How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

65
Revolu’onized Assessments for Business SkillSurvey PreHire 360™

description

ERE Webinar from 10/18/11 presented by Jack Kramer.

Transcript of How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Page 1: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Revolu'onized  Assessments  for  Business  

SkillSurvey  Pre-­‐Hire  360™  

Page 2: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

1  minute  

5  minutes  

10  minutes  

2  seconds  

Page 2

Page 3: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

About  Us:  SkillSurvey  

•  Inventor  of  web-­‐based  reference  checking  with  a  patent  pending  •  Providing  Reference  SoluEons  since  2002  •  25,200+  Candidates  in  September    

–  September  2010  –  14,200+  –  151,000+  people  experienced  the  SkillSurvey  process  

•  490+  customers  •  220+  surveys  in  current  inventory    

–  Cynthia  Hedricks,  PhD,  Chief  AnalyEcs  Officer  –  18  Surveys  for  IT  roles,  12  for  Sales  roles,  9  for  Customer  Service  roles,  19  for  

Finance  roles,  68  Clinical  and  Healthcare  related  roles  

Page 3

Page 4: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Financial Services & Insurance

Engineering & Construction

Consumer Products & Retail

Energy & Utilities HR Related

Gov, Non-Prof & Edu Services & IT Pharma & Medical

Manufacturing

Healthcare

Sample  Clients  &  Partners  

Page 5: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Customers  for  Today’s  Audience  

Page 6: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Quality  of  Hire  Behaviors  

 

TradiEonal  Phone  Checking  

Page 7: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Page 7

Phone interview

Face to Face

Personality / Behavior Assessments

Resume

From  Candidate  PerspecEve  –  Today’s  Approach  

I’m terrific

I work really hard, weekends too!

I interview well

I’m a Team Player

Recruiter Candidate

Page 8: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Page 8

Phone interview

Face to Face

Personality / Behavior Assessments

Resume

From  Reference  PerspecEve  –  Today’s  Approach  

She’s terrific

I would hire her again, yes!

She works hard

She’ a Team Player

Recruiter Reference

Page 9: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Page 9

Phone interview

Face to Face

Personality / Behavior Assessments

Resume

A  New  PerspecEve  –  The  New  Paradigm  

Dependability

Interpersonal Skills

Personality

Work Ethic

Teamwork

Integrity

References

Recruiter

Page 10: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Comparison  SkillSurvey Solution Typical Phone Check

More  references   5+  business  references  50%  of  which  are  former  or  

current  Supervisors  

2  to  3  

Faster   1  to  2  days   3  to  5  days  

Guide  Hiring  Managers   Previous  managers  assisEng  in  leading  interview  

No  

Pauses  a  hiring  decision   5%  -­‐  10%  of  candidates   <  1%  of  candidates  

Passive  sourcing  tools   5  references  per  candidate  –  warm  leads    

2-­‐3  on  paper  or  in  ATS  –  not  uElized  

Compliant/Legal  Risk   Supports  compliance  with  EEOC  and  OFCCP  

Uncertain/Inconsistent  

Page 10

Page 11: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Why  You  and  SkillSurvey?  

•  Improve    –  Quality  of  Hire  –  Hiring  Manager’s  Interview  EffecEveness  –  Efficiency  –  Passive  Sourcing  

•  Drive    –  Compliance  and  Consistency  

•  Elevate  Recruitment’s  Role  

Page 11

Page 12: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Improve  Quality  of  Hire  

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Minimal

Moderate

Great

Percent

Dev

elop

men

tal N

eed

SkillSurvey References Perceive That 10% or more of Candidates Have Great Developmental Need

Avoidable, High Risk Candidates = over $420k in savings annually (see next slide)

Coachable,  Moderate  Risk  Candidates  =  Interview  and  on-­‐boarding  assistance  

Page 12

Page 13: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Hard  ROI  Example  

Page 13

Johns Manville, a Berkshire Hathaway company, is a leading manufacturer and marketer of premium-quality building insulation, commercial roofing, roof insulation, and specialty products for commercial, industrial, and residential applications.

q  293 Candidates entered in 2010 q  30.33% with a moderate or great developmental need – medium or lower scoring q  With SkillSurvey, avoided 6 hires at $70,000 salaries q  Bad hire avoidance of a little less than 5% of external hires q  Approximate $420,000 Cost Savings

Page 14: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Improve  Hiring  Manager’s  Interview  EffecEveness    

•  Lack  of  consistency  for  hiring  managers  •  Managers  looking  for  differences  in  candidates  •  Probing  quesEons  driven  by  previous  managers’  comments  

Page 14

Page 15: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Page 15

Low  Scores  Guide  Targeted  QuesEons  

Page 16: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Improve  Efficiency  –  Time  and  Money  

