Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf ·...

27
www.sfplanning.org Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4, 2011 Filing Date: October 27, 2010 Case No.: 2010.0973A Project Address: 500 Washington Street Zoning: C2 (Community Business) Jackson Square Special Use District WashingtonBroadway Special Use District No. 1 65A Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 0196/023 Applicant: Joseph Camicia of Permit Me for TMobile West Corp. Concord, CA 94520 Staff Contact Aaron Hollister (415) 5759078 [email protected] Reviewed By Tim Frye – (415) 5756822 [email protected] PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 500 Washington Street, northwest corner of Washington and Sansome Streets, in Assessor’s Block 0196, Lot 023, within the Jackson Square Historic District. The subject property contains an eightstory office building that was built in 1983 and is a noncontributory structure to the Jackson Square Historic District. The subject building is located within a C2 (Community Business) Use District, the Jackson Square Special Use District, the WashingtonBroadway Special Use District No. 1 and a 65A Height and Bulk limit PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposes to install a wireless telecommunications service (“WTS”) facility operated by TMobile by adding six panel antennas on the façade of an existing mechanical penthouse and four equipment cabinets on the rooftop of the subject building. The antennas will be installed in pairs and flushmounted to the northerly, southeasterly and southwesterly facades of the mechanical penthouse at an approximate height of 116 feet. The antennas will also be painted to match the penthouse. The equipment cabinets will be located at the base of the western side of the penthouse and will be painted to match the existing rooftop equipment. OTHER ACTIONS REQUIRED None.

Transcript of Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf ·...

Page 1: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

 

www.sfplanning.org

 

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4, 2011

 Filing Date:  October 27, 2010 Case No.:  2010.0973A Project Address:  500 Washington Street Zoning:  C‐2 (Community Business)   Jackson Square Special Use District   Washington‐Broadway Special Use District No. 1   65‐A Height and Bulk District Block/Lot:  0196/023 Applicant:  Joseph Camicia of    Permit Me for   T‐Mobile West Corp.   Concord, CA 94520 Staff Contact  Aaron Hollister ‐ (415) 575‐9078   [email protected] Reviewed By   Tim Frye – (415) 575‐6822   [email protected]  

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 500 Washington Street, northwest corner of Washington and Sansome Streets, in Assessor’s Block 0196, Lot 023, within the Jackson Square Historic District.   The subject property contains an eight‐story office building that was built in 1983 and is a non‐contributory structure to the Jackson Square Historic District.  The  subject  building  is  located within  a C‐2  (Community  Business) Use District,  the  Jackson  Square Special Use District,  the Washington‐Broadway Special Use District No. 1 and a 65‐A Height and Bulk limit  PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposes  to  install  a wireless  telecommunications  service  (“WTS”)  facility  operated  by T‐Mobile  by  adding  six  panel  antennas  on  the  façade  of  an  existing mechanical  penthouse  and  four equipment cabinets on  the rooftop of  the subject building.   The antennas will be  installed  in pairs and flush‐mounted to the northerly, southeasterly and southwesterly facades of the mechanical penthouse at an  approximate  height  of  116  feet.    The  antennas will  also  be  painted  to match  the  penthouse.   The equipment cabinets will be located at the base of the western side of the penthouse and will be painted to match the existing rooftop equipment.   OTHER ACTIONS REQUIRED None. 

Page 2: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Certificate of Appropriateness May 4, 2011 

Case Number 2010.0973A500 Washington Street

 COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANNING CODE PROVISIONS The proposed project is in compliance with all other provisions of the Planning Code.     APPLICABLE PRESERVATION STANDARDS ARTICLE 10 500 Washington  Street  has  been deemed  a  non‐contributory  structure  to  the  Jackson Historic District under  Article  10  of  the  Planning  Code.    A  Certificate  of  Appropriateness  is  required  for  any work involving  a  sign,  awning,  marquee,  canopy, mural  or  other  appendage  for  which  a  City  permit  is required in a historic district.  In appraising a proposal for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Commission should (1) consider the factors of height, massing fenestration, materials, color texture, detail,  style,  scale and proportion,  signage,  landscaping and  street  furniture; and  (2) preserve, enhance or restore, and not damage or destroy, the exterior architectural appearance of the subject site, building,  structure  and  object which  compatible with  the  character  of  the Historic District.    Section 1006.7(d) of the Planning Code provides, in relevant part, as follows:  

For applications pertaining  to all property  in historic districts,  the proposed work  shall also  conform  to such  further  standards  as may  be  embodied  in  the  ordinance  designating  the  historic  district.    [The designating ordinance for the Jackson Square Historic District is Appendix B, Article 10.] 

 THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS Rehabilitation  is  the act or process of making possible a compatible use  for a property  through repair, alterations, and additions, while preserving those portions or features that convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. The Rehabilitation Standards provide, in relevant part(s):  Standard 9. New  additions,  exterior  alterations,  or  related  new  construction  will  not  destroy  historic  materials, features,  and  spatial  relationships  that  characterize  the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.  The proposed WTS facility installation is anticipated to be minimally visible from the immediately adjacent public rights‐of‐way and public places.   The proposed antennas would be  flush‐mounted to three  facades of a mechanical penthouse  so  the  antennas would not disrupt  the primary parapet  lines of  the building.   The  rooftop  equipment cabinets would not be visible from public rights‐of‐way due their setbacks from public rights‐of‐way in relation to the parapet height of the building.  The WTS facility would not appear in any viewscapes of the buildings located in the historic district as the mounting height of the facility is located above the prevailing low‐ to mid‐rise height of the district.  Standard 10. New additions and adjacent or  related new construction  shall be undertaken  in  such a manner  that  if removed  in  the  future,  the  essential  form  and  integrity  of  the  historic  property  and  its  environment would be unimpaired. 

