Alumni Survey Results: Winter FY12 Results from FY 2011B Alumni Surveys

Alumni Survey Results: Winter FY12

Results from FY 2011B Alumni SurveysConducted July to August 2011

Table of Contents• 3 - Methodology• 7 – Executive Summary• 9 – Satisfaction and

Likelihood to Recommend• 24 – BSC Scores• 36 – Impact & Network

Effects• 43 – RarePlanet.org• 47 – Needs for Continued

Impact• 50 – Non-conservation

Organizations• 53 – Expectations of the

Alumni Community• 57 – Response Rate

2Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011

Methodology


Overview of SurveysSurveys Support Multiple Initiatives to Improve Rare

• Understand the level of satisfaction of partners with Rare

• Understand where we are (or are not) making an impact along the 3Cs

• Understand what impact we are making in other areas

Reasons for Surveys Supports Many Initiatives• Input to the BSC• Input to the Pride

Scorecard• Input into Quality

Management and Improvement Initiatives

• Measure the impact of our alumni

• Inform strategy development process


Survey MethodIncorporates a number of best practices

• Integration - 5 point scale to integrate into the Pride Scorecard and Rare's Balanced Scorecard (BSC). Scales designed by Vovici Market Research.

• Multi-perspective - Similar questions across the audience to provide comparability across audiences and if possible across regions.

• Longitudinal - Similar questions across time to assess progress or change in perceptions.

• Net Promoter (“How likely are you to recommend a Pride campaign to colleagues or other organizations?”) used as the “Ultimate Question” of customer satisfaction. Method designed by Bain & Company Consulting.

Method


Divide and ConquerHow the Regions and QMI Share Responsibilities

• Send surveys (either PPM, office admin, or Director)

• Establish culturally appropriate follow-up that balances a good number or results without being pushy, e.g.:

– Reminder email after one week?– Follow-up call after two weeks?

• Regions review surveys as they come to review any critical questions

• Director determines who needs to respond to any important partner comments

Region QMIOrganization• Create a standardized questions• Get Leadership team support• TranslateData Entry & Analysis• Input survey results from regions

into a standard template• Do initial statistical analysis• Draft initial presentation for the

region

• Create a final presentation• Present / discuss to key audience• Discuss, plan and support improvement opportunities for

Regions• Discuss, plan and execute improvement opportunities for Rare

Jointly


Executive Summary

+pluses

• “Very likely to recommend Pride”, 4.5 on 5.0 scale•BSC Scores high:

o 98% are involved in conservationo 75% continue to use Pride methodology

Particularly used for community outreach and feedback• Strong impact and network effects:

o 65% trained someone in the Pride methodologyo 70% influenced someone who contributed to conservationo 69% continued their campaigno 96% reduced a threat to biodiversity

Δdeltas

• RarePlanet.org: satisfaction has gone down • Many qualitative comments express that CMs get bogged down with too much paperwork and reporting for Rare

iinfo

• Funding is the most needed aspect for campaign continuation• Low response rate limits the ability to draw fine tuned conclusions• Alumni 2011B was given in September of 2011, it is the 3rd alumni partner survey that is consistent. It followed Alumni 2011A because we learned that giving the surveys in December was poor timing, and have now streamlined the process.

!actions

• As alumni, they want:o Regional alumni reunions and trainingo More opportunities for sharing experiences

• Many have expressed interest in participating and helping with current campaign and Pride activities, each region could benefit from their knowledge and time


3 Cool Facts from Alumni 2011 B Survey!

Conservation96%

respondents reduced a threat to

biodiversity

Capacity100%

Campaign Manger

respondents are

considered accomplished

leaders in conservation


Constituency70%

influenced someone

who contributed

to conservation

Satisfaction and Likelihood to Recommend


Executive Summary

+ plusses

• All measures of satisfaction with Pride and Rare pass 4.0 minimum scoreo Campaign Resultso CM Trainingo Benefits to Local Partner

• “Very likely to recommend Pride”, 4.5 on 5.0 scaleo Going up from 4.2 last survey

Δ deltas

• Satisfaction with partner benefits has decreased since last survey, particularly around Rare’s commitment to their organization, and the importance of the Pride campaign for their overall site strategy

!actions

• Regions should note the number of responses that have requested refresher training courses, or updated resources and materials


+ Broad Satisfaction with Campaign Results

33.5

44.5

5

Alumni 2010Alumni 2011Alumni 2011B


Campaign Results CommentsPlease feel free to give any specific feedback you may have about the results of the Pride campaign, both to your organization and the target area, in the space below.

