Cha Cheka

download Cha Cheka

of 3

Transcript of Cha Cheka

  • 8/10/2019 Cha Cheka

    1/3

    m o n d a y , a u g u s t 9 , 2 0 1 0

    YU OH vs COURT OF APPEALS GR No. 12597 June 06, 2003

    my first digest: on retroactive effect(criminal law I)

    Petitioner: Elvira Yu Oh

    Respondent(s): Court of Appeals and People of the Philippines

    FACTS:

    Petitioner purchased pieces of jewelry from Solid Gold International Traders,

    Inc. Due to her failure to pay the purchase price, the company filed civil

    cases against her for specific performance before the RTC of Pasig. On

    September 17, 1990, petitioner and Solid Gold through it general manager,

    Joaquin Novales III entered into a compromise agreement to settle said civil

    cases. It was approved by the trial court provided that petitioner shall issue

    a total of ninety-nine post-dated checks in the amount of PHP 50,000.00

    each, dated every 15thand 30thof the month starting October 1, 1990 and

    the balance of over PHP 1million to be paid in lump sum on November 16,

    1994 (the due date of the 99thpost dated check). Petitioner then issued ten

    checks at Php 50,000.00 each for a total of Php 500,000.00 drawn against

    her account at the Equitable Banking Corporation (EBC). Novales then

    deposited each of the ten checks on their respective due dates to the

    company bank account. However, said checks were dishonored by the EBC

    for the reason Account Closed. Dishonor slips were issued for each check

    that was returned to Novales. On October 5, 1992, Novales filed 10 separate

    informations before the RTC of Quezon City charging the petitioner with

    violation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 22. Upon arraignment, petitioner pleaded

    not guilty.

    Nonetheless, RTC convicted her of ten counts of violation of BP 22. CA

    affirmed the decision.

  • 8/10/2019 Cha Cheka

    2/3

    ISSUES:

    (1) Whether or not appellate court was mistaken in not granting retroactive

    effect to RA 7691 in view of Art 22 of the RPC.

    (2) Whether or not notice of dishonor is indispensable in this case.

    HELD:

    (1) No.RA 7691 is not a penal law and therefore, Art 22 of the RPC does not

    apply in the present case. A penal law is an act of the legislature that

    prohibits certain acts and establishes penalties for its violations. It also

    defines crime, treats of their nature and provides for its punishment. RA

    7691 is a law that vests additional jurisdiction on courts, thus, it is

    substantive. The court further held that it cannot be given retroactive effect.

    (2) Yes. It is necessary that a notice of dishonor be received by the issuer

    and the prosecution has the burden of proving the fact of service. It thus

    stated in section 2 of BP 22. It is essential for the drawer to be notified of

    the dishonor of her checks so she could make arrangements for its payment

    within the period prescribed by law (5 days).

    Hence, SC reversed the decision of the CA and acquits the petioner.

    Posted byyham at8:30 PM

    Reactions:

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Newer PostOlder PostHome

    Subscribe to:Post Comments (Atom)

    anything goes. . .yhamyham's personal blog:)

    elance

    http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fajardo-vs-court-of-appeal-gr-no-128508.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/feeds/2969386101249353231/comments/defaulthttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/feeds/2969386101249353231/comments/defaulthttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/feeds/2969386101249353231/comments/defaulthttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/feeds/2969386101249353231/comments/defaulthttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fajardo-vs-court-of-appeal-gr-no-128508.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fajardo-vs-court-of-appeal-gr-no-128508.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902
  • 8/10/2019 Cha Cheka

    3/3

    blogcatalog

    Recent Viewers

    FriendlyBlogger4years ago

    Powered By BlogCatalog

    payperpost, inc

    about me

    yham

    workaholic. curious. loves challenges.

    View my complete profile

    blog archive

    2010(7)

    o August(7)

    Domestic violence. . .

    Our Deepest Fear

    LIANG VS PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES GR no. 125865 J...

    VALEROSO vs PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES GR 164815 ...

    FAJARDO VS COURT OF APPEAL GR no. 128508 February...

    YU OH vs COURT OF APPEALS GR No. 12597 June 06, 2...

    fast forward

    2009(1)

    followers

    http://www.blogcatalog.com/user/FriendlyBlogger?utm_campaign=recent-readers&utm_medium=web&utm_source=widgethttp://www.blogcatalog.com/user/FriendlyBlogger?utm_campaign=recent-readers&utm_medium=web&utm_source=widgethttp://www.blogcatalog.com/in/4769596http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/domestic-violence.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/domestic-violence.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/our-deepest-fear.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/our-deepest-fear.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/liang-vs-people-of-philippines-gr-no.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/liang-vs-people-of-philippines-gr-no.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/valeroso-vs-people-of-philippines-gr.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/valeroso-vs-people-of-philippines-gr.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fajardo-vs-court-of-appeal-gr-no-128508.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fajardo-vs-court-of-appeal-gr-no-128508.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fast-forward.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fast-forward.htmlhttp://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://www.blogcatalog.com/user/FriendlyBlogger?utm_campaign=recent-readers&utm_medium=web&utm_source=widgethttp://www.blogcatalog.com/user/FriendlyBlogger?utm_campaign=recent-readers&utm_medium=web&utm_source=widgethttp://www.blogcatalog.com/user/FriendlyBlogger?utm_campaign=recent-readers&utm_medium=web&utm_source=widgethttp://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fast-forward.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/yu-oh-vs-court-of-appeals-gr-no-12597.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/fajardo-vs-court-of-appeal-gr-no-128508.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/valeroso-vs-people-of-philippines-gr.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/liang-vs-people-of-philippines-gr-no.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/our-deepest-fear.htmlhttp://policemom007.blogspot.com/2010/08/domestic-violence.htmlhttp://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://void%280%29/http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://www.blogger.com/profile/09941117691035386902http://www.blogcatalog.com/in/4769596http://www.blogcatalog.com/user/FriendlyBlogger?utm_campaign=recent-readers&utm_medium=web&utm_source=widget