GARIS PANDUAN PELAKSANAAN PENTAKSIRAN KERJA … filePelaksanaan Pentaksiran Kerja Kursus dan CLO/PLO...
Transcript of GARIS PANDUAN PELAKSANAAN PENTAKSIRAN KERJA … filePelaksanaan Pentaksiran Kerja Kursus dan CLO/PLO...
GARIS PANDUAN PELAKSANAAN PENTAKSIRAN KERJA KURSUS DAN CLO/PLO [EE601 PROJEK 2] JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK POLITEKNIK, KEMENTERIAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI
EDISI PERTAMA DISEMBER 2012
i
PRAKATA
Dokumen ini disediakan sebagai panduan kepada semua pensyarah di Jabatan Kejuruteraan
Elektrik mengenai kaedah pentaksiran bagi kursus EE601 Projek 2. Garis panduan ini boleh
digunapakai dalam proses pelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja kursus yang akan mengukur hasil
pembelajaran pelajar dalam aspek pengetahuan, kemahiran praktikal dan kemahiran insaniah.
Garis panduan ini diharap dapat:
emberi kefahaman kepada pensyarah mengenai kriteria pentaksiran kerja kursus M
projek;
embantu pensyarah dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran kerja kursus projek dan M
embantu pensyarah menyediakan dokumen dan rekod proses pentaksiran kerja M
kursus projek
Nota: Garis panduan ini menjelaskan keperluan yang minimum bagi pentaksiran kursus projek
yang mesti dipenuhi oleh para pelajar. Sehubungan dengan itu, pihak Jabatan
Kejuruteraan Elektrik boleh menambah elemen yang bersesuaian agar ia selari dengan
keperluan semasa.
ii
PENGHARGAAN
Assalamualaikum w.b.t dan Salam Sejahtera agi pihak Seksyen Pembangunan dan Penilaian Kurikulum, saya ingin merakamkan setinggi-tinggi penghargaan dan ucapan tahniah dengan penyediaan Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Kerja Kursus dan CLO/PLO (EE601 Projek 2) yang
merupakan satu bahan rujukan kepada para pensyarah Jabatan Kejuruteraan Elektrik di politeknik.
Usaha mengeluarkan garis panduan ini wajar mendapat pujian memandangkan ianya dapat membantu meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kefahaman para pensyarah seterusnya dapat mewujudkan keseragaman dalam pelaksanaan pentaksiran kursus ini di politeknik masing-masing. Oleh itu, diharapkan garis panduan ini juga akan digunakan untuk memantau pencapaian projek pelajar sepanjang semester dan seterusnya menjana pemberian gred secara sistematik.
Akhir sekali, saya mengucapkan tahniah dan selamat maju jaya kepada Pn. Noorfozila binti Bahari, Pensyarah Utama di Politeknik Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah (POLISAS) yang telah menyumbangkan ilmu pengetahuan dan kepakaran beliau untuk menyediakan garis panduan ini.
Sekian, terima kasih.
HJ. ZULKEPLY BIN ABDUL SAMAD
Timbalan Pengarah
Seksyen Pembangunan dan Penilaian Kurikulum
Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik
B
EE601 PROJECT 2
1
GUIDELINES TO COURSEWORK AND CLO/PLO ASSESSMENT There are TWO (2) types of assessment for EE601 Project 2 which are the Coursework Assessment and the CLO/PLO Assessment. The assessments are done as follows. 1. CLO/PLO Assessment
The EE601 Project 2 CLO/PLO Assessment is divided into the following FOUR (4) parts.
A. To determine the relationship between the Assessment Tasks marks and the CLO marks,
please refer to the following mapping of CLO verses Coursework Distribution given below.
