally-friendly facilities
28
Intangible Resources
Intellectual /Property Resources Manufacturing Platforms for different brands of automobiles
Organizational culture Diverse work force Open culture Trust and respect
Human Experience and capabilities of research fellows Talent management practices
29
Organizational Capabilities
Ability for Talent acquisition and workforce composition
Flexible manufacturing
Quickly response to changing market needs
30
VRIS Analysis
Physical ResourcesReputation with
stakeholders
31
VRIS Analysis
Valuable• Suppliers--eliminate waste• Customers---generate revenue• Dealers---Sustainable dealer profit
Rare• Well known brand name --Industry revolution & American
Dream• The only automobile company survive from financial crisis in
2008 Costly to imitate• Path dependent Causally ambiguous Socially
complexDifficult to substitute
32
SWOT Analysis
33
Strengths
One of oldest and largest car manufacturer with strong brand
Wide network of distributors and dealers
Profitable financial service division
Invested efforts to go green in order to help the environment
Ford is present in Motorsports like Formula One, Rally, Sports cars, Touring cars & sponsorship of event
34
Weaknesses
Product Recall
Lack of diversification (product and geographic)
Low capital spending (R&D)
35
Opportunities
Emerging Market (China, Brazil)
Restructuring Plan (One Ford)
Expanding automobile sector in hybrid cars and fuel-efficient cars
36
Threats
Competition from major international players (Toyota)
Rising raw material prices and oil prices
Increasing usage of public transport
Production problems in local plants due to labor and similar issues
Economics Slowdowns in the U.S and Europe
37
Q3
How should Ford compete?
38
Q4
What has Mulally done to implement strategy, and what challenges remain?
39
Strategy implementation
‘One ford’ strategy
Friendly competition
‘Less is more’ new approach
Reduction of complexity
Creating a new corporate culture
A shift toward smaller and more fuel-efficient cars
Globalizing the Ford brand
40
One Ford
One team People working together as a lean, global enterprise
for automotive leadership Measured by customer, employee, dealer, investor,
supplier, council and community satisfaction
One goal An exciting viable Ford delivering profitable growth
41
One Ford
One plan Aggressively restructure to operate profitably at the
current demand and changing model mix Accelerate development of new products customers
want and value Finance plan and improve balance sheet Work together effectively as one team
42
‘Less is more’ new approach
The ‘bigger is better’ worldview defined ford for decades
Replaced with a new approach: less is more Cut costs Transform the way it did business than to measure
market share
43
Controlling the scale——Reduction of complexity
The vision: have a smaller and more profitable Ford. Cutback plan
14 plant closures 30000 plus job cuts
Increase the plant utilization and production levels in each production unit
Obtain operating profitability at lower volume and with a changing mix of products
44
Brand Acquisition year
Selling year
markets
Lincoln 1922 - North America, Middle east
Mercury 1939 2011 North America
Volvo 1999 2010 Global
Land Rover 2000 2008 Global
Jaguar 1989 2008 Global
Aston Martin 1989 2007 Global
Merkur 1985 1989 North America
Controlling the scale——Reduction of complexity
45
A New Corporate Culture
Structural and procedural changes Executives meet with Mulally every week ‘we are actually committed to hitting the numbers.’ Team working
Senior executive reorganization Report directly to him
46
cost advantage through focus——A shift toward smaller and more fuel-efficient cars
Oil prices persistently increasing over the last few years
A dramatic change in consumer’s car buying habits, reducing the demand for large vehicles
leased cars are sold for much less than their residual values
A change in products, shifting to smaller and more fuel-efficient cars
47
Globalizing the Ford brand
Globalize the Ford brand All Ford vehicles competing in global segments
would be the same in North America, Europe, and Asia within the next five years
Deliver more vehicles worldwide from fewer platforms and maximize the use of common parts and systems reduction of costs in the purchasing and
manufacturing processes
48
49
S
Performance?
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy
50
Stock Price
51Source: ford.com
Bond credit rating
Moody
Caa1
Moody
B3
Moody
B2
Moody
Ba+
Moody
Baa+
Oct,2011May, 2012
Oct,2010
Nov ,2009
Jul ,2009 Investment Grade!! 7 Years’ Effort!!
52Source: statistics collected from moody.com
Sales
53
Source: statistics collected from Ford’s annual report 2012
Profitability
10 years highest
54
Source: statistics collected from Ford’s annual report 2012
Top Selling Vehicles in U.S.(2012)
55
Source: http://bestsellingcarsblog.com/
56
S
Challenges?
Alan Mulally
Conflict between his management style and the old “Ford” way His Fearlessness is not suitable to Ford’s culture He may be Confidence in the early days, but later… Senior executives left Ford
Trouble being accepted as an auto guy
Serious clash with Workers Union
57
Challenges: European Financial Crisis
Global
Europe
29, Jan,2013
Second largest market 2012 is the worst of 20 years 2 billion annual loss in Europe in
2012 Closed three factories in Europe If recover, still too late!!
58
Challenges: Mature Markets
Largest market: North America Market share: 15.2% (2012) Intensified competition since 1980s Highly depend on
General economic situations Cost of purchasing and operating cars & trucks The availability of credit & fuel
Consumers could wait to replace them! 59
Challenges: Emerging markets
Ford market share review (2012)
Competitive pressure • Chinese own brands• Japanese cars’ dominant position• All the manufacturers focus on china
Limited brands• Focus & Fiesta
Chinese market could lose Ford,but Ford could not lose Chinese market60
Source: statistics collected from Ford Annual report 2012
Closing points
In the future, Uncertainty of fuel prices Fluctuations of foreign exchanges Increased competition Economic distress of suppliers …
61
References
Ford Q4 2012 financial results:http://corporate.ford.com/doc/ir_20130129a_financial_results.pdf
Ford 2012 SEC Filing:http://corporate.ford.com/doc/FordMotorCompany_10Q_20120219_2012Q4.pdf
Top selling vehicles:http://bestsellingcarsblog.com/2012/05/20/world-q1-2012-discover-the-top-100-best-selling-cars/
62
References
Xinhua.net, 2011http://news.xinhuanet.com/auto/201109/29/c_122104101.htm
NY times,2013http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/business/north-american-results-bolster-ford-earnings.html?_r=0
Moody.com,2012http://www.moodys.com/Pages/rr003_0.aspx?bd=4294966708&ed=4294966848&rd=4294966708&tb=0&po=0&sb=&sd=&lang=en&cy=global&searchfrom=SearchWithin&kw=ford
63
Q&A
Thank you!
64