Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastruk turnim projektima ... postojece situacije na...

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastruk-turnim projektima (IPF TA) EuropeAid/128073/C/SER/MULTI

WB4-MNE-ENV-12F Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana ot-pada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnog rješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"

Analiza postojeće situacije Mart 2013

Program pomoći Evropske unije - IPA 2008 za Albaniju, Bosnu i

Hercegovinu, Hrvatsku, Bivšu Jugoslovensku Republiku Makedoniju,

Crnu Goru, Srbiju, Kosovo*, Tursku i Island

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima

(IPF TA)

EuropeAid/128073/C/SER/MULTI

WB4-MNE-ENV-12F

Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnog rješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"

Izvještaj o analizi postojeće situacije

Mart 2013

Dokument br. WB4-MNE-ENV-12F_TEC_Acivity 2.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Report

Verzija 3

Datum izdavanja 11.03.2013.

Pripremio Vladanka Presburger Ulniković, Ivana Stevanović, Dragan Tadić

Pregledao Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu, Enver Kıyık, Jürgen H. Pries

Odobrio Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu

*) Ovaj naziv se upotrebljava bez ikakve pristrasnosti vezano za status, i u skladu je sa UNHCR 1244 i stavom Međunarodnog suda pravde o deklaraciji o nezavisnosti Kosova

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnog rješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"

1

.

Sadržaj

1 Uvod 5

2 Pregled prethodnih studija i postojeće dokumentacije 6

2.1 Analiza podataka 6

3 Podaci o lokaciji stanje postojeće lokacije 10

3.1 Lokacija 10

3.2 Prirodne karakteristike 11

3.3 Klima2 11

3.4 Geološke i hidrogeološke karakteristike lokacije 13

3.5 Postojeće stanje na odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka” 15

4 Uticaj na životnu sredinu postojećeg odlagališta 19

4.1 Zagađenje podzemnih voda 19

4.2 Zagađenje površinskih voda 19

4.3 Emisija gasova sa odlagališta 19

4.4 Nekontrolisani požari 20

4.5 Raznošenje smeća 20

5 Analiza podataka koji će se koristiti za dalja izračunavanja i idejno rješenje 21

5.1 Analiza stanovništva 21

5.2 Karakteristike čvrstog otpada 22

5.3 Količina čvrstog otpada 23

6 Zaključak 27


2

.

Lista tabela

Tabela 1 Pregled podataka o sastavu čvrstog otpada ...................................... 8 Tabela 2 Prosječne mjesečne temperature na Cetinju [°C] ........................... 11 Tabela 3 Prosječne mjesečne padavine na Cetinju [mm] .............................. 11 Tabela 4 Frekvencija vjetra i tišine na Cetinju [prosječna vrijednost u %] . 12 Tabela 5 Prosječna godišnja snaga vjetra na Cetinju [po Boforovoj skali] .. 12 Tabela 6 Seizmički parametri za region Cetinja ........................................... 14 Tabela 7 Broj stanovnika u opštini Cetinje ................................................... 21 Tabela 8 Sastav čvrstog otpada koji se odlaže na odlagalište “Vrtijeljka” ... 23 Tabela 9 Prosječna gustina sastojka .............................................................. 24 Tabela 10 Procjena količine deponovanog čvrstog otpada i pokrivnog

materijala ..................................................................................... 25


3

.

Lista slika i dijagrama

Slika 1 Lokacija odlagališta “Vrtijeljka” ................................................ 10 Slika 2 Prosječna frekvencija vjetra, ruža vjetrova ................................. 12 Slika 3 Prosječna godišnja snaga vjetra .................................................. 12 Slika 4 Karta seizmičke regionalizacije Crne Gore ................................ 14 Slika 5 Dalekovod preko odlagališta ...................................................... 15 Slika 6 Pogled na odlagalište“Vrtijeljka”, ulazna kapija ........................ 16 Slika 7 Odlagalište“Vrtijeljka”, stražarska kabina .................................. 16 Slika 8 Odlagalište “Vrtijeljka”, čvrsti otpad sa i bez prekrivke ............ 17 Slika 9 Odlagalište “Vrtijeljka” – pojava spontanog požara ................... 18

Prilozi

Prilog 1 Projektni zadatak

Prilog 2 Topografska podloga

Prilog 3 Geotehnička istraživanja

Prilog 4 Upitnik u vezi nesanitarnog odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" u Cetinju

Prilog 5 Proračun produkcije deponiskih gasova


4

.

Lista skraćenica

COWI-IPF Konzorcijum koji sprovodi predstavljeni projekat

EU Evropska unija

ICJ Međunarodni sud pravde

IPA Instrument za pred-pristupnu pomoć

LEAP Lokalni ekološki akcioni plan

LPUO Lokalni plan upravljanja otpadom

MNE Crna Gora

ČKO Čvrsti komunalni otpad

JKP Javno komunalo preduzeće

REC Regionalni ekološki centar

ToR Projektni zadatak

IPF Infrastrukturni projekat

LPUO Lokalni Plan upravljanja otpadom

SMPUORN Strateški Master plan za upravljanje otpadom na republičkom

nivou

SIMPUČO Strategija za implementaciju Master plana za upravljanje čvrstim

otpadom

PUO Plan upravljanja otpadom 2008 – 2012


5

.

1 Uvod

Ovaj izvještaj "Aktivnost " predstavlja prvi

rezultat Zadatka 2 koji se bavi pripremom tenderske dokumentacije za

rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" za Projekat " č r ku ,

transporta i tretmana otpada iz Pr c C r r m d r š

i tender k d kum c r h b c u d š Vr k " u skladu sa

Projektnim zadatkom (Prilog 1).

Ciljevi Cilj ovog Izvještaja je da se, nakon ažuriranja dostupnih podataka, identifikuje i

analizira postoje e stanje na lokaciji "Vrtijeljka", kao i izbor relevantnih

podataka neophodnih za izradu idejnog rješenja, odnosno:

Stanovništvo Cetinja (vremenske demografske varijacije),

Podaci o generisanju čvrstog otpada (obim i sastav)

Lokacija i karakteristike lokacije "Vrtijeljka" (podaci o lokaciji,

topografija, geotehničke, hidrogeološke i meteorološke karakteristike)

Postoje a situacija u upravljanju čvrstim otpadom na odlagalištu

Uticaj odlagališta na postoje u životnu sredinu (zagađenje podzemnih

voda, zagađenje površinskih voda, emisija deponijskih gasova,

nekontrolisani požari, raznošenje sme a).

Osnovne informacije Za potrebe takve analize, Konsultant je sproveo sljede e aktivnosti:

Istražni radovi na lokaciji (obilazak, topografska (Prilog 2) i geotehnička

istraživanja (Prilog 3))

Korespodencija i intervjui sa predstavnicima opštine Cetinje i Javnog

komunalnog preduze a (JKP) (vidjeti intervju i upitnik za odlagalište

"Vrtijeljka", Prilog 4)

Pregled prethodnih studija i postoje e dokumentacije.

Struktura izvještaja U poglavlju 2 ovog Izvještaja, analizirana je postoje a dokumentacija.

Poglavlje 3 daje kratak opis lokacije "Vrtijeljka" i sadašnjeg stanja, kao što su

lokacija, i prirodni, klimatski, geološki uslovi. Poglavlje 4 kratko razmatra

uticaje odlagališta na životnu sredinu. U poglavlju 5 su dati demografska

procjena i obračun postoje eg obima i strukture čvrstog otpada pripremljeni od

strane Konsultanta, kao osnov za izradu idejnog projekta. Poglavlje 6 sumira

zaključke koji su relevantni za dalju pripremu idejnog projekta.


6

.

2 Pregled prethodnih studija i postojeće dokumentacije

U cilju identifikacije relevantnih podataka koji e biti osnova za budu e odluke,

Konsultant je razmotrio i analizirao raspoložive podatke i informacije o

sljede im dokumentima:

Strateški master plan za upravljanje otpadom na republičkom nivou,

GOPA Consultants, 2004 (SMPUO);

Strategija za implementaciju Master plana za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom

u Crnoj Gori, Egis BCEOM International, 2009 (SIMPUČO);

Nacrt Lokalnog plana za upravljanje otpadom na teritoriji Cetinja 2011-

2015, 2011. (LPUO);

Lokalni ekološki akcioni plan Prijestonice Cetinje, Regionalni centar za

životnu sredinu, Kancelarija u Crnoj Gori, 2006 (LEAP);

Plan upravljanja otpadom u Crnoj Gori za period od 2008-2012 (PUO)

Izvještaj postoj eg stanja i mogu nostidaljeg odlaganja čvrstog

komunalnog otpada na lokaciju "Vrtijeljka", Opština Cetinje, Prof. Dr.

efik ejnilovi et.al, 2007;

Studija o ocjeni potrebe revizije Strateškog Master plana za upravljanje

otpadom u Crnoj Gori i preporukom za organizovanje poslova upravljanja

otpadom do 2030. Godine, usvojena na Vladi u julu 2012.

Pored navedenog spiska, Konsultant se takođe pozivao na Izvještaj o analizi

pripremljen i odobren u ranijoj fazi (Zadatak 1) Projekta WB4-MNE-ENV-12F.

Štaviše, za potrebe ažuriranja i provjere prikupljenih podataka, Konsultant je u

avgustu 2012. godine napravio intervjue sa predstavnicima opštine Cetinje i

JKP-a. Rezultati intervjua su navedeni u Upitniku za odlagalište "Vrtijeljka" u

Cetinju i priloženi kao Prilog 4.

2.1 Analiza podataka

Konsultant je napravio potpunu reviziju gore navedenih dokumenata i izdvojio

relevantne podatke i informacije. Opšti zaključak je da postoje značajne razlike

u podacima o količini i sastavu čvrstog otpada generisanog u opštini Cetinje, u

zavisnosti od izvora i načina predstavljanja podataka.

Uzimaju i u obzir svrhu i budu e koriš enje ovog Izvještaja, u narednim

poglavljima bi e predstavljeni odabrani podaci o stanovništvu, količini i


7

.

sastavu generisanog čvrstog otpada za opštinu Cetinje, kao i podaci o

nesanitarnom odlagalištu Vrtijeljka.

2.1.1 Demografski podaci

Veoma je važno definisati demografske podatke, kako bi se mogli koristiti kao

osnova za projekcije generisanih količina čvrstog komunalnog otpada (ČKO).

SIMPUČO Podataci o projekcijama stanovništva dati su u Strategiji za implementaciju

Master plana za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom (SIMPUČO) u Crnoj Gori..

Strategija daje procjenu promjene stanovništva u centralnom regionu Crne

Gore, kojem Cetinje pripada, u vidu smanjenja; - 0,80% godišnje za period od

2011. do 2014., i u vidu pove anja; + 0,81% godišnje, počev od 2015. godine.

LPUO U Lokalnom plana upravljanja otpadom (LPUO), rast broja stanovnika u

opštini Cetinje procijenjen je na 0,81% godišnje.

Izvještaj o analizi U Izvještaju o analizi (Zadatak 1) realizovanom u okviru projekta WB4-MNE-

ENV-12F uzete su u obzir projekcije iz prethodnih studija i procijenjeno je da

e 2013. godine opština Cetinje imati 16.490 stanovnika, dok e se 2014. blago

smanjiti na 16.358 stanovnika.

2.1.2 Podaci o generisanju čvrstog otpada

Podaci o proizvedenim količinama čvrstog otpada u postoje im dokumentima

znatno se razlikuju, kao što je ve kazano. Ove varijacije se odnose i na

količine i na način prezentacije.

SIMPUČO Strategija za implementaciju Master plan za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom u

Crnoj Gori pokazuje da je u Opštini Cetinje 2009. godine generisano 5.882 tona

čvrstog otpada. Takođe, u pomenutom dokumentu se navodi da je do 2009.

deponovano 19.054 tona čvrstog otpada.

SMPUO U Strateškom master planu za upravljanje otpadom na republičkom nivou

(SMPUORN) navedeno je da je 2004. godin u Opštini Cetinje generisano 5,471

tona čvrstog otpada i da je 3.999 tona tog otpada deponovano.

LPUO U nacrtu Lokalnog plana upravljanja otpadom Prijestonice Cetinje 2011-2015

(LPUO), tvrdi se da je u opštini Cetinje 2010. godine generisano 5.501 tona

čvrstog otpada.

LEAP U Lokalnom ekološkom akcionom planu (LEAP), navodi se slede e:

„Dnevno se odloži oko 140 m3 čvrstog otpada, i to 30 m3 presovanog sme a,

60 m3 rasutog kontejnerskog sme a i 50 m3 sme a na divljim lokacĳama. Čvrsti

otpad se odlaže na nesanitarnoj deponĳi koja se nalazi na lokacĳi Vrtĳeljka

udaljenoj od grada šest kilometara.”

Upitnik Na osnovu odgovora predstavnika JKP Cetinje na pitanja iz upitnika koji je

pripremio Konsultant za potrebe ovog izvještaja, utvrđeno je da količina

prikupljenog čvrstog otpada iznosi oko 100 m3 dnevno, dok količina otpada


8

.

deponovanog na nesanitarno odlagalište "Vrtijeljka" 2011. godine iznosi oko

10.000-14.000 tona.

Izvještaj o analizi Izvještaj o analizi ( adatak 1) takođe se odnosi na podatke dobijene od JKP-a,

koji govore da je 2011. godine na uslužnom području opštine Cetinje

prikupljeno 12.000-14.000 tona čvrstog otpada. U izvještaju je takođe navedeno

da gore navedeni iznosi obuhvataju i građevinski otpad koji, pod normalnim

uslovima, ne bi trebalo da bude prihva en na opštinskom odlagalištu čvrstog

otpada.

2.1.3 Podaci o sastavu čvrstog otpada

Podaci o sastavu čvrstog otpada su predstavljeni u SMPUO i LPUO,

uključuju i i projekcije po periodima. Ovi podaci o sastavu čvrstog otpada

prikazani su u Tabela 1.