Recruiters  Sou

rce  Cand

idates  

Screen  to  top  3  candidates    

Page 16

Page 17: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

•  Improve  efficiency  –  'me  and  money  • Six  Sigma    

ü   From  60  work  weeks  to  4.8  

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

Telephone   SkillSurvey  

Work  weeks  to  reference  check  

2,272  job  candidates  

Use  of  SkillSurvey  Pre-­‐Hire  360®  Resulted  in  a  92%  Reduc'on  in  Time  Spent  Reference  Checking  

Improve  Efficiency  –  Time  and  Money  

Page 18: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Passive  Sourcing  by  the  Numbers  

Job opening

100  

Candidates

300  

References

1,500  

An organization has 100 job openings

3 candidates apply on average for each job = 300 candidates

3 candidates SkillSurveyed and provide 5 references each = 1,500 potential contacts

85% of the 1,500 contacts opt in to learn about future career opportunities. 1,500 x .85 = 1,275 passive candidates

1   2   3   4  

Talent  Pipeline  and  Funnel  • MulEplier  Effect  Based  on  Number  of  Candidates  Screened  

• Builds  AutomaEcally  

Industry  Professionals  with  Whom  To  Network  and  Source  

•   “Great  People  Know  Great  People”  

• “Warm  Lead”  vs.  “Cold  Lead”  

Page 18

Page 19: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Increase  Compliance  and  Consistency  

•  SkillSurvey  reference  feedback  shows  no  differences  between  sub-­‐groups  –  Helps  support  your  efforts  to  remain  EEOC  and  OFCCP  compliant    

•       Standardized  process    •       Eliminates  risk  

– In  a  decentralized  environment,  recruiters  tend  to  do  things  their  own  way  

Page 19

Page 20: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Why  You  and  SkillSurvey?  

•  Clear  ROI  for  Finance  and  Budgets  –  Quality  of  Hire  –  Turnover  –  Efficiency  –  Passive  Sourcing    

•  Quickly  Implement  and  Easy  “Win”  for  HR  •  Elevate  Recruitment’s  Role  

Page 20

Page 21: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

1  minute  

5  minutes  

10  minutes  

2  seconds  

Page 21

Page 22: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  1:  Enter  Candidate  Data  

Page 23: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  1a:  Select  Survey  

Page 24: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  1a:  Select  Survey  

Send email to candidate

Page 25: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Other  Libraries:  IT,  Customer  Service,  Healthcare,  Finance,  etc

Page 26: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Other  Libraries:  IT,  Customer  Service,  Healthcare,  Finance,  etc

Page 27: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Other  Libraries:  IT,  Customer  Service,  Healthcare,  Finance,  etc

Page 28: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Other  Libraries:  IT,  Customer  Service,  Healthcare,  Finance,  etc

Page 29: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Other  Libraries:  IT,  Customer  Service,  Healthcare,  Finance,  etc

Page 30: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Survey  Availability  Job Level ►

▼Job Family Entry- Level Hourly Clerical Professional Supervisor Manager Executive

General ü ü ü ü ü ü ü

Production ü ü ü ü ü

Sales ü ü ü ü ü ü ü

Marketing ü ü ü ü ü

IT ü ü ü ü ü ü ü

Operations ü ü ü ü ü Customer Service ü ü ü ü ü ü

R&D ü ü ü ü

Admin ü ü ü ü ü ü

Finance ü ü ü ü ü ü

Legal ü ü ü ü ü ü

HR ü ü ü ü ü ü

Engineering ü ü ü ü ü

Education ü ü ü ü

Healthcare ü ü ü ü ü ü ü

Page 31: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  1a:  Select  Survey  

Send email to candidate

Page 32: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

From: Your Company Name Recruiting Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2011 To: Patrick T Subject: Your Company Name Selection Process Information

Dear Patrick T, Thank you for your continued interest in the Major Account Sales position with your co name. As already explained to you, a critical step in the selection process is reference checking. org name uses web-based reference checking for this purpose. Please click on the link below. It will open a web page where you will input your reference. You will also be able to review a sample of the questions being asked and the email that will be sent to your references. Your references will be emailed a reference survey and their responses will be submitted directly back to SkillSurvey. No one will see your references' individual responses because all responses are electronically aggregated together to produce one summary report. Note that all references will be responding as individuals, not as representatives of any company or organization. Please click on the following link (URL) to begin: http://eref.skillsurvey.com//CandidateUtilities/EOC.aspx?

Step  2:  Candidate  Enters  References  Automated  Email  From  Recruiter  to  Candidate  Explaining  the  Process  

Page 33: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  2b:    Candidate  Inputs  References  

Page 34: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  2c:  Candidate  Confirms  References  and  Signs  Legal  Waiver  

Proof  of  Consent  “…I  hereby  release  any  such  person,  their  company,  and  any  affiliated  officers,  directors,  agents,  and  employees  from  any  and  all  claims  I  may  have  arising  out  of  the  disclosure  of  such  informaEon…”  