2

Page 3: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Certificate of Appropriateness May 4, 2011 

Case Number 2010.0973A500 Washington Street

 The WTS facility would be able to be removed without impairment to the building or district.  The antennas would be mounted to the façade of a non‐historic penthouse, while the equipment cabinet mounting rack would be simply bolted into the rooftop of the subject building.  PUBLIC/NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT The Department has received no public input on the project at the date of this report.  ISSUES & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS None.  STAFF ANAYLSIS Particular  to WTS  facilities,  staff  considered  the  proposed  location, method  of  attachment,  screening material, size and number  in relation  to  the subject and historic district.   Based on  the requirements of Article 10 and the Secretary of Interior’s Standards, staff has determined that the proposed work will not adversely affect the non‐historic subject building, or the architectural and historic character of the Jackson Square Historic District.  The  components  of  the  proposed  wireless  telecommunication  facility  have  been  positioned  to  be minimally visible from adjacent rights‐of‐way.  All six of the wireless communication antennas would be located on three facades of an existing rooftop mechanical penthouse.  Each antenna would be mounted to the façade of the penthouse at a height not to exceed the penthouse structure to which the antennas are attached; therefore, no antenna would disrupt the existing parapet line or add undesired height and bulk to  the building.   The proposed  equipment  cabinets would be  set back approximately 65  feet  from  the nearest street‐facing elevation.  The equipment cabinets would have a maximum height of approximately five feet, nine inches, or one foot, nine inches above the existing parapet.  Due to the proposed setback of the  cabinets  from  the  public  right‐of‐way  combined with  the  existing  parapet  height,  the  equipment cabinets are not anticipated to be visible from the nearby public rights‐of‐way.   In respect to the Jackson Square Historic District, the proposed installation does not appear to affect the viewscape  of  other  buildings  located within  the district.   The mounting  height  of  the proposed WTS facility is well above the prevailing heights of buildings in the district, which tend to be low‐ to mid‐rise buildings; therefore, the proposed WTS facility would not be in viewscapes from nearby public rights‐of‐way of buildings in the district.  ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS The  Planning  Department  has  determined  that  the  proposed  project  is  exempt  from  environmental review, pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 (Class Three‐New Construction of Small Structures) because  the project  is a minor alteration of an existing structure and meets  the Secretary of  the  Interior’s Standards.     

3

Page 4: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Certificate of Appropriateness May 4, 2011 

4

Case Number 2010.0973A500 Washington Street

PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Planning  Department  staff  recommends  APPROVAL  of  the  proposed  project  is  appropriate  for  and consistent with the purposed of Article 10, meets the standards of Article 10 and the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.  ATTACHMENTS Draft Motion  Photo Simulations of Proposed Project Plans Zoning Maps    AJH: G:\DOCUMENTS\Projects\C of A\500 Washington Street\500 Washington Street Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report.doc

Page 5: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

 

Historic Preservation Commission Draft Motion HEARING DATE: MAY 4, 2011

 Hearing Date:  May 4, 2011 Filing Date:  October 27, 2010 Case No.:  2010.0973A Project Address:  500 Washington Street Zoning:  C‐2 (Community Business)   Jackson Square Special Use District   Washington‐Broadway Special Use District No. 1   65‐A Height and Bulk District Block/Lot:  0196/023 Applicant:  Joseph Camica of    Permit Me for   T‐Mobile West Corp.   Concord, CA 94520 Staff Contact  Aaron Hollister ‐ (415) 575‐9078   [email protected]  Reviewed By   Tim Frye – (415) 575‐6822   [email protected] 

 ADOPTING FINDINGS FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR PROPOSED WORK DETERMINED  TO  BE  APPROPRIATE  FOR  AND  CONSISTENT  WITH  THE  PURPOSES  OF ARTICLE 10, TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF ARTICLE 10 AND TO MEET THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 023 IN ASSESSOR’S  BLOCK  0196, WITHIN A  C‐2  (COMMUNITY  BUSINESS)  ZONING DISTRICT, THE  WASHINGTON‐BROADWAY  SPECIAL  USE  DISTRICT  NO.  1,  THE  JACKSON  SQUARE SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS AND A 65‐A HEIGHT AND BULK DISTRICT.  PREAMBLE WHEREAS, on October 27, 2010, Joseph Camicia of Permit Me for T‐Mobile West Corp. (Project Sponsor) filed  an  application  with  the  San  Francisco  Planning  Department  (hereinafter  “Department”)  for  a Certificate of Appropriateness for  installation of a wireless telecommunications service (“WTS”) facility operated by T‐Mobile by adding six panel antennas on the façade of an existing mechanical penthouse and  four equipment cabinets on  the  rooftop of  the  subject building.   The antennas will be  installed  in pairs  and  flush‐mounted  to  the  northerly,  southeasterly  and  southwesterly  facades  of  the mechanical penthouse  at  an  approximate  height  of  116  feet.    The  antennas  will  also  be  painted  to  match  the penthouse.  The equipment cabinets will be located at the base of the western side of the penthouse and will be painted  to match  the  existing  rooftop  equipment  at  the  subject building  located on Lot 023  in Assessor’s Block 0196. 

www.sfplanning.org

Page 6: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Motion No. XXXX CASE NO 2010.0973A Hearing Date: May 4, 2011 500 Washington Street