Tabela 1 Pr d d k vu čvr d

Tip materijala

Pa

pir

i

ka

rton

Sta

klo

Me

tal

Pla

stika

Te

kstil

Org

an

ski

otp

ad

Osta

li o

tpad

SMPUO, MNE, do 2004. (centralna regija) 17% 7% 4% 10% - 30% 32%

SIMPUČO, MNE, do 2004.(prosjek za CG) 19% 8% 4% 12% - 27% 30%

SIMPUČO, MNE, do 2004. (centralna regija) 17% 7% 4% 10% 5% 25% 32%

SIMPUČO, MNE, do 2004. (prosjek za CG) 18% 8% 4% 12% 5% 28% 25%

LPUO Cetinje, 2011. 17% 7% 4% 10% 5% 25% 32%

LPUO Cetinje, 2015. 20% 9% 5% 13% 5% 25% 23%

Izvor: SMPUO i LPUO

2.1.4 Podaci o odlagalištu "Vrtijeljka"

Ve ina postoje e dokumentacije ne sadrži nikakve podatke koji bi mogli biti

relevantni za preciznu identifikaciju i opis nesanitarnog odlagališta "Vrtijeljka".

LEAP U Lokalnom ekološkom akcionom planu (LEAP) kaže se: „Uslovi na deponiji

ne zadovoljavaju ni minimum ekoloških standarda, jer deponija nije ograđena,

nema rampu za kontrolu i naplatu. Mjesečno je za tamponiranje potrebno 100-

150 m tampona, često otpad gori, ne postoji rasvjeta, niti hidroizolacija,

pristupni put je uzak i ošte en”.

U izvještaju o postoje em stanju i mogu nostima za odlaganje čvrstog

komunalnog otpada na lokaciji "Vrtijeljka", pripremljenom od strane Dr.

Refika ejnilovi a 2007. godine, primje eno je da lokacija zagađuje životnu

sredinu na sljede e načine:

agađenje vazduha: prouzrokovano je širenjem prašine i neprijatnih mirisa

Izvještaj o

postoje em stanju i

mogu nostima za

odlaganje ČKO na

lokaciji "Vrtijeljka"


9

.

agađenje zemljišta (direktno i indirektno): direktan uticaj na zagađenje

zemljišta kroz čvrsti otpad odložen na lokaciji. Kvalitet zemljišta je

ugrožen supstancama iz komunalnog čvrstog otpada.

agađenje vode (i podzemnih i površinskih voda): uzrokovano je

procjednim vodama koje mogu doprijeti do izvora ijeke Crnojevi a.

Štaviše, u izvještaju je takođe dat sljede i komentar: „Kako se neposredno

pored lokacije otvorenog smetlišta nalazi privatni objekat to je neophodno

riješiti imovinsko-pravne odnose sa vlasnicima, koji su u toku razgovora sa

podnosiocima ovog izvještaja iskazali spremnost na dogovor sa Opštinom”


10

.

3 Podaci o lokaciji stanje postojeće lokacije

3.1 Lokacija

Nesanitarno odlagalište Vrtijeljka u Prijestonici Cetinje koriš eno je za

odlaganje čvrstog otpada od 1987.godine, a urbanističkim planom iz 1990.

definisano je kao lokacija za odlaganje čvrstog otpada.

Topografija1 Odlagalište se nalazi u blizini brda Vrtijeljka, udaljenog od Cetinja 5,7 km,

blizu magistralnog puta Cetinje-Budva.

Prosječna nadmorska visina terena na lokaciji odlagališta je 700-800 m. Na

terenu koji okružuje loakciju nalazi se nisko rastinje i slaba vegetacija.

Slika 1 Lok c d š “Vr k ”

Izvor: Topografska istraživanja sprovedena od strane Konsultanta

1 Izvještaj o analizi adatka 1


11

.

3.2 Prirodne karakteristike2

Cetinjsko polje je formirana u istočnom kraško-kontinentalnom podnožju

planine Lov en, čiji najviši vrhovi su Štirovnik (1.749 mnm) i Jezerski vrh

(1.660 mnm) na kojem je izgrađen mauzolej Petra II Petrovi a jegoša.

Cetinjsko polje je okruženo golim krečnjačkim brdima sa strmim padinama.

Izuzetno kraški teren uslovio je formiranje nekoliko pe ina na ivici Cetinjskog

polja. Ove pe ine su formirane od podzemnih kanala, komora i sala sa bogatim

speleološkim ukrasima. Posebno su atraktivne Cetinjska pe ina u gradu i

Lipska pe ina u blizini grada.

3.3 Klima2

Cetinje ima umjereno kontinentalnu klimu koju karakterišu suva i topla ljeta sa

prosječnom temperaturom od 20°C, i blage i vlažne zime sa prosječnom

temperaturom od 2,1°C.

Temperatura Prosječna godišnja temperatura na teritoriji cetinjske opštine iznosi 11°C.

Prosječna godišnja temperatura se kre e od 0,9°C u januaru do 21,1°C u julu.

Prosječne mjesečne temperature na Cetinju date su u Tabela 2:

Tabela 2 Pr č m č m r ur C u [°C]

Jan Feb Mar Apr Maj Jun Jul Avg Sep Okt Nov Dec

0.9 1.9 4.7 9.5 14.2 18.2 21.1 20.7 16.5 11.2 6.9 2.8

Izvor: www.cetinje.me

Padavine Cetinje je poznato po velikom nivou padavina tokom prolje a i jeseni, a smatra

se jednim od najkišovitijih gradova u Evropi, sa oko 4.000 mm vodenog taloga

godišnje.

Uprkos velikoj količini padavina, na teritoriji cetinjske opštine nema površin-

skih vodotoka i, uopšte, kapacitet vodenih resursa je siromašan. azlog za ovo

su kraški sastav stijena i geološka struktura.

Podaci o prosječnim mjesečnim padavinama na Cetinju predstavljeni su u Ta-

bela 3.

Tabela 3 Pr č m č padavine na Cetinju [mm]

Jan Feb Mar Apr Maj Jun Jul Avg Sep Okt Nov Dec

445 443 358 206 172 114 61 75 181 484 605 592


2 www.cetinje.me

http://www.cetinje.me/


12

.

Vjetar Cetinje je sa svih strana okruženo visokim brdima, tako da preovlađu-

ju i vjetrovi nisu mnogo jaki. Jači vjetar duva sa jugoistoka, iz pravca Skadar-

skog jezera i naselja ijeka Crnojevi a. Karakteristike vjetrova su predstavljene

u Tabeli 4 i u Tabeli 5, kao ina slikama 2 i 3.

Tabela 4 Fr kv c v r š C u [ r č vr d u %]

S SI I JI J JZ Z SZ Tišina

1.5 3.7 2.3 11.4 3.8 7.0 3.7 8.7 57.9

Izvor: Vrijeme i klima Crne Gore, adojiči B. (1991)

Tabela 5 Pr č d š v r C u [ B f r v k ]

S SI I JI J JZ Z SZ

2.1 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.7 2.0


Slika 2 Pr č fr kv c v r , ruž v r v


Slika 3 Pr č d š v r



13

.

3.4 Geološke i hidrogeološke karakteristike lokacije

Podaci prikazani u ovom poglavlju predstavljaju kratku prezentaciju o "geo-

tehničkom istraživanju” sprovedenom u avgustu 2012. godine, za potrebe

ovog projekta, koji je predstavljen u Prilogu 3.

Morfologija postoje e lokacije odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" je tipična kraška sa

karakterističnim krajolikom kao što su vrtače, depresije i grebeni. Plato na

kojem se nalazi odlagališta izdvaja se veličinom (100,0 m širine i 120,0 m

dužine), sa dvije padine od kojih se jedna pruža ka istoku, a druga ka jugu sa

nagibima od 35 do 45 stepeni. Visina ove lokacije je od 720 m do 760 m

nadmorske visine.

Teren šireg istraživanja obuhvata formacije Gornjeg trijasa (T3) poput dolomit-

skog krečnjaka i masivnih krečnjaka, postepeno formirane iz Ladinskih (T22)

krečnjaka sa rožnjacima. Dolomitski krečnjaci i dolomiti su široko rasprostran-

jeni na ovom području prema jugu, od Cetinja ka Vrelima i Očini ima. Dolo-

miti se uglavnom nalaze u zbijenim naslagama (banks), rijetko se nalaze u slo-

jevima i nijesu masivni, smjenjuju i se povremeno sa dominantnim krečnja-

cima. Blokovi su razdvojeni, ali bez vidljivog kontinuiteta.

ajmlađi, Kvartarni nanosi/sedimenti sastoje se od deluvijalne (dl), crvene

gline koja se pretežno može vidjeti u depresijama i ponorima, a rijetko na

površini terena. Pukotine i pe ine u krečnjaku su pune crvene gline i finih

naslaga. Duboke pukotine na ovom području su mapirane, i uglavnom se

prostiru u pravcu sjeverozapad- jugoistok što je ujedno i pravac seizmičke ak-

tivnosti.

a osnovu hidrogeoloških karakteristika i funkcija terena, veoma dobro su pri-

kazane vodopropusne stijene i kompleksi.

Kao propustljive stijene pukotinskog kraškog poroziteta terena, možemo izdvo-

jiti sve karbonatne stijene sa izuzetkom čvrstih dolomita koji se rijetko po-

javljuju. Intenzivno mehaničko odvajanje i stepen karstifikacije ukazuju da pre-

ovladava kraški porozitet i takvi su tereni bez površinskih voda. Teren koji se

sastoji od veoma vodopropusnih stijena formira razbacane/raštrkane kraške iz-

dani. a istražnom prostoru mogu se vidjeti pukotine, pe ine i depresije, koje

obično prate pukotine. One su glavne propusne zone na lokaciji.

Voda koja pada na zemlju brzo, kroz mrežu otvorenih pukotina, pe ina i jama

infiltrira se duboko u zemlju. a velikoj dubini, formiraju se raštrkani kraški

izdani. Pražnjenje ovih izdana vrši se kroz izvor ijeke Crnojevi a (Obodski

izvor). Baza karstifikacije je veoma duboka u ovom dijelu terena, skoro do

nivoa Skadarskog jezera. Deluvijalna glina sa drobinom je klasifikovana kao

stijena niske propustljivosti sa intergranularnom i kapilarnom poroznoš u. ji-

hova distribucija na površini je minimalna, i oni nemaju značajan uticaj na

hidrogeološke karakteristike terena.

Prema karti seizmičkog mikro-zoniranja urbanog područja Cetinja sa Ivanovim

Koritima, jegušima i ijekom Crnojevi a, ova lokacija je dio seizmičkog

Morfološke

karakteristike terena

Geološka struktura

terena

Hidrogeološke

karakteristike terena

Seizmičnost terena


14

.

područja B3. a navedenu oblast B3, maksimalni očekivani zemljotres ima in-

tenzitet VIII stepeni MCS skale. Seizmički parametri njihovog ponavljanja za

vremenski period od 50, 100 i 200 godina, dati su u tabeli 6. Karta seizmičke

regionalizacije Crne Gore predstavljena je na slici 4.

Tabela 6 S m čk r m r r C

Zona Karakteristične zone terena

Period po-navljanja

t (godina)

Maksimalno ubrzanje tla,

amax

Seizmički koefi-cijent

ks

B3 Krečnjački i dolomitski kompleksi, slojevite teksture, tektonski savijeni i karstifikovani.

50 0.12 0.03

100 0.17 0.04

200 0.25 0.06

Izvor: Izvještaj geotehničkog istraživanja, COWI IPF, 2012

Tokom sanacije i zatvaranja "Vrtijeljke" svi građevinski radovi moraju biti u

skladu sa svim važe im pravilima i principima za projektovanje i izgradnju,

kako bi se smanjio seizmički rizik na prihvatljiv nivo, u skladu sa akonom o

prostornom planiranju i izgradnji ("Službeni list Crne Gore", 51/08).

Slika 4 K r m čk regionalizacije Crne Gore

Izvor: Seismic eonisation of Montenegro (’Seizmička rejonizacija Crne Gore’).

Autori knjige su V. adulovi , B.Glavatovi , M. Arsovski i V. Mihailov, 1982


15

.

3.5 Postojeće stanje na odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka”

Kao što je ve pomenuto, u cilju identifikacije situacije odlagalištaVrtijeljka,

Konsultant je obavio posjete lokaciji i istraživanja odlagališta i okoline,

prikupljeni su podaci od predstavnika JKP Cetinje, i sproveo je geološka i geo-

detska istraživanja na licu mjesta. Tipični rezultati koji identifikuju situaciju na

lokaciji su dati ispod.

Životni vijek Prikupljeni čvrsti otpad u opštini Cetinje se odlaže svakog dana na nesanitarno

odlagalište “Vrtijeljka”, koje se koristi za tu svrhu ve 25 godina.

Područje Lokacija “Vrtijeljke” je stjenovita i ima otežan pristup, te stoga nije koriš ena

za neku drugu namjenu prije nego što je počela da se koristi kao nesanitarno

odlagalište. Lokacija je okružena rastinjem i slabom vegetacijom.

Površina Nesanitarno odlagalište ima površinu prekrivenu sme em od približno 16.300

m2, što se može videti na topografskoj podlozi koja je snimljena u avgustu

2012. godine.

Okolna naselja ajbliže naselje se nalazi na oko 500 metara udaljenosti od nesanitarnog

odlagališta, ali najbliži objekat (privatna štala) je na oko 100 metara udaljenosti

od lokacije i nije u upotrebi.

Infrastruktura Nema komunalnih ili infrastrukturnih instalacija na lokaciji, osim nedavno

postavljene javne rasvjete.

