GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE TO EXTREME FLOOD EVENTS IN...
Transcript of GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE TO EXTREME FLOOD EVENTS IN...
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
1
GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE TO EXTREME FLOOD EVENTS IN ALLUVIAL RIVERS
Ph.D. candidate: MARGHERITA RIGHINI, II course
Tutor: Prof.. NICOLA SURIAN
Co-Tutor: Prof.. FRANCESCO COMITI, Dr. LORENZO MARCHI, Prof. ELLEN WOHL
Cycle: XXIX
Abstract
Extreme floods are one of the major natural hazards that affect Italian territory and their frequency has increased over the last
years. Thus geomorphological hazards due to channel dynamics should be taken into account, specifically in alluvial rivers, as
a possible cause of severe damage to human property and infrastructure. This research aims to assess quantitatively
geomorphic effects due to extreme events in alluvial and semi-alluvial rivers in different physiographic and climatic settings.
The research is based on integration of field surveys and remote sensing, GIS and statistical analyses to obtain a quantitative
analysis of morphological changes and to correlate such changes with possible controlling factors (e.g. confinement,
channel gradient, stream power, and unit stream power). Further objective of the research is to develop and test conceptual
and empirical models to improve our capability of predicting channel dynamics and related geomorphological hazard during
extreme events.
Full Report
Introduction
Infrequent, high-magnitude floods can lead to sudden, dramatic channel changes in alluvial and semi-
alluvial channels. A number of previous geomorphological studies argued about the role of events with
high magnitude and low frequency in conditioning channel form (Baker, 1977) in order to evaluate the
ability of a flood to be geomorphically effectiveness and their capacity to modify the channel morphology
in a very short time period (Wolman and Miller, 1960; Miller, 1990; Costa and O'Connor, 1995; Phillips,
2002; Magilligan et al., 2015). Whereas few recent studies have focused on the role of such events in
terms of channel dynamics hazards.
Therefore besides hydraulic hazard, geomorphological hazard owing to channel dynamics should be
taken into account, specifically in alluvial and semi-alluvial rivers. Geomorphic effectiveness of extreme
or catastrophic events can be explain as the amount of work done during a flood (Wolman et al., 1960) or
by the degree of landscape modification caused by a flood (Miller at al., 1987). However quantifying
geomorphic changes is much more difficult than quantifying the hydraulic forces (Costa et al., 1995) due
to the conjunction of multiple variables and the different boundary conditions. Although several studies
have documented the effects of catastrophic events (Magilligan, 1992; Hooke at al., 2000; Merritt at al.,
2003; Kale et al., 2007; Langhammer, 2010; Krapesch et al., 2009; Milan, 2012; Dean et al., 2013),
nowadays an overall quantitative approach that related geomorphic response to extreme floods of
different alluvial rivers is not available.
The main purposes of this work are (i) to provide a quantitative assessment of geomorphic effects due
to extreme events (recurrence interval > 100 years) in some alluvial and semi-alluvial rivers and (ii) to
identify a range of potential controlling factors of channel changes. The research is carried out in different
physiographic and climatic settings including several study rivers located in Northern Apennines
(Tuscany), Northeastern Sardinia, Venetian Prealps, Rocky Mountain National Park (Colorado, USA).
The research focuses on (i) the quantitative assessment of geomorphic effects and their spatial
distribution (ii) the evaluation and the improvement of the current understanding of the main controlling
factors affecting the geomorphic response to extreme floods (iii) the identification of relationships
between controlling factors and channel changes and (iv) the development of conceptual and empirical
models to be tested to a wider data set in order to assess and predict fluvial dynamics and related
geomorphological hazard in order to build up tools enabling to predict where major geomorphic changes
occur during an extreme flood.
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
2
Methods
The methodological approach is based on a quantitative analysis of morphological changes carried out
by photo interpretation conducted in a geographic information system (GIS), using the pre-flood and
post-flood aerial photographs or satellite images and Digital Elevation Models, integrated with field
surveys (i.e. geomorphological survey, grain size analysis, topographic survey) and statistical analysis.