WHEREAS,  the  Project  was  determined  by  the  Department  to  be  categorically  exempt  from environmental  review  pursuant  to CEQA Guideline  Section  15303  (Class  Three‐New Construction  of Small Structures). The Historic Preservation Commission (hereinafter “Commission”) has reviewed and concurs with said determination.  WHEREAS, on May 4, 2011,  the Commission  conducted a duly noticed public hearing on  the  current project, Case No. 2010.0973A (“Project”) for its appropriateness.  WHEREAS,  in  reviewing  the  Application,  the  Commission  has  had  available  for  its  review  and consideration  case  reports,  plans,  and  other  materials  pertaining  to  the  Project  contained  in  the Departmentʹs case files, has reviewed and heard testimony and received materials from interested parties during the public hearing on the Project.  MOVED, that the Commission hereby grants the Certificate of Appropriateness, in conformance with the architectural plans dated received October 27, 2010, and labeled Exhibit A on file in the docket for Case No. 2010.0973A based on the following findings:  FINDINGS Having reviewed all the materials  identified  in the recitals above and having heard oral testimony and arguments, this Commission finds, concludes, and determines as follows:  

1. The above recitals are accurate and also constitute findings of the Commission.  2. Findings pursuant to Article 10: 

  The  proposed  WTS  facility  has  been  located  on  a  non‐contributory  structure  so  it  is 

minimally visible from adjacent public rights‐of‐way and public open spaces. 

The  six  proposed  antennas would  be  located  on  a  secondary  elevation  at  a  height  not  to exceed the structure to which the antennas are attached; therefore, no antenna would disrupt the existing parapet line. 

The equipment cabinets would not exceed approximately five feet, nine inches above the roof surface, or approximately one foot, nine inches above the height of the parapet and would be set back approximately 65  feet  from  the nearest street‐facing elevation;  thereby making  the equipment cabinets not visible due to the proposed setback in relation to building height. 

The WTS facility does not appear in any viewscapes of the buildings located in the Jackson Square Historic District  as  the  prevailing  low‐  to mid‐rise  heights  of  the  building  in  the district are well below the mounting height of the proposed WTS facility. 

The proposed project meets the following Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation:   

2

Page 7: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Motion No. XXXX CASE NO 2010.0973A Hearing Date: May 4, 2011 500 Washington Street

Standard 9.  New  additions,  exterior  alterations,  or  related new  construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.  Standard 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed  in  the  future,  the essential  form and  integrity of  the historic property and  its environment would be unimpaired. 

 3. General  Plan  Compliance.    The  proposed  Certificate  of  Appropriateness  is,  on  balance, 

consistent with the following Objectives and Policies of the General Plan:  

I.  URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT THE URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT CONCERNS THE PHYSICAL CHARACTER AND ORDER OF THE CITY, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEOPLE AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT.  GOALS The Urban Design Element  is concerned both with development and with preservation. It  is a concerted effort  to  recognize  the  positive  attributes  of  the  city,  to  enhance  and  conserve  those  attributes,  and  to improve  the  living  environment where  it  is  less  than  satisfactory. The Plan  is a definition of quality, a definition based upon human needs.  OBJECTIVE 1  EMPHASIS OF THE CHARACTERISTIC PATTERN WHICH GIVES TO THE CITY AND ITS NEIGHBORHOODS AN IMAGE, A SENSE OF PURPOSE, AND A MEANS OF ORIENTATION.  POLICY 1.3 Recognize that buildings, when seen together, produce a total effect that characterizes the city and its districts.  OBJECTIVE 2 CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES WHICH PROVIDE A SENSE OF NATURE, CONTINUITY WITH THE PAST, AND FREEDOM FROM OVERCROWDING.  POLICY 2.4 Preserve notable landmarks and areas of historic, architectural or aesthetic value, and promote the preservation of other buildings and features that provide continuity with past development. 

 POLICY 2.7 Recognize and protect outstanding and unique areas that contribute in an extraordinary degree to San Franciscoʹs visual form and character.  

3

Page 8: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Motion No. XXXX CASE NO 2010.0973A Hearing Date: May 4, 2011 500 Washington Street

The goal of a Certificate of Appropriateness  is  to provide additional oversight  for buildings and districts that  are  architecturally  or  culturally  significant  to  the  City  in  order  to  protect  the  qualities  that  are associated with that significance.     The proposed project qualifies for a Certificate of Appropriateness and therefore furthers these policies and objectives  by maintaining  and preserving  the  character‐defining  features  of  the  Jackson Square Historic District for the future enjoyment and education of San Francisco residents and visitors.    

4. The proposed project is generally consistent with the eight General Plan priority policies set forth in Section 101.1 in that:  A) The  existing neighborhood‐serving  retail uses will be preserved  and  enhanced  and  future 

opportunities  for  resident  employment  in  and  ownership  of  such  businesses  will  be enhanced:  Numerous neighborhood‐serving retail uses (including the on‐site commercial space) will be enhanced with improved T‐Mobile coverage provided by this site 

 B) The existing housing and neighborhood character will be conserved and protected  in order 

to preserve the cultural and economic diversity of our neighborhoods:  

The  proposed  project  will  maintain  neighborhood  character  by  respecting  the  character‐defining features of the district in conformance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.  

 C) The City’s supply of affordable housing will be preserved and enhanced:  

The project will not affect the affordable housing supply of the City.  D) The  commuter  traffic will  not  impede MUNI  transit  service  or  overburden  our  streets  or 

neighborhood parking:  

The  proposed  project  will  not  result  in  commuter  traffic  impeding  MUNI  transit  service  or overburdening the streets or neighborhood parking.  

 E) A diverse economic base will be maintained by protecting our industrial and service sectors 

from  displacement  due  to  commercial  office  development.  And  future  opportunities  for resident employment and ownership in these sectors will be enhanced: 

 The proposed will not have any impact on industrial and service sector jobs. 

 F) The City will achieve the greatest possible preparedness to protect against injury and loss of 

life in an earthquake.  

The  Project  is  designed  and  will  be  constructed  to  conform  to  the  structural  and  seismic  safety requirements of the Building Code. 

4

Page 9: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Motion No. XXXX CASE NO 2010.0973A Hearing Date: May 4, 2011 500 Washington Street

 G) That landmark and historic buildings will be preserved:  

The proposed project is in conformance with Article 10 of the Planning Code and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.   