Struja Dalekovod se nalazi blizu ulaza nesanitarne deponije, sa kablovima koji se

protežu iznad parcele nesanitarnog odlagališta i nije povezan na energetsku

mrežu. Dalekovod je prikazan na slici 5.

Slika 5 D k v d r k d š

Izvor: Arhiva konsultanta


16

.

Ograda Područje nesanitarnog odlagališta nije ograđeno i ne postoji kontrola pristupa

deponiji uključuju i i kamione za prikupljanje otpada. Međutim, uzimaju i u

obzir karakteristike topografije, nesanitarno smetlište je praktično nedostupno

iz drugih pravaca osim ulaza.

Ulaz Ulaz je opremljen malom kapijom i stražarskom ku icom, ali je visina

postoje e ulazne kapije manja od 2 metra, što nije adekvatano. Stražarska

ku ica nije opremljena potrebnim sanitarnim instalacijama. Pogled na ulaz ne-

sanitarnog odlagališta i stražarsku ku icu prikazan je na slikama 6 i 7.

Slika 6 P d d š “Vr k ”, u k


Slika 7 Od š “Vr k ”, r ž r k k b



17

.

Oprema Mašinerija deponije neophodna za prevrtanje i sabijanje čvrstog otpada se

privremeno nalazi na lokaciji. Sabijanje čvrstog otpada se vrši bagerom, valjak

se ne koristi.

Prekrivka Čvrsti otpad se pokriva zemljom 5 do 8 puta u mjesec dana, a debljina sloja

varira od 0,5 do 1,5 metara. Materijal koji se koristi za prekrivanje je uglavnom

zemlja, ali i građevinski otpad, a s vremena na vrijeme i izlomljen kamen.

aštita epropusni sloj nije postavljen na dnu odlagališta te se stoga čvrsti otpad

odlaže direktno na tlo. Tlo je propusno, a sve otpadne vode i filtrati iz ot-

pada idu direktno u zemlju predstavljaju i na taj način direktnu prijetnju za-

gađenju podzemnih voda. Lokacija nije zašti ena/okružena drenažnim

kanalima koji bi spriječili dopiranje vode iz uzvodnog pravca, što pove ava

količinu otpadnih voda nastalih na tijelu nesanitarne deponije.

Slika 8 Od š “Vr k ”, čvr otpad sa i bez prekrivke


Emisija gasova Nesanitarno odlagalište nema sistem za prikupljanje gasova, zbog čega dolazi

do požara. Iz tog razloga, emisija gasova sa odlagališta je začajno smanjena, a

može se očekivati manja količina gasa u tijelu deponije. Fotografija požara je

prikazana na slici 9.

Recikliranje Sakupljači otpad prisutni su s vremena na vrijeme na nesanitarnom odlagalištu,

a prikupljaju materijale koji se mogu reciklirati. Količina recikliranog čvrstog

otpada na ovaj način je veoma mala, pa se može smatrati i zanemarljivom kada

se radi o smanjenju količine odloženog čvrstog otpada.

Pristupni put Pristupni put je dug oko 500 m i širok 4 m, sa pojedinim djelovima širokim od

6 do 7 m. Pristupni put je makadamski put.


18

.

Slika 9 Od š “Vrtijeljka” – pojava ž r



19

.

4 Uticaj na životnu sredinu postojećeg odla-gališta

U skladu sa zahtjevima Projektnog zadatka, Konsultant je analizirao mogu e

uticaje na životnu sredinu, prvenstveno kroz:

agađenje vode (podzemne i površinske vode);

Emisiju gasova sa odlagališta;

ekontrolisani požari;

Sme e koje raznosi vjetar.

4.1 Zagađenje podzemnih voda

Tokom sprovođenja istražnih bušenja u avgustu 2012. godine nije bilo

podzemnih voda u bušotinama.

Međutim, kako je krečnjak veoma propusno tlo, gotovo sva količina vode

koja padne na tlo infiltrira se duboko pod zemljom, gdje se nalaze kraške

izdani. Ove izdani se prazne kroz izvor ijeke Crnojevi a, uz mogu nost da

prenose zagađenje sa odlagališta na ovaj izvor. Stoga je od vitalnog značaja

sprovođenje mjera ublažavanja koje e spriječiti infiltraciju vode sa odla-

gališta u podzemne vode.

4.2 Zagađenje površinskih voda

Kako nema površinskih voda u blizini nesanitarnog odlagališta “Vrtijeljka”,

nisu predviđeni nikakvi uticaji na tokove površinskih voda.

4.3 Emisija gasova sa odlagališta

a lokaciji "Vrtijeljka" nema sistema kontrole koji bi pružio precizne podatke

o emisiji gasova na odlagalištu. a osnovu pretpostavki vezanih za raniji čvrsti

otpad na Cetinju, na osnovu podataka dobijenih od JKP-a, te na osnovu posjeta

lokaciji i zatečenog stanja, Konsultant je napravio model stvaranja gasova na

osnovu koga procjenjuje emisiju gasova. ezultati ovog proračuna su prikazani

u Dodatku 5.


20

.

aključak je da je ve ina gasa proizvedena u prethodnom periodu bila spaljena

ili ispuštena u vazduh. Takođe je pretpostavljeno i da se dio nastalog gasa

nalazi i dalje unutar tijela nesanitarnog odlagališta, a može biti oslobođen u bilo

koje vrijeme zbog nanošenja/raspoređivanja čvrstog otpada. Očigledno je da,

čvrsti otpad, koji je odložen u posljednjih nekoliko godina, još uvijek stvara

štetne gasove, ali i čvrsti otpad koji e se odlagati do zatvaranja nesanitarnog

odlagališta e takođe doprinijeti stvaranju štetnih gasova. Stoga, procijenjena

količina proizvedenog štetnog gasa mora biti prikupljena i obrađena odgovara-

ju im sistemom prikupljanja gasova.

4.4 Nekontrolisani požari

Budu i da ne postoji sistem za prikupljanje gasova i da se dnevne prekrivke

preko tijela deponije primjenjuju veoma neorganizovano, uobičajena je pojava

nekontrolisanih požara.

Zbog pojave nekoliko uzastopnih požara ove godine, ulaz na nesanitarno odla-

galište je osvijetljen i čuvar je angažovan 24 časa dnevno.

Kako bi se ublažio ovaj negativan uticaj, sistem za prikupljanje gasova mora

biti obezbijeđen i opremljen odgovaraju im instalacijama za kontrolisano is-

puštanje gasova.

4.5 Raznošenje smeća

Lokacija nesanitarnog odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" je praktično okružena sa svih

strana visokim brdima i prevladavaju i vjetar je prilično nizak. Stoga,

raznošenje sme a sa nesanitarnog odlagališta nije značajno.

Međutim, zbog neadekvatnog zbijanja čvrstog otpada i neredovnog prek-

rivanja tijela čvrstog otpada, kao i zbog nedostatka ograde oko nesanitarnog

odlagališta, male količine sme a, koje je vjetar oduvao sa nesanitarnog od-

lagališta mogu biti primije ene u okoloni. Koriš enje prekrivnog sloja, u

skladu sa propisima, e spriječiti ovaj negativni uticaj.


21

.

5 Analiza podataka koji će se koristiti za dalja izračunavanja i idejno rješenje

Budu i da različiti izvori podataka pokazuju značajne varijacije, Konsultant je

odlučio koristiti najnovije zvanično ažurirane i odobrene podatke. Dakle, u dal-

jim izračunavanjima, smatra e se relevantnim podaci verifikovani i pred-

stavljeni u adatku 1 Izvještaj o analizi.

Priprema idejnog rješenja, kao sljede i korak ovog projekta, bi e preduzeta na-

kon što se odobri ovaj izvještaj o trenutnoj situaciji, stoga e se podaci

prikupljeni u daljem tekstu iskoristiti za dalja izračunavanja koja e pred-

stavljati bazu za Idejno rješenje za rehabilitaciju odlagališta “Vrtijeljka”.

5.1 Analiza stanovništva Demografski podaci veoma su važni za razumijevanje i predviđanje proizvod-

nje čvrstog otpada. S druge strane, budu i da nije bilo sistematske evidencije o

podacima o čvrstom otpadu odloženom na nesanitarnom odlagalištu, i kako bi

se utvrdio iznos odloženog čvrstog otpada i izračunala proizvodnja gasa u tijelu

nesanitarnog odlagališta i trenutni status emisije gasova sa odlagališta, bilo je

potrebno utvrditi podatke o stanovništvu za proteklo razdoblje. Ovi podaci su

uzeti iz popisa izvršenih do sada.

Prema podacima popisa iz 2011, u opštini Cetinje ima 16.757 stanovnika što je

2,67% ukupne populacije Crne Gore. Grad Cetinje ima 13.991 stanovnika. Na

osnovu podataka iz 1948., na Cetinju se broj stanovnika smanjio sa 25.000 na

16.750 stanovnika. Tabela 7 pokazuje promjenu u broju stanovništva u opštini

Cetinje između 1948. i 2011. godine.

Tabela 7 Br v k u š C 3

Godina Opština Cetinje Gradsko područje Seosko područje

stanovnici % stanovnici %

1948 25.114 9.038 36,00 16.076 64,00

1953 25.549 9.102 35,63 16.447 64,37

1961 23.503 9.359 39,82 14.144 60,18

1971 22.024 11.876 53,92 10.148 46,08

3 www.cetinje.me


22

.

Godina Opština Cetinje Gradsko područje Seosko područje

stanovnici % stanovnici %

1981 20.213 14.088 69,70 6.125 30,30

1991 20.307 15.946 78,53 4.361 21,47

2003 18.482 15.325 82,92 3.157 17,08

2011 16.757 13.991 83,42 2.766 16,51


Rast populacije Broj stanovnika opštine Cetinje opada. Izmedju dva popisa stanovništva 1991 i

2011, broj stanovnika Cetinja opao je za 3.550. Paralelno sa Strategijom za im-

plementaciju Master plana za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom, pretpostavlja se da

e se ovaj negativni trend nastaviti do 2014. godine, pos topi od -0,8%

godišnje.

Takodje je očigledno da se i struktura populacije značajno promijenila, a prim-

jetna je i migracija ruralnog stanovništva. Prema popisu iz 2011. godine, samo

16,51% populacije živjelo je na seoskim područjima opštine Cetinje, u pore-

đenju sa 64% zabilježenih 1948. godine.

5.2 Karakteristike čvrstog otpada Od početka koriš enja nesanitarne deponije, nema evidencije o odloženom

čvrstom otpadu, te stoga, ne postoje službeni podaci o količini čvrstog otpada

na nesanitarnomodlagalištu Vrtijeljka.

S obzirom da do sada praksa recikliranja, odnosno implementacija separacije

izvora reciklabilnog čvrstog otpada, nije bila efikasno organizovana u opštini

Cetinje pretpostavlja se da su sve vrste proizvedenog čvrstog otpada odložene

na nesanitarnom odlagalištu "Vrtijeljka" s neznatnom količinom koju su recik-

lirali sakupljači sekundarnih sirovina.

Godine 2011., nakon stupanja na snagu Zakona o upravljanju otpadom (Sl. List

RCG, broj 64/2011) i drugih relevantnih zakona, odlaganje specifičnog čvrstog

otpada na nesanitarno odlagalište “Vrtijeljka” je zaustavljeno (poput dotrajalih

vozila, otpad od električne i elektronske opreme, baterije i istrošeni akumula-

tori, otpadna ulja, otpadne gume, i druge slične vrste otpada).

Opasni otpad i medicinski otpad nekada se skupljao i odlagao na lokaciji ne-

sanitarnog odlagališta, kao i industrijski otpad, koji bi mogao da se okarakteriše

kao kompatibilan sa komunalnim čvrstim otpadom.

Građevinski otpad se dijelom odlaže na nekoliko manjih nekontrolisanih ne-

sanitarnih odlagališta, a dijelom ga koristi JKP Cetinje kao svakodnevni pok-

rivni materijal na odlagalištu "Vrtijeljka".

Sastav otpada a osnovu zaključaka predstavljenih u poglavlju 2, Konsultant je napravio

izbor podataka o sastavu čvrstog otpada koji e se smatrati relevantnim za dalje

proračune. Prihva eni podaci predstavljeni su u sljede oj tabeli.


23

.

Tabela 8 Sastav čvr d k d ž d š “Vr k ”

Sastojak Učešće (%)

Papir i karton 17

Staklo 7

Metal 4

Plastika 10

Tekstil 5

Organski otpad 25

Ostalo 32

Izvor: adatak 1 Izvještajo analizi, COWI IPF

5.3 Količina čvrstog otpada Količina čvrstog otpada koji je odložen na nesanitarno odlagalište "Vrtijeljka"

do avgusta 2012.godine određena je upoređivanjem rezultata iz dva različita

pristupa:

1. Proračun konsultanta na osnovu modeliranja deponije, i

2. Proračun konsultanta o količini (masi) odloženog otpada i prosječnoj

gustini čvrstog otpada.

5.3.1 Pristup 1 – Modeliranje deponije

Da bi izračunao količinu čvrstog otpada odloženog na odlagalište "Vrtijeljka",

konsultant je sproveo model postoje eg otpada pomo u dvije granične

površine:

Modeliranje gornje površine – na osnovu topografskog istraživanja, i

Modeliranje donje površine (donji sloj deponije – postoje i podzemni

nivoi) – na osnovu zaključaka "Geotehničkog istraživanja"

Izračunato je da razlika između gornje i donje površine iznosi 99.300 m3 što je

ekvivalentno količini deponovanog čvrstog otpada na lokaciji "Vrtijeljka" u

period od 1987. do avgusta 2012. godine.

5.3.2 Pristup 2 – Proračuni

U cilju procjene količine čvrstog otpada na lokaciji potrebno je da se procijeni

količina (masa) i prosječna gustina deponovanog materijala.

Proračun o količini čvrstog otpada izvršen je na osnovu podataka o broju

stanovnika i specifične količine čvrstog otpada po stanovniku.