B. The Life-Long Learning assessment (CLO4) will use the provided rubric and rubric marks form.
C. The Project Psychomotor Skill assessment (CLO1) will use the EE601 Project 2 Psychomotor Skill Rubric provided along with the assessment form for the following:
i. Psychomotor skill assessment form and rubric for Hardware project ii. Psychomotor skill assessment form and rubric for Software project
iii. Psychomotor skill assessment form and rubric for Interfacing Project
D. The overall EE601 Project 2 CLO/PLO assessment will be using the following form: i. Coursework CLO and PLO Assessment Form (MQA purposes)
2. Coursework Assessment For EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment, the following are provided:
ii. Coursework Grading Assessment Form (for ISO purposes), iii. Coursework Assessment Marking Schemes for Hardware, Software and Interfacing
Projects The Coursework Grading Assessment Form (for ISO purposes) is an overall coursework assessment for Project 2. The Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme is to aid the assessment of some of the assessment tasks for Project 2. It will ONLY have the marking scheme for the following assessment tasks for Project 2; Attendance, Involvement, Logbook (Format), Presentation, Final Report and Model/System. The assessment task for Logbook (Progress) however, will use the Psychomotor Skill Rubric in Part C above.
EE601 PROJECT 2
2
1. CLO/PLO Assessment
1.
2.
3.
4.
Coursework
CLOCLO Attendance Involvement Logbook Presentation Final Proposal Model / System
* √ - P
√ - C √ - C
√ - C √ - C
√ - A √ - A **√ - A
Legend:
C - Cognitive ; ; A - Affective
Note:
1.
2. CLO2 (Cognitive) mark will come from Logbook and Model / System.
3.
4. CLO4 (Affective) will be assessed using the provided Life-long Learning Rubric for Project 2.
The rubric will include the Attendance, Involvement and Logbook(**) assessments.
} Marks from
Coursework
demonstrate continuous learning and information management skill while engaging in independent
acquisition of new knowledge and skill to develop the project. (A3, PLO6)
Course Learning Outcomes:
Part A. CLO VS COURSEWORK MARKS DISTRIBUTION
P - Psychomotor
Portfolio Product
design project prototype (hardware project) with suitable and attractive casing or system programme
(software project) with user interface. (C5, PLO1)
CLO1 (Psychomotor) mark will come from Logbook(*) assessment and uses the provided EE601 Project 2
Psychomotor Skill rubric.
conduct circuit testing, troubleshooting and repair based on electrical circuit fault finding and operation theory
(hardware project) or test run, debug and execute system programme (software project). (P4, PLO2)
prepare an oral presentation of the project, in group or individually, inclusive of a final report written in a
standard format with the necessary technical data referred to during project implementation. (C3, PLO1)
The rubric mark is 100% and IS NOT PART of the coursework mark.
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3
CLO4
CLO3 (Cognitive) mark will comes from Presentation and Final Proposal assessments.
The mark for CLO1 comes from the Course Progress mark (20%) and IS CONVERTED to 100%.
EE601 PROJECT 2
3
A B C D E F
Acq
uir
e
Info
rma
tio
n
Ma
na
ge
Info
rma
tio
n
Sha
re I
de
as
Le
arn
Ind
ep
en
de
ntl
y
Att
en
da
nce
Invo
lve
me
nt
5 5 5 5 5 5 100%
1 2345678 4 4 4 4 4 4 80
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
Prepared by :
Date :
Note:
1. Assessment of affective skill must be based on the 'Life-long Learning Rubric' provided.
2. Total mark for Life-long Learning skill is to be converted to 100% and IS NOT PART of the coursework mark
Part B. Life-long Learning Rubric Form (CLO4, PLO6)
Ali bin Abu
Total No. Student ID
Aspects
Student Name
( Course Lecturer Name )
EE601 PROJECT 2
4
Very
GoodFair
4 2
A. Acquire Information:
Able to acquire relevant information
from various sources.
B. Manage Information:
Able to manage acquired
information.
C. Share Ideas:
Ready /will ing to share new ideas.
D. Learn Independently: Able to learn
independently.
E. Attendance
Attendance during project sessions
F. Involvement
Involvement in project activities
Skills / Aspects
Learning Domain
(LD) / Programme
Learning Outcome
(PLO)
Involve in more than 90% of the
project activities
Involve in 60 - 70% of the project
activities
LIFE-LONG LEARNING SKILL RUBRIC FOR EE601 PROJECT 2
Demonstrate the ability to learn
independently with minimum
supervision.
Demonstrate the ability to learn
independently with some supervision.
