energy efficiency in pumps

43

description

energy efficiency in pumps

Transcript of energy efficiency in pumps

Page 1: energy efficiency in pumps
Page 2: energy efficiency in pumps

2

Page 3: energy efficiency in pumps

•  Energy  consumption  in  India  is  low  

  Indian  Per  capita  energy  consumption  is  530  kgoe  while          world  average  is  1770  

  Per  capita  electricity  consumption  is  631.5  kWh  against  world  average  of  2500  kWh  

  Installed  Indian  Capacity  1,45000  MW  (approx.)  

  Peak  Load  Electricity  Supply  Shortage  15%  

  Base  Load  Supply    Shortage  9%  

•  Energy  demand  is  increasing  due  to  rising  incomes,  accelerated  industrialization,  urbanization  and  population  growth  

       2003-­‐04          :        572                        Mtoe         2016-­‐17              :        842-­‐916        Mtoe  

Page 4: energy efficiency in pumps

Per Capita Consumption of Electricity in India

Source:  CEA  

(Projected)  

As  per  UN  Methodology  (Gross  Electrical  Energy  Availability  /  Population)  

Growth Pattern

Page 5: energy efficiency in pumps
Page 6: energy efficiency in pumps

Bureau  of  Energy  Efficiency  

  Established  in  2002,  under  the  Energy  Conservation  Act,  2001.    Improve  energy  efficiency  through  various  regulatory  and  

promotional  instruments    Plan,  manage  and  implement  provisions  the  EC  Act  

  Appliance  standards  and  labeling    Industrial  energy  benchmarks    Energy  Conservation  Building  Codes    Monitor  energy  use  in  high  energy-­‐consumption  units    Certify  and  accredit  energy  auditors  and  energy  managers  

  Provide  a  policy  framework  and  direction  to  national  energy  conservation  activities  

  Disseminate   information  and  knowledge,  and   facilitate  pilot  and  demonstration  projects  

  Establish   EE   delivery   systems   through   Public-­‐Private  Partnerships  (PPP).  

6

Page 7: energy efficiency in pumps

Barriers  of  Energy  Efficiency  

Inadequate  awareness  about  the  benefits  of  energy  conservation  &  efficiency  

Lack  of  Innovative  financial  instruments  

Lack  of  Information  about  comparative  energy  use  –  especially  of  appliances  bought  by  retail  consumers  

Higher  upfront  cost  of  energy-­‐efficient  technologies  

Page 8: energy efficiency in pumps

8

•  BEE is established to implement & monitor the Energy Conservation Act,

2001. The Act empowers Bureau and Central Government to specify Energy

Consumption Standards.

•  The Standards and Labeling is a direct outcome of section 14 clause (a)-(d)

of the Energy Conservation Act,2001.

•  BEE had launched S&L Scheme as voluntary basis under National Energy

Labeling Programme on 18th May 2006, covering Eleven Products phase

wise.

•  EC act can Prohibit manufacturers for sale or import of equipments and

appliances that do not meet standards.

•  Require display of Energy performance labels on equipments and appliances.

Page 9: energy efficiency in pumps

9

EC Act 2001/Chapter –V Power of Central Govt. to Facilitate & Enforcement Efficient Use Of Energy & Its Conservation

Clause  (14)  ((a)to  (d))  

The  Central  Government  may,  by  notification,  in  consultation  with  the  Bureau-­‐  

• The  Bureau  shall  recommend  to  the  Central  Government  the  norms  for  processes  and  energy  consumption  standards  required  to  be  notified  under  clause  (a)  of  section  14.  

•   And  recommend  to  the  Central  Government  the  particulars  required  to  be  displayed  on  label  on  equipment  or  on  appliances  and  manner  of  their  display  under  clause  (d)  of  section  14.  

