Https Polylearn.calpoly.edu AY 2014-2015 Pluginfile.php 547426 Mod Resource Content 1...
description
Transcript of Https Polylearn.calpoly.edu AY 2014-2015 Pluginfile.php 547426 Mod Resource Content 1...
-
1
Motivation: A little Fun with Composites!
Nobody sails metal boards!
Carbon/Epoxy SAE fun
-
ME 412
First a little Business Adds/Drops after class today call me crazy add max (10 teams) *(3,4)
That is what I have specimens for 38ish people LAB
lots-o-reading on PLEARN print out lab handout quick read ASTM specs and Vishay strain info
BOOKs El Cartel now known as Cal Poly Store should have some by Friday?
Lets Get Going
Motivation Composite Materials Dig into some the subject Why Composites? A little on cost and manufacturing
2
-
3
Somewhat New Cal Poly Composite Work
8 foot radius wind turbine rotor Carbon/E-glass-Epoxy Vacuum-infused Bonded Root Joint
Paper study 9 meter blade MS Thesis right now Compression Molding (zero waste?) MS
Crash Energy Management Table Light-Rail Application Honeycomb Sandwich Multi-Purpose
-
More Composites Projects Supermileage Wheels
Geez 4 ish years ago Only way to learn composites mfg. by doing of course
Tooling two piece clamshell Mold and prepreg layed up in autoclave ready to go
Cured part out of mold
-
5
Composites what and why?
What is a composite?
Why Composites?
-
6
Why Composites The specifics stiffness, strength Performance Charts Misleading I thought composites were good, Biaxial-Iso laminates barely win?
Figure 2.9 Daniel and Ishai performance map of fibers used in structural composites
Figure 1-24 Jones Strength and stiffness of composite materials
-
7
Analysis Example: Specific Stiffness/Strength Calculations
Divide strength or stiffness by Weight Density In silly American units Some typical values alum vs carbon/epoxy
Carbon/Epoxy
Su1 = 350 ksi Su2 = 8ksi E1 = 27 msi E2 = 1.35 msi g = .055 lb/in3
Aluminum 7075-T6 Su = 75 ksi E = 10 msi g = .100 lb/in3
23
//
lb in inlb in =
-
8
The Specifics Advanced composites vs. metal, wood, filled polymers
Some Designer Points Wood is good, metal too Metal specific stiffness nearly
identical If loads are in one direction
composites are phenomenal But if you miss the loads,
composites will fail, transverse properties are scary low
Fiber must be in the direction of loads!
Force, Flow Load Pathare keys for any structural designer (DESIGN the FBD) then pick the material
Get control of the geometry early for composites to have a chance, metal replacement hard, black alum is inefficient
File: Material_specifics.xls
Material System Su E Weight Su/Dens E/DensityDensity
(ksi) (msi) (lb/in3) 103 in 106 inSteel
4130 (Normalized) 90 29 0.283 318 102Aermet 100 280 28 0.281 996 100
Aluminum 7075-T6 75 10.3 0.101 743 102
Titanium (6AL-4V) 150 16 0.16 938 100
Carbon (graphite)/ EpoxyHigh Modulus (Long) 170 40 0.055 3091 727High Modulus (Trans) 3.5 0.9 0.055 64 16
Int Modulus (long) 350 27 0.06 5833 450Int Modulus (trans) 8 1.35 0.06 133 23
AS4 Quasi-Iso --- 13.8 0.06 --- 231
S2 Glass/Epoxy (long) 220 5.6 0.07 3143 80S2 Glass/Epoxy (trans) 5 1.5 0.07 71 21
Nylon (30% Glass) 25 1 0.05 500 20Nylon 11 0.175 0.04 275 4
Sitka Spruce 7 1.57 0.015 467 105
-
9
What else should the designer analyst worry about when trading structural materials
Fracture Toughness (LEFM research area for composites) Fibers arrest cracks but fiber is directional Hard to put fibers through thickness, delams (stitch and needle)
Impact Strength (again still active research area) strength after impact, FOD again composites can be good (F1, Indy cars, fighter aircraft)
Fatigue endurance Fibers again stop crack progression Composites can be very good in fatigue (rotorcraft blades) Look out for the other (joints and environment)
Creep Fibers good, matrix not so good, data?