Prosječna gustina tijela deponije zavisi od sastava čvrstog otpada i količine i

vrste inertnog materijala koji se koristi za svakodnevni površinski sloj, ali ta-


24

.

kodje i od procesa slijeganja materijala, budu i da je odlagan tokom dužeg

vremenskog perioda.

Konačno slijeganje je proces koji se sastoji od početno-neposrednog slijeganja,

primarne konsolidacije i sekundarne kompresije.

Treba napomenuti da za razliku od prirodnog tla, u kojoj se ve ina slijeganja

dešava u početnoj i primarnoj fazi konsolidacije, slijeganje materijala čvrstog

otpada dešava se tokom cijelog radnog vijeka deponije, i glavni efekti slijeganja

su sekundarne kompresije. azlog za to leži u činjenici da sekundarna kompre-

sija obuhvata sve "skrivene" efekte uključuju i i one povezane sa degradacijom,

kako hemijskom tako i biološkom. Efekti sekundarne kompresije mogu sman-

jiti deponiju do 25-40% prvobitne visine i zapremine. Sekundarna kompresija

uglavnom zavisi od vremena.

Govore i o "Vrtijeljci", procjenjuje se da slijeganje čvrstog otpada od mak-

simum 37 % treba uzeti u obzir za prve deponovane slojeve, sa postepenim

smanjivanjem do posljednjih godina upotrebe, gdje ne bi trebalo očekivati

značajnije efekte slijeganja. Budu i da čvrsti otpad nije zbijen upotrebom prese,

ve upotrebom bagera sa kašikom, postignuta gustina sabijenog čvrstog otpada

se procjenjuje na 0,5 t/m3.

Gustina čvrstog otpada zavisi od sastava, sadržaja vlažnosti i procenta mineral-

nih sastojaka. Prosječna gustina čvrstog otpada izračunava se pomo u dolje

ispisane formule:

gdje je:

= Udio sastojka u čvrstom otpadu

= Prosječna gustina sastojka

Vrijdnosti upotrijebljene za distribuciju sastojka u čvrstom otpadu pred-

stavljene su u Tabeli 8, a prosječna gustina određenih sastojaka čvrstog otpada

predstavljena je u Tabeli 9.

Tabela 9 Pr č u k

Sastojak Prosječna gustina sastojka, ρn (t/m3)

Papir i karton 0,065

Staklo 0,4

Metal 0,8

Plastika 0,08

Organski sastojci 0,4

Ostalo 0,2

Izvor: Upravljanje čvrstim otpadom, U -ov Program za životnu sredinu, 2005

Slijeganje čvrstog ot-

pada

Gustina čvrstog otpada


25

.

Koriste i podatke prikazane gore, prosječna gustina čvrstog otpada u Cetinju, a

odložena na odlagalište "Vrtijeljka" iznosi 0,263 t/m3.

Pokrivni materijal Budu i da nije bilo zabilježenih podataka o upotrijebljenom pokrivnom

materijalu, količina pokrivnog materijala odloženog na nesanitarnom odla-

galištu "Vrtijeljka" procijenjena je na osnovu činjenica i predviđanja dobijenih

iz Upitnika i intervjua JKP-a. :

Čvrsti otpad se pokriva inertnim materijalom 5 do 8 puta mjesečno;

Debljina inertnog pokrivnog materijala kre e se od 0,5 m do 1,5 m;

Prvih 10 do 15 godina na nesanitarnoj depeniji nije koriš eno pokrivanje

inertnim materijalima;

atim je u sljede ih 5 godina pokrivanje vršeno rijetko (vjerovatno samo

ljeti radi sprječavanja paljenja, širenjačvrstog otpada, prašine i neprijatnih

mirisa);

Posljednjih 5 godina pokrivanje inertnim materijalima vršeno je kao što je

pomenuto gore (5-8 puta mjesečno);

Prosječna količina čvrstog otpada u prvih 20 godina perioda koriš enja bila

je oko 2.400 t/godišnje;

Pove anje čvrstog otpada zbog prosječnog privrednog rasta od 2%

godišnje;

Približno 5% smanjenja deponovanog čvrstog otpada zbog aktivnosti

sakupljača sekundarnih sirovina u posljednjih 10 godina;

Približna vrijednost gustine ne-sabijenog čvrstog otpada je 0,263 t/m3.

Uzimaju i u obzir smanjenje otpada nakon sabijanja, procijenjena gustina

čvrstog otpada iznosi 0,5 t/m3.

Proračuni ezultati proračuna na osnovu gore pomenutih predviđanja, za zapreminu

čvrstog otpada sa i bez slijeganja (od početka upotrebnog perioda do kraja

2013) i za procijenjenu količinu inertnog materijala predstavljeni su u Tabela

10.

Tabela 10 Pr c k č d v čvr otpada i pokrivnog materi-

jala

Godina

Deponovani čvrsti otpad


(sabijen)

Deponovani pokrivni materijal

Ukupni sabijeni depo-novani čvrsti

otpad uključu-jući pokrivni

materijal

(m3) (t) (m

3) (m

3) (m

3)

1987 3.532 1.766 2.225 0 2.225

1988 3.560 1.780 2.243 0 2.243

1989 3.588 1.794 2.261 0 2.261

1990 3.741 1.871 2.357 0 2.357

1991 3.918 1.959 2.468 0 2.468

1992 4.186 2.093 2.637 0 2.637

1993 4.235 2.117 2.668 0 2.668

1994 4.283 2.142 2.741 0 2.741


26

.

Godina



(sabijen)

Deponovani pokrivni materijal

Ukupni sabijeni depo-novani čvrsti

otpad uključu-jući pokrivni

materijal

(m3) (t) (m

3) (m

3) (m

3)

1995 4.392 2.196 2.811 0 2.811

1996 4.760 2.380 3.047 0 3.047

1997 4.925 2.462 3.201 0 3.201

1998 4.969 2.485 3.230 0 3.230

1999 5.013 2.507 3.509 150 3.660

2000 5.134 2.567 3.594 154 3.748

2001 5.243 2.621 3.670 183 3.853

2002 5.410 2.705 3.787 216 4.003

2003 5.618 2.809 4.213 225 4.438

2004 5.687 2.844 4.265 398 4.664

2005 5.819 2.909 4.364 465 4.829

2006 5.880 2.940 4.410 529 4.939

2007 5.986 2.993 4.490 599 5.088

2008 6.176 3.088 4.632 741 5.373

2009 6.451 3.225 5.161 774 5.935

2010 6.588 3.294 5.270 823 6.093

2011 6.374 3.187 5.736 829 6.565

2012 6.615 3.308 6.615 860 7.475

2013 8.341 4.170 8.341 1.376 9.717

UKUPNO 140.424 70.212 103.946 8.322 112.268

Prema rezultatima proračuna prikazanih u Tabela 10, ukupna količina čvrstog

otpada deponovanog na “Vrtijeljci” do avgusta 2012. procjenjuje se na 99.438

m3.

5.3.3 Zaključak

Na osnovu analiza i rezultata gore predstavljenih, Konsultant je procijenio da je

na nesanitarnom odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka” do avgusta 2012. depenovano prib-

ližno 99.500 m3 čvrstog otpada.


27

.

6 Zaključak

a osnovu analize podataka iz postoje e dokumentacije i analize podataka

prikupljenih sa nesanitarne deponije i od predstavnika Opštine Cetinje, za dalju

pripremu Idejnog rješenja za rehabilitaciju smetlišta, sljede i zaključci se sma-

traju validnim:

a) Prema podacima sa popisa iz 2011. godine, Opština Cetinje ima 16.757

stanovnika od čega 13.991 živi na gradskom području.

b) Promjena populacije za period od 2011. do 2014. iznosi -0,8 %, na osnovu

odobrenog adatka 1 Izvještaj o analizi.

c) Količina čvrstog otpada iznosi 0,80 kg/stan./dan, na osnovu odobrenog

adatka 1 Izvještaj o analizi.

d) Sastav čvrstog otpada za centralni region Crne Gore, koji uključuje opštinu

Cetinje,predstavljen je u Tabela 8, na osnovu odobrenog Zadatka 1 Iz-

vještaj o analizi.

e) Proširenje usluga prikupljanja čvrstog otpada za kratkoročni period (2005-

2009) projektovano je kao:

na gradskim područjima, postepeno pove anje sa 85% na 92%;

na seoskim područjima (za populaciju od preko 190 stanovnika)

postepeno pove anje sa 15% na 27%.

f) Proširenje usluga prikupljanja čvrstog otpada za srednjoročni period (od

2010 do 2014) projektovano je kao:

na gradskim područjima, postepeno pove anje sa 93,3% na 100%;

na seoskim područjima (za populaciju od preko 190 stanovnika)

postepeno pove anje sa 48,3 % na 75 %;

g) Nesanitarno odlagalište Vrtijeljka zauzima površinu od oko 16.300 m2, na

osnovu rezultata topografskog istraživanja sprovedenog u avgustu 2012.

godine. Do rehabilitacije, odlagalište e nastaviti sa radom. Međutim, oče-

kuje se da e novi čvrsti otpad biti deponovan na vrh nesanitarnog odla-

gališta, a ne sa strane.


28

.

h) a osnovu zaključaka geotehničkog izvještaja pripremljenog u septembru

2012, površina vrha nesanitarnog odlagališta je 100 m širine i 120 m

dužine, sa dvije padine, jednom na istoku i drugom na jugu, nagiba 35º do

45º.

i) Količina čvrstog otpada deponovanog na nesanitarnom odlagalištu “Vrti-

jeljka” do avgusta 2012. procjenjuje se na približno 99.500 m3.

j) Očekuje se da e se do kraja 2013. (završne godine) zapremina tijela ne-

sanitarnog odlagališta pove ati do približno 112.500 m3, uzimaju i u obzir

čvrsti otpad iz Opštine Cetinje.

k) “Vrtijeljka“ treba da se zatvori i rehabilituje implementacijom svih neo-

phodnih mjera definisanih EU Direktivama i crnogorskim zakonodavstvom

datim ispod:

Direktiva o otpadu 2008/98/EC;

Direktiva o deponiji otpada 1999/31/EC;

Pravilnik o bližim karakteristikama lokacije, uslovima izgradnje, sani-

tarno-tehničkim uslovima, načinurada i zatvaranjadeponije za ot-

pad,stručnoj spremi, kvalifikacijama rukovodioca deponije i vrstama

otpada i uslovima za prihvatanjeotpada na deponiji(Službeni list Crne

Gore, 84/2009 i 46/2011);

akon o upravljanju otpadom (Službeni list Crne Gore, 64/2011);

Zakon o uređenju prostora i izgradnjiobjekata (Službeni list Crne

Gore, 51/08, 40/10, 34/11, 40/11 i 47/11).

Prilog 1

April 2012

WB4-MNE- ENV-12

Component F:

Analysis of the way of Collection, Transport and Treatment of Waste from the Old Royal Capital of Cetinje and Preparation of Con-ceptual Design and Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation of “Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite

Terms of Reference

April 2012

Infrastructure Projects Facility in Western Balkans

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F

WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

2 / 17

Document Control Sheet

Client:

IFI:

European Commission

European Investment Bank

Sector/Country: Environment– Montenegro

Project Identification: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F

Activity Title: Analysis of the way of Collection, Transport and treatment of

Waste from Old Royal Capital of Cetinje and Preparation of

Conceptual Design and Tender Documents for the Rehabilita-

tion of “Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

ORIGINAL NAME: NAME: NAME:

Rene Boesten

DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

22.05.2011

REVISION NAME NAME NAME

Rene Boesten Vassilis Evmolpidis DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

29.06.2011

REVISION NAME NAME NAME Jan Skajaa Rene Boesten Vassilis Evmolpidis

DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 28.07.2011

REVISION NAME NAME NAME Jan Skajaa Vassilis Evmolpidis


REVISION NAME NAME NAME Jan Skajaa Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu Vassilis Evmolpidis


REVISION NAME NAME NAME Jürgen Pries Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu Vassilis Evmolpidis




3 / 17

Contents 1 Background .................................................................................................................. 6

2 Overall Objective .......................................................................................................... 6

3 Specific objectives and purpose ................................................................................... 6

4 Specific background and information ............................................................................ 7

4.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 7

4.2 Previous Studies and existing Documentation ....................................................... 7 4.3 Key Environmental Regulations of Montenegro ..................................................... 7 4.4 Risks and Assumptions .......................................................................................... 8

5 Detailed Tasks and deliverables ................................................................................... 8

5.1 Task 1 Analysis ...................................................................................................... 8 5.1.1 Activity 1.1: Analysis of the options for way of collection,

transport and treatment of municipal waste ........................................................ 8

5.1.2 Activity 1.2: Siting and conceptual design of the preferred option for a transfer station ............................................................................................ 9

5.1.3 Activity 1.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for Transfer Station .............................................................................................................. 10

5.2 Task 2 Preparation of Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation of “Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite ....................................................................................................... 10

5.2.1 Activity 2.1: Analysis of Existing Situation ........................................................ 10

5.2.2 Activity 2.2: Conceptual design of the Rehabilitation of the Dumpsite .......................................................................................................... 11

5.2.3 Activity 2.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation .................................................................................................... 12

5.3 Task 3: Assistance during Tendering ................................................................... 12 5.4 Outputs and planning ........................................................................................... 13

6 Project Coordination and Meetings ............................................................................. 13

6.1 Coordination and meetings .................................................................................. 13

6.2 Facilities for the Consultant and access to information ........................................ 14

7 Experts’ profiles .......................................................................................................... 14

8 Incidental expenses .................................................................................................... 16

9 Requirements for Reporting and Deliverables ............................................................ 16

10 Budget ........................................................................................................................ 17



4 / 17

Abbreviations

CAPEX Capital Expenditure

CBA Cost Benefit Analysis

DG ELARG Directorate General for Enlargement

EC European Commission

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EIB European Investment Bank

EU European Union

EUD European Union Delegation

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

FS Feasibility Study

IFI International Financing Institution

IPF Infrastructure Projects Facility project

KE Key Expert

MNE Montenegro

MoM Minutes of Meeting

MoSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism

NPV Net Present Value

OPEX Operational Expenditure

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PM Project Manager

PROCON National Project Implementation Unit in the Field of Communal Ser-

vices and Environment

STE Short Term Expert

TA Technical Assistance

ToR Terms of Reference

WBIF Western Balkan Investment Framework



5 / 17

Terms of Reference

Project Title: Infrastructure Projects Facility Technical Assistance Window

(IPF TA) Western Balkans

Assignment Title WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F- Analysis of the Way of

Collection, Transport and Treatment of Waste from the Old

Royal Capital of Cetinje and Preparation of Conceptual De-

sign and Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation of “Vrti-

jeljka” Dumpsite

The Assignment: The Contract of which these Terms of Reference form a part.

The Promoter: Ministry for Sustainable Development and Tourism

(MoSDT)

The Beneficiaries: PROCON which is the National Project Implementation Unit

(PIU) in the Field of Communal Services and Environment

and Cetinje Municipality

The Investor: Cetinje Municipality

The Consultant: COWI IPF (IPF2) Consultant. The Entity contracted to carry

out the works described in these Terms of Reference.

The Financier: European Investment Bank (EIB) and local finance



6 / 17

1 Background

Montenegro has entered into a finance agreement with the European Investment Bank

(EIB) for the implementation of the “Montenegro Solid Waste” project (the Project).

The total investment under the Project is estimated to be approximately EUR

54,000,000 for the benefit of municipalities throughout Montenegro.

The Government of Montenegro, the Beneficiary, has established a Project Implemen-

tation Unit (PIU) for the purposes of implementing the project. The PIU is the National

Project Implementation Unit in the Field of Communal Services and Environment

(PROCON). The Project will benefit from Technical Assistance under the Western

Balkan Investment Framework (WBIF), which will be directed initially towards specif-

ic outputs to mobilise projects or specific components of identified projects.

The Government of Montenegro passed, in 2005, the Strategic Master Plan for Solid

Waste and in 2007 the National Waste Management plan (February 2008), which en-

visage the construction of seven regional sanitary landfills for the needs of all 21 mu-

nicipalities, recovery of the existing dumpsites, procuring equipment and machinery

with the aim of a better level of equipment of the public utility service companies and

for resolving the issues of hazardous waste disposal.

2 Overall Objective

The overall objective of the Project is to develop EU-standard Integrated Sustainable

Solid Waste Management in Montenegro, as defined in the National Strategic Master

Plan adopted in 2005. The Project concerns inter alia the construction of new sanitary

landfills, recycling and composting facilities, including the implementation of the first

disposal cells of up to 5 new inter-municipal sanitary landfills, with transfer, recycling

and composting facilities, as well as the rehabilitation of existing dumpsites.

Under the Project, ToRs for separate components will be drafted which can be imple-

mented by different resources and with varying durations.

3 Specific objectives and purpose

The general objective of this Component is the provision of an adequate waste man-

agement system in the Municipality of Cetinje.

The specific objectives of this Component are:

to prepare an analysis of the way of collection, transport and treatment of waste

from the Old Royal Capital of Cetinje;

to prepare the conceptual design and tender documents for necessary infrastructure

components as i.e. the construction of a transfer station;

to prepare the conceptual design and tender documents for the rehabilitation of the

existing dumpsite “Vrteljka”



7 / 17

4 Specific background and information

4.1 Background

Cetinje, the Old Royal Capital of Montenegro, is located in a karst area, at an altitude

of 640-750 m. It lies at a distance of 10-12 km from the Adriatic Sea, the Bay of Kotor

and Skadar Lake. The Municipality of Cetinje covers an area of about 900 km2

According to the latest population census of 2009 (Monstat – Statistical Office), the

Municipality of Cetinje has about 18,000 inhabitants (including the 3,000 inhabitants in

the villages). According to the Republic-Level Solid Waste Strategic Master Plan, the

total municipal solid waste generation is about 5,500 Ton /year. There are no signifi-

cant separate collection and recycling activities.

The municipal solid waste of the Old Royal Capital Cetinje is presently disposed in the

dumpsite “Vrtijeljka” but this dumpsite does not meet the requirements of the EU and

Montenegrin legislation. The dumpsite “Vrtijeljka“ needs to be closed and rehabilitat-

ed.

Pursuant to the Strategic Master Plan, the Municipality of Cetinje should dispose its

waste at the sanitary landfill “Livade“ in Podgorica, which was constructed in 2007.

According to the Waste Management Plan 2008 – 2012, a transfer station needs to be

constructed in Cetinje to facilitate the transport of the waste to “Livade”.

4.2 Previous Studies and existing Documentation

The following documentation has been identified which are relevant to the project:

Report on the current situation and possibilities for disposal of solid municipal

waste at the site of “Vrtijeljka” – the municipality of Cetinje, December 2007, Prof.

Dr. Refik Zejnilovic et. al;

Strategy for Implementation of the Solid Waste Management Master Plan in Mon-

tenegro, Egis BCEOM International, February 2009

Preparation and Implementation of a Republic-Level Solid Waste Strategic Master

Plan Republic of Montenegro, GOPA Consultants, 2004

Waste Management Plan 2008 – 2012 for Montenegro

Forecast for tender “ME-Podgorica: IPA — equipment/vehicles for waste collec-

tion and transport 2011/S 72-116513”

Local Environmental action plans

4.3 Key Environmental Regulations of Montenegro

The Project will be implemented in compliance with the legislation of Montenegro and

applicable EU Directives in the field of waste management. EIB and EU guidelines on

the preparation of feasibility studies should be taken into consideration.



8 / 17

4.4 Risks and Assumptions

According to the Waste Management Plan 2008 – 2012, a transfer station needs to be

constructed in Cetinje to facilitate the transport of the waste to the “Livade” landfill. It

is assumed that a transfer station is indeed the most cost and environmentally effective

solution for disposing the waste at the “Livade” landfill. If the analysis demonstrates

that this not the case, the Consultant is required to provide alternatives.

For the rehabilitation as well as for the construction of the transfer station, it is ex-

pected that Environmental Impact Assessment Studies need to be prepared. The decision

whether indeed an EIA study is required is made by the Environmental Protection Agen-

cy based on a request for decision from the investor(s).

5 Detailed Tasks and deliverables

5.1 Task 1 Analysis

5.1.1 Activity 1.1: Analysis of the options for way of collection, transport and treatment of municipal waste

The purpose of this task is to prepare an analysis for the need for a transfer station to be

established in Old Royal Capital of Cetinje to transport municipal solid waste from the

Old Royal Capital of Cetinje to the regional landfill “Livade” of Podgorica, and to ana-

lyse alternatives in terms of treatment of waste (collection and recycling of waste).

The study shall include economic, financial and environmental factors in determining

the need for a transfer station and options for collection and recycling of the waste, and

compare two or three different options for transport of municipal solid waste from Ce-

tinje to the Livade landfill including, inter alia:

Direct haul by compaction collection trucks,

Reloading into open semitrailers without compaction (directly or via floor/dozer),

Reloading via hopper into compacting containers and transport via truck,

Bailing and transport by truck.

The cost comparisons shall be expressed as total capital and operating costs over a 20-

year period (NPV, applying a discount rate per annum in accordance with the Monte-

negrin legislation).

Environmental concerns to be included in the study are inter alia:

CO2 emissions

NOX emissions

Number of transports

Noise/dust/odour

Littering



9 / 17

Waste quantities should be based on data on present waste generation of municipal sol-

id waste, derived from the documents listed in 4.2 and estimates of future waste gen-

eration for an equal number of years as the lifetime of the investment with the longest

economic lifetime. This includes estimates of future quantities of waste recycled or

otherwise disposed of by methods other than landfilling at Livade landfill. The estimate

shall also include waste from the Vrtijeljka” dumpsite, if the decision is to move the

waste as the preferred option for rehabilitation (see section5.2.2).

The Consultant will prepare a report comparing the different methodologies and criteria

for choices together with a recommendation for the best option.

The report and recommendations shall be discussed and approved by PROCON and the

Old Royal Capital of Cetinje before the following phases of the project continues.

5.1.2 Activity 1.2: Siting and conceptual design of the preferred option for a transfer station

In case the preferred option is a transfer station (and not direct haul of waste in collec-

tion trucks), conceptual design of the transfer station shall be carried out. This includes

inter alia:

Site identification and analysis of site considerations (e.g. traffic patterns, distance

to primary road network, environmental considerations, and others),

Acceptance of site by Municipality of Cetinje,

Obtaining of urban-technical conditions and other preconditions and requirements

form the authorities for obtaining building permit,

Conceptual design, including, but not necessarily limited to:

o Overall layout

o Access road (principles and simple cross section)

o Equipment

o Soil, earth and concrete work as required

o Fencing, gate, weight bridge and others

o Operations and maintenance

o Cost estimate

If the result of the analysis under Task 1 indicates that the most economical and finan-

cially and environmentally feasible option is direct haul by compacting trucks, the fol-

lowing activity 1.3 shall not been carried out. Then the activity 1.3 shall be revised and

the man days which are foreseen for the preparation of the Tender Documents shall be

used for a detailed outline report for options for source-segregation and selective col-

lection of recyclable waste fractions and establishment of equipment for pre-processing

and preparing the waste for recycling, e.g. balers and other equipment at the chosen

site. This should be supported by a more comprehensive recycling study for Old Royal

Capital of Cetinje and possible surrounding municipalities (which is outside the scope

of this study).

It is assumed that no geological, hydrological and waste composition analysis are to be

carried out at this stage, and that sufficient information about waste quantities and



10 / 17

composition is available from the Municipality of Cetinje. The Consultant is required

to identify if any such analyses are necessary for the later stages by a detailed review of

available information and to include an estimate of associated costs in the tender doc-

uments.

Any EIA to be conducted for the transfer station is outside the scope of this study and

shall be conducted by the Municipality of Cetinje.

The activity shall be reported in a Siting and Conceptual Design report to be approved

by PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje before the following phases of the project

continue.

5.1.3 Activity 1.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for Transfer Station

Tender Documents for the construction of the transfer station, in accordance with the

legislation and regulations of Montenegro, shall be prepared. The Tender Documents

shall include the following parts as a minimum:

Invitation for Tenders;

Instructions to Tenderers;

Forms of Tender and Tender Security;

General Conditions of Contract (Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-build,

FIDIC Yellow Book)

Particular Conditions;

Evaluation matrix/criteria;

The Tender Documents will be prepared in compliance with the rules and requirements

of the European Investment Bank, i.e. signed Financial Agreement between the EIB

and the State of Montenegro for "Montenegro Solid Waste”, and require the approval

of PROCON, and the "no objection" from the EIB, the Municipality of Cetinje and

from the Ministry for Sustainable Development and Tourism.

5.2 Task 2 Preparation of Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation of “Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite

5.2.1 Activity 2.1: Analysis of Existing Situation

The information available about the “Vrtijeljka” dumpsite is rather limited and from

2007. The information needs to be updated and the Consultant is required to prepare a

complete overview of gaps in the information. The following needs to be determined:

Approximate amount of waste being deposited on the site

Type of waste

Period for disposal and date for last disposal (to determine if the dumpsite is still in

its active phase)



11 / 17

Topographical information needs to be available. If not, a survey shall be carried out

under this project allowing for calculation of area and approximate volumes of waste, if

this cannot be established in any other way.

An assessment of the geological and hydrogeological conditions shall also be made for

the site. If necessary, water samples shall be taken and analysed in order to check the

current impact on surface and/or ground water. In the event that soil has been applied

as top layer the thickness and quality of the soil shall be checked.

The analyses of the environmental impacts of the current dumpsite may include:

Groundwater pollution,

Surface water pollution,

Landfill Gas Emissions,

Uncontrolled fires,

Wind blown litter.

Any EIA to be conducted for the remediation of the dumpsite “Vrtijeljka” is outside the

scope of this study and shall be conducted by the Municipality of Cetinje.

The activity shall be reported in a report describing the existing situation.

5.2.2 Activity 2.2: Conceptual design of the Rehabilitation of the Dumpsite

Based on the information obtained under activity 2.1, the Consultant prepares a con-

ceptual design of the rehabilitation project, including specific closure and remediation

measures for the actual site.

Emphasis shall be put on a realistic and feasible option, not only with respect to in-

vestment costs, but more importantly with respect to subsequent operation costs and

likelihood for proper maintenance of the measures. The following options are dis-

cussed:

Shaping of dumpsite surface and installation of top covers

Taking into consideration the level of seismic activities

Control of landfill gas emissions

Hydraulic measures in the aquifer

Excavation and removal of the waste

Establishment of surrounding fences

Leachate management

The most probable methodology is to clean up the site, keep the waste on the site, cov-

er the waste by a layer of low permeable soil, and re-cultivate the area.

The design includes a description of monitoring activities that are recommended to be

initiated if relevant in order to document the future situation.

The design report is subject of approval by PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje.



12 / 17

5.2.3 Activity 2.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation

Based on the analysis of existing situation, including all measures proposed and agreed

in the conceptual design report, the procurement strategy must be determined. Tender

documents for the rehabilitation, in accordance with the legislation and regulations of

Montenegro, need to be prepared. The tender documents shall include the following

parts as a minimum:

Invitation for Tenders;

Instructions to Tenderers;

General Conditions of Contract (Conditions of contract for works contract or plant

and design-build, FIDIC Red or Yellow Book);

Particular Conditions;

Requirements;

Evaluation matrix/criteria.

