Converting science into public policy - Matatā...
Transcript of Converting science into public policy - Matatā...
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Converting science into public
policy - Matatā debris flow case
study
Australasian Natural Hazards Conference 2017
Jeff Farrell
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Landslide Risk
Management
• Systems
– AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009
– AGS (2007)
– Other Systems
• Management options
– Hazard avoidance
– Hazard elimination
– Hazard reduction
– Monitoring 11
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
F-N Curve Awatarariki
Fanhead
14
1.00E-08
1.00E-07
1.00E-06
1.00E-05
1.00E-04
1.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0
Current Density Future Density
Unacceptable
Tolerable, if as low as reasonably practical (ALARP)
Broadly Acceptable
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Better Business Case - 5
lenses
Strategic
Economic
Commercial Financial
Management
Is there a compelling case
for change?
Does the
recommended
option optimise
public value?
Is the
proposed deal
achievable &
attractive in
the market
place?
How will the
proposal
be successfully
delivered?
Is the spending
proposal
affordable?
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Investment objectives
1. Protect the life safety of residents;
2. Create certainty for property owners and for the Matatā community;
3. Increase community resilience.
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Transferable Funding Framework
Criteria
TA/Regional Council/Government are potential funding partners
• Risks to human life from the hazard are accepted as being unacceptable; and
• No viable alternative life-risk-reduction strategies available (such as warning and evacuation and/or construction of mitigation measures), and
• Costs to manage the risk are beyond the fiscal capability of the local authority to manage.
20
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Policy Framework
• Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
• Local Government Act
• Resource Management Act
• Regional Policy Statement
• Regional Plans
• District Plans
21
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Regional Policy Statement
(RPS)
• Roles and responsibilities (landuse control) –Objectives, policies and methods - shared
– District councils: rules to control landuse and subdivision for avoidance of natural hazards
–Regional Council: rules for addressing existing land uses subject to natural hazards
• Risk Assessment Methodology (and approved alternatives)
23
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Awatarariki Risk Reduction
Options
• Engineering solution X
• Early warning system X
• Planning solution √
25
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
District Plan Change
• Change zoning from ‘Residential’ to ‘Coastal Protection’
• Life safety focus
• Gives effect to the RPS
26
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Regional Plan Change
Initiated by Whakatāne District Council • Gives effect to the RPS • Risk reduction required • Only viable risk reduction solution is retreat • Strong evidence base using RPS assessment
methodology • A new rule in a Regional Plan • Extinguish existing land uses in high debris
flow risk area
27
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Commitment Pathway
28
Commitmen
t
Understandi
ng Information
Awareness Ignorance
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Main Technical Challenges
• Lack of national guidance on levels of risk
• Limitations of modelling for long
recurrence interval natural hazard events
• Cost benefit analyses have significant
limitations
• Qualitative analysis using MCA
29
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Main Political Challenges
• Funding
• Precedence - accepting responsibility
• Commitment to a decision
• Accepting the science
30
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Key Lessons
• Proactive DRR preferable approach • Reactive - get in early (i.e. as soon as possible after
event) • Involve the community • Robust analysis • Plain language– catchy, key messages • Use diagrams and pictures • Present information in multiple ways • Storey telling • Personalise the issue
31
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz
Acknowledgements
• Kevin Hind - Tonkin and Taylor Ltd
• Tim Davies - University of Canterbury
• Maurie McSaveney, Nicola Litchfield, and Chris Massey - GNS Science
• Craig Batchelar - Boffa Miskell Ltd
• Andrew Green - Brookfields
• Colleagues at the Whakatāne District Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council
34