LD6 / PLO6
Life Long
Learning/
Information
Management
Skills and
Continuous
Learning
Retrieve relevant information from
several sources.
Retrieve relevant information from
only one source.
Hardly analyze and integrate acquired
information with own ideas.
Sometimes analyze and integrate
acquired information with own ideas.
Frequently share ideas and
resources.
3
Sometimes share ideas and resources.
Unsatisfactory
1
Attend more than 90% of the
project sessions
Attend 60 - 79% of the project sessions Attend less than 40% of the project
sessions
80 - 90%
Retrieve relevant information
from various sources.
Always analyze and integrate
acquired information with own
ideas.
Excellent
5
Good
Involve in less than 20% of the project
activities
80 - 90% 30 - 50%
Hardly share ideas and resources.
Hardly able to learn independently
and need consistent supervision.
40 - 59%
EE601 PROJECT 2
5
A B C D E F G H
sim
ulat
ion
PCB
layo
ut
Sold
erin
g
Phot
olito
grap
hy
Etch
ing
Com
pone
nt
test
ing
Circ
uit t
estin
g
Mod
el
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100%
1 2345678 Ali bin Abu 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 79
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
Prepared by :
Date :
Note:
1. Assessment of psychotor skill must be based on the 'EE601 Project 2 Psychomotor Skill' rubric given below.
2. Total 1 - marks for Project Course Progress (ISO mark - 20%)
3. Total 2 - marks for Psychomotor Skill (CLO1,PLO2 - 100% each)
4.
No. Student ID
Course Lecturer Name
0
0
0
0
0
Part C(i). Psychomotor Skill Assessment / Project Progress Assessment (CLO1, PLO2 - Hardware Project)
Total 2
(Psycho
motor)
0
0
0
0
20%
16
Total 1
(Project
Course
Progress)
Student Name
Aspects
The number of aspects in the rubric form is determined by the number of aspects used in the project
psychomotor skill rubric for hardware project.
EE601 PROJECT 2
6
A B C D E
Initi
al D
evel
opm
ent
of P
rogr
am
Mai
n Pr
ogra
m a
nd
Subr
outin
e
Test
ing
and
debu
ggin
g
Exec
ute
Prog
ram
Des
ign
Syst
em
Soft
war
e
10 10 10 10 10 100%
1 2345678 Ali bin Abu 9 9 9 9 9 902 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
Prepared by :
Date :
Note:
1. Assessment of psychotor skill must be based on the 'Project Psychomotor Skill' rubric given below.
2. Total 1 - marks for Project Course Progress (ISO mark - 20%)
3. Total 2 - marks for Psychomotor Skill (CLO3,PLO2 - 100% each)
Course Lecturer Name
Total 2
(Psycho
motor)
Part C(ii) Psychomotor Skill Assessment / Project Progress Assessment (CLO1, PLO2 - Software Project)
No. Student ID Student Name
Total 1
(Project Course
Progress)
Aspects
20%
180
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
EE601 PROJECT 2
7
A B C D E F G
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100%
1 2345678 Ali bin Abu 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 90
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
Prepared by :
Date :
Note:
1. Assessment of psychotor skill must be based on the 'Project Psychomotor Skill - Interfacing Project' rubric given.
2. Total 1 - marks for Project Course Progress (ISO mark - 20%)
3. Total 2 - marks for Psychomotor Skill (CLO1,PLO2 - 100% each)
4. The number of aspects in the rubric form is determined by the number of aspects used in the project psychomotor skill rubric.
0
0
0
Part C(iii) Psychomotor Skill Assessment / Project Progress Assessment (CLO1, PLO2 - Interfacing Project)
Aspects
Te
stin
g /
de
bu
gg
ing
/ si
mu
lati
on
soft
wa
re-h
ard
wa
re
inte
rfa
cin
g
Total 1
(Project
Course
Progress)
Total 2
(Psychomotor)
0
0
0
Course Lecturer Name
Cir
cuit
sim
ula
tio
n
an
d P
CB
lay
ou
t
Ph
oto
lito
gra
ph
y
an
d E
tch
ing
Co
mp
on
en
t a
nd
Cir
cuit
te
stin
g
So
lde
rin
g a
nd
Mo
de
l
Ma
in p
rog
ram
an
d
Su
bro
uti
ne
No. Student ID Student Name
0
0
20%
18
0
EE601 PROJECT 2
8
2 - 3 7 - 8
A. Circuit simulation
- simulation techniques
- simulation results
B. PCB layout using CAD
- track size and distance
C.
- use of soldering tools
- soldering quality
D. Photolitography
E.
- steps in etching process
- PCB quality (after etching)
F. Component testing
- use of correct components
- use of correct testing tools and technique
G.
H.
- produce good casing and wiring finishes
Note: The aspects of the project psychomotor skill can be added or removed as required.
- pad size
- footprint selection and placement
- layout size
Aspects
Able to use correct simulation techniques and produce
correct simulation results / displays for parts of the project
circuit.
Score Descriptions
Excellent
9 - 10
Inability to use proper simulation techniques and produce
correct simulation results / displays for most part of the
project circuit.
Poor
Able to use correct simulation techniques and produce correct
simulation results / displays successfully.
Acceptable handling of the UV exposure unit and correct
exposure duration used.
Use correct tools and techniques for testing ALL different
components.
Able to use and handle correctly the UV exposure unit and
correct exposure duration used.
Observe the safety procedures of handling the etchant in the
etching steps, PCB tracks produced are well-defined and shiny
with no oxide layer on the tracks.
- use of photolithography tools (UV exposure
unit)
- exposure duration
Etching
Not able to use and handle the UV exposure unit in a proper
manner and over setting the exposure duration.
Does not observe the safety procedures of handling the
etchant in the etching steps, PCB tracks produced are jagged
and corroded tracks with oxide layer.
Incorrect component used, incorrect use of tools and
techniques for testing the components.
Incorrect use of tools and techniques to trace the input and
output and testing of the project circuit. Circuits fail to
function.
Soldering
Perfect track size, track distance, pad size, footprint selection
and placement and PCB layout size.
Correct handling of the soldering and desoldering tools. Solder
is shiny and of proper size.
Use correct tools and techniques for testing some of the
components.
Use correct components, use correct tools and techniques to
trace the input and output and testing of ALL parts of the
project circuit. Circuits are fully functional.
0 - 1
- use of correct circuit testing technique
- use of correct testing tools
Breadboard Circuit testing
Improper track size, track distance, pad size, footprint
selection and placement and PCB layout size.
Improper handling of the soldering and desoldering tools.
Produce many cold-joints and bulky solder.
Observe the safety procedures of handling the etchant in the
etching steps, produced some well-defined shiny PCB tracks
and and some oxidated tracks.
Use correct component, use correct tools and techniques to
trace the input and output and testing of SOME parts of the
circuit. Circuits are partly functional.
Moderate
4 - 6
Proper and acceptable track size, track distance, pad size,
footprint selection and placement and PCB layout size.
Correct handling of the soldering and desoldering tools.
Produce a few cold-joint or bulky solder.
Part C(i) EE601 PROJECT 2 PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL RUBRIC (HARDWARE PROJECT)
Model Model design is not acceptable, poor wiring finishes and uses
unacceptable quality materials.
Model is well-designed with very good casing and wiring
finishes and uses good quality material.- produce model /casing (hardware) or a
complete system (software)
Model design is acceptable with proper wiring finishes and
uses good quality materials.
EE601 PROJECT 2
9
2 - 3 7 - 8
A. Initial Development of Program
- flow chart
- algorithm
B. Writing Main program and Subroutine
- main program and subroutine links
C. Testing and debugging
- syntax / logical error
D.
E.
- attractive program layout display
Note:The aspects of the project psychomotor skill can be added or removed as required.
Excellent design of system software wih very good user
interactive elements. The program is visually
stimulating through active animation, color, and
graphics.
Did not select suitable software to perform the task
of the project. Was not able to execute the program.
Design System Software Poor design of system software with no user
interactive elements and too simple and
unattractive layout display.
Acceptable design of system software with user
interactive elements but visually not so stimulating
layout display.
- produce a complete system with user
interface
Flow chart or algorithm is logical but the sequence is
hard to follow, the main program is linked to the
subroutine.
