Establishing Computational Simulation Capability for Aircraft...
Transcript of Establishing Computational Simulation Capability for Aircraft...
26th (2:00-5:00PM) November, 2013
R. S. Myong
Dept. of Aerospace and System Engineering
Aerospace Computational Modeling Lab; http://acml.gnu.ac.kr
Gyeongsang National University, South Korea
Presented at KAI
Establishing Computational Simulation Capability for Aircraft Lightning Certification 항공기 낙뢰 해석 및 인증 기술
Acknowledgement of
Dr. Sangwook Lee (Boeing)
R. Ranjith (GNU; Graduate Student)
and
financial support through the Brain Pool program.
Subjects
• Introduction of lightning
Lightning research communities and references
Aircraft lightning and its importance
• Lightning certification
Certification process and standards
Current waveforms
Lightning zoning
Steps in protection design and certification
• Computational lightning simulation
Role of computational simulation and applications
Numerical codes
Mechanical-thermal-electrical physical modeling
Validation of computational codes
Subjects (Continued)
• Sample calculations
Integrated wet fuel tank
EM simulation supporting lightning protection design
• Recent research trend
New zoning method
Digital photographic technique
Conductivity in composites and scaling issues
Lightning research using UAV
• Summary
Major computational capabilities and issues
• Q & A
Research Communities and References
• ICOLSE International Conference on Lightning and Static
Electricity (Seattle 2013; www.icolse.us, 2007)
• Aircraft lightning requirements, components testing,
aircraft testing, and certification (University of Kansas
Course, 2012); introduction, EMI EMC, certification,
environment, aircraft lightning attachment phenomena,
lightning effects on aircraft, direct effect, indirect effect,
design to minimize indirect effects, fuel systems, aircraft
wiring
• Lightning hazards of aircraft and launchers, Journal
Aerospace Lab (12 articles, Issue 5, December 2012)
• Other journal articles
Lightning - Importance
• Lightning is an atmospheric electrical phenomenon which deserves adequate protection design of aircraft.
• Though the probability of the lightning strike is very low (10-9 events per hour), the effects might be quite considerable. (small-size solid-state components, sensitive devices, reinforced polymers, complex systemization → Lightning protection must be considered from the start. Cf. Embedded de-icing systems)
Lightning – Importance (Korea)
Lightning – Effects
• The effects of lightning are classified into two as direct
and indirect effects.
• Direct effects include the structural damage, fuel ignition,
etc., whereas indirect effects are interference to the
navigation equipment.
• The worst case would be the loss of the aircraft and the
lives in it.
Lightning – Mean Rate
• Pan Am Boeing 707 in 1963: induced EM effects in the fuel tank
• Iran Air Boeing 747 in 1976: arcing in the fuel tank by a direct lightning strike
• TW800 in 1996: central fuel tank explosion (wear and tear on bonding braids and sparking at chafed wiring)
• Mean rate of one event per year
Lightning – Air France Case
1 2
3
6
7
4
5
1 2
3
6
7
4
5
• Strikes take place during: approach, cruise, take-off
• Damage locations
• Damage effects: – 68% minor – 24% moderate – 8% major (flight control planes)
• Air France: – 0.7 events/AC/year – 205 hrs delay, 11 flights cancelled
• Use of ILDAS (In-flight Lightning Strike Damage Assessment System) could result in more efficient maintenance procedures.
Lightning – Phenomenon
Generalized diagram
showing distribution of
air currents and
electrical charge in a
typical cumulonimbus
cloud
Lightning - Triggering/Interception
• Transall C160 research
aircraft (1980s)
Lightning - Triggering/Interception/Sweeping
Lightning – Typical Current Waveform
C160 research aircraft
Idealized high current
waveforms
Lightning - Certification
• Fundamental goal:
To prevent catastrophic accidents, and to enable the aircraft to continue flying safely and be able to land at a suitable airport.