Page 10: energy efficiency in pumps

10

1.5  Sample  Labels  

Page 11: energy efficiency in pumps

Products covered under Indian S&L Program

Current List 1. Frost-free Refrigerators 2. Tubular Fluorescent Lamps (TFL) 3. Air-conditioners 4. Direct cool /Frost Free Refrigerators 5. Distribution Transformers 6. Motors 7.  Pump sets 8. Ceiling fans 9. LPG Stoves 10. Colour TVs 11. Storage Water Geysers

Launched on 18th May 2006 , for 4 products by BEE

Page 12: energy efficiency in pumps

12

 Washing Machines  Electronic Ballast  Computer Monitors  Kerosene Stoves  Consumer Electronics  Microwave ovens

 Adaptive Defrost  Commercial Freezers  Visi Coolers  Chocolate Coolers  Chest Coolers  Heat Pumps

 Passenger Cars.

 Industrial Fans & Blowers  Diesel Generating sets  Boilers  Compressors

Home Appliances

Industrial Equipments

 Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS)  External Power Supplies (EPS)  Battery Chargers (BCs)  Standby Power equipments

Refrigerator &AC Systems

Page 13: energy efficiency in pumps

  Domestic  and  agricultural  Consumers  

  Commercial  consumers  

  Institutional  and  Government  Purchases  

  Industrial  Users  

  Electricity  Generating,  Transmitting,        and  Distributing  companies  

13

Page 14: energy efficiency in pumps

14

Regulation:

• Policies & its framework • Standards & Labels to be made mandatory at appropriate time

Supply Push

• Design & technology developments • Align with international trends • Handholding of some segments of manufacturers

Demand Pull

• Awareness & dissemination • Demand for the EE products

Energy Efficiency

Page 15: energy efficiency in pumps

Ins$tu$onal  frame  work  for  regula$on  

 BIS  –  National  Standards  Body      Formulation  &  Implementation  of  National  Standards    

  Production  certification,  Quality  system  certification,  EMS  certification  etc.  

 Bureau  of  Energy  Efficiency  (BEE)      BEE  is  established  to  implement  &  monitor  the  Energy  

Conservation  Act,  2001  

  One  of  the  key  thrust  areas  of  EC  Act,  2001  is  Standards  &  

Labeling  Programme  

  Formulation  of  Energy  Efficiency  Standards.  

15

Page 16: energy efficiency in pumps

16

1.Rapid Growth of Energy

is predicted

2.Significant Variations in

Energy Efficiency of Different Units

3.Energy Efficient Technology

Exists but not being used in

Most of the products

Page 17: energy efficiency in pumps

Targeted  cumula$ve  savings  during  the  year  2007-­‐08  and  2008-­‐09    

17

Page 18: energy efficiency in pumps

Reduc$on  in  genera$on  capacity  obtained  as  a  result  of  energy  efficiency  interven$ons  during  the  financial  

year  2008-­‐09    

18

3.5 BU in 2007-08 and 6.5 BU during 2008-09 is saved

Page 19: energy efficiency in pumps

Market  Transforma$on:  2008-­‐09  

19

Non star 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star 5 star Total

Refrigerators

% share 29.4 - 0.4 14.1 45.4 10.6 100

Units 1,616,824 - 24,605 774,301 2,498,729 585,541 5,500,000

ACs

% share 14.0 24.7 38.5 11.1 8.1 3.6 100

Units 349,140 617,405 962,793 277,489 203,316 89,856 2,500,000

Page 20: energy efficiency in pumps

Programme Electricity Saved (MUs)

Equivalent million MTOE

Avoided Thermal

Capacity (MW)

Total Fuel Saved (mtoe)

Standards and Labeling (07-08) 1425.8 0.48 260.4 0.48

Standards and Labeling(08-09)

2111 0.717 568 0.917

Page 21: energy efficiency in pumps

Importance  of  star  labeling  Meaning of star labeling %

Star labeling is useful for saving electricity 52

It saves energy 20

More star saves more power 19

Good quality product 13

It has more advance technology 5

It depends upon the number of stars in it 3

They told about power saving with star level products 3

Page 22: energy efficiency in pumps

Policy interventions

• Designated consumers, which are basically energy intensive industry, commercial buildings and establishments.