We have achieved very clear and measured results in terms of taimen conservation. It is a good example to many other projects and campaigns for WWF Mongolia trying.~ Gankhuyag Balbar (PEP 2 CM)

It is good to try to use social marketing for awareness building campaigns but it is not good to for the campaign managers to deal with too much paper work, abstracts, theories, etc that were very demanding.~ Anak Pattanavibool (PEP 1 Supervisor)


Note – Quotations require written consent to use externally

+ Broad Satisfaction with CM Training

The Pride campaign process trains you to mobilize a com-

munity to reduce threats to bio-diversity.

How much do you currently use the training that you received through the Pride program?

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B13Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011

Post-Campaign Training CommentsWhat important skills do you think have been developed in both the people and your organization by learning how to run a Pride campaign?

Facilitating techniques, participatory planning, design and media messages.~ Ade Yuliani (Bogor 4 CM)

Project design and project implementation capacity, the use of social marketing approach to community environmental education medium~ Duan Honglian (China 1 CM)

Greater security and confidence, INCREASE MY ABILITY OF PUBLIC RELATIONS AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES~ Jaqueline Nájera Hernández (Guad 5 CM)

Ability to focus more on objectives. Strengthening technical expertise in communications.~ Sandra Conde (Guad 6 CM)



+ Broad Satisfaction with Benefits to Partner

The Pride campaign process trains your organization (the local partner) to

mobilize a commu-nity to reduce

threats to biodiver-sity.

Over the past year, how has partnering with Rare affected your organizational capacity to protect

biodiversity?

How important do you believe the

Pride campaign is to your site's

overall strategy, right now?

Over the past year, how satisfied have

you been with Rare’s completion

of their agreed upon professional commitments to

your organization?

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Alumni 2010

Alumni 2011

Alumni 2011B


Benefits to Partner CommentsPlease feel free to give any specific feedback you may have about the support you have received from Rare, RarePlanet.org, or the alumni mentor in the space below.

RARE people visited FSM and I was not contacted to meet or see them. I only heard from friends that RARE people where around and I made time to visit them, but they left the island already. Why visit a RARE project site and not say hello to former RARE alumni's?~ Bradley Phillip (CM Kent 5)

Well, I am not sure if Brooke is my mentor, but she has been awesome and patient and so supportive of the follow up work we are trying to do. She has stayed communicative and assisted with conflict resolution in some of the challenges we have faced.~ Elaina Todd (CM PEP 1)

more contacts from alumni mentors and more information provided about the conservation activities, particularly those associated with the source of continued funding opportunities~ Sri Ulie Rakhmawati (CM Bogor 2)

A very positive experience. The mentorship our campaign manager has received has been hugely valuable to her as an individual and to our programs and conservation efforts regionally~ Amanda Fine (Supervisor PEP 1)



+ Likelihood to Recommend Pride is High

1= Not at all likely to recommend a Pride campaign

2 = Slightly likely to recommend a Pride campaign

3 = Moderately likely to recommend a Pride campaign

4 = Very likely

to recommend a Pride campaign

5 = Completely likely to

recommend a Pride campaign

Kent/PEP Alumni

Guad Alumni Bogor Alumni China Alumni3

3.5

4

4.5

5

• Average of 4.47, and all regions surpass 4.0


+ All region’s have scores above minimum threshold of 4

Bogor Alumni Guad Alumni Kent/PEP Alumni China Alumni3

3.23.43.63.8

44.24.44.64.8

5

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B18Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011

Likelihood to Recommend Pride Comments

How likely are you to recommend a Pride campaign to colleagues or other organizations? Why?