-
10
Other material design criteria continued Hardness, wear
polymer matrix is soft. Wear is proportional to pressure, velocity, hardness
Dimensional stability can be good or bad, directional and of course matrix and fiber dependant
Thermal Stability Same as dimensional, but watch out for high temps (which are really low
relative to metals) with polymer matrix composites. There are metal and refractory matrix materials as well!
Hygroscopic sensitivity Matrix swells and strains with water, watch out for chemical compatibility
Weatherability Consider paints and coatings
Erosion resistance Corrosion resistance
Watch out for batteries at your joints! Consult galvanic series, coat and shield
Conductivity Electrical conducts or doesnt conduct (lightning strike, EMI shielding) Thermal
-
11
So composites have SPECIFIC advantages. Many other issues not addressed yet?
How to make it? Cost or life-cycle cost, LCC?
Raw material cost (200$/lb in 70s to 20$/lb?) by 1990s for commercial apps)
Design Cost Component fabrication costs Assembly cost Operating cost (weight, fuel transportation
apps, launch) Maintenance cost Salvage value, cost
Initial costs
Life-cycle costs
Sustainability recycle and reuse issues are active research areas and problematic for thermosetting resin systems!
-
12
Composites cost advantage? When weight matters compost can win, the relative value of weight savings
What is the Cross-Over Point for AUTOs Trucks ETC?? 6 bucks a gallon? An interesting economics problem Now? BMW I3 next slide
Material utilization factor can be good
Mufac = raw matl. Weight / final part weight Or it costly put Ti, Alum chips on the floor
Jones, Fig 1-27 Value of Weight Savings in Structures (old data but relative nature still applies)
-
BMW I3 No Longer Urban CONCEPT Vehicle
124 mpg equivalent Range 81mi
http://blogs.motortrend.com/1501_is_bmw_i3_profitable.html The quirky-looking BMW i3 is the first carbon-fiber-intensive car thats both affordable and built in significant volumes. Those two qualifiers might fit more comfortably in quotation marks, given the $42,300 starting price and modest 100-a-day production rate, but theyre apt by comparison with the Lambos, McLarens, Ferraris, and Boeing 787s also built of the tough black fibers.
13
-
14
Composites Cost Advantage?
Labor cost is directly related to part count. Composite structures are generally composed of fewer parts Integral part design is usually lighter too, they go hand in
hand. But this can all evaporate if a lay-up takes many technicians
many hours to accomplish, or you scrap huge parts. This is all controlled by design. One must think about this up
front and all along with mfg. engineers. Composites must be concurrently engineered for costs to be
competitive.
-
15
Brief Overview Manufacturing Techniques
Cost analysis leads us to manufacturing or fabrication You all will be inventing this. But lets briefly review current practice,
methods some of which were discussed in ABC book. What is the oldest, simplest and most commonly used method for
fabrication of a composite with a thermosetting resin system? Advantages, disadvantages?
Which method may be best for tanks or torque tube driveshaft medium or high volume production?
What is VARTM and RTM?
-
Brief Overview Manufacturing Techniques
1. Filament Winding 2. Tape Wrapping 3. Fiber Placement 4. Autoclave Layup 5. Bladder molding 6. Liquid Molding (VRI, RTM, VARTM) 7. Injection Molding, SRIM 8. Sheet Molding Compound (Compression
Molding
16
-
17
Always Think About How to Build It?
This is not restricted to Composites! Composites = Concurrent Engineering
All at once team thinks about Shape Materials Mfg. Design
Tools Process and QC
Analysis/Design Layup schedule Lamina Type
Joints, Bonds, Inserts Test Plan