CJK#20 B3G-WG CCSA Wang Li [email protected]
description
Transcript of CJK#20 B3G-WG CCSA Wang Li [email protected]
2
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획 Contents
Introduction
ChEG Evaluation Schedule
Simulation Model and Assumptions
CJK Eval SIG Time Schedule(Proposal)
3
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획 Introduction
4
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획
Sep ’09
May ’09
Apr ’09
• Output the evaluation result of
802.16m technology
• ……
• Evaluate basic radio characteristics
(e.g., geometry distribution, large scale loss distribution)
• Output the evaluation result of LTE-Advanced technology
• Compare the results with other companies or Eval Groups
• Focus on the SCM channel before Apr ’09
• Check the accuracy of SLS
ChEG Evaluation Schedule
5
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획 Simulation Model and Assumptions(1)
6
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획 Simulation Model and Assumptions(2)Parameter Value
Multiple Access OFDMA(DL)DFT-S-OFDMA (UL)
Number of Cells 19
Number of Sectors per Cell 3
Inter-site distance( m) 5001732
Antenna Configuration 2x2(DL) 1x2(UL)
Centre Frequency 2 GHz
Traffic model Full Buffer
BS transmit power 46dBm
MS transmit power 24 dBm
Lognormal Shadowing Standard deviation: 10 dB
Shadowing Correlation
Between cells 0.5
Between sectors 1
UE Noise Figure 9dB
MS Antenna Gain 0 dBi
BS Antenna Gain 14 dBi
7
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획 Simulation Model and Assumptions(3)
Parameter Value
MIMO SU-MIMO
Path-Loss 128.1+37.6log10(R), R in km
HARQ Synchronous HARQ 6 Processes
Maximum Retransmission Number 3
Thermal Noise Density -174 dBm/Hz
Antenna Bore-sight points toward flat side of cell (for 3-sector sites with fixed antenna patterns)
BS Antenna pattern(horizontal)(For 3-sector cell sites with fixed antenna patterns)
= 70 degrees, Am = 20 dB
Minimum distance between UE and Cell >= 35 meters
Users dropped uniformly in entire cell
L2S interface EESM
m
dB
AA ,12min2
3
dB3
고객상담센터 조직구성 및 운영계획
8
Some Ideas
• We would be glad to discuss IMT-A channel items with CJK Eval SIG colleagues
9
May ’09May ’09
Apr ’09Apr ’09
CJK
Eval S
IGIT
U-R
IMT A
dvan
ced
IMT.EVAL
IMT.RADIO
Proposal SubmissionProposal Submission
Jan’09Jan’09
Conference Call for Conference Call for checking the result of IMT-checking the result of IMT-
A channelA channel
Proposal Evaluation & Consensus BuildingProposal Evaluation & Consensus Building
Develop Recommendation Develop Recommendation
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2008 2009
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2010
Oct ’09 Oct ’09
Jun ’10 Jun ’10
AprApr MayMay JunJunJulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDecITU-R WP5D
Oct ’08 Oct ’08
System Level
Link Level Conference for checking Conference for checking the result of SNR-BLER the result of SNR-BLER
curves of LLScurves of LLS
Conference Call for Conference Call for checking the geometry checking the geometry
distribution and large scale distribution and large scale loss of LTE-A systemloss of LTE-A system
Apr ’09Apr ’09
Conference for checking the result of Conference for checking the result of user throughput and the cell edge user user throughput and the cell edge user
spectral efficiency of LTE-A systemspectral efficiency of LTE-A system
May ’09May ’09
Conference for Conference for checking the result checking the result of 802.16m systemof 802.16m systemSep ’09 Sep ’09
Conference for checking the result Conference for checking the result of any other candidate technologiesof any other candidate technologies
CJK Eval SIG Time schedule for IMT-A Evaluation (Proposal)
CJK Eval SIG Time schedule for IMT-A Evaluation (Proposal)
10
ANNEX :Part of Simulation Results
Geometrey Distribution
11
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Geometry [dB]
CD
F
Case 1
Case 3
12
Large Scale Loss (Urban Macrocell and Suburban Macrocell)
-150 -140 -130 -120 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
L a r g e S c a l e L o s s ( d B )
CDF
S M A S c e n a r i o
-160 -150 -140 -130 -120 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
L a r g e S c a l e L o s s ( d B )
CDF
U M A S c e n a r i o
13
Thank you!