Erratum
1
22. Kuhl CK. Breast MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15:315–320. 23. Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, et al. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions. Invest Radiol 2009; 44:553–558. 24. Schmitz AC, Peters NH, Veldhuis WB, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3.0T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:355–364. 25. Kuhl CK, Kooijman H, Gieseke J, et al. Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0T [letter]. Radiology 2007; 244:929–930. 26. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BI-RADS-MRI). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003. 27. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15:277–290. 28. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic performance char- acteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:409–415. 29. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging; multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238:42–53. 30. Agrawal G, Su MY, Nalcioglu O, et al. Significance of breast lesions descrip- tors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon. Cancer 2009; 115:1363–1380. 31. El Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256:64–73. Erratum Wu LM, Xu JR, Liu MJ, Zhang XF, Hua J, Zheng J, Hu JN. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for nodal staging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(3):331-40. In the published version of this article, the title of one of the author Jasmine Zheng is not PhD, and actually she is M.D. Candidate. Her highest academic degree is a Bachelor’s of Science. The authors regret the error. JOHNSON ET AL Academic Radiology, Vol 19, No 6, June 2012 674
Transcript of Erratum
JOHNSON ET AL Academic Radiology, Vol 19, No 6, June 2012
22. Kuhl CK. Breast MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007;
15:315–320.
23. Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, et al. A combined high temporal and high
spatial resolution 3 teslaMR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast
lesions. Invest Radiol 2009; 44:553–558.
24. Schmitz AC, Peters NH, Veldhuis WB, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3.0T
breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity
by using vascular maps. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:355–364.
25. Kuhl CK, Kooijman H, Gieseke J, et al. Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on
breast MR imaging at 3.0T [letter]. Radiology 2007; 244:929–930.
26. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data
system atlas (BI-RADS-MRI). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology,
2003.
Erratum
674
27. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15:277–290.
28. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic performance char-
acteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR
imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:409–415.
29. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and
dynamic features at breast MR imaging; multicenter study. Radiology
2006; 238:42–53.
30. AgrawalG,SuMY,NalciogluO, et al. Significanceof breast lesionsdescrip-
tors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon. Cancer 2009; 115:1363–1380.
31. El Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging
improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR
imaging. Radiology 2010; 256:64–73.
Wu LM, Xu JR, Liu MJ, Zhang XF, Hua J, Zheng J, Hu JN. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for nodalstaging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol.2012;19(3):331-40.
In the published version of this article, the title of one of the author Jasmine Zheng is not PhD, and actually sheis M.D. Candidate. Her highest academic degree is a Bachelor’s of Science.
The authors regret the error.