The procurement strategy will determine which of the contract complexes will be ap-

plied. In case the decision is to carry out the tender according to the FIDIC Red book

(Works contract), a main design project must be available, prepared by another party,

outside these TORs.

The Tender Documents will be prepared in compliance with the rules and requirements

of the European Investment Bank, i.e. signed Financial Agreement between the EIB

and the State of Montenegro for "Montenegro Solid Waste” and requires approval from

PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje and "no objection" from the EIB.

5.3 Task 3: Assistance during Tendering

The assignment will be led by the Component Project Manager who shall provide

technical assistance and on the job training to PROCON during the tendering process

and the tender opening and evaluation. This shall include as a minimum:

Planning and assistance to organize and attend pre-tender meetings, site visits, clar-

ification meetings and preparing draft responses to questions of tenderers;

Reviewing the queries raised by tenderers and preparing draft responses to be ap-

proved and distributed by PROCON to all tenderers. Assistance in preparing the

MoMs and draft tender addendum notices;

Being present in the tender opening and assistance for preparing the draft the

minutes of tender opening;

Attending to the meetings of the Evaluation Committee as an Observer and provid-

ing assistance during the evaluation process;

Prepare the draft Tender Evaluation Reports;

Assistance for any necessary post-tender correspondence with tenderers,

Assistance to PROCON during the pre-contract clarification and negotiation meet-

ings

Assistance to prepare the Contract to be submitted to the “no objection” of the EIB.



13 / 17

5.4 Outputs and planning

The project is expected to commence in May 2012.

5.4.1 Outputs and Planning related to Tasks 1

Activities/Outputs Indicative dates

Task 1 Analysis

Report on Analysis of the options

for way of collection, transport and

treatment of municipal waste

Within 4 weeks following the commencement

Siting and conceptual design of the

preferred option for a transfer sta-

tion

Within 6 working weeks following the approval of the

methodology report

Preparation of the Tender Docu-

ments for Transfer Station

Within 8 weeks following the approval of the Siting and

Conceptual Design report

5.4.2 Outputs and Planning related to Tasks 2

Activities/Outputs Indicative dates

Task 2 Preparation of Tender Documents for Rehabilitation of “Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite

Report for Analysis of Existing Sit-

uation

Within 9 working weeks following the commencement

Conceptual design of the Rehabili-

tation of the Dumpsite

Within 1 week following the approval of the analysis re-

port

Preparation of the Tender Docu-

ments for the Rehabilitation

Within 6 weeks following the approval of the conceptual

design report

6 Project Coordination and Meetings

6.1 Coordination and meetings

PROCON will coordinate all activities, including communication between the Consult-

ant and The Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism and the Municipality of

Cetinje. All activities shall be carried out in close cooperation with the appointed pro-

ject manager at PROCON.

Regular meeting shall be held with PROCON to report and discuss progress, critical

issues and all aspects of the work.

PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje will provide the Consultant with all relevant

documents, reports, maps that they have, as well as the ones they manage to provide

from the relevant institutions. The duty of the Consultant is to check the quality and

appropriateness of this information.

The assignment will be led by the Component Project Manager (CPM) who will report

to the overall Project Manager (PM) of the project. The CPM is responsible for ensur-

ing progress to plan, for coordination with PROCON and for reporting / highlighting

critical issues in project execution of their respective component.



14 / 17

The CPM will organise meetings for the discussions and review of the reports. At these

meetings the presence of PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje is required, and the

Ministry for Sustainable Development and Tourism and the EIB will be invited.

Minutes of the meeting will be prepared by the CPM who shall also ensure timely

comments and approval of the reports.

The Project Manager (PM) of the overall project is responsible for supervision of the

project, quality control and internal reporting to the environment KE and to IPF2 Team

Leader (TL) who then reports to EC DG ELARG.

6.2 Facilities for the Consultant and access to information

The IPF2 Consultant will work in the local IPF project office in Podgorica.

PROCON with assistance of the Municipality of Cetinje and MoSDT shall provide ac-

cess to all available and relevant information, maps, studies, legal documents etc. at no

cost to the Consultant.

All expenses including but not limited to taxes, fees, duties stamps etc. obligatory and

necessary for the application/follow-up/approval are outside of the scope of the Con-

sultant and shall be born by the Investor.

The cost of communications material, printing and report production is also covered by

the Consultant.

7 Experts’ profiles

The Consultant should ensure that the appropriately qualified experts are available for

each task defined above. For this project, the following staffing is foreseen:

Experts’ Profile: Component Project Manager (CPM) (senior) / Solid waste

expert

Education: A degree in environmental engineering/civil engineering or edu-

cation relevant to the tasks

Specific Require-

ments:

Minimum 10 years experiences in projects related to municipal

services (water, wastewater, solid waste etc.)

Experience of minimum 5 years in municipal waste management

services

Experience in at least 2 landfill design or landfill rehabilitation

projects according to the relevant EU Directives;

Experience in cooperation with local, regional and national gov-

ernments in the field of waste management;

General Require-

ments:

Experience as project manager in multidisciplinary projects;

Language Skills: Proficiency in oral and written English



15 / 17

Working days:

Task 1: 40 days

Task 2, 60 days

Total: 100 days

Experts’ Profile: Solid waste Expert (senior)

Education A degree in civil engineering, environmental engineering or similar educa-

tion relevant to the tasks

Specific

Requirements:

Minimum 10 years experiences in projects related to infrastructural services

(water, wastewater, solid waste etc.)

Experience with engineering design of solid waste management facilities

such as transfer stations, recycling facilities, composting etc. or dumpsite

rehabilitation and/or landfill design,

Experience with software to prepare engineering designs

General

Requirements:

Minimum 10 years of experience in multidisciplinary environmental pro-

jects;


Knowledge of the Montenegrin language will be an asset

Working days:

Task 1: 30 days

Task 2: 40 days

Total: 70 days,

Experts’ Profile: Procurement Expert (senior)

Education A degree in civil engineering, environmental engineering or equivalent edu-

cation relevant to the tasks

Specific Require-

ments:

Experience in developing tender documents in at least 2 public funded mu-

nicipal solid waste management projects;

Experience in the use of FIDIC and EIB/EBRD/WB procurement guidelines;

Procurement experience in West Balkan countries will be an asset

General Require-

ments:

Minimum 10 years of relevant experience;


Working days

Task 1: 20 days

Task 2: 30 days

Total: 50 days

Experts’ Profile: Solid Waste Expert (Junior)

Education: A degree in environmental engineering/civil Engineering or education rele-

vant to the tasks



16 / 17

Specific

Requirements:

Experience in municipal waste management projects

Experience in landfill design and/or operation or landfill rehabilitation pro-

jects according to the relevant EU Directives;

General Require-

ments:

Experience in multidisciplinary projects; Minimum 5 years of relevant expe-

rience.


Knowledge of the Montenegrin language will be an asset

Working days:

Task 1: 35 days

Task 2: 60 days

Total: 95 days

8 Incidental expenses

The Project office for this assignment will be in Podgorica. As defined in the IPF2

Contract, the incidental expenses in this contract will be the cost of travels of the STE

experts within the region to/from the Project Office – not including the transfers from

their home offices to the Project Office –, per diems of the experts during such mis-

sions when overnight stays are necessary. In addition, if necessary, field surveys will

be carried out to be included in incidental expenses, see section 10.

9 Requirements for Reporting and Deliverables

All reports will be delivered in electronic copy to PROCON and the municipality of

Cetinje. All reports shall be prepared in English. PROCON will ensure that the munici-

pality of Cetinje, and the MoSDT will receive a copy for commenting.

All other project outputs and communication will be in English. Minutes of Meetings

shall be prepared and distributed to the participants by the Consultant during the Pro-

ject Activities. Draft Minutes of Meetings must be commented within seven calendar

days.

The comments to the draft final outputs shall be submitted to the Consultant in maxi-

mum 3 weeks. Following the receipt of comments on Draft Final Outputs, the Final

Outputs will be produced in two weeks and will be submitted for approval to PROCON

and for their no-objection to the EIB.

The final approval of the PROCON should be sent to the Consultant with an official

letter. The no-objection of the lead IFI and of the Promoter may be sent by letter and/or

by electronic message.

Following the approval of the Tender Documents for the transfer station and for the

rehabilitation of the dumpsite and closure of the project PROCON and for their no-

objection to the EIB shall draft in maximum 7 days a “works completion certificate”.



17 / 17

The final approval of the PROCON should be sent to the Consultant with an official

letter. The no-objection of the lead IFI and of the Promoter may be sent by letter and/or

by electronic message.

After these have been received, reports are submitted to EC DG ELARG, together with

the above approval/no-objection.

10 Budget

The indicative budget for these services is EUR 194,360 including EUR 8,340 for con-

tingencies and EUR 19,220 for Incidental expenses.

Prilog 2

Prilog 3

D.O.O. p r o j e c t i n g , e n g i n e e r i n g and s u p e r v i s i o n

E L A B O R A T E

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUND FOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING

SANITARY LANDFILL ’’VRTIJELJKA’’ FOR CITY OF CETINJE

NIKSIC, September, 2012.

E L A B O R A T E


SANITARY LANDFILL ’’VRTIJELJKA’’ FOR CITY OF CETINJE

PROJECT MANAGER: GENERAL MANAGER:

______________________________ ____________________________ Andrija Delibašić, M.Sc. geol. Vukašin Gredić, M.Sc. geol.


SANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE

Study : THE GEOTECHNICALPROPERTIES OF THE

GROUND FOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING SANITARY LANDFILL ‘’VRTIJELJKA’’ FOR CITY OF CETINJE

Holder of Elaborate: "GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o., Nikšić Project manager: Andrija Delibašić, M.Sc. geology Associates: Dragomir Vukašinović, M.Sc. geology Vukašin Gredić, M.Sc. geology Issuing date: September, 2012.



TABLE OF CONTENTS: Strana 1. INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………………….... 1 2. POSITION OF EXPLORATION AREA ……..……………………….. 2 3. TYPE AND SCOPE OF PERFORMED WORKS.....….…………….. 2 3.1. Field works ……………………………….......…….………....... 2 3.2. Laboratory analysis................................................................. 3 3.3. Cabinet works …...……………………………………….....….. 3 4. EXPLORATION RESULTS ...……………..…………………………... 4 4.1. Morphological characteristics of the terrain…………………... 4 4.2. Geological structure of terrain ….……………………………… 4 4.3. Hydrogeological characteristics of the terrain ……………….. 5 4.4. Seismicity of the terrain …………………..…………….…….. 5 4.5. The modern geological processes and phenomena ……….. 6 4.6. Engineering-geological characteristics of selected areas ….. 6 5. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LANDFILL….. 8 6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROJECT MANAGERS AND CONTRACTORS... 10 7. CONCLUSION .................................................................................. 11 LITERATURE AND FUND DOCUMENTATION….............................. 12



LIST OF GRAPHICAL APENDIX: 1. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA, R 1:25 000, 2. GEOLOGICAL MAP OF WINDER STUDY AREA, R 1:25 000, 3. ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL TERRAIN MAP, R 1:1 000, 4. GEOTECHICAL CROSS-SECTION OF TERRAIN 1-1’ I 2-2’, R 1:500, 5. ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL PROFILES OF RESEARCH BOREHOLES, R 1:100, 6. ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL PROFILES OF RESEARCH TRIAL PITS, R 1:50. THE DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL:

1. RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF SAMPLES



strana 1

1. INTRODUCTION

"GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o. from Niksic performed detailed geotechnical field explorations of existing sanitary landfill "Vrtijeljka", city of Cetinje, for the reconstruction Study purpose based on the accepted offer, number 0606/012 dating from 06.06.2012, by the Investor of the project. With its implementation the Elaborate will be done to obtain necessary geotechnical basis for reconstruction Study.

Exploration has consisted of field, laboratory and cabinet work. From the field work was carried out reconnaissance of the site, engineering- geological mapping of the field, drilling exploratory wells, core mapping of the exploration wells, digging of exploration trial pits and mapping of it, sampling for laboratory testing, installation piezometric structures in boreholes and geotechnical supervision of field work. In the laboratory was carried out detail analysis of samples. Subsequently, based on the results obtained and data collected from the fund documentation and literature, Elaborate on geotechnical properties of the terrain has been done for sanitary landfill reconstruction Study purpose.

In the Study are presented data on the morphology, geological structure, hydrogeological characteristics and seismic properties of the ground as well as the engineering-geological properties of the specific formations. In the specific chapters the geotechnical conditions for re-construction of the landfill has been presented as well as recommendations for project managers.

On the performance of field and laboratory work and in Elaborate work out Dragomir Vukašinović M.Sc. geology, Andrija Delibasic M.Sc. geology and Vukašin Gredić M.Sc. geology have been participated.

The works were carried out in August and September 2012.



strana 2

2. POSITION OF EXPLORATION AREA

Location of the existing sanitary landfill is on the left side of the main road Cetinje-Budva, locality Vrtijeljka. Landfill location is situated about 1 km from the main road and is connected with the local road. Exploration area, geodetically mapped, is situated on area of approximately 4.50 ha and existing sanitary landfill occupies area of some 1.65 ha.

Location is presented In Appendix No. 1.

3. TYPE AND SCOPE OF PERFORMED WORKS 3.1. Field works

Next field works have been performed: o reconnaissance of the micro-location; aimed at preliminary detection of

location and research activities planning;

o engineering-geological mapping of the terrain; was performed on the entire site that has been geodetically mapped around (4.5 ha). For field mapping, method of spring and engineering-geological processes detection was used. Engineering-geological map of the terrain is presented in appendix 3;

o exploration drilling; 6 exploration geomechanical wells has been drilled

with depths from 3.0 to 15.0m. Successively with the drilling of the wells, core of the boreholes has been mapped. Engineering-geological profiles of the exploration wells are given in Appendixes No. 5. The following table provides an overview of the performed exploration wells:

Table No 1: Performed exploration wells:

Well Depth (m) Coordinate Y Coordinate X Elevation Z

B-1 3.00 4 691 752.15 6 578 141.36 756.10 B-2 3.00 4 691 744.38 6 578 179.92 755.35 B-3 15.00 4 691 749.50 6 578 208.14 753.75 B-4 15.00 4 691 692.46 6 578 153.71 755.70 B-5 3.00 4 691 704.26 6 578 141.22 757.45 B-6 3.00 4 691 710.27 6 578 127.01 757.65



strana 3

o the installation of piezometric construction; in performed exploration wells 42.0 m length of piezometric structure has been installed. Piezometric structure is pipe with the cover both made from PVC with bottom perforations;

o digging of exploration trial pits; exploration trial pit was dug to the depth of 1.0 m. After was mapped. Engineering-geological profile is given in Appendixes No. 6. The following table provides an overview of the performed trial pit:

Table No 2: Performed exploration pit:

Coordinate Elevation Pit mark Dimension (m) Y X Z

R-1 2.50 x 0.50 x 1.00 4 691 678.33 6 578 138.56 755.10

o taking of samples for laboratory geotechnical analysis; during mapping of the core exploration boreholes and exploration pit 8 samples of the soil sample and 2 rock samples were taken, as well as 1 sample for Proctor and CBR test.

o the expert-geotechnical supervision was performed continuously during performance of field exploration works by the geotechnical engineer.

3.2. Laboratory analysis

Soil samples from sanitary landfill were taken. Partial geomechanical analyses have been performed on taken soil samples. Only identification-classification tests were performed with determination of: lithology, specific gravity, density and dry density.

Rock samples were determined with: density, compressive strength, angle of internal friction and cohesion.

Sample from exploration pit was tested for moisture condition with Proctor test and also CBR values were determined.

3.3. Cabinet works In cabinet, the interpretation of results of exploration work has been

done, also its processing and synthesis with data from the fund documentation and literature. Based on all of that, the Elaborate on the geotechnical properties of the terrain for reconstruction Study of an existing sanitary landfill, city of Cetinje locality “Vrtijeljka”, has been done.



strana 4

4. EXPLORATION RESULTS

4.1. Morphological characteristics of the terrain Morphology of sanitary landfill "Vrtijeljka" location is typical Karst with

characteristic landforms like sinkholes, depressions and reefs. Landfill plateau depicts with size (100.0 m wide and 120.0 m long), with to slopes spreading one to the East and second to the South with inclinations 35º to 45º. Elevation of the site is from 1080 m to 1176 m above sea level. Location morphology is presented in engineering-geological map and profiles given in Appendixes No. 3 and No. 4.

4.2. Geological structure of terrain Geological structure of terrain can be seen on Basic Geological Map

"Kotor" 1:100 000 with interpreter (Institute for Geological and Geophysical Research, Belgrade, 1962-1969). Terrain of wider exploration includes Upper Triassic formations (T3) of dolomitic limestones and massive limestones, gradationally developing from Ladinian (T2

2) limestones with chert. Dolomitic limestones and dolomites are widely distributed on area, going to the South, from Cetinje to Vrela i Očinići. Dolomites are usually in tick banks, rarely stratified or massive, changing occasionally with dominant limestones. Blocks are separated but without apparent continuality.

Youngest, Quaternary depositions consist from deluvial (dl) red clay

dominantly seen in depressions and sinkholes, while rarely seen on terrain surface. Fractures and caverns in limestones are filled with red clay and fine debris.

Terrain of wider exploration area by the geotectonic structure belongs to “High karst” zone and “Old Montenegro” anticlinorium (axis is dipping Southeast) changing to “lower Zeta” sinclinorium. Paleorelief is cross-sected with faults differently orientated. Deep faults were mapped on this area; generally spreading Northwest-Southeast and Northwest-Southeast are also directions of seismic activity.

Geological map of the wider area is presented in Appendix No. 2



strana 5

4.3. Hydrogeological characteristics of the terrain Based on hydrogeological characteristics and functions of the terrain

very well water permeable rocks and complexes were depicted.

As permeable rocks of fracture-karst porosity in the terrain we can sort out all the carbonate rocks with the exception of solid dolomites who appear very rarely. Intensive mechanical separation and degree of karstification indicate that prevails karst porosity and such terrains are without surface waters. The terrain made of very well water permeable rocks forms scattered karts aquifer type. On exploration area fractures, caverns and depressions, that usually accompany faults, can be seen. They are the main sinking zones on the site. Water that falls on the ground quickly, through a network of open fractures, caverns and caves infiltrate deep into the ground. At great depth scattered karst aquifer is formed. Discharge of this aquifer is through the spring of Crnojevića River (Obodska springs). Karstification base is very deep in this part of the terrain, almost to the level of Skadar Lake.

Deluvial clays with debris are classified as low permeability rocks of intergranular and capillary porosity. Their distribution on the surface is minimal, and they do not have a significant impact on the hydrogeological characteristics of the field.

During exploration drilling (August 2012.) there was no underground

water appearance in exploration wells.

4.4. Seismicity of the terrain

According to the map of seismic microzonation of urban areas Cetinje with Ivanova Korita, Njeguši and Rijeka Crnojevića, this location is a part of seismic area B3. For the mentioned area B3, the maximum expected earthquake is with intensity of VII degree MCS scale. Seismic parameters for return periods of time for 50, 100 and 200 years are:

Table No 3: seismic parameters

Zone Characteristic zones of the terrain Return period t (god)

Maximum acceleration

of the soil amax

Seismic coefficient

ks

50 0.12 0.03 100 0.17 0.04 B3

Limestone and dolomite complexes, stratified and banked in textures, tectonically folded and karstified. 200 0.25 0.06



strana 6

4.5. The modern geological processes and phenomena

From modern geological processes and phenomena at the site of

exploration planar erosion and karstification are present. Planar erosion has affected the entire field and the intensity is

different depending on the type of environment in which it takes place. Mostly eroded surface deluvial sediments are subject to planar erosion. In the limestone dominant formation, planar erosion intensity is low.

Karstification is expressed in the limestone since the limestone is

highly tectonically fractured. It is estimated that karstification depth goes up to several hundred meters. In terms of engineering-geological characteristics terrain is stable.

4.6. Engineering-geological characteristics of selected areas Based on the analysis of existing documentation relating to the

location and other related terrains, engineering-geological location mapping and exploration drilling can be concluded that the field is basically built out of solid rock (limestone and dolomite). At one end of location is existing landfill. Sections viewed from the surface are: • Mound (DR, PR)n - an artificial mound, and materials of the existing

landfill (in terrain profile it is section numbered 1). Material composition is heterogeneous, unsorted, medium consolidated. It is compiled from debris and limestone blocks, dust and various municipal waste. It covers part of the site. Mound thickness is variable, from minimal to over 10.0 m (central part of the landfill between wells B-3 and B-4). According to building standards GN-200 this material belongs to Class II and III of the excavation. Physical and mechanical parameters of this section are not considered as a landfill material is not sorted and there is a large range of values (from limestone blocks to the waste of plastic, metal, wood or construction debris).

• Limestone (K, D) - massive dolomitic limestone or dolomite that forms

the base and the back of the field to a wider area (in terrain profile it is section numbered 2). These are massive rocks, fractured on surface, degraded and karstified, whitish in colour. When drilling or digging this dolomitic limestone is broken into pieces, debris or dust. Fractures and caverns in the surface zone are enlarged by karstification and filled with



strana 7

red clay and limestone debris. Limestones are stable and well-supporting formation. The water level is deep in the ground. According to building standards GN-200 this material belongs to the category V to VI of the excavation. A good basis for founding. Physical and mechanical parameters of this environment (based on founding documentation and immediate field assessment) are given in the following table:

Table 4: Physical-mechanical parameters for limestone

Parameters Range of the values γγγγ (kN/m3) 26.0 - 27.0

ϕϕϕϕ (0) 30.0 - 35.0 c (kN/m2) 400.0 - 500.0 qu (kN/m2) 1000.0 - 15000.0 E (MPa) 1700.0 - 2000.0

νννν 0.25 - 0.28

Engineering-geological units are shown in Appendixes No.4, 5 and 6.



strana 8

5. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LANDFILL

Geotechnical conditions for reconstruction of the landfill are complex. Section that is favourable in geotechnical terms for construction of necessary facilities is the limestone section. On the site they are partially covered with a thick layer of the existing landfill. Landfill itself is not suitable for any construction on it. If any facility is planned to be build it is required to remove the landfill from the site and perform the founding in the limestone.

Allowed load capacity of limestone is good while the subsidence is

negligible because it is virtually undeformable. To calculate the allowable loads Goodman's formula for ultimate bearing capacity of foundations in fractured rock formations:

[ ])2/45(1 2 ϕ++= tgqq uf Where are: qf - limit load of the foundation in the fractured rocks qu - uniaxial compressive strength of rocks under the foundation ϕ - angle of internal friction of the rock mass under the foundation.

Permitted load qa is obtained when the ultimate bearing capacity is reduced for the safety factor value (qa=qf/Fs). Value of the safety factor Fs range from 3 to 5. In this case, the adopted value for Fs is 5. The adopted values for parameters used in the calculation are:

ϕ = 30o, qu = 1200 kN/m2, Fs = 5 Result of calculation:

qf = qu ( )[ ]2/4521 ϕ++ tg - limit load qf = 1200 ( )[ ]2/304521 ++ tg = 4800 kN/m2 qa = qf / Fs - allowable load

qa = 4800/5 = 960 kN/m2

As it can be seen from the calculation allowable load of the substrate is high. Subsidence is negligible since it is practically undeformable formation.



strana 9

Limestone is good in terms of allowable load, subsidence and stability. It is not suitable in terms of hydrogeological properties since it is tectonically fractured, faulted, cracked and karstified, high permeable rock. All the water that falls on the ground infiltrates deep into the ground where they form scattered karst aquifer. This aquifer is discharged through springs of Crnojevića River (Obodska springs). This means that the water takes all pollution from the landfill deep underground.

It is necessary to provide waterproof basis for future landfill, waters

from landfill should not be washed down and drained in the ground without purification.



strana 10

6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROJECT MANAGERS AND CONTRACTORS

In the design and construction of the facilities to keep in mind the following recommendations:

� excavation for the facilities foundations can be performed completely by

machines, with excavator and pikamers, since the material belongs to the II and III to V and VI category excavation by GN-200 categorisation,

� landfill has poor geotechnical properties on one side so it needs to be

removed if any facilities are planned there,

� all facilities should be founded in the limestone since they have good geotechnical properties,

� Large fractures and caverns if they occur in the initial excavation is

necessary to clean of red clay and debris and space should be filled with broken stone or lean concrete,

� for future landfill waterproof surface at the basis should be provided

since limestone basis is well-permeable and karstified, � wastewaters from the landfill must be purified before being released to

the ground, � geotechnical engineers presence is recommended in the execution of

foundation excavation and groundwork.



strana 11

7. CONCLUSION Landfill terrain site "Vrtijeljka" in Cetinje from engineering-geological aspect is built from underlying limestones. At one end is existing landfill. Foundation conditions are generally favourable in geotechnical but are problematic in terms of hydrogeological conditions. Location is stable under natural conditions.

From the hydrogeological point of view, the terrain is one of the well-permeable, fractured and karstic porosity. The water level is deep inside the ground where it forms a scattered karts aquifer.

The facility is in seismic zone with the expected maximum earthquake intensity of VIII degree MCS scale.

Permitted load of limestone as a base for foundation of buildings is

high (over 500 kN/m2), while the subsidence is negligible. Basic excavations can be carried out completely by machines. Excavation of foundations and groundwork should be run with geotechnical monitoring. Nikšić, September 2012. Project manager: ________________________ Andrija Delibašić, M.Sc. geology



strana 12

LITERATURE AND FUND DOCUMENTATION

• Antonijević R. et al., (1962-1969): Basic geological map of "Kotor" 1:100 000 with an interpreter, Institute for Geological and Geophysical Research, Belgrade,

• Jokić D., Ivanović K. et al., (1983): Seismogeological basis and seismic microregionazation of urban area Cetinje wi th Njeguši, Ivanova Korita and Rijeka Crnojevi ća, Institute of Geological Exploration SR Montenegro - Titograd,

• Radulović M., (2000): Hydrogeology of Montenegro karst, Special

edition, book XVIII, Podgorica,

• Fund documentation: "GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o., Nikšić.



GRAPHICAL APPENDIX



THE DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL

Naziv podnosioca zahtjeva: Objekat: Deponija "Vrtijeljka", Opština CetinjeBroj zahtjeva/ugovora: Vrsta materijala: tloDatum podnošenja zahtjeva: Broj uzoraka: 10 8Adresa: Datum uzorkovanja: avgust 2012. godineTelefon/fax: / Zahtijevano ispitivanje: identifikaciono-klasifikaciona i otporno-deformabilna svojstva po standardima

Uzorkovao: "GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o., Nikšić

γ γd γs e n W LL PL PI CI φ c

(%) (%) > 60.0 2.0-60.0 0.06-2.0 0.06-0.002 <0.002 0-50 50-100 100-200 200-400 (O) (kPa)

B-1 (0.70-1.00) 1.88 1.76 2.63 0.49 33.08 6.82 10 42 17 29 2

B-2 (2.20-2.50) 1.92 1.81 2.62 0.45 30.92 6.08 21 44 18 14 3

B-3 (1.40-1.70) 1.89 1.77 2.64 0.49 32.95 6.78 16 38 30 12 4

B-3 (3.00-3.30) 1.95 1.83 2.68 0.46 31.72 6.56 10 41 15 34 0

B-4 (1.70-2.00) 1.97 1.86 2.66 0.43 30.08 5.91 6 27 21 42 4

B-4 (5.50-5.80) 1.90 1.81 2.58 0.43 29.84 4.97 5 26 31 34 4

B-5 (2.00-2.30) 1.98 1.85 2.60 0.41 28.85 7.03 0 42 16 38 4

B-6 (0.20-0.50) 1.97 1.84 2.65 0.44 30.57 7.07 9 33 19 34 5

N.P.

N.P.

IZVJEŠTAJ O ISPITIVANJU BROJ __12/08/012__

US

CS

N.P.

N.P.

N.P.

TABELARNI PRIKAZ REZULTATA LABORATORIJSKIH ISPITIVA NJA

modul stišljivosti Mv (MPa)

(%)

oznaka uzorka

dubina uzorkovanja

frakcija

(g/cm3)

N.P.

N.P.

N.P.

DATUM: avgust 2012. god., Nikšić strana 1/1 Prilog broj 1.

L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T S - R O C K Borhole number

Sampling depth

Water contenet

W n e

(%) %

1 4.8 8 0.09

2 4.20 2 0.024.2 2.690 0.9832.644 21.442 0.32B-4 (10.6-11.0) 35.30

v

0.31243212.437

Young's modulus

E

MPa

Porosity

2.667 0.91417.84 1.1

No

Uniaxial compress. strenght Poin load test

B-3 (6.7-7.0)

Unit weight

MPa MPa g/cm 3

Poisson's ratio

g/cm 3

σσσσc σσσσi γγγγw γγγγs

Specif. gravity Density index

Location: Vrtijeljka-Cetinje

Sample: B-1_0.7-1.0

fractions %> 60 102.0-60.0 420.06-2.0 170.002-0.06 29< 0.002 2

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHART

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%

DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšić standard: JUS U.B1.018


Sample: B-2_2.2-2.5

fractions %> 60 212.0-60.0 440.06-2.0 180.002-0.06 14< 0.002 3


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%



Sample: B-3_1.4-1.7

fractions %> 60 162.0-60.0 380.06-2.0 300.002-0.06 12< 0.002 4


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%



Sample: B-3_3.0-3.3

fractions %> 60 102.0-60.0 410.06-2.0 150.002-0.06 34< 0.002 0


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%



Sample: B-4_1.7-2.0

fractions %> 60 62.0-60.0 270.06-2.0 210.002-0.06 42< 0.002 4


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%



Sample: B-4_5.5-5.8

fractions %> 60 52.0-60.0 260.06-2.0 310.002-0.06 34< 0.002 4


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%



Sample: B-5_2.0-2.3

fractions %> 60 02.0-60.0 420.06-2.0 160.002-0.06 38< 0.002 4


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%



Sample: B-6_0.2-0.5

fractions %> 60 92.0-60.0 330.06-2.0 190.002-0.06 34< 0.002 5


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

grain size (mm))

perc

enta

ge p

assi

ng (

%


Porijeklo materijala:

Laboratorijski brojREZULTATI ISPITIVANJA:

ρρρρd max = g/cm3 ;

g/cm3 ;

LEGENDA:Linija zasićenja pri stepenu zasićenosti Sr=100 %Intpretacija krive Lagranžovim polinomomEksperimentalne tačke

Ispitao: Intepretirao: Ovjerio:

101

E=

6.7 %

Specifična težina

ρρρρs = 2.67

1.84

w opt =kNm/m3600

Objekat:

PROKTOROV OPITVrijeljak Cetnje

R-1

1.30

1.35

1.40

1.45

1.50

1.55

1.60

1.65

1.70

1.75

1.80

1.85

1.90

1.95

2.00

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Vlažnost w (%)

Suv

a za

prem

insk

a m

asa

ρd

(g /

cm3

)

Vrtijeljaka Cetinje

R-1

0 00 0

PROKTOROV OPIT

E =

zapreminska masa ρ d max =

600

(%)

(g/cm3)

kN m/m3

6.18

1.84

6.2

1.83

6.19

7

0

1.8

CBR

6.2

13

30

9

0 0

10 14

Objekat:

Porijeklo materijala:

PODACI ISPITIVANJA

(%)10.2) =ρ d max

Ispitao: Intepretirao: Overio:

Maksimalna suva

Optimalna vlažnost w opt = 6.7

1.84

( %Vlažnost posle opita (%)

Suva zaprem.masa (g/cm3)

Bubrenje ( % )

Vlažnost prije opita (%)

100

CBR vrijednost (%)

Broj udaraca - N

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14C B R ( % )

Suv

a za

prem

insk

a m

asa

(g/c

m3 )

Prilog 4

Questionnaire for "Vrtijeljka" dumpsite in Cetinje

Team comments

Mr. Popivoda answers (from PUC Cetinje)

1. Location data?

Already described in Task 1: Analysis Report

2. What year begun waste disposal on dumpsite „Vrtijeljka“?

1977 (operating for 35 years)

Analysis Report says 1987 (25 years). Zdenka will check once again which year is stated in official Montenegrin documents.

3. Estimated waste amount on dumpsite „Vrtijeljka“ (in m3)?

Approx. 490.000 cubic meters (around 35.000 cubic meters per year i.e. 14 tons)

4. Waste disposal area, with specified area that is still in use, and recultivated area?

Waste disposal area, 150 times 100 i.e. around 15.000 sq. meters.

Dumpsite is covering periodically with levelling towards entrance gate (preparation for winter period).

There is no area recultivated according to standards. When say dumpsite sanitation, they include only covering dumpsite periodically with ground cover layer.

5. In relation to previous question describe the way of recultiavation: type ad thickness of cover layer?

-

6. Waste amount disposing to dumpsite „Vrtijeljka“(daily (in tons and cubic meters)/yearly (in tons and cubic meters))?

100 cubic meters per day i.e. 11-14 tons

16 cubic meters of pressed waste per day

7. Number of days of waste disposal on dumpsite, per year?

Every day i.e. 365 days per year (not in full capacity)

8. Number of inhabitants covered by the waste collection service?

See Analysis Report

Urban area is approx. 100% covered plus two Nature Parks, Skadar Lake and Lovcen Mountain.

9. Is the waste scattered along the edges of the dumpsite?

Yes, partly along the edges.

10. Vicinity of watercourses/water sources/water intake?

No watercourses/water sources/water intake in the vicinity of dumpsite. Skadar Lake is around 5000 m away.

11. If so, whether dumpsite is upstream or downstream?

-

12. Previous use of dumpsite land?

The rocky meadows, with no specific purpose at least 50 years

13. Is waste being covered after disposal?

Yes, 5-8 times per month, to assure access for trucks.

14. If being covered describe:

a. Type of material,

Ground, construction waste, available materials from excavation

b. Thickness of cover layer,

Depends on the needs, sometimes it goes to 2 or even 3 meters, but not less than 0,5m.

c. How often (daily/weekly/monthly),

5-8 times per month

d. Is cover layer being compacted and in what way?

Yes, using only weight of the truck or dredger bucket loading.

No compactors.

15. Are there any collectors of secondary raw materials? If yes, what are the estimated amounts of collected materials?

Yes, negligible amounts.

16. What is the distance of nearby residential area?

Around 500 meters, small Roma settlement

17. What is the distance of individual houses?

100 m, neighbours object, assume it is stable or similar

18. Width and quality of access road, distance of category road (e.g. state road) and distance of railway, if any?

Access road 4m wide, on some parts 6 and 7m.

500m macadam access to the dumpsite

No railway close to the dumpsite.

19. Is transmission line or other installations crosses over the dumpsite?

Transmission line is 50 m away from the dumpsite land border.

Electricity for dumpsite lightening is conducted month and a half ago. This is borrowed electricity (unofficial) for security purposes.

20. Is in the vicinity of the dumpsite any protected area (Nature Park, Natural Park, Cultural Heritage etc.) and what is their distance from the location?

No.

Prilog 5

1

ESTIMATED PRODUCTION OF THE LANDFILL GAS: To estimate the production of landfill gas was used a model for the emission of landfill gas (LandGEM), U.S. Agency for Environmental Protection (Environmental Protection Agency). The annual amount of produced methane can be determined using the following equation:

ijktin

=i j=CH eMLk=Q

100

1

1

0,14

Where:

4CHQ annual amount CH4 (m3/god);

i increment(1 godina); n initial year for the waste acceptance; j increment (0,1 godina);

k speed of forming CH4 (god-1);

0L potential capacity of forming CH4 (m3/t);

iM mass of waste deposited in the i-year (t);

ijt age of the j- section of waste mass Mi deposited in the i-year;

Theparameters used foragiven model are: Start depositing 2012

10,004 god=k

tm=L /100 30

content CH4 : 49 vol. % content CO2 : 50 vol. % other : 1 vol. %

2

Estimated production of landfill gas at the landfill , depending on the year of disposal is: TABLE 4

Year Biogas-total Methan Carbon Dioxide

m3/year m3/h m3/year m3/h m3/year m3/h

1987 15543,6 1,8 7616,36 0,9 7771,8 0,9 1988 30602,1 3,5 14995,02 1,7 15301,0 1,7 1989 45195,4 5,2 22145,77 2,5 22597,7 2,6 1990 59889,1 6,8 29345,65 3,3 29944,5 3,4 1991 74785,8 8,5 36645,06 4,2 37392,9 4,3 1992 90276,3 10,3 44235,40 5,0 45138,2 5,2 1993 105374,3 12,0 51633,39 5,9 52687,1 6,0 1994 120093,6 13,7 58845,87 6,7 60046,8 6,9 1995 134716,2 15,4 66010,95 7,5 67358,1 7,7 1996 150385,7 17,2 73688,98 8,4 75192,8 8,6 1997 166163,6 19,0 81420,15 9,3 83081,8 9,5 1998 181518,0 20,7 88943,83 10,2 90759,0 10,4 1999 196464,8 22,4 96267,75 11,0 98232,4 11,2 2000 211358,6 24,1 103565,72 11,8 105679,3 12,1 2001 226145,3 25,8 110811,18 12,6 113072,6 12,9 2002 241086,8 27,5 118132,55 13,5 120543,4 13,8 2003 256358,1 29,3 125615,48 14,3 128179,1 14,6 2004 271337,5 31,0 132955,38 15,2 135668,8 15,5 2005 286307,5 32,7 140290,68 16,0 143153,8 16,3 2006 300960,6 34,4 147470,70 16,8 150480,3 17,2 2007 315506,9 36,0 154598,36 17,6 157753,4 18,0 2008 330317,2 37,7 161855,44 18,5 165158,6 18,9 2009 345756,8 39,5 169420,84 19,3 172878,4 19,7 2010 361193,0 41,2 176984,55 20,2 180596,5 20,6 2011 375083,3 42,8 183790,81 21,0 187541,6 21,4 2012 389491,8 44,5 190850,97 21,8 194745,9 22,2 2013 410930,0 46,9 201355,71 23,0 205465,0 23,5 2014 394817,2 45,1 193460,44 22,1 197408,6 22,5 2015 379336,2 43,3 185874,75 21,2 189668,1 21,7 2016 364462,2 41,6 178586,49 20,4 182231,1 20,8 2017 350171,5 40,0 171584,02 19,6 175085,7 20,0 2018 336441,0 38,4 164856,11 18,8 168220,5 19,2 2019 323249,0 36,9 158392,01 18,1 161624,5 18,5 2020 310574,2 35,5 152181,37 17,4 155287,1 17,7 2021 298396,4 34,1 146214,25 16,7 149198,2 17,0 2022 286696,1 32,7 140481,11 16,0 143348,1 16,4 2023 275454,6 31,4 134972,77 15,4 137727,3 15,7 2024 264653,9 30,2 129680,41 14,8 132326,9 15,1 2025 254276,7 29,0 124595,57 14,2 127138,3 14,5 2026 244306,3 27,9 119710,11 13,7 122153,2 13,9 2027 234726,9 26,8 115016,21 13,1 117363,5 13,4 2028 225523,2 25,7 110506,36 12,6 112761,6 12,9 2029 216680,3 24,7 106173,34 12,1 108340,1 12,4 2030 208184,1 23,8 102010,22 11,6 104092,1 11,9 2031 200021,1 22,8 98010,35 11,2 100010,6 11,4 2032 192178,2 21,9 94167,30 10,7 96089,1 11,0 2033 184642,8 21,1 90474,95 10,3 92321,4 10,5 2034 177402,8 20,3 86927,38 9,9 88701,4 10,1 2035 170446,7 19,5 83518,91 9,5 85223,4 9,7 2036 163763,4 18,7 80244,08 9,2 81881,7 9,3 2037 157342,2 18,0 77097,67 8,8 78671,1 9,0 2038 151172,7 17,3 74074,63 8,5 75586,4 8,6 2039 145245,1 16,6 71170,12 8,1 72622,6 8,3

3

TABLE 5

LANDFILL GAS PRODUCTION RECAP. FOR THE PERIOD BETWEEN 2012 – 2064

TOTAL PRODUCTION OF LANDFILL GAS 12203007,08 m3/yearTOTAL PRODUCTION OF METHANE 5979473,47 m3/yearCARBON DIOXIDE TOTAL PRODUCTION 6101503,54 m3/yearMAXIMUM PRODUCTION OF LANDFILL GAS 46,91 m3/hMAXIMUM PRODUCTION OF METHANE 22,99 m3/hCARBON DIOXIDE MAXIMUM PRODUCTION 23,45 m3/h MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GAS PRODUCTION OF THE LANDFILL GAS

160,3E-4 m3/tday

MAXIMUM SPECIFIC PRODUCTION OF METHANE 785,7E-5 m3/tday

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

2014

2017

2020

2023

2026

2029

2032

2035

2038

0,0

50000,0

100000,0

150000,0

200000,0

250000,0

300000,0

350000,0

400000,0

450000,0

Biogas-total m3/year

Methan m3/year

Carbon Dioxide m3/year

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastruk turnim projektima ... postojece situacije na...

Documents

Transcript of Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastruk turnim projektima ... postojece situacije na...