Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
-
Upload
andru-dea-andreea -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
1/19
coala Naional de Studii Politice i Administrative
Argumentation Theory
-Final Paper-
Andreea Gospodariu
Master Comunicare i Publicitate cu predare n limba englez
5
10
15
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
2/19
I. Introduction
I chose as object of my analysis an advertorial that appeared in the May 1962 issue of
Mechanix Illustrated, an American magazine founded in the first half of the 20th century. It
presents the story of a journalist who decides to follow the fastest way to grow hair and tries
out a skull falsie. After he tells his editor that hes curious about Tashays (this was the name of
the hair pieces), he gets a reply that motivates him to write the advertorial that I am about to
analyze (annex 1).
I chose this in spite of all the other advertorials because its almost 50 years old and I was
really curious if it would be so much different from the ones we can see nowadays. I also chose
this, and not one of the other advertorials presented in the magazines site, as I thought this
subject is funny and outdated now, because there are other ways to resolve the baldness issue,
but at the time, it was rather controversial.
Throughout the paper, I will establish the standpoints and substandpoints at stake in the
text, I will discuss and exemplify the dialectical stages present in the advertorial. I will also
formulate the main arguments which the author puts forward for his standpoint and I will
identify and analyze the argumentation schemes and how strategic maneuvering occurs in the
text, as well as the role of pictures in the advertorial. In the last page I will try to identify the
violations of the ten rules of the critical discussion, and analyze the fallacies present in the
advertorial.
I found the strategy of starting off the discourse by being rather skeptical, becoming more
and more enthusiastic and finishing it in a positive note that stated that choosing the Tashays is
the best solution for the bald people, a really good one because faking empathy is, in my opinion,
one of the most important features of an advertisement or advertorial.
2
20
25
30
35
40
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
3/19
II. Analysis
I start off with the idea that at the time, most of the people considered wearing a toupee
tasteless, as it looked fake and unnatural. Given this, they may be seen as the antagonists that
oppose to the ones that originally developed and wore the toupee, and the writer is, at first, on
the antagonists side, but as we keep on reading, he switches teams and starts bringing pro
arguments in wearing it. So, in this advertorial, the readers of the magazine are the antagonists
and the author starts out by agreeing with them, but changes his standpoint and becomes the
protagonist.
The text is part of a retrogressive presentation, as the standpoint precedes the
argumentation (EEemeren, 2002, p. 37). Also, the argumentation is based on the power of
example, as the author uses his own experience as an argument. The main standpoint in the text
is that There is only one cure for baldness and that is the toupee(1). From the authors point of
view, this means two things that also become implicit premises: baldness is a disease (in a
pejorative sense) and it must be cured so bald people must always hide their lack of hair and
hope that no one will notice that they are wearing a some kind of wig. Another standpoint is that
the mystery and jokes about the toupees have come to an end with the argument that the idea that
toupees are bad has changed (3) [because] a man named Louis Feder has made them
absolutely undetectable and non-skid [and] has won for them a wide social acceptance (3-5).
There are no other explicit standpoints or arguments in the text, there are only experiences meant
to appeal to the emotional part of the audience. But it is implicit that the audience (the
antagonist) thinks toupees are fake, ugly and a subject of joke, while the writer (seen as the
protagonist) has a common standpoint at first but starts to change it (through the experience oftrying out a Tashay) and ends up believing that toupees are a good idea and that they can look
natural.
The argument a man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and
non-skid [and] has won for them a wide social acceptance (3-5) becomes a standpoint with
3
45
50
55
60
65
70
5
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
4/19
several arguments that are implicit, in the form of the authors stories about experience with the
Tashay. This is a coordinative argumentation, as the arguments must be taken together to
constitute a conclusive defense (Eemeren, 2002, p. 65). The arguments are dependent on each
other for the defense of the standpoint because each argument by itself is too weak to
conclusively support the standpoint (Eemeren, 2002, p. 65).