Flow chart or algorithm is logical and easy to follow and
in sequence, the main program is linked to the
subroutine.
The main program and the subroutine does not
linked. Input / output declaration and program not
according to standard programming format.
The main program and the subroutine is linked. Input /
output declaration and program not according to
standard programming format.
The main program and the subroutine is well written
and linked. Input / output declaration and program are
according to standard programming format.
Select appropriate software to perform the task of the
project. Able to make the program partly work, loads in
acceptable time duration, and quite easy to navigate
through.
Select the precise and best software to perform the task
of the project. Able to make the program works well,
loads quickly, and easy to navigate through.
-selection of software
-performance
- programming format
- main and subroutine interaction
Execute Program
Test and debugging of program is unsuccessful, with
many logical and syntax error. Main program and
subroutine did not interact and no passing of data.
Able to test and debug parts of the program with still few
logical and syntax error. Main program and subroutine
seems to interact and data is partly passed correctly.
Able to test and debug program successfully with no
logical and syntax error. Main program and subroutine
interacts and data is passed correctly.
Part C(ii) EE601 PROJECT 2 PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL RUBRIC (SOFTWARE PROJECT)
Aspects
Score Descriptions
Poor Moderate Excellent
0 - 1 4 - 6 9 - 10
Flow chart or algorithm is not logical and the
sequence is confusing, no links between the main
program to the subroutine.
EE601 PROJECT 2
10
2 - 3 7 - 8
A. Circuit simulation and PCB layout using CAD
- simulation results
- track size and distance
B. Photolitography and Etching
- safety steps in etching process
- PCB quality (after etching)
C. Component and Breadboard Circuit testing
- use of correct components
D.
- produce good casing and wiring finishes
E. Writing Main program and Subroutine
- flow chart / algorithm
- main program and subroutine links
F. Testing / debugging / simulation
- syntax / logical error
G.
Note:The aspects of the project psychomotor skill can be added or removed as required.
Moderate Excellent
0 - 1 4 - 6 9 - 10
Not able to use and handle the UV exposure unit and
over setting the exposure duration. Does not observe
the safety procedures of handling the etchant in the
etching steps, PCB tracks produced are jagged and
corroded tracks with oxide layer.
Incorrect component used, incorrect use of tools and
techniques for testing the components. Incorrect use of
tools and techniques to trace the input and output and
testing of the project circuit. Circuits fail to function.
Use correct tools and techniques for testing some of the
components. Use correct component, use correct tools
and techniques to trace the input and output and testing
of SOME parts of the circuit. Circuits are partly
Use correct tools and techniques for testing ALL different
components. Use correct components, use correct tools and
techniques to trace the input and output and testing of ALL
parts of the project circuit. Circuits are fully functional.
Part C(iii) EE601 PROJECT 2 PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL RUBRIC (INTERFACING PROJECT)
Aspects
Score DescriptionsPoor
- footprint selection and placement
- layout size
Able to produce correct simulation results / displays
successfully. Perfect track size, track distance, pad size,
footprint selection and placement and PCB layout size.
- programming format
Test and debugging of program is unsuccessful, with
many logical and syntax error. Main program and
subroutine did not interact and no passing of data.
Able to test and debug parts of the program with still
few logical and syntax error. Main program and
subroutine seems to interact and data is partly passed
correctly.
Able to test and debug program successfully with no logical
and syntax error. Main program and subroutine interacts
and data is passed correctly.- main and subroutine interaction
- use of photolithography tools
- exposure duration
Model design is acceptable with quite attractive layout
and display and uses good quality materials, proper
wiring finishes with a few cold-joint or bulky solder.
Model is well-designed with attractive layout and display,
very good casing and uses good quality material, and wiring
finishes with ALL solders are shiny and of proper size.
Soldering and Model Model design is not acceptable and uses unacceptable
quality materials., produce poor wiring finishes with
many cold-joints and bulky solder - soldering quality
- produce model /casing
Able to handle the UV exposure unit and correct
exposure duration used. Observe the safety procedures
of handling the etchant in the etching steps, produced
some well-defined shiny PCB tracks and and some
oxidated tracks.
