b s g Exclusive D ecays
-
Upload
cassidy-albert -
Category
Documents
-
view
22 -
download
0
description
Transcript of b s g Exclusive D ecays
Evidence for bsg
• CLEO found an evidence for bsg process using exclusive BK*(892)g decays in 1993 with only 1.38fb-1 data on Y(4S).
More than 20 years has passed from the evidence and now….
Now we are here
• Now we (Babar and Belle) have more than 800 times larger data of 1144fb-1 (433fb-1+711fb-1) on Y(4S) than data with which CLEO found an evidence for bsg.
• Further, LHCb collected 3fb-1 at 7TeV and 8TeV at pp collisions.– sbb = 7.7mb for pT
bb > 5GeV and 2.5 < h < 4.0 at 7TeV
Copious numbers of B hadrons are available.
Ideal tool to search for new physics• Exclusive bsg decays can be used to measure
– Branching fraction (BF)• Fragmentation of Xs
– Direct CP Violation (ACP)• To Search for New phase
– Time dependent CP Violation (SCP)• For B0fCPg modes• to search for right handed current/new phase• CPV is suppressed by O(ms/mb)
– Isospin Violation (D0+ or AI)• Spectator dependent operator
– Up-Down Asymmetry (AUD)• For BK1gKppg• To search for right handed current• New physics makes |AUD| value smaller than the SM
– Photon Polarization from conversion (no groups measure yet)• To search for right handed current
Observed Exclusive Decays• Now we observed
– BK*(892)g in 1993– BK2*(1430)g in 2000– BKfg in 2004– BKhg in 2005– BK1(1270)g in 2005– BpLg in 2007– BKh’g in 2010
12.6
12.33.62.40.80.80.7
9.557.3
Exclusive Fraction [%]K*(892)K1(1270)K2*(1430)KηKη'KΦpΛnon-res Kππothers
Only 40% are exclusively known!
Direct CPV• In the SM, bsg process is dominated by single
EW penguin diagram, and further weak phase in Vts is suppressed by O(l2), so direct CPV in bsg is small. – E.g. ACP(BK*(892)g) = -0.6±0.4%
• If new physics contribution to bsg has sizable amplitude and weak (+strong) phase, direct CPV could appear.
• Is the difference of direct CPV btw B0 and B+ interesting/sensitive NP also for exclusive decays?– Benzke, Lee, Neuber and Paz propose it for inclusive
decays as a sensitive probe for new physics.
Matsumori, Sanda, Keum
Direct CPV in BK*(892)g
ACP B0 B+ B
Babar 347fb-1 -1.6±2.2±0.7 % 1.8±2.8±0.7 % -0.3±1.7±0.7 %
Belle 78fb-1 n.a. n.a. -1.5±4.5±1.2 %
LHCb 1fb-1 0.8±1.7±0.9 % n.a. 0.8±1.7±0.9 %
Average 0.7±1.9 % 1.8±2.9 % 0.1±1.3 %
• LHCb reported ACP with 1fb-1
– Only with K*0K+p-
• W.A. consistent with null asymmetry predicted in the SM– -0.6±0.4 %
• exp error 3times larger than theo– LHCb 1fb-1 3fb-1
– Belle 78fb-1 711fb-1
Matsumori, Sanda, Keum
Isospin Violation
• Isospin Violation can be calculated in the SM.
– +5.0 ~ +10 %– +2.7±0.8 %
• If new physics has isospin breaking contributions, such as spectator dependent diagrams, D0- could be deviated from the SM value– Even sign of Isospin Violation flips
Matsumori, Sanda, Keum
Kagan, Neubert
Isospin Violation in BK*(892)g
• Babar and Belle measured isospin violation– thanks to high reconstruction
efficiency for Ks and p0 involved modes at e+e- machine
• Consistent with SM Predictions– +5.0 ~ +10 %– +2.7±0.8 %
D0-
Babar 347fb-1 6.6±2.1±2.2 %
Belle 78fb-1 1.2±4.4±2.6 %
Average 5.2±2.6 %
Matsumori, Sanda, Keum
Kagan, Neubert
Time dependent CPV• In the SM, photon emitted from b is predominantly left handed. Time
dependent CPV in BfCPg is small due to small interference
• If new physics has right handed current, time dependent CPV emerges by interference.