Page 35: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

From:  Patrick  T  Sent:  Thursday,  June  6,  2011  To:  ScoZ  Davies  Subject:  Patrick  T  Reference  Request      Dear  ScoZ  Davies,    I  am  pursuing  a  professional  development  opportunity  and  I'd  like  to  use  you,  as  well  as  several  other  individuals,  as  a  professional  reference.  All  you  need  to  do  is  complete  a  short  (less  than  30  ques'ons),  confiden'al,  web-­‐based  survey  regarding  my  skills.      No  one  will  see  your  individual  responses  because  the  system  averages  the  responses  from  all  of  my  references  together  to  produce  one  summary  report.  To  further  ensure  confiden'ality,  no  report  will  be  produced  unless  at  least  3  people  respond.      Please  note  that  you  will  be  responding  as  an  individual,  not  as  a  representa've  of  any  company  or  organiza'on.  Also,  I  have  executed  a  legally  binding  agreement  that  releases  you  as  well  as  any  organiza'on  with  which  you  are  now  affiliated  or  have  been  affiliated  in  the  past,  from  any  poten'al  liability  for  providing  this  informa'on.    The  process  is  quick  and  easy.  Please  click  on  the  following  link  to  begin:  hZp://eref.skillsurvey.com/SS.WebUI/RefSurveyDetails.aspx?      If  you  have  any  ques'ons,  you  can  email  me  at  [email protected].      Thank  you  for  your  'me,  Patrick  T  

Step3a:    Automated  Email  Sent  to  All  References  

Page 35

Page 36: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  3b:  References  Receive  Automated  Email  

Dear  Scop  Davies,    Thank  you  for  taking  the  Eme  to  respond  to  Patrick  T’s  reference  request.  Before  you  take  the  survey,  please  take  a  moment  to  review  the  informaEon  in  the  form  below.  If  any  informaEon  is  incorrect,  please  select  the  appropriate  field  and  make  the  desired  changes.  When  you  are  finished,  click  the  conEnue  bupon  at  the  bopom  of  the  page  to  save  your  changes  and  access  the  reference  survey.  

Page 37: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

The  Surveys:  Job-­‐Specific,  Behaviorally-­‐Based  QuesEons  

Page 38: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

The  Surveys:  Job-­‐Specific,  Behaviorally-­‐Based  QuesEons  

Page 39: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

The  Surveys:  Job-­‐Specific,  Behaviorally-­‐Based  QuesEons  

Page 40: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

The  Surveys:  Job-­‐Specific,  Behaviorally-­‐Based  QuesEons  

Would you like to learn more about job openings at Your Co name?

Page 41: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Drive  Warm  Candidates  to  Career  Page  

Page 42: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

SkillSurvey  Goes  Mobile  

SkillSurvey  Mobile  •  On-­‐the-­‐go  access  anyEme,  anywhere  

 •  Use  your  iPhone,  BlackBerry,  Droid,  or  Windows-­‐

enabled  Smartphone    

•  No  hassle  for  recruiters,  candidates,  or  references  

     

Page 43: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  4:  Aggregate  References  into  a  PreHire  360  

Page 44: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Step  4:  Aggregate  References  into  a  PreHire  360  

Candidate and Reference Response Data

Page 45: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Reference Information Corrected

Step  4:  Aggregate  References  into  a  PreHire  360  

Page 46: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

IP Address Alert for Review

Step  4:  Aggregate  References  into  a  PreHire  360  

Page 47: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Validated  Candidate  –  Good  Fit  

Page 48: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Validated  Candidate  –  Good  Fit  

Page 49: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Pause  or  Avoid  this  Candidate  –  Low  Scoring  

Page 50: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Professionalism  

Page 51: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Interpersonal  Skills  

Page 52: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Problem  Solving  and  Adaptability  

Page 53: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Personal  Values  

Page 54: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

VerbaEm  Comments  

Page 55: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

VerbaEm  Comments  

Page 56: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

VerbaEm  Comments  

Page 57: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Candidate  Comparison  Report  

Page 58: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Business Intelligence Dashboard

Page 59: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Passive  Candidate  Compiler  

Page 60: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Passive  Candidate  Compiler  

Page 61: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Integrated  Link  to  LinkedIn,  Zoom  info  

Page 62: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Integrated  Link  to  LinkedIn,  Zoom  info  

Page 63: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Passive  Candidate  Compiler  –  Daily  Sourcing  Update  

Page 64: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Quick  Startup  and  ROI  

•  SoluEon  up  and  running  in  less  than  3  hours  –  Setup,  training,  launch  

•  No  need  for  IT  involvement  •  Not  a  long  and  complex  project  •  Provides  a  quick  and  easy  “win”  for  recruiEng  and  HR  

Page 64

Page 65: How to Improve Quality-of-Hire and Efficiency using Web 2.0 Reference-Checking

Why  You  and  SkillSurvey?  

•  Clear  ROI  for  Finance  and  Budgets  –  Quality  of  Hire  –  Turnover  –  Efficiency  –  Passive  Sourcing  

•  Quickly  Implement  and  Easy  “Win”  for  HR  •  Elevate  Recruitment’s  Role  in  the  OrganizaEon  

Page 65