• Energy consumption standards and labeling program for equipment and appliances.

• Mandating of Energy Efficient equipments in Government Purchases.

• Making voluntary schemes for market transformation towards energy efficiency and mandating them later on.

• Creating compliance of energy efficiency policies through monitoring and verification.

Page 23: energy efficiency in pumps

23

•  The   basic   tenet   of   the   mission   is   to   ensure   a  sustainable   growth   by   an   appropriate   mix   of   4   E’s  namely-­‐  Energy,  Efficiency,  Equity  and  Environment.    

•  Promote  development  objectives,  while   also  yielding  co-­‐benefits   for   addressing   climate   change   effects.-­‐Cost-­‐   effective   energy   efficiency   and   energy  conservation  measures  

•  Potential   to   reduce   energy   consumption   by  Demand  Side  Management  (DSM)  of  15-­‐25%  (IEP:  2006)  

•  Market  based  approach  to   implementation  of  energy  efficiency  –  market  size  of  Rs.  14,000  crores  estimated  

Background/ Opportunities

Page 24: energy efficiency in pumps

24

Rural Electrification and Pump sets Electrified ( as of Feb, 2009)

Page 25: energy efficiency in pumps

25

Page 26: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 26

Overview  of  India’s  Agriculture  Sector  

•  India’s   agriculture   sector  consumes   22%   of   total   electricity,  up  from  10%  during  the  1970’s  •  The   agricultural   tariff   has   not  grown  while  average  cost  of  supply  of   utilities   is   increasing   at   a   fast  pace  •  Free   &   flat   HP   based   tariff   plan  for  agriculture  has  been  one  of  the  factors   contributing   to  inefficiencies   and   thereby   high  AT&C  losses  of  the  State  Utilities    

Page 27: energy efficiency in pumps

Equipment Annual electricity consumption of equipment GWh[1]

Annual sales of equipment in 2002-03 millions

Annual electricit

y consumption of

new stock

GWh[2]

Electricity consumption of new stock to total electricity %[3]

Estimated

improvement in efficienc

y of new stock %[4]

Annual

electricity

savings

GWh[5]

Organised

sector[6] %

Informal

sector[7] %

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Agricultural pump sets[8] 84,486 0.8 6,000 1.1 15 2,280 55 45

[8] Sample calculation for agricultural pump sets is given below. Similar estimates were made for other equipment. Column 4 = Annual electricity consumption of new stock = column 3 * 1500 hours per year * average 5 kWh consumption per hour = 6000 GWh Column 5 = Electricity consumption of new stock to total electricity = Column 4/ 562572 *100 = 1.1% Column 6= Estimated improvement in efficiency of new stock = 5kW pump replaced by 3.1 kW high efficiency pump delivering the same quantity of water = 100* (5-3.1)/5 = 38% Column 7 = Annual electricity savings = Column 4* column 6/100 = 2280 GWh

Page 28: energy efficiency in pumps

Sl. No.

Product detail Electrical pumps Range kW No. of Poles Applicable IS

1. 3 Phase open well submersible pump sets

1.1kW, 1.5kW, 2.2 kW, 3.0kW, 3.7 kW &

5.5 kW, 7.5kW, 9.3kW, 11kW, 15kW

2 Pole IS 14220:1994

2. 3 Phase submersible pump sets

1.1kW, 1.5kW, 2.2 kW, 3.0kW, 3.7 kW &

5.5 kW, 7.5kW, 9.3kW, 11kW, 15kW

2 Pole IS 8034:2002

3. 3 Phase Mono-set pumps 0.37kW, 0.75kW,1.1kW, 1.5kW, 2.2

kW, 3.0kW, 3.7 kW & 5.5 kW, 7.5kW,

9.3kW, 11kW, 15kW 2 Pole IS 9079:2002

Page 29: energy efficiency in pumps

Star Rating Overall Efficiency of the Pump Set*

(multiplying factor – times the BIS value)

