Evaluation Of Mobile App Paradigms

Ngu Phuc Huy & Do vanThanh

2012

Outline :• Introduction.• The aim of paper.• Related works.• General terms.• The mobile app paradigms: - Mobile native applications. - Mobile widget. - Mobile web applications. - HTML5 mobile application.

• Evaluation and result: - For developers. - For mobile users. - For service/content provider.• Verification.• Conclusion.• References.

which mobile application paradigm fits better to what type of application and usage ?

Introduction :

The development cost

User experience

Sale revenues of mobile apps

The aim of paper :

RELATED WORKS:

It provide both a formal evaluation and practical verification of the four mobile app paradigms.

It provide both a formal evaluation and practical verification of the four mobile app paradigms.

Different Different

General terms :

The mobile app paradigms :

The mobile app paradigms :

The mobile app paradigms :

The mobile app paradigms :

EVALUATION AND RESULT:

For developers : Native apps and HTML5 are the best selection

To build a mobile app that requires accelerated graphic processing. ( using native )

More straightforward content driven service (HTML5)

Widgets are valuable for developers when they want to make a lightweight, and portable mobile app.

Mobile web app paradigm obtains the lowest grading .

For mobile users : Native apps are very robust.

HTML5 mobile apps are the second choice of mobile users since they are lightweight.

Mobile widgets come third because they are lightweight and quite convenient to use.

Users are not interested in mobile web apps.

For service/content provider :

HTML5 mobile apps are the best choice. Service providers can build an HTML5 mobile app once and distribute it everywhere.

Mobile Web apps work in the same way and get the second position in the race.

widgets and native apps have the lowest grading because of platform fragmentation.

VERIFICATION: Native application : Android platform , Eclipse , Java .

HTML5 application :The user load the app onto their device and run it on

browser .

PhoneGap application : HTML5 , CSS3 , JavaScript.

Result :

Developers prefer HTML5 mobile app to native app paradigm . For users, it is understandable that native app is more preferable than the HTML5 mobile app paradigm.

VERIFICATION:

Key finding and recommendation :

Native apps are well-known for their fast and responsive user interface, and the seamless capability to access hardware features.

PhoneGap framework also lets developers make the HTML5 app access built-in apps and run on multiple platforms effectively.

VERIFICATIO:

CONCLUSION:

[1] Huy, Ngu Phuc, and Do vanThanh. "Evaluation of mobile app paradigms."Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia. ACM, 2012.

References: