8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

1/8

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

2/8

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

3/8

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

4/8

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

5/8

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

6/8

(territoire de la Bulgarie).................................................................................................................................................................. 4875. Pierre DUPONT, Vasilica LUNGU : Beidaud : un cas d’acculturation potière dansl’hinterland gète ? ...................................... 493Chapitre 4 : Les indigènes dans l’habitat et dans les nécropoles des cités

grecques ........................................................................ 4991. Rosa Maria ALBANESE PROCELLI : Presenze indigene in contesti coloniali sicelioti :sul problema degli indicatoriarcheologici...................................................................................................................................................................................... 5012. Henri TRÉZINY : Note sur les céramiques indigènes présentes à Marseille................................................................................ 5093. Nunzio ALLEGRO, Simona FIORENTINO : Ceramica indigena dall’abitato di Himera............................................................ 5114. Laurence MERCURI : Archéologie des pratiques funéraires en Grèce d’Occident aupremier âge du Fer :

de quelques idées reçues.................................................................................................................................................................. 5215. Irene BERLINGÒ : La nécropole archaïque de Siris (Policoro)................................................................................................... 5296. Vasilica LUNGU : Pratiques funéraires chez les Grecs et les indigènes en Dobroudjaseptentrionale ......................................... 537Chapitre 5 : Les fortifications.............................................................................................................................................................. 5551. Henri TRÉZINY : Fortifications grecques et fortifications indigènes dans l’Occidentgrec.......................................................... 557

2. Gabriel de PRADO : La fortificación ibérica del Puig de SantAndreu (Ullastret,Cataluña) : aspectos técnicos,formales y funcionalesÒ................................................................................................................................................................... 5673. Massimo BRIZZI, Liliana COSTAMAGNA : Il sito fortificato di Serro di Tavola(Aspromonte) ............................................... 5814. Paolo VISONÀ : Controlling the chora. Archaeological investigations at Monte Palazzi,a mountain fort of Locri Epizephyrii.595Chapitre 6 : Cultes grecs et cultes indigènes...................................................................................................................................... 6031. Massimo OSANNA : Greci ed indigeni nei santuari della Magna Grecia : i casi di

Timmari e Garaguso ................................... 6052. Alfonsina RUSSO : Cerimonie rituali e offerte votive nello spazio domestico dei centridella Lucania settentrionale ................ 6133. Patrick De MICHÈLE et Antoine HERMARY : Iconographie grecque en contexteceltique : à propos d’un nouveaunaïskos au type de la déesse assise ..................... 627Chapitre 7 : Langage - Écriture - Onomastique .. 6351. Javier de HOZ : L’écriture gréco-ibérique et l’influence hellène sur les usages del’écriture en Hispanie et dans le sud

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

7/8

de la France ........................................................ 6372. Paolo POCCETTI : Contacts et échanges technologiques entre Grecs et indigènes enItalie méridionale : langues et écrituresau cours du IVe siècle av. J.-C.......................................................................................................................................................... 659

Chapitre 8 : Étude de casparticuliers................................................................................................................................................ 6791. Réjane ROURE : Grecs et non-Grecs en Languedoc oriental : Espeyran, Le Cailar etla question de Rhodanousia..................... 6812. Fabio COPANI : Greci e indigeni ad Eloro.................................................................................................................................. 6893. Laurence MERCURI : Monte San Mauro di Caltagirone : Histoire des interprétationsd’un site du premier âge du Fer ............ 6954. Emanuele GRECO : Indigènes et Grecs à Lemnos à la lumière des fouillesd’Hephaestia ........................................................... 701Conclusion : M. Lombardo (Université de Lecce), « Riflessioni conclusive »

....................................................................................... 709Résumés............................................................................................................................................................................................. 000

8/19/2019 GRECS ET INDIGÈNES DE LA CATALOGNE À LA MER NOIRE

8/8

7. Domestic Architecture in the Northern Aegean : the Evidence from the ancient settlement of Karabournaki 

Despoina Tsiafakis 

1. Introduction Domestic architecture, although of great importance and interest for the reconstruction ofancient Greek culture, is not well documented through the archaeological evidence, especially forthe pre-classical period. The number of Geometric or Archaic excavated houses is limited, as isour understanding of the residential areas of otherwise well-known towns of Greek Antiquity(Drerup 1969 ; Fagerström 1988 ; Lang 1996 ; Hoepfner 1999 ; Lang 2005, 12-35 ; Kourou 2004,147-162).

This already partial information diminishes further in the Northern part of the Aegean, wheremost excavations are more recent than those in the South (Lang 2005, 13-32).

Although outside the initial borders of Greek territory, the region of the North-eastern Aegeanattracted Greek colonists apparently from very early times (Tiverios 2008, 1-17). Even thoughthere are references to the various local inhabitants of the area, such as the Thracians for example,the literary sources do not provide sufficient information about their life and settlements or theirrelations with Greek colonists (Xydopoulos 2007 ; Tsiafaki 2009).

“Mixed populations or separate settlements for Greeks and locals ?”, is a critical question towhich the literary sources do not provide a clear answer. The scattered archaeological evidencecould make a significant contribution to this problem, even though it cannot offer definitiveanswers. Architectural remains, in combination with the rest of the finds reflect the socialstructure of the people living on a site. House-types, as well as their arrangement withinsettlements, can present some kind of information about how the inhabitants structured space andcreated community.

The aim of this paper is to present an aspect of the constructions found in pre-classicalsettlements in the North-eastern Aegean, inhabited by Greeks but in some relationship with thelocal population. The geographical area of interest is the Thermaic Gulf, and the time periodunder discussion is mostly the Archaic period, with some references to the Geometric and Iron

Age. A limited number of domestic buildings have been excavated and published in the areaduring that time-frame (Lang 1996 ; Tiverios 2008). The names of some additional sites in thearea are known through the literary sources, but without any information about their physicallayouts.

The focus of this study is the settlement at Karabournaki, a site that can contribute to ourunderstanding of the domestic architecture of the region under investigation.