The overall procedure includes:
1. Morphological characteristics and delineation of spatial units. General setting of the rivers
physical conditions and a first division of the watershed in macro-areas (physiographic units) and
in corresponding macro-reaches (segments) is carried out (Fig. 1a). The definition of
homogeneous reaches (with lengths normally of the order of 1-5 km) is achieved taking into
account channel morphology, lateral confinement (i.e. confinement index and confinement
degree) (Brierley and Fryiers, 2005), hydrologic discontinuity, channel slope, artificiality (Rinaldi
et al., 2013) (Fig. 1b). For a more accurate analysis of relation between channel changes and
controlling factors, reaches were divided into sub-reaches having a constant slope. Finally sub-
reaches are defined in order to attain a more accurate analysis by using the method proposed by
Vocal Ferencevic and Ashmore (2012). This method is based on constant horizontal increments
(Knighton, 199; Jain at al 2006) and it permitted to extract a satisfactory quality DEM-derived
slope for the stream power calculation. Indeed the definition of sub-reaches is essentially based on
the definition of the proper minimum distance to obtain constant slope depending on the DEM
resolution and by considering hydrologic discontinuities on the main stream (e.g., presence of
tributaries) (Fig. 1c).
a) b)
c)
Figure 1. Example of delineation of spatial units in the Teglia River (Magra River catchment):
physiographic units and segments (a); homogeneous reaches (b); constant slope sub-reaches (c).
2. Quantitative analysis of channel response. The geomorphic channel responses due to the events in
terms of banks erosion, channel aggradation and incision, wood transport, hillslope failure were
mostly analyzed in the field in a qualitative way. Otherwise the dominant geomorphic change
observed in most of the study rivers is channel widening. For this reason the channel width
changes are measured in detail in GIS by comparing aerial photographs or satellite images taken
before and after the flood (Fig. 2). In order to quantify the channel widening, it is expressed as a
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
3
width ratio, i.e. channel width after/channel width before the flood (Krapesch et al., 2011) and it
is used as a parameter to describe the morphodynamic activity in terms of lateral erosion,
avulsions and overbank scouring (Krapesch et al., 2009) at reach and sub-reach scale.
a) b) Figure 2. Example of comparison between satellite images pre (a) and after (b) the flood in the
Posada River (Sardinia) at sub-reach scale.
3. Controlling factors. A range of several morphological and hydraulic variables are considered as
possible controlling factors which could explain the channel response to high-magnitude flood
events. The geomorphic factors could be: in partly confined and unconfined reaches the extent of
floodplain, stated in terms of confinement index Ci, define as the ratio between the floodplain
width and the channel width representing the natural constrain to channel widening; channel
gradient; channel sinuosity; potential significant tributary sources, in terms of lateral sources and
the associated sedimentary links that could have significant impact on river bed sediment texture
and, in turn, on channel form (Rice, 1998); artificial structures which may hinder channel lateral
mobility; sediment supply, in terms of landslide areas effectively coupled to the main channel
network (Cavalli et al., 2013, Crema et al., 2015); the role of both riparian arboreal vegetation and
arboreal vegetation included in the floodplain. The possible hydraulic variables are driving forces
strictly related to stream energy and flood power, such as: the cross-sectional stream power Ω
(Wm-1
), defined as the rate of potential energy expenditure per unit length of channel; the unit
stream power ω (Wm-2
) , defined as rate at with potential energy is supplied to a unit area of the
bed (Knighton, 1999). Unit stream power has been shown to have an important influence on many
aspects of the fluvial system as the geomorphic effectiveness of flood discharge (Baker et al.,
1987; Magilligan, 1992), also as a reasonable predictor for river width changes during extreme
floods (Krapesch et al., 2011). For instance, Magilligan (1992) identified stream power value of
300 W m-2
as the potential minimum threshold, above which significant geomorphic adjustment is
likely to occur in unconfined channel reaches. Furthermore two different values of stream power
could be consider by taking into account pre or post flood channel width in order to understand
which one gives a better explanation of channel response, especially in those case where the width
ratio is particularly high. However peak instantaneous stream power could not adequately quantify
the spatio-temporal distribution of river energy expenditure along a channel reach, but the
geomorphic work could be also influenced by the flow duration and total energy expenditure
(Costa and O’Connor, 1995). Indeed two main parameters derived from the stream power
hydrograph could be take into account, such as: event energy expenditure Ωe (J), computed as the
area under the stream power hydrograph from the start to the end of the runoff event; geomorphic
energy expenditure Ωg(J), define as a proportion of Ωe above Miller-Magilligan critical stream
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
4
power threshold of 300 W m-2
referred and associated with energy available for geomorphic work
in unconfined and/or partially-confined channels. In addition another adimensional parameter (i.e.,
geomorphic index, GI=Ωg⁄Ωe) that combines flood-flow duration, stream power per unit area and
threshold for alluvial channel erosions is developed and tested and taken into account as a
predictor of geomorphic effectiveness for high magnitude floods.
4. Statistical analysis: morphological changes and controlling factors correlations. Statistical analysis
is carried out to explain channel response to the flood event, by exploring the relationship between
geomorphic changes occurred and controlling factors. Different statistical tools could be applied
to investigate which set of controlling factor gave best explanation of channel response (e.g.,
ANOVA analysis, simple regression, multiple regression). The statistical analysis could be
applied both at reach and sub-reach scale.
5. Conceptual/empirical models. As a result of correlations between channel response and possible
controlling factors for each case of study, conceptual and empirical models will be developed in
order to assess new tools for a better understanding and prediction of fluvial dynamics and
morphological responses to such extreme events.
Study Rivers
Teglia and Geriola Rivers
Teglia and Geriola Rivers are tributaries of the Magra River located in Northern Tuscany. Their
catchment have an area of 43.1 km2 and 8.2 km
2 respectively and their courses have a total
length of
approximately 14 km and 7 km. On October 25th
2011 Teglia and Geriola catchments were affected by an
extreme meteorological event with hourly rainfall intensities up to 25 mm/h and a peak in rain
accumulation of approximately 330 mm in 13 hours with an estimated recurrence time of more 100 years.
The study focuses on reaches affected by evident and significant geomorphic responses in terms of
channel widening that occurred along most of the partly-confined and unconfined reaches (i.e. 6.6 km in
the Teglia River and 5.8 km in the Geriola River).
Posada and Mannu di Bitti River
The Posada River and its tributary Mannu di Bitti are located in Northeastern Sardinia. Their
catchments have an area of 680 km2 and 302 km
2 respectively and their courses have a length of
approximately 88 km and 59 km. On November 18th
2013 Posada and Mannu di Bitti catchments were
affected by an extreme meteorological event with hourly rainfall intensities up to 100 mm/h and a peak in
rain accumulation up to 250 mm in 24 hours. The study focuses on reaches affected by evident and
significant geomorphic responses in terms of channel widening occurred along most of the confined,
partly-confined and unconfined reaches (i.e. 22.5 km in the Posada River, upstream of Maccheronis dam;
18.2 km in the Mannu di Bitti River).
Lierza River
The Lierza River is a tributary of the Soligo River located in the Venetian Prealps. The catchment has
an area of 8 km2 and the river has a length of 19.5 km. On August 2
nd 2014 the Lierza catchment was
affected by an extreme meteorological event with a peak in rain accumulation of approximately 58 mm in
2 hours. The study focuses on the reach upstream of Molinetto waterfall affected by geomorphic
responses in terms of channel widening occurred along most of the reach 1.8 km long. For this case study the geomorphic analysis are carried out mainly by field surveys because of the small size of the channel.
North Saint Vrain Creek
The St. Vrain Creek is a tributary of the South Platte River, approximately 51.8 km long, in north
central Colorado in the United States. The catchment has an area of 216 km2
and it drains Wild Basin
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
5
within the southeastern portion of Rocky Mountain National Park near Allenspark. In September of 2013,
the Colorado Front Range foothills experienced an extensive period of rainfall that culminated in a major
flood that peaked in many streams on Friday, the 13th. Rainfall depths of up to 457 mm were recorded
over a 10 day period, with a large proportion of the rainfall falling over a 36 hour period. Peak flow
estimates about 700 m3/s, with return interval >200-year (S.E. Yochum, 2015; Chignell S.M. et al.,2015).