Therefore, a man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and non-
skid [and] has won for them a wide social acceptance:
-because toupees are made from natural hair bought from live peasant women- because
the hair of most women is unsuitable- because it has been dyed or permanently waved (22-24)
argumentation based on a causal relation
-because Tashays are made from several colors of hair as do most human heads (25-28)
-because you can choose the cut-out (43)
-because Feders craftsmen can crochet 750-1,000 hairs into one square inch of hairpiece
as there are 1,000 hairs per square inch in a full natural head of hair (52-53)
- because the stitches used give the hair a bristly, natural, upstanding look (54-55)
-because they can cut, trim and apply double-faced adhesive (57-58)
-because they barber the hairpiece to your natural hair (58-59)
-because you can swim in a Tashay (66)
-because you can drive in an open convertible with no harmful results (66-67)
-because even you can forget that you are wearing it (68)
-because good old average Joe Bloewe can hold his head high secure in the knowledge
that his Tashay will stay up there without betraying him (so even average men are not betrayed
by this particulary toupee) (80-81)
The first dialectical stage, the confrontation, is present in the first 7 lines of the
advertorial, where the difference of opinion starts to become more obvious and the two parts
4
75
80
85
90
95
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
5/19
silently establish that there is a difference of opinion: the author changed his mind throughout the
investigation of the Tashays, while the audience still thinks toupees are a really bad idea.
In the opening stage (8-10) the author decides to bring proof and justify his action (of
changing his mind) by testing out the Tashay himself.
He makes an appointment to personally see Louis Feder, the father of the Tashays and
share his experience with the audience, and this is the start of the argumentation stage (11-70). In
my opinion the concluding stage is the part where the author starts writing about how to take
proper care of a toupee and stating the prices (71-81). The last 5 lines are the ultimate try to
convince the audience that toupees are actually great through an attempt using Joe Bloewe, a
name used to refer to a man whose name is not known or whose normality is being emphasized.
The author tries to demonstrate that his views reflect those of the common person. The
concluding stage is another weak point of this advertorial, due to the fact that the argumentation
was pretty weak as well. Because his arguments were subjective, a subjective and weak
conclusion follows and it is only deducted: the Tashays look very much like the real hair, they
are well made and fitted and they can stay on the head for a very long time. It is not a very
powerful conclusion and cannot answer any of the possible questions of the audience like: Was
it worth the money in the long run?, Was it obvious that you were wearing a toupee?, Did it
make you feel different? How? or Did it look natural on your head?.
The argumentation stage is actually the biggest part of the advertorial, as the author
explains in a very detailed manner how he perceived the experience from being received by the
people working at the toupee store and how they managed to help him get past his anxiety, the
way they explained step by step the process of toupee-making, and how they managed to realize
his own Tashay. In my opinion it would have been a better approach if he presented
convincing arguments to support his standpoint, not only to tell the story in detail, but to show
some positive reactions to his improved new look, or how people perceived him as being
younger, better looking, more confident etc. Sticking to his own opinion, clearly affected bysubjectiveness, makes his argumentation scheme a weak one.
The images used in this advertorial talk for themselves, as the first picture shows a bald,
sad man, while the second presents the same man with a toupee, smiling (annex 3). The images
also have a description below them:
5
100
105
110
115
120
125
10
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
6/19
-the first with the bald man SAD AND PENSIVE client of the House of Fender before
being fitted with his Tashay
-the second with the same man, but with a toupee JOLLY, CONFIDENT client
wearing Tashay. Friends soon forget you ever were denuded.
The images along with the description are not a very subtle suggestion that bald men will
be happier using a Tashay, therefore reinforcing the authors arguments.
