Ed Pentz: Executive Summary #crossref15
-
Upload
crossref -
Category
Technology
-
view
608 -
download
0
Transcript of Ed Pentz: Executive Summary #crossref15
Crossref: Growth and Change Ed Pentz
Executive Director
The team
• 29 people (2 joining in December) - up 24, or 21%, from 2014• 9 of them, or 31%, new since last year• Two new directors: better organisational structure as
we grow and expand• Newly created positions are a UI designer joining the
Product team and an International Outreach person (Rachael!) joining the Member and Community Outreach team
Content
• 77,356,876 content items - up 10% from 2014• Journals, books, conference proceedings, technical
reports, theses and dissertations, standards, databases, components
Members
• 5,322 participating publishers - or organizations that publish• 1,345 new members so far this year - 30% growth
some new members
• African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development • Comhar Teoranta • DJ Publications • ERM Publications • LACCEI (Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering
Institutions) • Northern Institute • Sciencepark Research Organization and Counseling • Summa Psicologica UST • Universidad de Oviedo • University of Guam Press
some new members
• Brand Design Association of Korea • Current Approaches in Psychiatry • Dokuz Eylul Universitesi • Istanbul University Faculty of Fisheries • Korean Political Science Association • Korean Society for Lacan and Contemporary Psychoanalysis • Liinc em Revista • The Association of Popular Narrative • The Jungang English Language and Literature Association of Korea • The Korean Ethics Education Association
Governance
• Election: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Hindawi, Taylor & Francis, Sage Publications, Wiley• Board: AIP, APA, Elsevier, IEEE, IOP, Johns Hopkins UP,
PLOS, Springer Nature, Vilnius GediminasTechnical University (VGTU) Press, de Gruyter, Zhejiang University Press• Board committees: Executive, Nominating, Audit• Nominating Committee proposed the slate of board
candidates - includes general members
How to get involved?
• Committees: Membership & Fees, CrossCheck, CrossMark, Text and Data Mining, DET, DUL• Working Groups: Taxonomy, Linked Clinical Trials,
Standards Technical, Book Interest Group, Funder Advisory Group
Preprints
• In July the board voted to accept preprints• Updated rules being reviewed tomorrow• Clarify best practice for: • Assigning DOIs to preprints and requirements for clear
labelling and to link to published version - privilege the Version of Record • Assigning CR DOIs at acceptance and maintaining the same
CR DOI for the formally published version. • Assigning separate DOIs to duplicative and derivative content
such as re-publications, translations, annotated copies, etc.
Funding data
• Changing a name - renaming FundRef - will use funding data and the Crossref Open Funder Registry• “FundRef” caused confusion - many thought it was
separate from Crossref or a separate system. • Took focus away from all the metadata we are now
collecting including: funder ID and grant number, authenticated ORCID iDs, licenses (embargoes), full text URL for TDM, CrossMark metadata, abstracts
What’s in store?
• 2016 Budget• $7.2 million revenue (7% increase from 2015 YE)• $7.0 million expenses (21% increase from 2015 YE)
- staff costs, new website, re-branding roll out• Full roll out of new branding and communications;
new website; new manual deposit process, DET, DUL, Linked Clinical Trials, ORCID Auto Update, Participation Reports, international outreach, etc.
Collaboration & Engagement
• Institutional Identifiers - ORCID, DataCite and others• I believe there is an opportunity for the scholarly community
to come together and address the challenge of providing a stable persistent identifier for institutions. This conversation should clearly involve the existing stakeholders I have listed above. But a standard alone is insufficient for success; both ORCID and CrossRef demonstrate the need for organisational infrastructure, services and outreach in order to drive uptake and ensure success.• Richard Padley, Semantical - Digital Science - Perspectives• https://www.digital-science.com/blog/perspectives/on-the-benefits-of-institutional-identit
y-a-guest-post-by-richard-padley/
The future?
• More (valuable) growth• More (thoughtful) change
Thank you Ed Pentz
[email protected]@epentz