1 Star >=1.00 & <1.05

2 Star >=1.05 & <1.10 3 Star >=1.10 & <1.15 4 Star >=1.15 & <1.20 5 Star >=1.20

*Overall efficiency of the pump set is including the efficiency factor for induction motors. The overall efficiency is calculated as per IS 14220:1998, IS 8340:2002 and IS 9079: 2002 for pump sets and IS 12615: 2004, IS: 4029 – 1967, IS 325: 1996 for induction motors.

Page 30: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 30

Opportunity  /  PotenDal  in  Ag  DSM  

• DSM  in  Agriculture  provides  immense  opportunity  in     Reducing  the  overall  power  consumption   Improving  efficiencies  of  ground  water  extraction   Reducing  the  subsidy  burden  of  the  states  without  sacrificing  the  service  obligation  to  the  sector  

• Most  of  the  pilot  projects  as  well  as  other  studies  project  potential  of  45-­‐50%  by  mere  replacement  of  inefficient  pumps    • Overall  electricity  savings  (from  20  million  pumps)  is  estimated  at  62.1  billion  units  annually    

Page 31: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 31

ObjecDves  of  the  Scheme   To  create  appropriate  framework  for  market  based  interventions   in   agricultural   pumping   sector  through    Public  Private  Partnership  (PPP)  mode                     Intended  Outcomes  of  Programme  

  Shelf  of  bankable  DPRs  (one  in  each  State)  to  stimulate  the  market    Business  model  through  ESCO  mode    Baseline   development,   conducive   regulatory   regime   and   security  

mechanism      Awareness  and  outreach  to  the  local  farmers  and  utility  employees    Risk  Mitigation  Measures  to  encourage  PPP      CDM  benefits  for  the  scheme      

Page 32: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 32

Steps  Involved  Selection  of  States  

  To   rank   states   for   implementation   of   Ag-­‐DSM   based   on  Framework  developed    

  Attributes  to  rank  the  states  

  Connected   load,  percentage  consumption  by  agricultural   sector,  status   of   feeder   separation,   AT&C   Losses,   Power   sector  performance  rating  by  PFC  

Selection  of  Feeders  for  DPR  preparation  

  To  identify  eligible  feeders  for  DPR  preparation  

  Criteria  for  feeder  selection  

  No   of   connected   pump   sets,   HVDS   implementation,  Dependability  on  ground  water  extraction,  measurable  baseline  12

Page 33: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 33

Steps  Involved  Engagement  of  Consultants  for  DPR  preparation  

  DPR  to  be  prepared  to  estimate  energy  saving  potential  along  with  clear  baseline  

Organization  of  workshops  and  Seminars  

  Awareness  generation  and  capacity  building  for  utility  employees  and  farmers    

Develop  a  model  for  Project  Implementation  

  Identify  risk  mitigation  measures  and  ring   fencing  of  risks   in  Ag  DSM  projects  

Engagement  of  ESCO/Discom  for  implementation  of  DPR      

   Replacement  of  existing  pump  sets  with  energy  efficient  ones  13

Page 34: energy efficiency in pumps

Business  Model  for  AgDSM  project  (ESCO  mode)  

Consumers

Farmer

Government / Regulatory Commission

• Reduction in Subsidy payments • Policy Guidelines and Approvals •  Inclusion in Annual Revenue

Requirement

• Sale of saved energy to other consumers

• Free Energy Efficient Pump set • Reduced Energy Bills • Free Maintenance • Quality Power Supply

Monitoring Agency

Third Party Testing Agreement

Utility / Discom

•  Improved power delivery (Reliability & Quality)