Some critical questions that could appear are: Is the case mentioned as example indeed
representative? and Is the case sufficient to justify the generalization?. As I said before, the
argumentation scheme is not very powerful as it is sentenced to a subjective interpretation the
authors. To successfully sell a product one must use testimonials from a number of people,
positive reactions to the product or any other outcomes the buyer would have from it. So the case
mentioned in the advertorial is not representative, nor sufficient to justify the generalisation or to
support the purpose of the text itself to increase the sales of Tashays. Even if the people
working at the toupee store were very helpful and the toupee itself is a great product, the
advertorial presents only a day in the life of the toupee-buyer, and a not very important one the
day when his Tashay is made and very few details from the future experience of wearing it,
while the important part, the feed-back one gets from people, is clearly ignored by the author
What the author clearly lacks is powerful evidence: he narrates the story adding up his own
opinion about the product, opinion which is definitely subjective, so the arguments dont carryany weight as they are not supported by an objective view or at least someone elses subjective
view. The text sells readers to advertisers, but not customers to Louis Feder, the owner of the
toupee-store (Slade, 2002, p. 1).
The toupees are clearly a high involvement product and advertisements for high
involvement products may require the target audience to reason, the reasoning is only part of the
message, and affective components (the feel), are equally important (Slade, 2002, p. 1). Here,
the reasoning part as well as the affective components are ignored. The affective component
would have been achieved if the author told a story about how the toupee made him feel in some
relevant situation of if the presented some reactions from friends or family. The reasoning part
would have also been emphasised by some stories about how his baldness affects his everyday
life. These components are merely presented in the two pictures from the beginning of the
advertorial, but they should have been developed as a more detailed story.
6
130
135
140
145
150
155
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
7/19
According to Kress and van Leeuwens textual metafunction as the
meaning of compositional elements of the image (Slade, 2003, p. 3, annex
4), the appearance of the text and the pictures is a not very correct one as in
the upper left part should be the Ideal Given and in the upper right the Ideal
New (Slade, 2003, p. 3). We can notice in the magazine that in the upper left
is the picture with the bald man, while in the upper right the one with the
same man wearing a toupee. The context, though, is not necessarily a
proper one for using this theory, as this is a magazine, not a printed
advertorial by itself, and the arrangement follows the logic scheme of
moving our eyes forward, or to the right part of the page. Also, the picture
itself shows the man from his chest up and the reader may sense some kind
of physical or metaphorical approach to the person in the picture, and this
may try to fill up the need for the affective component of the advertorial.
Advertisements are the prime example of visual argumentation precisely
because they are conventionally read as persuasive images (Slade, 2003,
p.4) but even if the pictures could have a powerful effect on the reader, we
cannot use the images as being arguments, at least not without a real
written argument to support them, as Fleming (1996) says that if all
argumentation is by definition verbal confrontation, then evidently non verbal confrontation is
not argumentation (Slade, 2003, p. 4).
Regarding the strategic maneuvering in the confrontation stage, it aims for the most
effective choice among the potential issues for discussion, restricting the disagreement space in
such a way that the confrontation concentrates on the subject or the points the speaker or writer
finds easiest to handle (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). In this case, the issue of discussion becomes the
toupee, as it is easy for the writer to approach this subject because he experienced the feeling.
In the opening stage, strategic maneuvering aims to creating the most advantageous starting
point, for instance by calling to mind or by eliciting helpful concessions from the other
party (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). In this advertorial the starting point is the idea of trying out a
toupee and deciding to narrate the experience: Like many bald men, I had long toyed with the
idea of trying out a skull falsie and one day while talking with MI editor Bill Parker, I mentioned
this secret thought. His reaction was, Well, Bob, why dont you look into the matter and give us
7
160
165
170
175
180
185
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
8/19
a report? So, here it is..In the argumentation stage, the speaker or writer can, starting from
the list of status issues associated with the type of standpoint at issue, choose strategic lines of
defence or attack that involve selecting from the available loci those that suit him or her best
(Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). The strategy here is presenting the arguments as experiences with the
toupee, explaining in detail the whole story, from the authors visit to the headman of the
business, to the rather short positive personal feed-back about the Tashay. Regarding the
concluding stage, in theory all efforts must be directed toward achieving the result of the
discourse desired, for instance, by pointing out the consequences of accepting a certain complex
of arguments (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6), but in the advertorial, this never happens. The author does
not tell the readers how felt about his purchase, if he got positive feed-back from other people, if
he was perceived in another way due to the fact that he was hairless no more, if the toupee was
useful in any way or even if it was a good experience in the long run.
