DRIVE 2016 | 26 October: Create Health
Transcript of DRIVE 2016 | 26 October: Create Health
CO-CREATION UNTIL THE PAGER TRIGGERS Ingeborg Griffioen | Panton
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
Empower people to conquer healthcare challenges
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
Innova6ng for healthcare 10 lessons learned
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
1|connec(vity&dependency
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
2|complexity
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
3|usergroups
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
4|hierarchy
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
5|actnow
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
6|focusonthebigproblem
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
7|consistency
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
8 |knowledge,procedures&standards
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
9|limitedimpactondailycare
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
10|implementa(on
How
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
Designing for Healthcare Empowerpeopletoconquerhealthchallenges Mul@disciplinaryteam Acceptonlythebestanddedicatedexperts Seethebigproblem,realizeindetail
©2016–Panton|Ontwerpersvoordezorg
UTRECHT3D MEDICAL,COOPERATION IN 3D-PRINTINGFOR MEDICAL PURPOSESClaartje Aarts | Protospace
Res
ou
rces
Time
Basic research
Development Market penetration
Time
Development Market penetration
Res
ou
rces
Traditional Product Development
Product Development withRapid Prototyping
Triple osteomie
Heupdysplasie bij jongvolwassenen
Dept. OrthopedieImage Science Institute
A‘fitting’supportforpeoplewithdementiaforlivingindependently
BenKröse,lectorDigitalLife- UniversityofAppliedSciences,Amsterdam
urgency
• 260.000personswith dementia
• In2040:morethan 500.000personswith dementia
• Anenormous growth inthe number ofinformal caregivers isneeded (they arenot there…)
• Less nursing homes->personswith severedementiahavetoliveathome
Supply
There aremany products and services
BenKröse 4
Forthose involved it isdifficult tofind a‘fitting’solution
Activities(1)What arethe NEEDS? (2)Inventoryofproducts
and services
(3)FIT=process offinding good solutions
(4)Evaluation
(6)Personalizedsolutions:- Studiesinlivinglabs- Discuss with care
organizations- Study the budget
(5)DISSEMINATIE
Partnershipcreative industry
• Inventoryofneeds and inventory ofproducts and services
BenKröse 7
Partnershipcreatieveindustrie
• Co-creation ofa“keuzehulp”
• Testphase – testand changedesigns
• Bothdigitaland non-digitalsolutions
• Use hackatons to mobilize usersand designers
BenKröse 8
Howto evaluate tesolutions?
• Personalized solutions arenot ‘pills’
• Not possible to doRCT– Technologydevelopsfasterthantriallenght
– Toocomplexintervention
• Can weuse evaluationmethods fromcreative industries?
BenKröse 9
Thank you!
ROODKAPJEEvert Hoogendoorn | IJsfontein
Little Red Riding Hood
An empty fridge…and you are hungry.What do you do….?
Ask little red riding hood
for help
Invite the hunter in your
house
Order groceries
online
Healthy Aging & Games
Healthy Aging
Challenges
1. Target audience is hard to reach for testing
2. Private subject
3. Personalized outcome
Healthy Aging
Solutions
1. Partner with patient (organizations)
2. Playful learning
3. Offer food for discussion, no right or wrong
Validation
Validation
1. Literature
2.Testing primary assumptions
3.Validationstudy design
Prototype ValidationConcept Playtest Development
Prototype Playtest ValidationConcept
Existing theories
Development
PrototypePilot
studies Development Implemen-tation
Existing studies
Existing theories
Concept
DISCUSSIONRCT is not very suitable for validation:
Ben: Can we use evaluation methods from creative industries?Evert: How can we develop (more and fast) new and better ways for validation?
Other question of Evert:How can we take care of a better distinction between Health and Wellness games
NEW CALL CREATE HEALTHInge Valstar | ZonMw
Create HealthProgram activities 2016/2017
Inge ValstarProgram officer ZonMw
Date 26.10.2016
Create Health - introduction
• Cross-over top sectors LSH en CI* Added value: interaction creative industry and care!