 H) Parks  and  open  space  and  their  access  to  sunlight  and  vistas  will  be  protected  from 

development:  The proposed project will not impact the access to sunlight or vistas for the parks and open space. 

 5. For  these  reasons,  the proposal overall,  is appropriate  for and consistent with  the purposes of 

Article  10,  meets  the  standards  of  Article  10,  and  the  Secretary  of  Interior’s  Standards  for Rehabilitation, General Plan and Prop M findings of the Planning Code. 

 

5

Page 10: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Motion No. XXXX CASE NO 2010.0973A Hearing Date: May 4, 2011 500 Washington Street

6

 DECISION

That based upon  the Record,  the  submissions by  the Applicant,  the  staff of  the Department and other interested parties, the oral testimony presented to this Commission at the public hearings, and all other written  materials  submitted  by  all  parties,  the  Commission  hereby  GRANTS  a  Certificate  of Appropriateness  for  the  property  located  at  Lot  023  in Assessor’s  Block  0196  for  proposed work  in conformance with the renderings and architectural sketches dated October 27, 2010 and labeled Exhibit A on file in the docket for Case No. 2010.0973A.   APPEAL  AND  EFFECTIVE DATE OF MOTION:    The  Commissionʹs  decision  on  a  Certificate  of Appropriateness shall be final unless appealed within thirty (30) days.  Any appeal shall be made to the  Board  of  Appeals,  unless  the  proposed  project  requires  Board  of  Supervisors  approval  or  is appealed to the Board of Supervisors as a conditional use, in which case any appeal shall be made to the Board of Supervisors (see Charter Section 4.135).  Duration of this Certificate of Appropriateness:  This Certificate of Appropriateness is issued pursuant to Article 10 of the Planning Code and  is valid for a period of three (3) years from the effective date of approval by the Historic Preservation Commission.  The authorization and right vested by virtue of this action shall be deemed void and canceled  if, within 3 years of  the date of  this Motion, a site permit or building permit for the Project has not been secured by Project Sponsor.   THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TO COMMENCE ANY WORK OR CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY UNLESS NO  BUILDING  PERMIT  IS  REQUIRED.    PERMITS  FROM  THE DEPARTMENT OF  BUILDING INSPECTION  (and  any  other  appropriate  agencies)  MUST  BE  SECURED  BEFORE  WORK  IS STARTED OR OCCUPANCY IS CHANGED.  I hereby certify that the Historical Preservation Commission ADOPTED the foregoing Motion on May 4, 2011.  Linda D. Avery Commission Secretary    AYES:     NAYS:      ABSENT:    ADOPTED:  May 4, 2011  

Page 11: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

*The Sanborn Maps in San Francisco have not been updated since 1998, and this map may not accurately reflect existing conditions.

Sanborn Map*

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Certificate of Appropriateness RequestCase Number 2010.0973AJackson Square Historic District500 Washington Street

Page 12: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Aerial Photo

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Certificate of Appropriateness RequestCase Number 2010.0973AJackson Square Historic District500 Washington Street

Page 13: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Aerial Photo

Certificate of Appropriateness RequestCase Number 2010.0973AJackson Square Historic District500 Washington Street

Page 14: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Aerial Photo

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Certificate of Appropriateness RequestCase Number 2010.0973AJackson Square Historic District500 Washington Street

Page 15: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

I

T-Mobile Contextual Photos for the Proposed Base Station at 500 Washington St.

Building Permit Application No. 2010.082 7.9721

Looking South along Sansome St.

* sj

..fl � 41k .

41

1, li�lEc

Eli .iftiU.%il

.li’itlI,’i illi

hi ilVTt41;çq..

ii. EIILIII... � li!%uE

Looking Southwest at Subject Site and Adjacent Buildings from Sansorne St.

Page 16: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Looking North from Washington St. near Montgomery St.

Looking East along Washington St.

Page 17: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Looking West along Washington St.

Looking North along Sansome St.

Page 18: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,
Page 19: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

Proposed ;

PoposedT-Mob;fe Antennas

i "A

/ -

ij

TI H

4at: ic)<)kji u

SF434 78 Brick Kiddie Corner ’I" -4-)- � 600 Acchinalnn Sri -pet San Fronc,no CA

Page 20: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

:

Pro posed T Mobile Anteww

I "I’ \ SF434I8 Brick Kiddie Corner

6) i.Vc1jr7t’ Sru’ Son Franiy

, 07

Page 21: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR, CONCORD, CA 94520

T to mMobile-m T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION,

c DELAWARE CORPORATION 1B55 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR

CONCORD, CA 94520

PROJECT INFORMATION:

SF4341 8E BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

CURRENT ISSUE DATE:

08/25/10

ISSUED FOR:

100% CONSTRUCTION

LPRAWINGS REV,:DATE:DESCRIPTION:BY

0 07/14/10 OWIN%S_______

08/’5/’0100% CONSTRUCTION 1 DRAw:Ncs BM

T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION SF ,

.T [0 hi 1e a DELAWARE CORPORATION

SF43418E USA North

UNDERGROUND su<VWFALERI It NOR FIIITRA cAlIFORNIA

CODE COMPLIANCE I ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK 1407 CONFORMING TO THESE CODES,

1. CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS 2. 2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 3, 2007 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 4. 2007 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 5. 2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE 8. ANY LOCAL BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE ABOVE 7. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES

ADA REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE STATE CODE PART 2, TITLE 24, CHAPTER 116, SECTION 11038.

