HOW TO PERFORM A PEER REVIEW

An Academic presentation byDr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, Phdassistance Groupwww.phdassistance.comEmail: info@phdassistance.com

GIVE A STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE FOR NEW RESEARCHERS INREVIEWING THE MANUSCRIPT

In-BriefIntroduction

Overview of the Report

Format First Read-Through

What are the considerations in the first

read Spotting potential major flaws

Outline

TODAY'S DISCUSSION

Concluding the first reading

Rejection after the first

reading To save time and

reviewCarry out the second reviewConclusion

In-Brief

PhD Manuscript Pre-Submission Peer Review allows the students writing to clarify their ideas in the content. PhD peer reviewing services exists to validate academic work

and helps to increases networking possibilities within research communities byimproving the quality of published research. Making the writing process collaborative through peer review helps students to gain experience to learn from one side and to

think carefully about the research writing.

Peer review is the process that involves various aspects in the manuscript that deem the necessary element for publication.

The PhD peer-review process ensures the manuscript is easy to comprehend, do not have any gaps.

Manuscript Writing Help determines the reliability and validity of research findings.

The reviewer should check for scientific merits its methods and research misconduct.

Int roduct ion

The structuring of the report varies based on the journal.

Some follow the informal structure, while others have a formal approach.

PhD Manuscript Peer Review Process carried out based on the journal submission guidelines and the requirements of the researchers.

Overview of the Report Format

Most of the journals do not provide strict criteria for submission.

In this case, you have a look at the other articlespublished in the journal to get an idea of structuring.

So, you should gain some knowledge about structuring to rely on your evolving style or get help from PhD Manuscript Peer Reviewing experts to have a quality document.

Informal St ructure

Other journals require a formal approach and follow strict submission guidelines.

It is an important stage when there is a presence of submission guidelines because they will ask you to address a specific format to research questions.

You need to go on your own to check the submission guidelines.

So when you want to submit your paper to the specific journal, there are formal guidelines, and that directs the structure of your review.

Formal St ructure

The first read-through is the skim read which will help you to form an initial impression of the paper and get the sense of what is an eventual recommendation made in the paper that decides the acceptance or rejection.

Professional Pre-Submission Peer Review Help you to work with the rejected document and gain strength to paper for publication.

First Read- Through

Peer Review Service for Manuscripts check for the central question addressed in writing is relevant to the study and interesting.

Peer review of the thesis is to evaluate the topic novelty and check for what it does add to the subject area compared with other published material.

Check whether the conclusions consist of evidence and argument from standard articles and also check for the relevance.

Do this paper include tables, figures and to check whether they add significance to the paper.

Contd..

What are the Considerat-ions in the First Read

It was all about spotting the major flaws that decrease the quality of the document.

Check for mistakes in the methodology part, which is the main part of the whole writing.

Check for the information gathered whether this information provides enough knowledge to the readers.

Spotting Potent ial Major Flaws

Contd..

Manuscript Peer Review a Guide check if there is a presence of a critical flaw in themanuscript and help yo correct it on the early stage, flaws such as,

Insufficient data

Statistically non-significant variants

Unclear data tables and structures

Data that disagree with your conclusion

Including data that adds arguments little weak

After completing the initial reads, consider all thosemajor flaws you found.

Write a rough draft of paragraph you came to known from evaluating the paper make the rough draft as two paragraphs.

First summarises the research question, second address the contribution of work.

It will be helpful if the journal has prescribed thereport format.

Contd..

Concluding the First Reading

It helps to draft to compose your thoughts.

After reviewing the manuscript, you have to decide whether the manuscriptis seriously flawed or it is publishable.

If you come to an opinion that the article has serious flaws, make sure you read the whole content.

It is mandatory because you may find some positive aspect that communicated with other authors.

That could help you with future submission.

Reject ion after the First Reading

While writing does not rely on uninteresting comment on the manuscript document.

Try to the group based on the requirement.

Check whether the line number text upon, this will help you define items again and also aids your review.

Do keep images, graph and tables in a clear view whilewriting itself. It will help you evaluate easily.

To Save Time and Review

One of the reasons for the rejection of the M anuscript b y the Journal is a language issue.

Not every submission is well written in the right format.

If the article is difficult to understand, you should work with the document.

However, if the language is poor but the centralmessage is delivered well see if you can improve the document and fix the problem immediately.

Carry Out the Second Review

Contd..

1. Check the Language

Check whether the cited article is central to the author's argument.

It will help you to find errors from different areas than before.

There is a need to check to reference for accuracy, adequacy and balance.

2. Go through Section by Section

Contd..

If you are writing a formal report, remember to follow the guidelines.

It will always comprise of a range of questions followed by comments.

If you're following an informal report format, you could structure your report in three sections: summary, major issues, minor issues.

3. How to Structure your Report

PhD Manuscript Writing Peer review provides a professional experience for students writing.

Peer review is needed to minimize last-minute drafting and to cut down common lower-level writing errors.

Conclusion

Contact Us

UNITED KINGDOM+44-1143520021

INDIA+91-4448137070

EMAILinfo@phdassistance.com