ESTEBAN CRISTALDO JORGE MOLINA...JORGE MOLINA Laboratorio de Mecánica y Energía (LME) Facultad de...

20
TIMING RESOLUTION OF ACTIVE GANGING OF 48 SiPMs ESTEBAN CRISTALDO JORGE MOLINA Laboratorio de Mecánica y Energía (LME) Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción (FIUNA)

Transcript of ESTEBAN CRISTALDO JORGE MOLINA...JORGE MOLINA Laboratorio de Mecánica y Energía (LME) Facultad de...

  • TIMING RESOLUTION OF ACTIVE GANGING OF 48 SiPMs

    ESTEBAN CRISTALDOJORGE MOLINA

    Laboratorio de Mecánica y Energía (LME)Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción (FIUNA)

  • Brief description◦ I will present the preliminary results of the simulations of timing resolution of

    the amplified signals of 48 SiPMs by the transimpedance active gangingconfiguration.

    ◦ I will try to establish a relationship between the signal’s dynamiccharacteristics and the arrival time separation of photons hitting the detectorin order to distinguish individual photon hits at the output.

  • Active Ganging scheme

    Transimpedance

    Output

    Hamamatsu S13360-6050

  • Simulation outline

  • Dynamic characteristics of the simulated signal:Rise Time (tr) : 97 nsFall Time (tf) : 619.5 nsTime to begin Fall (tbf) : ~200ns

    The time to begin the fall is measured from t(Vp10%) at the rising edge to t(Vp90%) at the falling edge.

    tbf

    tr tf

  • 1 PE

    3 PESimulated event where 10 photon hitthe detector with exponential distribution ofarrival time. The first peak is the fast component withτ = 6 ns followed by photons arriving with τ = 1,6 us.

  • 1 PE

    3 PE

  • ~260 ns ~300 ns

    Single photon peaks can be clearly seen with a time separation of 300 ns and above 200 ns.

    Peaks below 200 ns of time separation start mergin in each other and blend as a fast arriving photon.

    𝑡𝑠 > 𝑡𝑏𝑓

    The signal peak is distinguishablebecause it has time to fall

    𝑡𝑠

  • ~110 ns

    Two photons arriving with a separation of 110 nsproduce a single double peak.

    The signal peak merge as one because:

    𝑡𝑠 < 𝑡𝑏𝑓

    𝑡𝑠

  • Increasing the number of hits in one detector to 100illustrates the limits of the timing resolution of the active ganging amplifier.

  • Increasing the number of hits in one detector to 100illustrates the limits of the timing resolution of the active ganging amplifier.

  • Multiple photon hits blending in one peak. Multiple photons arriving under the time resolutionare packed in one peak.

  • ◦ Apparently, the time resolution of this configuration is around 200 ns,meaning it cannot distinguish photons arriving less than 200 ns apart.

    ◦ To have a better view of the time resolution, photon hits can be simulatedarriving at fixed time rate of:◦ 300 ns

    ◦ 200 ns

    ◦ 150 ns

    ◦ 100 ns

  • With 300 ns arrival time, the peaks are clearlydistinguishable.

  • With 200 ns arrival time, the peaks are still clearlydistinguishable, but single photon peaks arrivingnearly can be missed.

  • With 150 ns arrival time, peak amplitude is nearlycompletely attenuated for single photon hits.

  • With 100 ns arrival time, the peaks are completelyundistinguishable.

  • Conclusions◦ Based on observations of this simulations, I conclude that for a signal with a

    rise time of 97 ns it may be posible to distinguish photons arriving 200 nsappart, down to 150 ns if good SNR is achieved.

    ◦ By extrapolation, to be able to obtain a timing resolution of 100 ns the risetime of the signal must be 60 ns or less and a time to begin the fall of ~100 ns.

    ◦ Statistical data on based on this kind of simulation can be produced todetermine the signal parameters more accurately.

  • Thanks for your attention.