During the 2013 event the combination of debris flows and flooding was responsible for eight victims and
caused extensive damage to buildings, highways, railroads, and infrastructure (J.A. Coe et al.,2014).
Results and research plan for next years
In the second year the work on Magra tributaries (i.e., Teglia and Geriola Rivers) was almost
concluded by encompassing in the ultimate work all the data collected and elaborated for six tributaries of
Magra River (i.e., Teglia, Geriola, Mangiola, Osca, Pogliaschina and Gravegnola River) in collaboration
with a large group of researches belonging to the Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of
Bozen-Bolzano (Italy), the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Florence (Italy), the CNR IRPI,
Padova (Italy) and the Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova
(Italy). An integrated approach was deployed to study this flood, including (i) analysis of channel width
changes by comparing aerial photographs taken before and after the flood, (ii) estimate of peak discharges
in ungauged streams, (iii) detailed mapping of landslides and analysis of sediment connectivity with
channel network. Considering a large range of morphological characteristics, and specifically the
variability in channel slope, and also to achieve a better understanding about the relationship among
channel widening and the controlling factor, the whole dataset was analyzed considering two subsets both
at reach and sub-reach scale, the first including reaches with a slope 4% (non-steep slope), the other subset with reaches having a slope ≥ 4% (steep slope). Channel widening was defined at reaches and sub-
reaches scale and it occurred in 35 reaches out of 39. In reaches with non-steep slope (< 4%) average and
maximum width ratio was 5.2 and 19.7 (i.e. channel widened from 4 m to 82 m), respectively; in steep
reaches (slope ≥ 4 %) widening was slightly less intense. Finally the correlation between the channel
widening and seven controlling factors was explored at sub-reach scale (i.e.,157 sub-reaches) by using
multiple regression models. The analysis of controlling factors was carried out taking into account four
geomorphic and three hydraulic factors. The geomorphic factors were: channel slope, as a proxy of
stream morphology; confinement index; artificial structures which may obstruct channel lateral mobility;
sediment supply, in terms of landslide areas effectively coupled to the main channel network. Stream
energy was analyzed taking into account three hydraulic variables closely related to flood power: cross-
sectional stream power (Wm-1); unit stream power (Wm-
2), obtained by dividing the stream power by
channel width measured before and after the flood (ω=Ω/Wbefore and ω=Ω/Wafter). In the steep sub-reaches, characterized by higher confinement, stream power, unit stream power (considering pre-flood channel
width), and lateral confinement showed good relationships with channel widening (i.e. width ratio) and
coefficients of multiple determination R2 ranging between 0.44 and 0.67 were obtained. The models for
the non-steep sub-reaches provided a lower explanation of widening variability, being R2 between 0.32
and 0.40; in these reaches a significant relation, although weak, between sediment supply from hillslopes
and channel widening was found. Results pointed out that hydraulic variables are not sufficient to explain
channel response to extreme floods and inclusion of other factors, e.g. lateral confinement, is needed to
increase explanatory capability of models. Concerning hydraulic variables, this study showed that unit
stream power, considering channel width before the flood, has stronger relations with channel widening,
in comparison to stream power and, in particular, to unit stream power calculated with post-flood channel
width. This could suggest that most of width changes occurred after the flood peak. These results suggest
that the widening processes is essentially controlled by two factors, flood power and valley confinement
(Fig.3) (Surian et al., 2015).
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
6
Non-steep slope Steep slope
a) d)
b) e)
c)
Figure 3. Simple regression models between width ratio and controlling factors. Only significant factors
of the two best models obtained by multiple regression analysis are shown: (a), (b), and (c) refer to sub-
reaches with non-steep slope; (d) and (e) to sub-reaches with steep slope.