• Goal: Contribute to the societal challenges around healthy and active aging
• 3 themes1. Independent living with dementia2. Prevention of overweight3. Prevention of loneliness in frail elderly
Program activities ZonMw/NWO
• Call: research projects on eHealth in relation to the 3 Create Health themes
• Overarching research project on central theme• Innovation vouchers• Medische inspirator price• Matchmaking & Network/project meetings
Program at a glance
Net
wor
k/pr
ojec
t mee
tings
Independent living withdementia
Prevention of overweight
Prevention of loneliness
Overarching research project
Medische inspiratorprijs
knowledgebuilding blocks
utilisation
Knowlegde vouchers
Call ehealth/3 themes
Program at a glance
Independent living withdementia
Prevention of overweight
Prevention of loneliness
Overarching research project
Medische inspiratorprijs
knowledgebuilding blocks
utilisation
Knowlegde vouchers
Call ehealth/3 themes
Net
wor
k/pr
ojec
t mee
tings
ZonMw & NWO call for proposalsKnowledge base eHealth on healthy and active aging
Specifically on:1. Independent living with dementia2. Prevention of overweight3. Prevention of loneliness in frail elderly
What knowledge is needed for development of meaningful, userfriendlyeHealth applications or assist the use of existing applications?
e.g. knowledge on behaviour, communication, literacy,….
This call is not about the actual development of an eHealth applicationitself
ZonMw & NWO call
• Available budget: M€ 2,6• Budget per project: max. 250k€ (excl. matching)• Project duration: max. 3 years• Fundamental research• PPP consortium, minimal:
o Research organisation (creative and care)o Representation of the target groupo Private party
• Matching of budget: 20% of total project costs(in cash or in kind) by partners
Timeline call research proposals
November 2016 Call open
November 21, 2016 Matchmaking
Half january 2017 Deadline project idea
May 2017 Deadline full proposal
September 2017 Final granting decision
Max. 6 months after granting Start projects
Q1 2018 1st Network meeting
Other activities
• Overarching project: central theme• Knowledge vouchers: utilisation of knowledge obtained
in research projects• Medische inspirator price• Netwerk meetings: creating more impact
HEALTH GAMES IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CARE ORGANIZATIONSJoris Arts | doctorpreneur & hospitalpharmacist,
Healthcare Center Kersenboogerd & Antonius Hospital Sneek
Paul van Geldrop | Cooperation Mental Wealth & GGZe
Eindhoven
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_k-1zxh5v0&feature=youtu.be
1+1=3
Startupcost €700,-Screen €1500,-
Year license €6.000,-
€8.200,-
2patients/day/physiotherapist2inthe timeof1/day/physotherapist€30,- extraperphysiotherapist/day
8,5FTE8,5x180days x€30,-
€45.900
Interlude
TheJourney
Selfmanagement
Benefits
• Dailyusage greatly increases personalinsight
• More‘effective’timeinbetween face-to-facecontacts
• Proactive insight influctuations ofstresslevels
Propositions
• Reduction of10%inrelapsesafter treatmentcompared to treatmentwithoutapp
• Increase ofefficiencyoftreatment,resulting inadecrease of10%inlength oftreatment
• Increase offace-to-facecontacts with healthcare professional,allowing for adecrease of10%inoveralltreatmenttime
• Preventionofescalation and crisiscare of5%compared to treatmentwithoutapp
Preventionofcrisis
Preventionofrelapse
Average timespent onPTSDtreatment: 1.378minutes (median:1.006minutes)
Cost ofaverage PTSDtreatment: €2.557,65 (current pricing)
Amount ofPTSD-treatments 2008-2013: 57.634
Average amount ofPTSD-treatments peryear: 11.527
Assumption:5%due to relapse,amounting to: 576treatments peryear
Reduction of5%due to usage TheJourney: - 29treatments peryear
29treatments ataverage pricing: - €74.171,85
sourceofdata:Relationship between duration oftreatmentand success inmental healthcare,Celsus AcademievoorBetaalbareZorg,E.Oberjé e.a.,2016
DISCUSSIONProfits of innovation doesn’t reach
the care organizations who have invested in it.
How do we come to collaborations to design new systems for financing care
and innovation where care organizations also have advantages of.
How can we realize a healthy financial situation for care organizations
(for instance more income with the same FTE…)