I PROJECT TEAM I ARCHITECT /ENGINEER:

APPLICANT/LESSEE:

MICHAEL WILY ARCHITECTURE

T-MOBILE 833 MARKET STREET, SUITE 805

1855 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 900

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103

CONCORD, CA 94820 CONTACT: BRYAN MCMILLAN

CONTACT: BRAD CHAPMAN

PHONE: (415) 839-9594

PHONE: (415) 309-6979 FAX; (415) 904-8388

EMAIL: brRd.chopmon*t-mobile.corn EMAIL: bmcmiIIonwiIkIirch.corn

SITE ACQUISITION:

ZONING MANAGER: PERMIT ME, INC. PERMIT ME, INC. 3850 23RD STREET

3880 23RD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114

CONTACT: JUUE HO

CONTACT: JOE CAMICIA PHONE: (415) 706-4191

PHONE: (415) 722-1183

EMAIL: juiiecl_heyohoo.com EMAIL: coniIcincQneuItantOgmoiI.com

BRICK KIDDIE CORNER 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM T-MOBILE OFFICE, CONCORD, CA

1. HEAD SOUTHWEST ON CLAYTON RD TOWARD EOIE CT/PINE ST - 0.2 MI 2. MERGE ONTO CA-242 S VIA THE RAMP TO OAKLAND - 1.2 MI 3. MERGE ONTO -680 $ - 3.3 MI 4. TAKE THE STATE ROUTE 24 EXIT TOWARD OALKAND/LAFAYEITE - 1.3 MI 8. MERGE ONTO CA-24 W - 12.3 MI 8. TAKE THE EXIT TOWARD -560 W - 1.0 MI 7. MERGE ONTO -560 W - 0.5 MI 8. TAKE THE EXIT ON THE LEFT ONTO -80 W TOWARD SAN FRANCISCO - 8.8 MI 9. TAKE EXIT 2C FOR FREMONT ST - 0.5 MI 10. TURN LEFT AT EREMONT ST - 0.3 MI II. CONTINUE ONTO FRONT ST - 0.1 MI 12. TURN RIGHT AT THE 2ND CROSS STREET ONTO SANSOME ST - 0.2 MI 13. T1JRI4 LEFT AT WASHINGTON ST. DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT - 98 FT

SITE ADDRESS: 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

APN: 0196-023

LAND OWNER: PUBLIC POUCY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA CONTACT: MONIKA PICARDO

CB RICHARD ELLIS 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 PHONE: (415) 291-4400

(510) 452-2175

LATITUDE: 37’ 47’ 45.0 (HAD 83)

LONGITUDE; 122- 24 06.75 (HAD 83)

(E) CONSTRUCTION: TYPE I, FULLY SPRINKLERED

(N) CONST. OCCUPANCY: S-2

ZONING: 0-2

JURISDICTION; CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO

TELEPHONE: AT&T

POWER: PG&E

POWER ORDER

POWER APPUCATION DATE:.. ..-__..-_-..

POWER APPLICATION NUMBER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES

DO NOT SCALE DRAWING:

CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAllE,

SHEET INDEX

DESCRIPTION SHEET

T-1 TITLE SHEET

T-2 GENERAL NOTES

T-3 RITOS / ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS

T-4 DUAL GPS ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS

7.5 BATTERY SPECIFICATIONS

T-6 SITE SIGNAGE

T-7 EME REPORT

T-8 FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST

A-i OVERALL SITE / ROOF PLAN

A-2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN

ENLARGED EQUIPMENT AREA / ANTENNA LAYOUT A-3

A-4 ELEVATIONS

A-5 DETAILS

A-6 DETAILS

STRUCTURAL NOTES S-i

S-2 STRUCTURAL PLAN

-- S-3 STRUCTURAL DETAILS -

E-1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM & NOTES

E-2 GROUNDING PLAN

E3 DETAILS

FROJECT_ACHITLcI/NUINLLH:

MICHAEL WILK M 833 Market Street, #805

San Francisco, CA 94103 T: 415-839-9594 F: 415-904-8388

www.wIlkorch.com

DRAWN BY: CKK.:APV.:"

LICENSER:

SHEET TITLE:

TITLE SHEET

HEET NUMBER:

Tml

RF ENGINEER T-MOBILE 1835 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 900 CONCORD, CA 94520 CONTACT: ED GUTIERREZ PHONE: (707) 342-8138 EMAIL: ed9arth.90irrzOt-rnobII6.com

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: T-MOBILE 1855 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 900 CONCORD, CA 94520 CONTACT: TIMOTHY FEHR PHONE: (925) 521-3806 FAX: (925) 339-4985 EMAIL: tlmothry.lehrl Ot-mobIIe.cm

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

THIS IS AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR T-MOBILE CONSISTING OF THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.

1. (N) 7-MOBILE (6) PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON (E) PENTHOUSE

2. (1) DUAL GPS ANTENNA

3. FOUR (4) T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS WILL BE MOUNTED IN (N) T-MOBILE 3’-10")( 26’-6 LEASE AREA ON (E) ROOF.

4, ANTENNA COAXIAL TRANSMISSIONS LINES FROM BTS TO ANTENNAS

5. POWER & TELCO SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED FROM (E) SOURCES

I PROJECT INFORMATION I

Page 22: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

100% CONSTRUCTIO N DRAWINGS

_Tl4/lO

1 08/25/10

CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

RU

Bm

- Th

PNOJLU I ANCHI /t.N1INbtN:

MICHAEL WILK M 833 Market Street, #805

San Francisco, CA 94103 T: 415-839-9594 F: 415-904-8388

www.wukarch.com

:CONSULTANT:

t T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION.