• The lightning protection requirements have been included in the collection of Federal Aviation Regulations (CFRs) and Advisory Circulars (ACs).
• A certification plan needs to be submitted earlier in the certification process. It includes Description of the system
Description of the protection
Pass/Fail criteria
Lightning - Certification
CFRs Pertaining to Lightning Protection
Vehicle Type and Regulations
Aircraft Rotorcraft
General Aviation
Transport Normal Transport
Airframe 23.867 25.581 27.610 29.610
Fuel System 23.954 25.954 27.954 29.954
Other System
23.1306 25.1316 27.1316 29.1316
Lightning - Certification
Guidance Documents: EUROCAE & SAE
Lightning - Certification
• Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) edited by the
SAE international group: ARP 5412A (Waveforms), ARP
5414A (Zoning), etc.
• SAE ‘Blue Book’ “Lightning Test Waveforms and
Techniques for Aerospace Vehicles and Hardware.” The
US standard for aircraft protection design and
certification testing, of both civil and military aircraft.
Foreign certifying agencies accepted this standard via
bilateral agreements
Lightning - Certification
• SAE ‘Orange book’ “Protection of Aircraft Electrical/
Electronic Systems Against the Indirect Effects of
Lightning.” In wide use as a de facto standard for
certification of flight critical or essential systems aboard
transport category aircraft.
Lightning – Certification (Continued)
• AC 20-53 dealt exclusively with lightning protection of
airplane fuel systems.
• The Federal Aviation Regulation Part 23.945, fuel
system lightning protection reads:
The fuel system must be designed and arranged to prevent
the ignition of fuel vapor within the system by
(a) Direct lightning strikes to areas having a high
probability of stroke attachment;
(b) Swept lightning strokes on areas where swept strokes
are highly probable; and
(c) Corona or streamering at fuel vent outlets.
Certification Steps
• Determine the lightning strike zones
• Establish the lightning environment
• Identify flight critical/essential components
• Establish protection criteria: determine system/
components protected and establish pass-fail criteria
• Design lightning protection
• Verify protection adequacy by similarity with previously
proven designs, by simulated lightning tests or by
acceptable analysis. When analysis is utilized,
appropriate margins may be required to account for
uncertainties in the analytical techniques
Design Protection
• Direct effects: the basic structural material and
manufacturing techniques, the addition of treatments or
devices to improve electrical conductivity, arc or spark
suppression, finishes, sealants and gaskets, application
of lightning diverters, insulating structures and electrical
bonding provisions and relocation of equipment
• Indirect effects: application of electromagnetic shielding,
provision of low impedance grounding surfaces,
incorporation of surge suppressors and proper design of
input and output circuits of electronic equipment
Test Plans
• Purpose of the test
• Production or test article to be utilized
• Article configuration and test drawing
• Method of installation that simulates the production
installation
• Applicable lightning zone(s)
• Lightning simulation method; test voltage or current
waveforms
• Diagnostic methods
• Pass/fail criteria
• Appropriate schedule and location of proposed test
Test Procedural Steps
• Obtain FAA concurrence that the test plan is adequate.
• Obtain FAA concurrence on details of part conformity of
the test article and installation conformity of the test
setup.
• Schedule FAA witnessing of the test(s).
• Conduct testing.
• Submit a final test report describing all results.
• Obtain FAA approval of the report.
Concluding Remarks
• Need of further activities in lightning study
• Major computational capabilities required for future
program
- Zoning
- EM simulation of transient lightning physics
- Mechanical-thermal-electrical coupled simulation
Concluding Remarks (Continued)
• Main issues in computational simulation for structure
- Global/local current distribution
- Current distribution in fasteners (found randomness-
oscillation or focusing of current on one fastener)
- Damage effects in materials
- Sparking conditions/threshold
- Lightning protection of radomes (electro-static
approach is common; what shape beneath the skin is the
key factor)
Q & A