Returning to the power of the arguments, they should be as persuasive as possible its
rhetorical moves must, at all dialectical stages of the discourse, be adapted to the audience
demand (Eemeren, p. 163) meaning that they must create a certain amount of empathy or
communion between the arguer and his audience (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). In this case, the
empathy is totally missing as the authors stories regard the product itself and not the users
feelings and gratifications. The author does not even try to enhance the status of personal
feelings and impressions to that of widely shared value judgements and the status of subjectivevalues to that of facts(Eemeren, 2000, p. 6), mainly because he does not share any personal
feelings about the product or stimulate fraternization more that what we would expect a seller
to do. In the following lines of the text we find the author using prolepsis the figure of
anticipating and clearing away objections (Eemeren, 2000, p. 7): Long the butt of jokes and
scornful remarks, there was once a plain brown envelope sort of mystery surrounding the
making, selling, buying and wearing of cranium cozies but all that has been changed. A man
named Louis Federhas made them absolutely undetectable and non-skid. Most important of all,
perhaps, he has won for them a wide social acceptance. The author tries to anticipate some of
the audiences arguments against the toupee (the users of the toupees are an easy target for jokes,
people can tell when youre wearing a toupee, you are not socially accepted if you wear a toupee,
it is tasteless to wear such a thing etc) and to clear them away with some remarks that are not
sustained in any way throughout the written material.
8
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
15
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
9/19
Regarding the violations of the ten rules of critical discussion, there is just one thing to
discuss. I believe that in this advertorial there is a violation of the Rule 8 regarding the validity
denying the antecedent. The mistake made in this case is that a sufficient condition is treated as a
necessary condition (Eemeren, 2002, p. 133). The author starts the article from the rather
unexpressed premise that toupees that are made from artificial hair will always look fake.
Afterwards he affirms that the Tashays are made from natural hair from live peasant women,
therefore the result is that Tashays must look real because they are made from real hair.
If a toupee is made from artificial hair (antecendent) it looks fake. (consequent)
Tashays are made from natural, real hair. (denial of the antecedent)
Therefore: Tashays dont look fake. They look real.
III. Conclusion
This advertorial has a very weak concluding stage that is so important in advertising,
because the argumentation was weak as well. It was also too long, with no evident traces of
arguments. As I said, it would have been a better approach for the writer to present convincing
arguments to support his standpoint, not only to narrate the story of how he got his toupee done
in 2 weeks by a bunch of great people. He should have shown some positive reactions to his new
look or some feedback from other people and how they perceived him as being handsome,
younger or more confident. The text looked promising at the beginning, but after a further
reading and a closer look, it became more and more obvious that it was just a long story with no
happy ending. Even being so long, and losing the audience at the half of the advertorial, many of
the readers may have tried to read the end of it, maybe out of curiosity, to see the aftermath, the
conclusions and what the author gained from buying the Tashay, and found some not very
convincing facts and no trace of strong evidence that they should try out another toupee. People
who were afraid of wearing a toupee because of other peoples reactions, would look for reasons
9
225
230
235
240
245
250
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
10/19
not to be afraid anymore, but they only found some weak arguments dressed in a long story, as
there were no opinions at all about the product or the experience.
There is another thing important here, the first sentence of the article There is only one
positive cure for baldness and that is the toupee, that even made me, as a non-bald girl to feel a
little offended. This means that the author states that baldness is a disease that must necessary be
cured. Yes, it is the advertising industries role to create new needs in our minds in order to sell
more and more types of products, but not by offending people.
In conclusion, I believe that this advertorial may have done its job at the time, but today
this piece of material would not get the chance to be published because of its lack of
effectiveness.
References:
10
255
260
265
270
275
280
20
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
11/19
1. Eemeren, Frans, H., van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (2002).
Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
2. Slade, Christina. (2002). Reasons to Buy: The Logic of Advertisements. Canberra:
University of Canberra, ACT 2600.
3. Slade, Christina. (2003). Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements.
Canberra: University of Canberra, ACT 2601.
4. Eemeren, Frans, H., van, Houtlosser, Peter. (2000) Rhetorical Analysis Within a
Pragma-Dialectical Framework. The Case of R. J. Reynolds. Amsterdam: University of
Amsterdam.
5. Eemeren, Frans, H., van, Houtlosser, Peter. Argumentation in Practice.
Source:http://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+
%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6i
eOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&r
esnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson
%20argumentative&f=false available at 28th of January 2011
Source for the advertorial: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?
magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966
Annex 1
11
285
290
295
300
305
310
http://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966http://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966http://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966http://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966 -
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
12/19
The Fastest Way to Grow Hair
By Robert Brindley
There is only one positive cure for baldness and that is the toupee.
Long the butt of jokes and scornful remarks, there was once a plain brown envelope
sort of mystery surrounding the making, selling, buying and wearing of cranium cozies but all
that has been changed. A man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and
non-skid. Most important of all, perhaps, he has won for them a wide social acceptance.
Mr. Feder presides over the House of Feder in New York City. His hairpieces are known as
Tashays (not only a word he coined but a device for which he was granted a U. S. Patent).
Like many bald men, I had long toyed with the idea of trying out a skull falsie and one
day while talking with MI editor Bill Parker, I mentioned this secret thought. His reaction was,
Well, Bob, why dont you look into the matter and give us a report? So, here it is.
I called the House of Feder and made an appointment with Ben Z. Kaplan, executive
vice-president and walking advertisement number one for Louis Feder. Kaplan wears a dark
brown, flecked-with-gray, crew-cut Tashay. He has a missionary zeal for his work. I put the
question to him straight. How about the chances of this brain beanie -(he winced)- blowing
off or sliding into the vichysoisse? He bent his head toward me and said, Pull it. I grabbed ahandful of his hair and gave it a good yank. Absolutely nothing happened (not even a wince). I
was convinced on that score.
Kaplan then took me next door to Mr. Feders office to meet the head headman.
He is a genial sort, obviously proud of his calling. He has probably caused more acres of skin to
be covered than the Legion of Decency. In the course of an hour or so of talking with him I
learned that he gets the hair for his Tashays from various New York importers who have agents
traveling all over Europe buying hair from live peasant women. (The hair of most American
women is unsuitable, having been dyed or made weak and brittle from permanent waving.) It
only takes about an ounce and a half of hair for a mans Tashay.
I also found out that he keeps an assortment of almost 200 shades of hair on hand in his
storeroom and that most, hairpieces contain several different colors (as do most human heads of
hair).
12
315
320
325
330
335
340
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
13/19
After chatting awhile, Feder stood up and walked behind the chair I was sitting in, saying,
Now let us measure the extent of your baldness. With that he took a grease pencil and traced
right onto my head of skin his conception of where my hairline used to be. Then, with calipers,
he took various measurements and called them out to an assistant, who made notes of each. He
then slapped a wet sheet of blotter like paper on my head, molding it firmly until it had assumed
the true shape of my skull. He removed it carefully and while it was drying Mr. Edward Karp,
vice-president and general manager of the House of Feder, came in with six different try-on
styles of Tashays. They sat me in front of a large mirror and tried each of them on me for effect.
First, came the Madison Avenue a casual, devil-may-care style which featured a part. Karp
laid it on my head and then combed the long sides and tail of the hairpiece right in with my own
remaining locks. There were bright fluorescent lights over the mirror and I swear, even without
the piece being glued down, I couldnt tell where the Federated hair ended and my own began!
Show me more! I exclaimed, with a longing glance at the Dean Martin type of hairpiece,
tousled and curly.
We tried it. But just as Feder had warned, it didnt look right. We tried a few more,
including the pride-and-joy of the House of Feder a crew-cut. Feder beamed, Thats it! When I
confessed to him that crew-cut was the way I used to wear my long-gone curls, he beamed all
over. Okay, he said, come back in two weeks and well have a custom-made Tashay ready for
you.When I returned for the fitting, I took a tour of their factory (over 100 employees) and
saw what had happened to the paper mold Feder had made of my head. From it they had made a
base consisting of a light, yet strong, nylon under layer (which lies next to the scalp) and an over
layer of extremely fine but durable Swiss lace, into which the actual hairs were crocheted in
clumps of three or four.
Feders craftsmen can crochet 750-1,000 hairs into one square inch of hairpiece. There
are 1,000 hairs per square inch in a full natural head of hair. The clumping together gives the
illusion of normal thickness. Feder uses a secret stitch on the front hairline which gives the hair a
bristly, natural, upstanding look.
I was shocked when I saw my very own Tashay for the first time. It was about the size of
a large beaver pelt. Richard Wolkis, Feders top fitter, showed me how to cut, trim and apply the
special double-faced adhesive to the Tashay and form it to my head. Then he carefully barbered
13
345
350
355
360
365
370
25
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
14/19
the hairpiece to my natural hair. When he finished, there were quantities of hair cuttings on the
floor around the chair such as I hadnt seen in 15 years. It felt great.
Wolkis then combed the fake fur in with the real, applied some hair dressing and handed me a
standard Feder service kit. It contained a roll of the special tape, a small paintbrush for applying
the solvent which removes the tape, a can of Fed-erene (cleaning fluid for the hairpiece) and a
jar of liquid adhesive. Finally I stood ready to face the world, with a full head of hair and a
wagonload of trepidation.
Feder says you can swim in a Tashay. I didnt try that but I did take a 50-mile drive in an
open convertible while wearing the Tashay with no harmful results. I slept in it twice (the first
time because I forgot I had it on). It was still on straight in the morning although it contained a
few snarls. I seem to recall this is natural with a stock head of hair.
With proper care, a toupee should last from one to seven years, depending, naturally, on
how often you wear it. Feder suggests buying them two at a time so youll always have a
wearable one if the other is back at Feders being repaired (or having gray hairs spotted into it, as
you grow older). The spare should be kept in a tight box containing moth flakes or a few old
cigarettes. Moths love hair but hate tobacco.
The going rate for a Tashay the size of mine is $175 although smaller divots (just to
cover a bald spot in the back) can run as low as $80.
Louis Feder has brought the artificial hairpiece business out into the bright sun-fight andfound it can survive the most careful scrutiny. For years, people in show business have worn
hairpieces and their fans knew and accepted that fact. Now, thanks to the strides that have been
made in this field, good old average Joe Bloewe can hold his head high secure in the knowledge
that his Tashay will stay up there without betraying him.
14
375
380
385
390
395
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
15/19
Annex 2
Standpoint 1. There is one positive cure for baldness and that is the toupee.
Standpoint 2.
Single argumentation
1. The mystery and jokes about the toupees have come to an end with the argument thatthe idea that toupees are bad has changed (3)
1.1[because ]a man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and non-skid
[and] has won for them a wide social acceptance (3-5).
Standpoint 3.Coordinative Argumentation (+ Subordinative Argumentation)
400
405
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
16/19
Annex 3
30
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
17/19
410
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
18/19
Annex 4
-
8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu
19/19
415