•  Improved Collection efficiency • Reduced Losses and Peak Load • Subsidy Reduction due to saved energy

ESCO

Design / Installation / Commissioning & O&M

• Capital for Installation of new pumps • Demonstrate the energy savings • Payment on Shared saving model • Repair and Maintenance

Payment Security Package

Pump

Policy guidelines & Approvals

Electricity sales

Page 35: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 35

Risks  in  Ag  DSM  Project  •  Risks  factors  outside  the  ESCO’s  control  

  Farmer  behaviour    Amount  of  land  under  irrigation    Cropping  patterns    Water  table  declines    Weather  and  rainfall      

•  These  factors  cause  energy  loads  to  vary,  even  if  the  technical  performance  of  the  ESCO’s  installed  systems  perform  as  specified  •  Variation  in  power  quality  affect  pump  performance,  useful  life  and  maintenance  and  replacement  costs  •  ESCOs  and  their  lenders  may  not  be  able  to  accept  full  exposure  to  such  uncontrollable  risks    

Page 36: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 36

Deemed  Savings  Approach  •  From  the  point  of  view  of  ESCO  and  its  lender,  a  stipulated  savings  protocol    (Deemed  Savings  Approach)  may  be  appropriate      

•  Demonstration  of  performance  (measure  input  power)  of  a  sample  of  pump  sets  before  and  after  the  project  in  order  to  estimate  savings  for  each  category  and  size  of  pump  set  

•  This  information  would  then  be  used  to  stipulate  savings  for  the  entire  project  area  based  on  fixed  hours  of  operation  of  pump  sets  (around  1600)  

•  Periodic  demonstration  of  pump  set  efficiencies  during  the  course  of  the  contract  period  

•  Even  if  Deemed  savings  approach  is  used  to  determine  payments  to  the  ESCO,  the  Discom  can  implement  measured  savings  approach  (Monitoring  and  Verification)  for  all  the  feeders  to  gather  the  most  accurate  savings    

Page 37: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 37

Benefits  to  different  Stakeholders  

DISCOM •  Reduction in technical

and commercial loss levels

•  Increase in reliability of the power supply

•  Improved power supply quality

•  Supply to more number of consumers without increase in the demand

•  50 % subsidy for HVDS implementation (Part B) under R-APDRP once AT&C loss level of 15 % is achieved

•  Additional CDM benefits could be availed for HVDS

FARMERS •  Free of cost BEE Star

labeled pump set will be provided

•  Negligible maintenance cost during the warranty period

•  Reduction in monthly energy bills due to 30 % of energy saved

•  Power supply with better quality and less time for same water discharge

•  Availability of trained local specialists to handle maintenance and repair of energy efficient pump sets

STATE GOVERNMENT •  Mitigation of Demand

Supply Gap •  Sustainable Development •  Reduced Energy Intensity

per GDP •  Additional investment in

new power plants could be avoided

•  Reduction in subsidy to Discom

Page 38: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 38

Roles  and  responsibiliDes  of  different  Stakeholders  

DISCOM •  Ensure quality of supply

by Implementing HVDS •  Ensure necessary

metering arrangements (electronic meters on transformers)

•  Sign a contract with ESCO •  Payments on a monthly

basis to ESCO based on the formula derived from competitive bidding

•  ESCROW account as a payment security mechanism

ESCO •  Finance, implement and

operating the project •  Procure, install, and

provide repair and maintenance

•  Demonstrate efficiency improvement of pump sets

•  Training of local specialist in repair and maintenance of star labeled pump sets

BEE •  Organize brain storming

session •  Develop financial model •  Prepare contract

documents associated with projects

•  Prepare M & V protocol •  Float RFP for engagement

of ESCO •  Bid process management •  Monitor the progress of

project implementation

Page 39: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 39

•  Based   on   a   framework,   5   states   namely  Maharashtra,   Gujarat,  Rajasthan,   Haryana   and   Punjab   were   selected   for  implementation   of   Agricultural   DSM   in   initial   phase   of   the  programme  

•  Energy   audit   of   all   the   pumps   have   estimated   the   savings   by  replacing  the  inefficient  pumps  with  star  labeled  energy  efficient  pumps.  