Able to use and handle correctly the UV exposure unit and
correct exposure duration used. Observe the safety
procedures of handling the etchant in the etching steps,
PCB tracks produced are well-defined and shiny with no
oxide layer on the tracks.
Fail to download and execute the program. Input and
output devices do not function at all.
Able to download and execute the program. The
software and hardware partly interfaced correctly with
only SOME of the input and output devices operates
according to design.
Flow chart or algorithm is not logical and the sequence
is confusing, no links between the main program to the
subroutine. Input / output declaration and program not
according to standard programming format.
Flow chart or algorithm is logical but the sequence is
hard to follow, the main program is linked to the
subroutine. Input / output declaration and program not
according to standard programming format.
Flow chart or algorithm is logical and easy to follow and in
sequence, the main program is linked to the subroutine and
are well writte. Input / output declaration and program are
according to standard programming format.
Download and execute program successfully, Complete and
excellent interface between the harware and the software.
The input and output devices operates fully and according
to design.
Program downloading and software-
hardware interfacing
- produce a complete system with user
interface
Inability to produce correct simulation results / displays
for most part of the project circuit. Improper track size,
track distance, pad size, footprint selection and
placement and PCB layout size.
Able to produce correct simulation results / displays for
parts of the project circuit. Proper and acceptable track
size, track distance, pad size, footprint selection and
placement and PCB layout size.
- use of correct component and circuit
testing technique
EE601 PROJECT 2
11
CLO4 PLO2 PLO6
Logb
ook
TOTAL
Logb
ook
Mod
el /
Sys
tem
TOTAL
Pres
enta
tion
Fina
l Rep
ort
TOTAL
Life
-long
Lea
rnin
g
Rubr
ic CLO2
+
CLO3
TOTAL CLO1 CLO4
20 100 10 20 100 20 20 100 100 200 100 100 100
1. 12345678 Ali bin Abu 15 75 8 16 80 17 18 88 80 168 84 75 80
2. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 8 9 8 8 8
(Course Lecturer Name)
Note:
1. Logbook is used to assess CLO1 (psychomotor skill), CLO2 and CLO4 (life-long learning skill)
2. To assess CLO1, use the provided rubric for EE601 Project 2 Psychomotor Skill assessment.
3.
PLO1
Student NameStudent ID#No.
CLO3CLO1 CLO2
To assess CLO4, use the Life-long Learning rubric provided. Mark for CLO4 is 100% and IS NOT PART of
the coursework mark.
Prepared by :
Date:
Group Attainment Average
Part D(i) - COURSEWORK CLO and PLO ASSESSMENT FOR EE601 PROJECT 2
EE601 PROJECT 2
12
2. Coursework Assessment The EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment uses Coursework Grading Assessment Form (for ISO purposes) below, with the aid of the Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme provided in section 2(ii).
5% 5% 20% 20% 20% 100%
1. 2345678 Ali bin Abu 4 4 19 19 19 91 A
2. 0
3. 0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
7. 0
8. 0
9. 0
10. 0
(Course Lecturer Name)
(format)
10%
8
Atte
ndan
ce
Invo
lvem
ent
(progress)
20%
18
Pres
enta
tion
Date:
No. Student ID# Student Name
2(i) COURSEWORK GRADING ASSESSMENT - EE601 PROJECT 2
GRADE
Prepared by :
Fina
l
Prop
osal
TOTAL
ProductPortfolio
Mod
el /
Syst
emLogbook
EE601 PROJECT 2
13
1-2
(Poor)
3-4
(Moderate)
5
(Excellent)
1 Attendance / 5 / 5
2 Involvement / 5 / 5
3 / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 20 / 10
4 Presentation / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 20 / 20
5 Final report / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 30 / 20
6 Model :
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 50 / 20
Content and
Concept
Casing and
Layout
2(ii) EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme (Hardware Project)
Verification by project supervisor every 2 weeks
Continuous improvement based on feedback by
project supervisor
Project Activity Plan / Gantt chart
Weekly notes on project activities
Student is involved in 90% of project activities
Scaling
ItemTotal
Marks
The model size is appropriate.
Attractive control panel layout and labelling.
