Converting science into public policy - Matatā...

36
www.Whakatāne .govt.nz Converting science into public policy - Matatā debris flow case study Australasian Natural Hazards Conference 2017 Jeff Farrell

Transcript of Converting science into public policy - Matatā...

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Converting science into public

policy - Matatā debris flow case

study

Australasian Natural Hazards Conference 2017

Jeff Farrell

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

WHAKATĀNE

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Matatā

Whakatāne

White

Island

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Awatarariki Catchment,

Matatā

4

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

5

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

7

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz 8

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

An Engineering Solution for the

Awatarariki

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Engineering Planning

10

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Landslide Risk

Management

• Systems

– AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009

– AGS (2007)

– Other Systems

• Management options

– Hazard avoidance

– Hazard elimination

– Hazard reduction

– Monitoring 11

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Hazard Assessment

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Risk Assessment (Annual loss

of life)

13

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

F-N Curve Awatarariki

Fanhead

14

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E-04

1.00E-03

1.00E-02

1.00E-01

1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0

Current Density Future Density

Unacceptable

Tolerable, if as low as reasonably practical (ALARP)

Broadly Acceptable

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz 15

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

11 Workstreams

16

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Better Business Case - 5

lenses

Strategic

Economic

Commercial Financial

Management

Is there a compelling case

for change?

Does the

recommended

option optimise

public value?

Is the

proposed deal

achievable &

attractive in

the market

place?

How will the

proposal

be successfully

delivered?

Is the spending

proposal

affordable?

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Primary BBC Focus

To prevent an inevitable

and predictable disaster

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Investment objectives

1. Protect the life safety of residents;

2. Create certainty for property owners and for the Matatā community;

3. Increase community resilience.

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Transferable Funding Framework

Criteria

TA/Regional Council/Government are potential funding partners

• Risks to human life from the hazard are accepted as being unacceptable; and

• No viable alternative life-risk-reduction strategies available (such as warning and evacuation and/or construction of mitigation measures), and

• Costs to manage the risk are beyond the fiscal capability of the local authority to manage.

20

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Policy Framework

• Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

• Local Government Act

• Resource Management Act

• Regional Policy Statement

• Regional Plans

• District Plans

21

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz 22

BOPRC Regional Policy

Statement

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Regional Policy Statement

(RPS)

• Roles and responsibilities (landuse control) –Objectives, policies and methods - shared

– District councils: rules to control landuse and subdivision for avoidance of natural hazards

–Regional Council: rules for addressing existing land uses subject to natural hazards

• Risk Assessment Methodology (and approved alternatives)

23

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

High, Medium & Low Debris

Flow Risk Areas

24

Replace Map

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Awatarariki Risk Reduction

Options

• Engineering solution X

• Early warning system X

• Planning solution √

25

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

District Plan Change

• Change zoning from ‘Residential’ to ‘Coastal Protection’

• Life safety focus

• Gives effect to the RPS

26

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Regional Plan Change

Initiated by Whakatāne District Council • Gives effect to the RPS • Risk reduction required • Only viable risk reduction solution is retreat • Strong evidence base using RPS assessment

methodology • A new rule in a Regional Plan • Extinguish existing land uses in high debris

flow risk area

27

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Commitment Pathway

28

Commitmen

t

Understandi

ng Information

Awareness Ignorance

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Main Technical Challenges

• Lack of national guidance on levels of risk

• Limitations of modelling for long

recurrence interval natural hazard events

• Cost benefit analyses have significant

limitations

• Qualitative analysis using MCA

29

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Main Political Challenges

• Funding

• Precedence - accepting responsibility

• Commitment to a decision

• Accepting the science

30

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Key Lessons

• Proactive DRR preferable approach • Reactive - get in early (i.e. as soon as possible after

event) • Involve the community • Robust analysis • Plain language– catchy, key messages • Use diagrams and pictures • Present information in multiple ways • Storey telling • Personalise the issue

31

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Communicating Risk in the

Future

32

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Natural Hazard Virtual

Reality

33

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Acknowledgements

• Kevin Hind - Tonkin and Taylor Ltd

• Tim Davies - University of Canterbury

• Maurie McSaveney, Nicola Litchfield, and Chris Massey - GNS Science

• Craig Batchelar - Boffa Miskell Ltd

• Andrew Green - Brookfields

• Colleagues at the Whakatāne District Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council

34

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz

Kia ora tātou

www.whakatane.govt.nz

www.Whakatāne .govt.nz