LI a DELAWARE CORPORATION I 1955 GATEWAY SLAG.. 9TH FLOOR

L CONCORD, CA

:PROJECT INFORMATION: P BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

CURRENT ISSUE DATE:

: "Ph i~:A i L

JACKSON STREET

7 :–A

-

(E) BUILD ING. --\

LLI LLJ

Lu ui

----__-

-------- j _ _

I :j -- i::I ;g

(E) BUILDING, us

ROOF. SEE 2/A-3

0 BUILDING

DEWALK

WASHINGTON STREET 4),

E)SID fl fl OVERALL SITE /ROOF PLAN ________ __ _____ ___ ____ ll10H0� ti

DRAWN BY: ChK.:APV.f

SM MWA MWI]

UCENSER: I

SHEET TITLE:

OVERALL SITE / ROOF PLAN

SHEET NUMBER:

Am I

Page 23: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

P M1e T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION,

DELAWARE CORPORATION 1855 GATEWAY BLVD. 9TH FLOOR

CONCORD, CA 94520

OJECT INFORMATION:

SF43418E BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

)RRENT ISSUE DATE:_______

SUED FOR:

100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

V.:DATE:DESCRIpTION:9Y:=

2L08/25/1

.9C%CONSTRIJCTION BM

DRAWINGS

. ....

1OJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:

M IC WILK H 833 Market Street, #805

Son Francisco, CA 94103 1: 415-839-9594 F: 415-904-8388

www.wllkorch.Com

CONSULTANT:

AWN BY: CHK.:APV.:’

GM MWA Me/il

DENSER: I

HEET TITLE:

ENLARGED ROOF PLAN

HEET NUMBER:

_A-2

Page 24: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

T Mobile .--.- . -0 CLR.

-- I

rL 4

---

K

0 (E) CONDUIT ON SLEEPERS T -MOBILE WEST CORPORATION.

DELAWARE CORPORATIONGATEWAY BLVD- 9TH FCOOR

_CONC 52O L WIWAHINOSYS1EM

l (N)T-MOLE

fiFIBS EQUIPMENT

((N) TMOBLE ERICSSON RS 3106 CABINET \J

PROiECCL!fORMATION:

SF4341 BE BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER

j ..i

I .

_____________________________________________________________ (N) 1-MOBILE ERICSSON RBS

02106 CABINET

fi (N)T-MO8II.E DUAL OPS

500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94111 _____

CURREN IS UE DATE:

[

08/2 j

’ t!i

-

fi I

I

fi

I L ’\ r

fi(N) r-MOBILE UTILITY RACK

(w)T-MOBILE PPC CABINET

0 PLUG CN PO MOUNTED TO IJ11UTT RACK

O(N) T-MOBILE SERVICE LIGHT MOU NTED

I-ISSUED FOR:

P100% CONSTRUCflON11

[ DRAWINGS

j . . DATE.DESCRPTION. BY.

07/14/10 RO% CONSTRUCTION

-----------------i----------- . --_----

1O6/25/1O ;00% CONSTRUCTION M

----

Ii r- :. --- ----. ENLARGED ANT, LAYOUT-340°AZ. ( 3

(D (P4) r-MOBILE TELCO CABINET

fi WITH SEN PLUG MOUNTED TO - UTILITY RACK

--- - -------- - 1 �] tJ

I @ (E) IrHAC

:PROJECT _ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:

\\\ \\

'(E)BLJILOIt4OPARAPET

MICHAEL WtLK M

@ I LI I

I ’-’\. ------ _iL I � �

. // / (N) T-MOBIL PANEL ANTENNA ,-

12 AZIMUTH) MOUNTED ON L-]. OF 2. _J

833 Market Street, #805 San Francisco, CA 94103

N1TCH TO 1: 415-839-9594

%0 <

(N) i-MOBILE PANEL ANTENNA @(120’ AZIMUTH) MOUNT

(E) PARAPF PAINT TO MATCH

(N) T-MOBILE PANEL ANTENNA 210’ AZIMUTH) MOUNTED ON

PANT To MATCH

(N) T-MOBILE TMA UNIT. MOUNTED BEHIND (E)

F: 415-904-8388

L

13 PENTHOUSE. TYP. OF 5

(N) 1-MOBILE POWER & TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE INSIDE (N) CABLE TRAY ON SLEEPERS -

__________ CHK.:APV RAWNBY:__ . :

E- 3M MWA L

_MWJJ =LICENSER:

D. I I

I’

6 - // 1

(N) 1-MOBILE STEEL FRAME

SIGNAGE AT FACE OF CABINET DOOR

ENLARGED ANT. LAYOUT -1200 AZ. _ _______ ________________ . 4

COLUMN, TYP

OF’ C g

:SHEET TITLE:

ENLARGED EQUIPMENT AREA/

/’

- \ ’’\

�.

\ \ N

I

ANTENNALLAYOUT

14 HEET

A03

ENLARGED ANT.LAYOUT - 2100 AZ. . . ENLARGED EQUIPMENT AREA 1/2-C’ 01 4 KEYNOTES

Page 25: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

---

"’LE

(N) T-hoai1 G

- PS MOUNT TO (E) PARAPET & ’ZjAj1

T-MMLE

\\ 2108 iTYI’ I

PAINT TO MATCH . I NSTALL

To (E) PPEt I I / CABINET. INSTALL SITE /’j’ / PAINT TO KIATCH. 1/ / SMUT-DOWN SGNAOE / INSTALL RF I 11 � -2– kG.L WARNING SIONAGE ,f i --- TOP or (E) PE ThoLIS

3106 CABINET 1101AI AINT (N) T-MOBILE PANEL

\

3 MTO(E)FRAPt1T \ GG j\ PAITO

RF WARNING SICNAGE \ MATCH, INSTALL RI WNCNG

\ SIGF’LOE fl9’-2– A.G.L. __ TOP OF (E) PN114OUSE

T Mobile CONCO RD, ~A 94520

PROJECT INFORMATION: I

_;:;;IP!!&! CABINET RACK

MOBILE \

V MOeILEuu1Y @Ii AWEN NAS

BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER 100 0 – kG L

-

100 0 ’ :’

kG 1. 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94111 TO p OF CE) PARpEr OP OF (E) PARAPET j

T

** WkGL L tL :

CURRENT ISSUE DAT TOP OF (E) ROOF

T-7 IL ISSUED FOR:

100%CONSTRUCTIONJ]

DRAWINGS

IE. L L LLLL I _L L_ i_ 1 H 07/14/10

RJ.DATE:DESCRiPON:BY:-

ORNNINGS

’001. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS m

ARCHITECT/ENGINEER; I

MICHAEL WILK H

833 Market Str eet, #805

O� -D� O-O L i I Son Francisco, CA 94103

1. 415-839-9594 415-904-8388

__________________________ � .--I---------- Gft

WASHINGTON STREET , ) ? � J-----.- - - (E) GRACE WASH I NGTON STREET

www.wflkorch.com

WEST ELEVATION 3 EAST ELEVATION 1 �I O0NSu:

(N) T-MOBILE PANEL � k (N) T-MOBILE PANEL I 1 ANTENN&S (210 AZIMUTH), ) ANTENNAS (120 AZIMUTH), I

1-S A-6 MOUNT TO (E) PARAPET & \ /1 uouo TO (E) PARAPET & A6 PANT TO MATCH. INSTALL \ I PAINT TO MATCH. INSTALL RF WANNING SIGNAGE \ I RF WARNING SIGNACE

\ I (N) T-MO8ILE I I A- TO MATCH

P____\\\

I (N) T-MOBILE .-------------- TOP OF (E) PEfl�4OUS

~UDUAL CPS

RACK

)TMOBILEURUW\

PANEL

p. ,�(N) TMOILE PANEL ROOF ACCESS! j_(N) TMOBILE PANEL NNAS (120 AZIMUTh), \ N) 1-MOBILE // ANTENNAS (340 AZIMUTH), 1 1

-6 - OF 2 MOUNT TO (E) \ ACCESS. INSTALL \ ’ MOUNT TO (E) PARAPET & PARAPET & PAINT TO \ SITE SHUT-DOWN I / PAINT TO MATCH. INSTALL

WARNINGSIONAG \ RF WARNING SIGNAGE \\

AF WARNING SIONAGE

llg-2– A-%

e TO OF (E) PENThOUSE .

/IF WNL CHKAPV,fl

I

3m MWA MW

0’1: TOP OF (E)P1’RAPET TO OF (E) PARAPET _LICENSER

9V TL.

EXP 9-30-11

El

ELEVATIONS I

SHEET NUMOER

L-J I I

L : H i 0, -O W OO� ____________________

Am4 . (E)GRA0S

SANSOME STREET (E)Gh.DE

SANSOME STREET

SOUTH ELEVATION .-. --.-.. NORTH ELEVATI ON I/1.I’

Page 26: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

4- 3.-0.

4 ERICSSON ERICSSON Ras 3106

j

RBS 2106___/CABINEr CABINET

ERiCSSON RBS 3108 PLAN ERICSSON RBS 2106 PLAN

ERICSSON RBS 3105 FRONT ELEVATION ERICSSON 685 3106 SIDE ELEVATiON ERICSSON RBS 2106 FRONT ELEVATiON ERçSSQN RBS 2lQ $105 ELYATIPN

NOT USED 3 3106 CABINET DETAIL 2 2106 CABINET DETAIL i

ERICSSON 685 3106 DIMENSIONS

CABINET HEIGHT WIDTH x DEPTH t Mx5142

FOOTPRINT 63 1/4"H Si 1/4W 26"D (INCLUDING INSTALLATION FRAME)

ERICSSON RBS 3108 WEIGHT & FLOOR LOADiNG

APPROX. MAX. FLOOR CABINET MAX. WEIGHT LOADING

1213 LBS (550 kg) ’1 1509 LBS (685 kg) 685 3106 (WEIGHT W/O BATTERIES) (WEIGHT WITH BATTERIES)

ERICSSON RBS 3106 MINIMUM CLEARANCES

DIRECTION MINIMUM CLEARANCE

CABINET FRONT CABINET REAR 2

CABINET LEFT CABINET 1,11W, FOR 135 DOOR SWING)

ABOVE THE CABINET - CABINET RIGHT 0

5’"SSOH RBS 2106 DIMENSIONS

CABINET HEIGHT ,, WIDTH ,, DEPTH

ROS 2106 6 5/8H x 51 3/16W x 38 3/6"0

FOOTPRINT 63 5/8"H SI 3/16W ’ 28"G (INCLUDING INSTALLATION FRAME)

ERICSSON RRS 2106 WEIGHT & FLOOR LOADING

APPROX. MAX. FLOOR CABINET MAX. WEIGHT LOADING

1213 LBS (550 kg) 1509 LBS (885 kg) RB5 2106 (WEIGHT W/O BATTERIES) (WEIGHT WITH BATTERIES)

ICSSON RAN 2106 MINIMUM CLEARANCES

DIRECTION MINIMUM CLEARANCE

CABINET FRONT 55"

CABINET REAR 2"

0"

CABINET LEFT (3" MIN. FOR 135" DOOR SWING)

CABINET RIGHT 0

ABOVE THE CABINET -

I 1--MOBILE WEST CORPORATION. I o DELAWARE CORPORATION I 555 GArEwAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR

L CONCORD, CA 94520

F PROJECT INFORMATION:

SF4341 8E BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

L_CURRENT ISSUE DATE-

08/25/10 -SSUED FOR:

100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

.REV.:DATE:DESCRIPTION:BY:- 1

08/25/ID

410 JCONSTRUCTION t1 CONSTRUCTION 13U

EXP 9-30-11

:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER:

833 Market Street. #805 San FrancISco, CA 94103

T: 415-839.9594 F: 415-904-8388

www.wlIkarch.com

DRAWN BY: CHK.:APV. :

SM MWA j MW]

MICHAEL WILK lvi

Ams

DETAILS

:SHEET NUMBER:

P

Page 27: Certificate of Appropriateness Case Reportcommissions.sfplanning.org/hpcpackets/2010.0973A.pdf · Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report Consent Calendar HEARING DATE: MAY 4,

T T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION.

s DELAWARE CORPORATION 1855 GATEWAY BLVD.. 9TH FLOOR

CONCORD, CA 94520

PROJECT INFORMATION:

SF43418E

BRICK KIDDIE

CORNER 500 WASHINGTON STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

CURRENT ISSUE DATE:

r08/25/10

100% CONSTRUCTION

DRAWINGS

REV.DATE:DESCRlPTION:BY:

07/14/I0 gos CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

1 08/25/1 D 00% CONSTRUCTION 4,, M

PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:

MICHAEL WILK H

833 Market Street, #805 San Francisco, CA 94103

T: 415-839-9594 F: 415-904-8388

www.wllkorch.com

CONSULTANT: I

ANTENNA MOUNTING

- PIPE GPs ANTENNA -----

- ANTENNA

(N) HUBBELL QUA2LR O SERIES #QL.-505. 300/500 W WIDE BEAM WITH i/2SWIVEL

UNISTRUT P1000 LENGTH AS REQ’D

KNUCKLE MOUNT (2 PLCS.)

===-

SUPPORT ff :

TMA

SWITCH BOX TO UNISTRUT, TIP. VIA

. CONDUIT PER ELECT. UNISTRVT CONDUIT CLAMP I

:_ , ZE �====== �== -

MOUNTING

: PIPE CLAMP

BRACKET

N) TWO HOUR WOUND Si MER SWITCH, 15A-TP ANCHOR TO (E) WALL WI WEAThERPROOF . 3/8W. MILfl EK BOLT (MOUNTING HEIGHT (N) 3/9 U-BOLT. N II S W/ MIN. 2 EMBED. BETWEEN 3-6 & TYP.

5-O) (E) B CONC. PENTHOUSE

�-GMV MOUNTING r _______ WALL :A/Y #5 0 12 D.C. /_ PIPE ------ EACH . V.I.F. IF .-.-. - - - THICKNESS IS LESS l = CONTACT ARCHITECT PRIOR

TO FABRICATION

MANUFACTURER: HUBER+SUHNER MODEL #: SOA 9018/360/2/0, DIMENSIONS 3.9400417 WEIGHT: 3.75 LEIS

ELEVA1TON -- FOR ANTENNA L__-_-_--_---__--____--_-- MOUNTING DETAIL SEE

-

A/S-3

-- -

SERVICE LIGHT MOUNT 5 DUAL GPS ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA MOUNT �If 1

3/4T-O I-T -O

A (N) MOUNTING PIPE -

UNISTRIJF PIPECLAMP JUMPER 2 MICROFLECT SPUCE PLATE . ("1

[ (N)ANTENNA

EXISTING EXTERIOR .- I MOUNTING .---...---- -.- --- ------.- --.-.-. CONCRETE W (N) r

PIPE

(N) Th4A SCREW (N) BAND

r-’ : -.--- MICROFLECT CONDUIT - - I FURNISHEDCLAMP

--- ----.-- ---- H WALL -MOUNTBRACK . (N) GROUND WIRE WITHA

U COVER KIT GROUND BAR .... Lt . --UNISTRUT

(E) ROOF

PCROftECT 4 SQUARE (N) UNSTRUT ) )J LENGTH AS ü D .E4GTHASREQU6 OOA ANPCS -

9OLTII KWIK JUMPER TO WI MIN. 2 MAIN COAX - EMBED. AT

CONCRETE

S’----

ENT WITH STAINLESS FRONT ELEVATION TMA WEIGHT-IT LBS. ROE ELEVATION

STEEL SNAP-IN ANCHORS, ENT PER PLAN. TI?. PER PLAN

12

0 I - TEIA IS A WEATHERPROOFED ENCLOSURE RATED TO P88.

I I MICROFLECT CABLE TRAY KIT 2. TAM SHALL NOT BE PAINTED. 81875 3. IF POSSIBLE, TMA SHALL BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA TO MINIMIZE WIND LOADING ON STRUCTURE. 1 I 4. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LENGTH OF JUMPER TO ALLOW FOR PROPER APPUCAI1ON OF WEATHER PROOFING AT

H ANTENNA AND TIM CONNECTIONS. _..._- GALV. CUP ANGLE S. BOND TIM GROUND STUD TO GROUND BAR WITH NO. 8 AWG GROUND WIRE AND 2-HOLE GROUND LUG. ANCHOR KIT TO WALL W/ 6. BACKPLATE AND POLE CLAMPS FOR MOUNTING TO 2 3/8*0 ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE PROVIDED WITH TMA.

4" SQUARE PVC SLEEPER SET 1/20A21/4LG NLTI HEX SLEEVE A HOR OR

- 7. TMA SHALL BE MOUNTED VERTICALLY.

F 8. CONNECTORS SHALL BE WEATHERPROOFED

I TO 2 FEET OF CONNECTORS.

(E)ROOF -

ECTIONA CONNECT COVER TO GROUND GYSTEM WITH 18 INSULATED GROUND WiRE.

- (CONCEAL ALL GROUND WIRES)

CABLE TRAY ON SLEEPERS 6 CABLE TRAY AT WALL Su

4 TMA WALL MOUNT DETAIL 2 II

DRAWN BY: CHK. :APV.:

BM MWA MW

LICENSER:

SHEET TITLE:

DETAILS

SHEET NUMBER:

A-6