•  Expression  of   Interest   (EoI)   for  engagement  of  energy  auditors  to   prepare   DPR   for   remaining   4   states   namely   Rajasthan,    Gujarat,  Haryana  and  Punjab  have  been  floated  

•  BEE  has  labelled  the  agriculture  pump  sets  •  BEE  has  accredited  35  ESCOs  through  an  accreditation  process  carried  out  by  CRISIL  and  ICRA  

Current Status of the Programme

Page 40: energy efficiency in pumps

40

•  An Example:

Unit = Input K.W. X Hour Over All Eff. = (H X Q/6120) / Input K.W.

5 STAR RATED PUMPS: ISI PUMPS : 58.7 = (125 X 536 / 6120) /Input k.w. 48 = (125 X 536/6120) / Input k.w. Input k.w. = 18.65 k.w.(max.) Input k.w. = 22.8 Unit Consum. with in 8 Hr. = 18.65 X 8 = 149.2 Unit Unit Consum. within 8 Hr.= 22.8X8 = 182.46 Unit For 300 Days = 149.2 X 300 = 44760 Unit Unit For 300 Days = 182.46 X 300 = 54738

Yearly Pay = 44760 X 5.5 =246181 Yearly Pay = 54738 X 5.5 = 301059

Saving = Rs. 54880 Every Year

Benefits of usage of 5 star Pumps

HP/KW   Stage   Head   D/Charge  (LPM)  

Overall  Efficiency  

(%)  

ISI  Efficiency    

(%)  

20/15   16   125   536   58.7   48  

Page 41: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 41

Cost  Benefit  Analysis  for  Pump  sets  replacement  

Particulars Based on Avg. Tariff

Monetary savings per annum (Rs. Lakhs) 221 Reduction in MSEDCL's revenue from Agricultural Consumers (@ collection efficiency of 60%) 39

Repair & Maintenance Cost (@10% of capital) (Rs Lakh) 36 Net benefit to MSEDCL per annum (Rs. Lakhs) 146 Actual Pump Cost Including VAT @ 12.5 % (Rs. Lakh) 401

Dismantling & Installation Cost (Rs Lakh) 9.8

Cost of Foot Valve Replacement (Rs Lakh) 7 Efficiency Testing Pre & Post Installation (5 % Sample) 2

GI Pipe & bend Replacement (Rs Lakh) 12

Total investment (Rs. Lakhs) 432

Simple payback period (years) 3

Page 42: energy efficiency in pumps

Slide 42

• Issues  of  Concerns  in  the  labeling  Program  

•  The   market   is   dominated   by   Submersible   pump   set   (   70%),  mono  block(20%)  and  balance  open  well  (  10%)  

•  The  commonly  use  ratings  are  3-­‐125  HP,  Head  range  of  5-­‐250  m  and  Discharge  of  60-­‐2600  LPM.  

•  Star  labeled  pump  set  are  available  in  2-­‐25  HP  and  head  of  29-­‐317  m.  

•  BIS  not  available  for  Higher  capacity  of  Pump  sets.  •  Non-­‐   availabity   of   the   standard   may   hamper   the   Agri-­‐DSM  Program.  

•  Proposal   to   develop   the   labeling   program   for   Pumpsets   for  higher  ratings.  

•  Request  for  labeling  of  Pump  sets  in  all  ratings  and  all  discharge.    

Page 43: energy efficiency in pumps

43

Contact information:

Sandeep Garg ([email protected]) Bureau of Energy Efficiency

(Ministry of Power, Govt. of India) 4th Floor, Sewa Bhawan

R.K.Puram New Delhi – 110066

www.bee-india.nic.in