It is significance noting that flood duration above a critical threshold could be a variable that would
increase very likely the robustness of models in these sub-reaches. For this reason models were improved
by introduction of the geomorphic index, the event energy expenditure and geomorphic energy
expenditure above Miller-Magilligan critical stream power threshold of 300 Wm-2
together with peak
stream power calculated with pre-flood channel width as possible controlling factors of channel widening
for five of the six studied tributaries. Four different multiple regression models were carried out on the
non-steep and steep sub-reaches including geomorphic variables (i.e., confinement index and sediment
supply) in all models and taking into account separately independent variables related to stream energy
and flood duration. Preliminary results showed that the input of controlling factors related to flood
duration provided a larger explanation of channel widening compared with the previous models. In more
detail in non-steep sub-reaches they gave higher coefficients of multiple determination and models
included peak stream power calculated with pre-flood channel width, the geomorphic energy expenditure
and total energy expenditure turned out the best fit with R2=0.53, R
2=0.52, R
2=0.55 respectively. In these
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
7
sub-reaches the most influential explanatory variables for the response variable (i.e., channel widening)
were the confinement index (R2=0.31), the peak stream power calculated with pre-flood channel width
(R2=0.37) and the total event expenditure energy (R
2=0.31). The analysis also highlighted that the
sediment supply was significant in all models. An increasing in value of coefficients of multiple
determination occurred also in the steep sub-reaches models and the best fit was given by the model
included the total energy expenditure (R2=0.68). In steep sub-reaches models the most influential
explanatory variables for the channel widening were the confinement index (R2=0.43), the peak stream
power calculated with pre-flood channel width (R2=0.52) and the total event expenditure energy
(R2=0.55). However in these models the sediment supply was not statistically significant.(Fig.4)
Non- steep slope Steep slope
a) d)
b) e)
c) f)
Figure 4. Simple regression models between width ratio and the most influential controlling factors for
no-steep sub-reaches (a), (b), and (c) and steep sub-reaches (d), (e) and (f).
Field surveys including geomorphological survey, GPS survey and grain-size analysis were carried
out in the Posada and Mannu di Bitti Rivers on April 2015. Three reaches for each study river were
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
8
surveyed in detail. Geomorphological surveys included observations and mapping, by using ArcPad on a
GPS device, of the geomorphic responses to the flood (e.g., bank erosion and scouring, overbank
deposition on the floodplain, sediment input), channel bedforms, floodplain extension, bedrock outcrops,
riparian and floodplain vegetation and the presence of artificial structure along the rivers corridor. 11
grain-size samplings were collected by using the pebble count approach along transects (Bunt et al., 2001)
on the surveyed reaches. Therefore the definition of spatial units (i.e., physiographic units, segments,
reaches and sub-reaches), channel confinement, channel gradient were carried out by using remote
sensing and GIS tools. The analysis was performed on two sets of satellite images of the rivers before
(2011) and after the flood (2014). Five homogeneous reaches were defined for both Posada and Mannu di
Bitti rivers by taking into account channel morphology, lateral confinement (i.e., confinement index and
confinement degree), hydrologic discontinuity, channel slope and artificiality. Furthermore reaches were
divided in 28 and 20 sub-reaches, having a constant slope, respectively for Posada and Mannu di Bitti
rivers by using the method proposed by Vocal Ferencevic and Ashmore (2012). Because DEM resolution
was rather low (10 m), sub-reaches length turned out to be of the order of 700-1000 m (Fig. 5).
Figure 5. Slope profile computed using different distances. Application of measuring channel slope from
a low DEM resolution (10m) the GIS‐based tools method proposed by Vocal Ferencevic and Ashmore (2012) for Posada and Mannu di Bitti rivers. This method is based on constant horizontal increments
(Knighton, 199; Jain at al 2006) and it permitted to extract a satisfactory quality DEM-derived slope for
the stream power calculation. Indeed considering slope over short distances (i.e., 100-500 m) can result in
extreme detail and may be subject to significant error as well as measuring slope over too large a distance
can create a widespread slope and smoothes real channel features and considerable local channel scale
slope variation (i.e., 1500 m).
The second half of the second year (June-December 2015) has been completed abroad, at the
Geosciences Department, Colorado State University (Colorado, USA) under the supervision of Prof.
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
9
Ellen Wohl. During the period abroad, in addition to the outlined PhD project, several activities were
carried out:
▬ Fieldwork in the Rocky Mountain National Park (Colorado, USA) with Professor José A. Ortega
from the Departamento de Geología y Geoquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. The
field work aimed to examine waterfalls on the western side of Rocky Mountain National Park to
evaluate whether drainage area or bedrock properties as reflected in joint characteristics correlate
more strongly with the location and characteristics of individual waterfalls (Fig.6). June 2015.
Figure 6. Example of studied waterfall and bedrock characteristics on the western side of Rocky
Mountain National Park.
▬ Fieldwork on the Corral and Haghe Creek (Poudre, Colorado, USA). The fieldwork aim was to
settle some stage discharge gauging along the Corral and Haghe Creek with professor Ellen Wohl.
July 2015.
Figure 7. Settlement of stage discharge gauging along the Corral and Haghe Creek.
▬ Flume experiment at the Engineering Research Center at CSU (Colorado, USA). This activity was
conducted with Dr. Lina Polvi Sjöberg, a researcher from Umeå University, Sweden. It aimed to
understand the natural condition of semi-alluvial streams in northern Sweden that have been
heavily impacted by timber-floating in order to predict channel geometry and to determine
whether there was any self-organization of bedforms (Fig. 7). August-September 2015.
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
10
Figure 8. Flume built at the Engineering Research Center at CSU.
▬ Fieldtrip to Poudre River (Colorado, USA). The fieldtrip consisted in a survey of a cross section
on the Poudre River in order to measure the active channel width, the high-flow channel width,
the flow depth, the particle size in the channel, the flow velocity and the channel roughness.
Furthermore the data collected were used to estimate low and high discharge for the surveyed
cross section using both the continuity equation and the Manning equation. Moreover different
approaches were applied to estimate roughness n for the channel (i.e., the Manning equation, the
Limerinos equation, Jarret equation, visual estimation using both a table and the Cowan method)
to compare n values obtained with each of these methods for the same reach channel, and
determine the effect of these varying n values on calculation of flow velocity and discharge (Fig.
9). September 2015.
a) b)
F ig Figure 9. Poudre River upstream view (a); measuring of channel width and flow depth on the
surveyed cross section (b).
▬ Fieldtrip to Pawnee Buttes (Colorado, USA). The fieldtrip concerned the examination of the
arroyo formation in the Pawnee Grassland region, northeast of Fort Collins, in order to address the
regional and local-scale control in channel incision, the specific process through which incision
occurred, the rate of incision and his variation through time by doing several observations and
measurements. Basically the field activities consisted in the measurement of valley floor and
channel slope in both actively incising and stabilized reaches, noting vegetative, topographic,
sedimentary characteristics of the basin and measuring channel characteristics (i.e., cross-sectional
area, width/depth ratio, bed gradient, grain size) (Fig. 10). October 2015.
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
11
a) b)
c)
Figure 10. Survey in an actively incising reach (a), (b) and stabilized reach (c).
▬ North Saint Vain Creek (Colorado, USA). Firstly a literature review about the flood that affected
the North St. Vain Creek was carried out. Also a fieldwork took a place on October 2015, under
the supervision of Prof. Sara Rathburn (Geosciences Department, Colorado State University), in
order to assess the main geomorphic effects due to the 2013 flood. The survey consisted in a
geomorphological survey of the highly confined and partly confined channel mostly focused on
the assessment of debris flow, bank failure, wood transport and jams, aggradation/incision and
sediment supply, GPS survey, measuring of channel width by using the laser distance meter (Fig.
11). October 2015.
a) b) c)
Figure 11. North Saint Vain Creek: highly confined reach (a); bank failure and sediment input on
the highly confined reach (b); partly confined reach (c).
