Ccip Bgp Ch10 Designing Stable Internets

4
Chapter 10: Designing Stable Internets I. Route Insta bili ties on the Internet 1. Factor s that affe ct route ins tabili ties on the Inter net: 1. Interior Gate way Pro toc ol (IGP) instabili ty 2. Fa ul ty hard wa re 3. Soft wa re p robl e s !. Insuff icient "P# po wer  $. Insuff icient e ory %. &et wor ' upr ades a nd routi ne a int enance . *u an error  +. ,i n' cones ti on 2. IGP Inst abil it y 1. -hen in ectin an IGP into /GP 0 you shoul d ta'e eas ures to pr eent instability 0 such as areatin the routes so that only the areate is inected into /GP preentin any sinle routes fro causin route flap. 2. Soe netwo r' desine rs are forced to rely on dynaic routin for alid reasons: 1. /GP i pleentati ons can hand le only a fi ed nuber o f networ ' entrie s to be adertised statically. he nuber of static routes peritted aries fro endor to endor. -hateer that liit is0 networ's that want to o beyond this liit re4uire that adinistrators inect the IGP into /GP 2. Soe adinist rator s are not coforta ble wit h the fact t hat the net wor's t hey are statically adertisin iht becoe unreachable by the router adertisin the. his is understandable0 especially in cases where routes are ad ertised fro different points in the 5S. 5dertisin a route that is not reachable can create  blac' holes. 3. Fa ul ty Har!are 1. Faulty hardwa re can be a probl e0 so it 6s ipo rtant t o proid e syste and lin' redundancy. ". So#t!are Pr obl e$s 1. Should t est sof tware be fore ipleent in0 bus are a real ity and it 6s ipo ssibl e to stop the all. %. Ins u##i&ient CP' Po!er 1. "P# is ne eded to pro cess upd ates0 pe er ses sions 0 anaeent plan e traf fic. 7a'e sure you hae the power necessary for your situation. (. Ins u##i&ient )e$ory 1. 7eory is needed to run the operati n syst e alon wi th stor in rout in tabl es0 cache tables databases and bits of software to perit operation. Insufficient eory can cause the router to not be able to reallocate unused fraents and will force you to reboot the router . 7a'e sure you hae enouh eory. *. +et!or, 'pgra es an Routine )aintenan&e 1. o reduce the li 'eliho od of causin di sruptions0 networ' chan es should first be siulated in non production enironents if possible. In addition0 ulti ple aor chanes should not be deployed at the sae tie. For eaple0 it is unwise for a proider to perfor aor router software uprades0 switch hardware0 and chane cablin all at the sae tie. Good plannin and networ'

Transcript of Ccip Bgp Ch10 Designing Stable Internets

8/10/2019 Ccip Bgp Ch10 Designing Stable Internets

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ccip-bgp-ch10-designing-stable-internets 1/4

Chapter 10: Designing Stable Internets

I. Route Instabilities on the Internet1. Factors that affect route instabilities on the Internet:

1. Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) instability2. Faulty hardware3. Software proble s!. Insufficient "P# power $. Insufficient e ory%. &etwor' up rades and routine aintenance

. *u an error +. ,in' con estion

2. IGP Instability1. -hen in ectin an IGP into /GP0 you should ta'e easures to pre ent

instability0 such as a re atin the routes so that only the a re ate is in ectedinto /GP pre entin any sin le routes fro causin route flap.

2. So e networ' desi ners are forced to rely on dyna ic routin for alid reasons:1. /GP i ple entations can handle only a fi ed nu ber of networ' entries to be

ad ertised statically. he nu ber of static routes per itted aries fro endorto endor. -hate er that li it is0 networ's that want to o beyond this li itre4uire that ad inistrators in ect the IGP into /GP

2. So e ad inistrators are not co fortable with the fact that the networ's they arestatically ad ertisin i ht beco e unreachable by the router ad ertisin the .

his is understandable0 especially in cases where routes are ad ertised frodifferent points in the 5S. 5d ertisin a route that is not reachable can create

blac' holes.3. Faulty Har !are

1. Faulty hardware can be a proble 0 so it6s i portant to pro ide syste and lin'redundancy.

". So#t!are Proble$s1. Should test software before i ple entin 0 bu s are a reality and it6s i possible

to stop the all.%. Insu##i&ient CP' Po!er

1. "P# is needed to process updates0 peer sessions0 ana e ent plane traffic.7a'e sure you ha e the power necessary for your situation.

(. Insu##i&ient )e$ory1. 7e ory is needed to run the operatin syste alon with storin routin tables0

cache tables databases and bits of software to per it operation. Insufficiente ory can cause the router to not be able to reallocate unused fra ents and

will force you to reboot the router. 7a'e sure you ha e enou h e ory.*. +et!or, 'pgra es an Routine )aintenan&e

1. o reduce the li'elihood of causin disruptions0 networ' chan es should first besi ulated in non production en iron ents if possible. In addition0 ultiple

a or chan es should not be deployed at the sa e ti e. For e a ple0 it isunwise for a pro ider to perfor a or router software up rades0 switchhardware0 and chan e cablin all at the sa e ti e. Good plannin and networ'

8/10/2019 Ccip Bgp Ch10 Designing Stable Internets

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ccip-bgp-ch10-designing-stable-internets 2/4

si ulation are the 'eys to successful networ' up rades.-. Hu$an rror

1. *u an error happens0 but ostly it happens because an ad inistrator decides tocircu ent policy and a'es chan es without 'nowled e of possible effects.8ou ust always plan0 prepare and test before i ple entin so that all possibleoutco es are found ahead of ti e. he ore co ple a networ' beco es the

ore infor ation that you ha e to consider before i ple entin additionalconfi urations. 9ules could be deployed that conflict with other rules whichlead to serious perfor ance and connecti ity de radation.

/. in, Congestion1. ,in' con estion can result in a or perfor ance de radation. 5 possible

scenario is when a redundant lin' fails0 and all that traffic is now sent throu hanother lin' on top of what traffic that lin' was already sendin causin the lin'to be con ested. en if the lin' can support the throu hput0 the router i htnot be able to handle the additional load.

II. GP Stability Features1. Controlling Route an Ca&he In ali ation See CH12 Page "2"

1. he use of soft reconfi uration re edies this. Instead of ta'in down the sessionor hard resettin it0 ust use soft reconfi uration to reconfi ure attributes on thefly without 'illin and already established "P session or anually introducina route flap.

2. -hen usin soft reconfi uration thou h0 you need to confi ure the router tostore the routes ad ertised to you (respecti e 5d ;9I/;In0 which should be inlinewith the peer6s 5d ;9I/;<ut) fro the specified peer(s) to be stored in local

e ory.2. GP Route Re#resh See CH12 Page "2/

1. &ewer ersion of soft reconfi uration= /GP route refresh. his re4uests that the peer re;ad ertise all it6s routes (its 5d ;9I/;<# ). his allows all thead ertise eents to run throu h the newly confi ured policies without ha in toreset the "P session and of course re o es the o erhead of e ory and "P#consu ption re4uired when usin soft reconfi uration.

8/10/2019 Ccip Bgp Ch10 Designing Stable Internets

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ccip-bgp-ch10-designing-stable-internets 3/4

8/10/2019 Ccip Bgp Ch10 Designing Stable Internets

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ccip-bgp-ch10-designing-stable-internets 4/4

1. Stability Insi e the 4S1. If /GP is in ected (or so e portion) into the IGP0 route da penin can be useful

to pre ent an IGP eltdown fro route instabilities.

2. Instabilities 5utsi e the 4S1. 9oute >a penin can help the pro ider by not allowin the unstable routes fro

affectin the ISPs 5S0 as well as the rest of the internet. If the pro ider isa re atin the custo ers routes than this is not an issue0 e en if ost of thecusto ers routes are unstable. *owe er if the custo ers prefi is not of the ISPor if the custo er is ultiho in 0 route da penin beco es a consideration.1. Fro the custo ers perspecti e0 if the ISP is da penin the custo ers

routes e en after the custo ers routes beco e stable0 the custo er can bewithout internet connecti ity until their routes beco e unsuppressed.

2. Instabilities can also co e fro the pro ider itself0 and the custo ers boarder routers can6t handle this= thus route da penin is a ust.

3.