Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

65
Recognizing Rights in Real Time: The Role of Google in the EU Right to Be Forgotten 虻懱ဩ膏虻懱硰ᒽ䌕氂/م蝰൹ᥝ

Transcript of Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Page 1: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Recognizing Rights in Real Time: The Role of Google in the EU Right to Be Forgotten

/

Page 2: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Edward Lee Professor of Law, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Founder, The Free Internet Project.

Teaches international intellectual property law, copyright law, and trademark law.

Page 3: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

I. II. III. IV. V. VI.

Page 4: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色
Page 5: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

(RTBF) • right to be forgotten, aka “RTBF”

• 2014 5 13Google [1] 5 29 Google

Webform [2] GoogleGoogle

·

• 2014 50·

[4]

[from wikipedia]

Page 6: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

(private administrative agency ) —(public right)

• (mixed administration)(co-regulation) (global administrative

law) (theory of bureaucracy )Coase Theorem

• (democratic accountability)

Page 7: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

(

• (hybrid agency)

(public-private partnership) (global governance)

Page 8: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

I. II. III. IV. V. VI.

Page 9: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• 2014 Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de

Datos ( AEPD)

• Mario Costeja González 16

(of no relevance)

• 5 13 1995 (1995 EU Data Protection Directive )

( inadequate, irrelevant or excessive in relation to the purposes of the processing )

• RTBF Mario Costeja RTBF case-by-case

I. RTBF II. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 10: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

( )• vs vs

• “[Google] didn’t ask to be the decision maker.” —Eric Schmidt, Google Chairman.

• (Advisory Council) webform

160,000 58%

• (Transparency Report)29 (EU Article

29 Working Party’s) (implement) RTBF

I. RTBF II. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 11: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

( )• RTBF —

( RTBF)

• RTBF(develop) (define)

• 29

I. RTBF II. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 12: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part I RTBF• (defining)

(implement) RTBF

• A. 1995 (1995 EU Data Protection Directive ) 1. 2. B.Costeja C.Costeja

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 13: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part I RTBFA. 1995 (1995 EU Data Protection Directive ) A-1.

• 1995

(fairly and lawfully)(incompatible)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 14: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part I RTBFA-1

• (RTBF) — (accurate)(necessary) (inaccurate) (incomplete)

(erased or rectified) — Costeja

• Costeja (controller) —(erasure) (rectification) (blocking)

A-2.

• 1995 (1995 EU Data Protection Directive )

• 1995 23,500 2005 6 20081.6 2012 6 —

“the Internet never forgets.”

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 15: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part I RTBFB. Costeja

• Costeja (AEPD)

• AEPD Costeja

()

2014 5

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 16: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part I RTBFB.Costeja

CJEU

• — (publisher)

• RTBF

RTBF

• — (decisive role in the dissemination)

•(personal profile)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 17: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part I RTBFC. Costeja

• CJEU

• case-by-case RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 18: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • Costeja RTBF

Part II

• A A-1. A-2. RTBF A-3. (Transparency Report of RTBF Requests) A-4. RTBF A-5.29 (Article 29 Working Party)

• B RTBF — Costeja B-1. B-2. B-3.

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 19: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • A-1.

• (case-by-case basis)

(Data Protection Authority , “DPA”)

• Eric Schmidt “[Google]“didn’t ask to be the decision maker ”

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 20: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • A-2. RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 21: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • A-3

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 22: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • A-4. RTBF

• Eric Schmidt (Chief Legal Officer) David Drummond

youtube

• 2015 6 (1) (2) — (3)

(4)

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 23: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • A-5. 29 (Working Party, WP)

• 2014 WP BingRTBF WP

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 24: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • B RTBF — Costeja

B-1. (WP) (PDAs)

• WP RTBF 2014 72014 11 WP

RTBF guideline

• (PDA) RTBFRTBF PDA

• B-2.

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 25: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part II RTBF • B-3.

• RTBF 2012(European Commission) (EU General Data Protection Regulation ,aka “GDPR”) 17

(Right to be forgotten and to erasure) GDPR

• 17 (a)(b) (a)

(c) 19 (d)

• 17 RTBF (a) 80 (b) 81(public health) (c) 83

(d)

I. RTBFII. RTBFIII. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 26: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part III • Part3 (Weber's bureaucracy theory)

(Coase Theorem) (private administrative agency)

• A. B. C.

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 27: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part III • A. —

(administrative state)—

• A-1. A-2 a. b. c. d.

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 28: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A-1. —

• (administrative agency) agency

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 29: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A-2 — (Public Functions) —a. (Rules, Interpretations, and Guidance )

(gap)

• (Administrative Procedure Act ,“APA”) (public notice) (public

comment )

(“soft law”)(strong recommendatory power) ”carry

considerable weight “ (quasi-regulatory agencies)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 30: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A-2 — (Public Functions) —b.

(Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ,aka ”EEOC” ) —

Securities Exchange Commission , aka “SEC”)— (Federal Bureau Investigation,

aka “FBI”)— IRS

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 31: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A-2 — — c.

• (develop)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 32: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A-2 —— d.

(Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, aka “OHIM”)(Community Plant Variety Office ,aka “CPVO”)

(European Aviation Safety Agency, aka “EASA”)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 33: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.

• B-1

• B-2

• B-3

• B-4

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 34: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.1 —

• (agency)

• (Public) (1) (2)

• NGO

• (1) (2)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 35: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.2 –

• (Max Weber)

• 1 2 3

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 36: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.2 –

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 37: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.3 –

• Ronald Coase

• (transaction cost)

in-house (

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 38: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.4 —

• 2000 Jody Freeman Freeman

...

“ ”Freeman (aggregate

accountability)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 39: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.4 — ( )

(co-regulation) —

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 40: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• C-1. –

• 1960s (DARPA)ARPANET DARPA

(NSF) NSFIBM

1995 NSF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 41: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• C-1. –

• (laissez faire)

• (NSF)

• Clinton

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 42: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

C-2. – ICANN

• 1997 Clinton ICANN (Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers)

(DNS)

ICANN ICANN

I. RTBFII. RTBF III.IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part III

Page 43: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part IV • Part IV RTBF

• A. B. 1. 2. 3. 4. RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV.V. RTBF VI.

Page 44: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A.

• $365.46B 40 70 46,170DC

/

• 28 DPA(RTBF

• RTBF2016

RTBF RTBF

• RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV.V. RTBF VI.

Part IV

Page 45: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• B. —1.

• RTBF RTBF

RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV.V. RTBF VI.

Part IV

Page 46: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B. —2.

• (2015) 356,012 RTBF1,261,476 RTBF

B. —3.

• Costeja (1) RTBF webform RTBF (2) RTBF

(CLO) (3) RTBF

• 41 RTBFRTBF RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV.V. RTBF VI.

Part IV

Page 47: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• B. —4. RTBF

• RTBF

RTBF

• RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV.V. RTBF VI.

Part IV

Page 48: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part V RTBFA. 1. 2. 3. —

B. 1. 2. - (Notice-and-Takedown) 3. 4. 5.

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBFVI.

Page 49: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part V RTBFA-1 —

• / RTBF

A-2.

• RTBFDPA

RTBF RTBF

• (General Privacy Counsel) Peter Fleischer

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBFVI.

Page 50: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part V RTBF• A-3 —

• RTBFwebform

• emailURL

......

case second review)

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBFVI.

Page 51: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part V RTBF• A-3 —

• RTBF

— (GDPR)(2015)

• RTBF case-by-case case

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBFVI.

Page 52: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part V RTBFB-1. —

• $365.46 B 46,170 PDA

• RTBFRTBF 1 6

B-2. — - (Notice-and-Takedown)

(DMCA) ISP DMCAISP RTBF

Youtube) 2015 2 9 8,107,272 URLs

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBFVI.

Page 53: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part V RTBFB-3. —

(GA)

B-4. —

• 500

B-5.

• RTBF RTBF

RTBF RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBFVI.

Page 54: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

Part VI • RTBF Part VI

(i) (ii)

( )

• RTBF

• A. - B. C. RTBF 1. / 2. 3.

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Page 55: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• A. -

• - (public-private partnerships, aka. PPP)

• PPP PPP (Collaborative PPP theory)

• HealthCare.gov 33

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 56: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

B.

• (1) RTBF (Third- Pair-of-Eyes Review)

• (2) RTBF —

a. RTBF b. c. d.

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 57: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• (1) RTBF (Third- Pair-of-Eyes Review)— RTBFBing

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 58: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

(2) RTBF

• ( i) RTBF (ii)

• 29 (WP)RTBF

RTBF

• a. RTBF —

Bing

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 59: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

(2) RTBF —b.

• RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 60: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

(2) RTBF —c.

• —

• d. — RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 61: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• C-1. RTBF – /

• -RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 62: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• C-2. RTBF —

RTBF

• RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 63: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• C-3.

• RTBF

I. RTBFII. RTBF III. IV. V. RTBF VI.

Part VI

Page 64: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色
Page 65: Google在被遺忘權 (Right to Be Forgotten)中所扮演的角色

• RTBF

• RTBF

RTBFRTBF

• -RTBF