• Gluon emission bsgg processes make SSM larger than naive calculation??
Grinstein, Pirjol
Ball, Zwicky
Atwood, Gronau, Soni
Atwood, Gershon, Hazumi, Soni
SSM ~ O(0.1) Grinstein, Grossman, Ligeti, Pirjol
Matsumori, Sanda
Time Dependent CPV in BKhg
• Recently Belle reported measurement of time dependent CPV in BKhg with full data
• Measured values are out of physical boundary but consistent with null CPV.
Preliminary711fb-1
SM prediction
Summary of time dependent CP Violation
• Four decay modes are used to search for time dependent CPV.– fCP = Ksp0(K*0), Ksh, Ksr, Ksf
• All are consistent with null with stat errors.
fCP Babar Belle
Ksp0 (K*0) 427fb-1 495 fb-1
Ksh 427fb-1 711 fb-1
Ksr n.a. 605 fb-1
Ksf n.a. 711 fb-1
Up Down Asymmetry• Polarization of photon can be extracted from
the BK1g(Kpp)g process by measuring up down asymmetry (photon polarization from K1 polarization).– Angle q btw photon and normal vector to K1
decay plane.
– Interference btw rK and K*p generates imaginary part.• modes involving p0 gives larger AUD
• Need theoretical calculation of the amplitudes
Gronau, Grossman, Pirjol, Ryd
Up Down Asymmetry in BKppg• LHCb observed AUD with 3fb-1 in BK+p-p+g
– With 13876±153 signal events
• Measure AUD with 4 bins of MKpp
– No resonance separation• 5.2s significance from null polarization
• No interpretation to photon polarization yet
bdg Decays
• The bdg is suppressed by Vtd– About 30 times smaller than bsg ( |Vtd/Vts|2 ) – Need very good PID detector and EM Calorimeter
• The observables to search for NP are the same as the bsg but NP contribution could be different.– Branching fraction (BF)– Direct CP Violation (ACP)
– Time dependent CP Violation (SCP)
– Isospin Violation (Dr)
– Up-Down Asymmetry (AUD)– Photon Polarization from conversion (no groups measure yet)
Observation of bdg
• Belle had observed bdg process using exclusive B(r, w)g with 357fb-1 data in 2006
|Vtd/Vts|, ACP and Dr• |Vtd/Vts| can be measured from the
ratio of BF of B (r,w)g and BK*g– Consistent with the SM
• Direct CPV in Br+ g consistent with null • Dr Isospin Violation large?
– 2~3s deviation
– + 4 +14 -7 %
– - 10±6 %– - 5.4±3.9 % if f3 = 60deg– - 4.6±7 %
|Vtd/Vts| ACP(B+r+g) Dr
Babar 423fb-1 n.a.
Belle 605fb-1
Average n.a.
Lyon, Zwicky
Ball, Jones, Zwicky
Beneke, Feldmann, Seidel
Ali, Lunghi
Time Dependent CPV in B0r0g
• Only Belle had measured time dependent CPV in B0r0g• 48±14 signal events are used for fits.
– Though signal yield is smaller than B0Ksp0g, fraction of events used for time dependent fit is larger thanks to easier vertex reconstruction with r0p+p-
• The results are consistent with null asymmetry
Summary
• Many studies of bsg are performed in more than 20 years to search for new physics.– No hint of new physics yet.
• New window bdg was opened since 2006.– A hint in Isospin Asymmetry??
• Some analyses in bsg and all analyses in bdg are still statistical error dominant– Need higher luminosity experiments– Belle II and LHCb upgrade
• Some theoretical predictions are different btw groups.– Isospin violation– Time dependent CPV– Hope the predictions improved in coming several years.