Logbook format mark :
Presentation mark :
Functional
Clear explanation / description of the contents
Include costing / bill of materials
Abstract / introduction / acknowledgement
Include graphics / tables / diagrams
ScoreAspects
Student unattendance is < 10%
Keypoints
Logbook
format
Use of visual aids
Note: The aspects can be added or deleted as required. Total marks should be converted to 20% (for EE601 Project 2 coursework
assessment)
Final Report mark :
Model mark :
Use good quality material
Neat wiring layout and finishes
The project works well.
Good safety elements and procedure
Clear operating instruction manual.
Content related to implemented project
Conclusion / Project further work
The project offers a solution to a problem.
The project sources are cited, reliable and replicable.
The project aligns with the curriculum & standards.
Excellent communication skill
Team work spirit
Follow standard format (table of contents)
EE601 PROJECT 2
14
1-2
(Poor)
3-4
(Moderate)
5
(Excellent)
1 Attendance / 5 / 5
2 Involvement / 5 / 5
3 / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 20 / 10
4 Presentation / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 20 / 20
5 Final report / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 30 / 20
6 System software :
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 80 / 20
2(ii) EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme (Software Project)
Item Aspects KeypointsScaling
ScoreTotal
Marks
Student unattendance is < 10%
Student is involved in 90% of project activities
Logbook
format
Project Activity Plan / Gantt chart
Weekly notes on project activities
Continuous improvement based on feedback by
Verification by project supervisor every 2 weeks
Logbook format mark :
Content related to implemented project
Use of visual aids
Excellent communication skill
Team work spirit
Presentation mark :
Follow standard format (table of contents)
Abstract / introduction / acknowledgement
Include graphics / tables / diagrams
Clear explanation / description of the contents
Include costing / bill of materials
Conclusion / Project further work
Final Report mark :
Content
The content is educational.
The content is valid & reliable.
The content is accurate & factual.
The content is clear.
The content sources are cited and reliable.
The content aligns with the curriculum & standards.
The content is free from bias.
Note: The aspects can be added or deleted as required. Total marks should be converted to 20% (for EE601 Project 2 coursework
assessment)
System Software mark :
Ease of Use
The directions are clear and easy to follow.
The program is interactive.
The program is easy to navigate through.
The students can exit the program at any time.
Program
execution
The installation and setup are easy.
The program loads quickly & is error-free.
The program works well.
The audio (sound) is clear.
The program is visually stimulating through active
EE601 PROJECT 2
15
1-2
(Poor)
3-4
(Moderate)
5
(Excellent)
1 Attendance / 5 / 5
2 Involvement / 5 / 5
3 / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 20 / 10
4 Presentation / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 20 / 20
5 Final report / 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 30 / 20
6 Model and System Software :
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 5
/ 80 / 20
Ease of Use
Logbook format mark :
Content related to implemented project
Use of visual aids
Excellent communication skill
Team work spirit
Student unattendance is < 10%
Student is involved in 90% of project activities
Logbook
format
Project Activity Plan / Gantt chart
Weekly notes on project activities
Continuous improvement based on feedback by
project supervisor
Verification by project supervisor every 2 weeks
2(iii) EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme (Interfacing Project)
Item Aspects Keypoints
Scaling
ScoreTotal
Marks
Note: The aspects can be added or deleted as required. Total marks should be converted to 20% (for EE601 Project 2 coursework assessment)
Operation of input and output devices
Casing and
Layout
The model size is appropriate.
Attractive control panel layout and labelling.
Use good quality material
Neat wiring layout and finishes
Functional
The project downloads and works well.
Good safety elements and procedure
Clear operating instruction manual.
Model & System Software mark :
Execution
and
Interfacing
The installation and setup are easy.
Iinterfacing between the software and the hardware
The program is interactive.
The program is easy to navigate through.
The program can be exited at any time.
Include costing / bill of materials
Conclusion / Project further work
Final Report mark :
Content and
Concept
The project offers a correct solution to a problem.
The project sources are cited, reliable and replicable.
The project aligns with the curriculum & standards.
Presentation mark :
Follow standard format (table of contents)
Abstract / introduction / acknowledgement
Include graphics / tables / diagrams and the sources
Correct explanation / description of the contents