Future steps of this research include: (i) definition of the main geomorphic and hydraulic controlling
factors in the Posada and Mannu di Bitti River (e.g., stream power, unit stream power, valley
confinement, channel sinuosity, channel gradient, potential significant tributary sources of sediment,
vegetation) and identification of relationships between those controlling factors and morphological
changes; (ii) definition of the main driving factors of the 2014 flood affected the Lierza River and
assessment of possible correlations with channel responses; (iii) quantitative analysis of geomorphic
response by remote sensing analysis in the St. Vrain Creek and definition of possible correlation with
controlling factors. As for the St. Vrain Creek, the analysis will mainly addresses to: assessment of
geomorphic channel response by comparing pre and post-flood Landsat imageries; estimation of the
volumetric change in sediment storage occurred during the 2013 flood from the difference in surface
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
12
elevations from digital elevation models DoD (i.e., digital elevation model of difference); mapping of
debris flows; definition of the main controlling factors that drove the channel response to the 2013 flood;
iv) final comparison among the different geomorphic responses and controlling factors assessed in the
distinct studied rivers and development and test of conceptual and empirical models.
References
BAKER VR. 1977. Stream channel response to floods with examples from Central Texas. Geological
Society of America Bulletin 88: 1057-1071.
BAKER VR., COSTA JE. 1987. Flood power. In: Mayer, L., Nash, D. (Eds.), Catastrophic Flooding.
Unwin, Boston and London: 1-21.
BRIERLEY GJ, FRYIRS KA. 2005. Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River
Style Framework. Blackwell: Oxford.
BUNTE K., ABT SR. 2001. Sampling Surface and Subsurface Particle-Size Distributions in Wadable
Gravel- and Cobble-Bed Streams for Analyses in Sediment Transport, Hydraulics, and Streambed
Monitoring. United States Department of Agriculture.
CAVALLI, M., TREVISANI, S., COMITI, F., MARCHI, L. 2013. Geomorphometric assessment of
spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments. Geomorphology 188: 31–41.
CHIGNELL S.M.,. ANDERSON R.S.,. EVANGELISTA P.H., LAITURI M.J., MERRITT D.M. 2015.
Multi-Temporal Independent Component Analysis and Landsat 8 for Delineating Maximum Extent of
the 2013 Colorado Front Range Flood. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 9822-9843; doi:10.3390/rs70809822.
COE J.A., KEAN J.W, GODT J.W., BAUM R.L., JONES E.S. 2014. New insights into debris-flow
hazards from an extraordinary event in the Colorado Front Range. GSA Today, v. 24, no. 10, doi:
10.1130/GSATG214A.1.
COSTA JE., O'CONNOR J.E. 1995. Geomorphically Effective Floods. U.S. Geological Survey,
Vancuver, Washington: 89-104.
CREMA, S., SCHENATO, L., GOLDIN, B., MARCHI, L., CAVALLI, M. 2015. Toward the
development of a stand-alone application for the assessment of sediment connectivity. Rendiconti
Online della Soc. Geol. Ital. 34, 58–61.
DEAN DJ., SHMIDT JC. 2013. The geomorphic effectiveness of a large flood on the Rio Grande in the
Big Bend region: Insight on geomorphic controls and post-flood geomorphic response. Geomorphology
201:183-198.
HOOK JM., MANT JM. 2000. Geomorphological impacts of a flood event on ephemeral
channels in SE Spain. Geomorphology 34: 163-180.
JOHNSON RM., WARBURTON J. 2002. Flooding and geomorphic impacts in a mountain torrent:
Raise Beck, central Lake District, England. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 945-969.
KALE VS. 2007. Geomorphic effectiveness of extraordinary floods on three large
rivers of the Indian Peninsula. Geomorphology 85: 306-316.
KNIGHTON AD. 1999. Downstream variation in stream power. Geomorphology 29: 293-306.
KRAPESCH G., HAUER C., HABERSACK H. 2011. Scale orientated analysis of river width changes
due to extreme flood hazard. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11: 2137-2147.
LANGHAMMER L. 2010. Analysis of the relationship between the stream regulations and the
geomorphologic effects of floods. Natural Hazards 54: 121-139.
MAGILLIGAN FJ. 1992. Thresholds and the spatial variability of flood power during extreme floods.
Geomorphology 5: 373-390.
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
13
MERRITT DM., WOHL E. 2003. Downstream hydraulic geometry and channel adjustment during a
flood along an ephemeral, arid-region drainage. Geomorphology 52: 165-180.MILAN DJ. 2012.
Geomorphic impact and system recovery following an extreme flood in an upland
stream: Thinhope Burn, northern England, UK. Geomorphology 138: 319-328.
MILLER, AJ., 1987. What does it take to make a geomorphically effective flood? Some lessons from the
November 1985 flood in West Virginia. In: Kite, J.S. (Ed.), Research on the Late Cenezoic of the
Potomac Highlands, West Virginia. Open File Rep. OF8801.West Virginia Geol. and Econ. Survey,
Morgantown,WV. 3-30.
MILLER AJ. 1990. Flood hydrology and geomorphic effectiveness in the central Appalachians. Earth
Surface Processes and Landforms 15: 119-134.
RICE S. 1998. Which tributaries disrupt downstream fining along gravel-bed rivers?. Geomorphology
22: 39-56
RINALDI M., SURIAN N., COMITI F., BUSSETTINI M. 2013. A method for the assessment and
analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: The Morphological Quality Index
(MQI). Geomorphology 180-181: 96-108.
SURIAN N., RIGHINI M., LUCÌA A., NARDI L., AMPONSAH M., BENVENUTI M., BORGA M.,
CAVALLI M., COMITI F., MARCHI L., RINALDI M., VIERO A. 2015. Channel response to extreme
floods: insights on controlling factors from six mountain rivers in northern Apennines, Italy.
Geomorphology, in review.
VOCAL FERENCEVIC, M.V., ASHMORE, P. 2012. Creating and evaluating digital elevation model-
based stream-power map as a stream assessment tool. River Research and Applications 28, 1394–1416.
WOLMAN M.G., MILLER J.P. 1960. Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes.
Journal of Geology 68: 54-74.
Yochum S.E. 2013. Colorado Front Range flood of 2013: peak flows and flood frequencies. Proceedings
of the 3rd Joint Federal Interagency Conference on Sedimentation and Hydrologic Modeling, April 19-
23, 2015, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova – A.A. 2014-2015
14
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY IN THIS YEAR
Courses:
F. FERRARESE, N. SURIAN: “Corso di GIS avanzato”, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova.
February-March 2015; 18 hours.
K. THIELEN: "English as a 2nd Language-Academic ESL 6-2", FRCC Center for Adult Learning, Fort Collins
(Colorado,USA). June-July 2015; 28 hours.
K. THIELEN: "English as a 2nd Language-Academic ESL 6-2", FRCC Center for Adult Learning, Fort Collins
(Colorado,USA). August-December 2015; 64 hours.
J. ANDERSON: "STAT 511-Design and Data Analysis for Researchers I", Clark Building, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins (Colorado, USA). August-December 2015; 85 hours.
E. WOHL:“G 652 Fluvial Geomorphology”, Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins (Colorado,
USA). August-December 2015; 45 hours.
Publications:
Rinaldi M., Amponsah W., Benvenuti M., Borga M., Comiti F., Lucìa, A., Marchi L., Nardi, L., Righini, M., Surian, N., 2015.
An integrated approach for investigating geomorphic response to extreme events: methodological framework and application
to the October 2011 flood in the Magra River catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, in review.
Surian N., Righini M., Lucìa A., Nardi L., Amponsah M., Benvenuti M., Borga M., Cavalli M., Comiti F., Marchi L., Rinaldi
M., Viero A. (2015). . Channel response to extreme floods: insights on controlling factors from six mountain rivers in northern
Apennines, Italy. Geomorphology, in review.
F. Comiti, M. Righini, L. Nardi A. Lucìa, W. Amposah, M. Borga, M. Cavalli, L. Marchi, M. Rinaldi, N. Surian. Channel
widening during extreme floods: how to integrate it within river corridor planning? 13th Congress INTERPRAEVENT 2016.
30th May-2nd
June 2016, Lucerne, Switzerland, submitted.
Other:
Seminar: M. G. MACKLIN: "Flooding in the Anthropocene: myths, mud, and metals", TESAF, Agripolis, Università degli
studi di Padova. 29th
April 2015.