I trust that you can make a difference (score of 5)~ Adriana Ochoa Valle (CM Guad 7)

It is a good tool for planning, organizing, monitoring. (score of 5)~ Ana Roberta Gomes (CM Guad 1)

I think it is demanding for the campaign managers to conduct the work in the field and preparing lots of paper work with RARE. (score of 3)~ Anak Pattanavibool (Supervisor PEP 1)

Because the planning strategy involving the development of methodology pride is essential to ensure the conservation objectives in an organized and orderly, and a wide safety margin. (score of 4)~ Jacqueline Aldana (CM Guad 7)

Pride in the protected area because of the implementation of protected areas can help foster a better project manager, management of protected areas to enhance capacity and efficiency. (score of 5)~ Xingyao Zhong (supervisor China 1)

19Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011Note – Quotations require written consent to use externally

+ Repeat Respondents Demonstrate Increasing Satisfaction• 8 people responded to both the FY 2010, FY 2011 and FY 2011B

alumni surveys; their recommendation score declined in the 2011 survey, but have now gone back up

• This tells us it is not simply a matter of who responded, but individual people changing their opinion.

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B3

3.5

4

4.5

5Total


Comparison of FY 2010 and 2011 Comments from Repeat Respondents

How likely are you to recommend a Pride campaign to colleagues or other organizations? Why?

2011A: so more and more actors can have a conservation campaign. (score of 4)2011B: Pride Campaign most importantly for me has proven to give results very constructive for conservation and community empowerment. (score of 4)~ Agus Wiyono

2011A: Because it is a methodology that caters to as many people, there are very few staff dedicated to environmental activities education (score of 4)2011B: Because it is a highly effective tool to guide specific to activities, environmental threats, sometimes without much money and if covering a lot of people. (score of 4)~ Maribel Sánchez García

2011A: Because campaigns are popping up from other agencies and the organization is always invited to be involved. (score of 4)2011B: So more different minded people can be involved which spreads out conservation believes and minds. (score of 5)~ Yalap P Yalap



All other FYs, including 2007, had 2 or fewer respondents on all alumni surveys in the past.

Despite increased cost of Pride, Partner Satisfaction is About the Same

Graduation Year of Respondent:

2006 2008 2009 20103

3.5

4

4.5

5



BSC Scores


BSC Scores Summary

+ plusses

• BSC Scores are high• 92% are likely to recommend Pride • 98% are involved in conservation• 75% continue to use Pride methodology

• Particularly used for community outreach and feedback• Use of Pride methodology has increased among alumni since FY

2010, but has stayed the same since FY 2011 survey


+ Involvement in Conservation High

“Are you still involved academically or professionally in any of the following conservation disciplines or social

marketing?”

Employed? Involved Academically? Other? 0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

• 98% still involved in conservation, academically or professionally


Top10 employment activities (out of 33)

Community Out-reach & Education

19%

Social Marketing 15%

Forestry & Forest Management

11%Social Science

9%

Climate Change 10%

Conservation Planning & Re-serve Design

10%

Agriculture 7%

Community Ecology

10% Pollution 2%

Freshwater7%


+ Leadership

“What are some developments in your own career in the past year?”

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

• 100% are accomplished leaders in conservation [have accomplishments in 3 of the 8 leadership roles listed below], going up from 82% last survey!


+ Leadership“What are some developments in your own career in the past year?”

02468

101214161820


• In fact, leadership has gone up significantly in each survey!


Leadership CommentsWhat are some developments in your own career – either since your Pride campaign ended or within the last few years if you are still running your campaign?

Promotions? I started this job as a project officer, eight months later promoted to project coordinator~ Tisna Nando (CM Kent 4)

Spoken at conferences? Management of environmental services by utilizing the natural landscape in the UB poor in 2010. The use of the TOC approach in moving the community to support conservation in national parks baluran East Java~ Agus Wiyono (Supervisor Bogor 3)

Quoted in the media? By China Sin Hua News Agency on 24 November 2010 on tiger conservation http://www.china.org.cn/environment/biodiversity/2010-11/24/content_21408428.htm~ Bobby Nopandry (CM Bogor 3)

Published articles? 2011 / "China Forestry", "Zoological Journal", "Sichuan Animals", "health professional education" and / wildlife protection and nature reserve management~ Zhong Zongzhou (CM China 1)

Provided technical advice? Communication strategy of the "Watershed and Cities" - the Mexican Fund for Conservation of Nature / Fundación Gonzalo Río Arronte~ Mauricio Quijano Farjat (CM Guad 7) 29Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011


http://www.china.org.cn/environment/biodiversity/2010-11/24/content_21408428.htm

Alumni 2011 B- Awards and PrizesWon awards, prizes, fellowships, grants, other recognition? CM Name Award

Lang Jianmin Council received the 2010 "protection model" titleMaria Ignacia Galeano

1 / 2 scholarship to study the masters. $ 3000 - January 2011

Martin Castillo Scholarship to study the mastersPatricia Scharr AFP Fundraiser of the year 1999, Austin TX, Elected president

AFP-Fairfield County for 2 yrs; Chaired National Philanthropy Day in CT in 2005 and 2009

Sandra Conde An appreciation for the support of the park's managementSanti Saypanya I was awarded US$10,000 from Sidney Beyers Scholarship

Award, Wildlife Conservation Network on March 16, 2011.Yalap P Yalap Blue Pride Award “Philippine Coral Reef Conservation

Champion”. July 2011Yanang (Angela) Cun

Ford International Fellowship, 2007; Whitley Fund for Nature Award, 2006 Rare Award 2006

Zhong Zongzhou

Tianshi Science and Technology Progress Award30Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011

Δ Use of Pride

"Have you conducted work that utilizes all or almost all of the “complete” Pride methodology, since your Pride campaign ended?"

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

NoYes

• Use of “complete” Pride methodology has declined from 54% to 48%


0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

+ Use of Pride• 75% use at least 5 components of the Pride methodology • Most used components of Pride are those for community outreach and

feedback• Note that Theory of Change and Barrier Removal are low since the tool has

been introduced only in the past two year

New


Use of Pride Methodology Trends

Stake

holde

r Mee

ting

Surve

ys (an

d/or S

urveyP

ro)

Socia

l Mark

eting

(Cam

paign

Activitie

s)

SMART O

bjectiv

es

Site E

valua

tion

Monito

ring a

nd Ev

aluati

on

Audien

ce Se

gmen

tation

Concep

t Mod

el

Thre

at Ran

king

The

ory of

Chang

e

Barrier

Remova

l Tactic

s

Behavi

or Cha

nge M

odel

Miradi

02468

10121416

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B


Use of Pride Comments

Please feel free to give any specific feedback you may have about the training you have received or the Pride methodology in the space below.

Need refresher course or something send via e-mail on PRIDE methodology tools~ Bradley Phillip (CM Kent 5)

Pride methodology I learned is very modern and useful in my organization, communities and my personal career~ Gankhuyag Balbar (CM PEP 2)

Maybe give new training courses to alumni for updates on the new curriculum of today's pupils. And included in the master.~ Guadalupe De la Cruz Guillén (CM Guad 2)

Usually partners like TOC and when explaining it they agree on my campaign issues. Bolortsetseg Sanjaa (CM PEP 2)



Impact and Network Effects


Impact and Network Effects Summary+

plusses

• Strong impact and network effects: • 65% trained someone in the Pride methodology• 70% influenced someone who contributed to conservation• 69% continued their campaign• 96% reduced a threat to biodiversity


+ Campaign Follow-up is High

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B


Continuing Campaign CommentsDid you continue your campaign after your formal partnership with Rare ended?If Yes, please briefly describe the work and how the project was a follow-up to your original campaign.

Continue to hold events and activities with key stakeholders to participate in the conservation actions~ Ana Luisa Figueroa Carranza (ED Guad 7)

Mainly the construction of pilot villages to protect ecological restoration work. Time in 2011-2014, the village-level development and ecological restoration, to reduce the consumption of organic forest combine together to save the multi-party interests do not suffer.~ Gedu (ED China 1)

In solid waste began a new campaign in 4 new communities on the coast and then worked with the mayors of the municipalities in fire management crews prepared fire and now we are notified before a burn in your plot.~ Rodrigo Migoya von Bertrab (Supervisor Guad Traditional)

Currently being done in Canopy Indonesia is the Orchid Conservation of Nature in Merapi. We record over the natural orchid species that still exist around the southern slope of Merapi, precisely in Turgo hill. Later this orchid orchids cultivated by farmers in the hamlet of Turgo. It also made assistance to farmer groups and conducted training.~ Sri Ulie Rakhmawati (CM Bogor 2)



Threat Reduction CommentsIn the years following your campaign, do you feel your campaign led directly to or contributed to the reduction or mitigation of an important threat to the environment, and/or a benefit to the conservation target? If Yes, please briefly describe the threats reduced (or mitigated), and the conservation results.

We believe the barrier removal activities focused on promoting legal hunting (obtaining permits, hunting only in authorized areas, etc.) have led to a reduction of illegal hunting of gazelle and marmots in our target areas. ~ Amanda Fine (Supervisor PEP 1)

Villagers began artificial grass, mowing livestock, to protect the wetland, so as to better protect the black-necked cranes.~ Dao Meibiao (CM China 1)

Search for firewood in the forest is reduced, from 3 times to 2 times. time for the forest began to move into the garden of energy are developed and to date has shown positive results but also firewood and fodder crops (chili sauce, peanuts and corn)~ Istiyarto Ismu (CM Bogor 3)


Post-Campaign Training CommentsHave you trained someone else in Pride methodology since your Pride campaign ended?If Yes, please briefly describe how many people and when you trained them?

Yu River in 2009, trained 46 protected areas~ Zongzhou Zhang (Supervisor China 1)

Performed on two training & debriefing program rulemaking LIF-AFEP village, involving 30 org, in July 2010~ Zakiah Najdy (CM Bogor 1)

Rare China 1 and China 2, total 15 people~ Yanang (Angela) Cun (CM Kent 3)

Given that I am coming to the States to do my PhD, before coming here I have trained five people in Pride methodology.~ Santi Saypanya (CM PEP 1)

A dozen people. I assisted Rare in a follow up study and had to train my enumerators.~ Brooke Nevitt (CM Kent 9)


Post-Campaign Influence CommentsHave you influenced someone during your campaign who has gone on to

accomplish something significant on behalf of conservation? If Yes, please briefly describe this person, how their involvement in the Pride campaign influenced them, and what actions they have taken towards conservation as a result.

The person that I have influenced during my campaign is the mayor of Lansak Municipality who has interested on the wildlife conservation activity. She has to continue the campaign activity to promote wild meat free in her area and the campaign material as billboard and poster still in there area. Angkana Makvilai (CM PEP 1)

Yes, During Wildlife event activity in May, biology teachers were helping to volunteer with students for activity. Because we find a new local partner which is Local Education Culture agency in Dornod aimag (name of the province) then who is Education Manager engaging with Biology teachers. Bolortsetseg Sanjaa (CM PEP 2)

Many poachers in my project area have left illegal bushmeat hunting for trade and today they are organized in communities groups of beekeepers and fishermen. Some of them continue to help us, park managers as data collectors, guides during antipoaching patrols, also denunciation of illegal activities. We can quote also teachers who continue to run conservation education activities in the primaries schools using our techniques and materials.Jean Bosco POUOMEGNE (CM Kent 8) 41Rare - Alumni Surveys August 2011Note – Quotations require written consent to use externally

RarePlanet.org


RarePlanet.org Summary

Δ deltas

• When asked about their satisfaction with RarePlanet.org, alumni score has gone down from a 4.0 in FY 2011 to a 3.4 in FY 2011B on a 5.0 scale (“neither satisfied nor dissatisfied”). • Some FY 2011 Alumni respondents report not being able to use it due to technical limitations


Δ RarePlanet satisfaction

2010:Over the past year, how important have the tools on RarePlanet.org been to the successful implementation of your Pride campaign?

5 - RarePlanet.org has been an extremely important tool

4 - RarePlanet.org has been a very important tool

3- RarePlanet.org has been a moderately important tool

2 - RarePlanet.org has been a slightly important tool

1 - RarePlanet.org has not been an important tool

2011 + 2011B:Over the past year, how satisfied have you been with the tools available on RarePlanet.org?

5 - Completely satisfied

4 - Somewhat satisfied

3 - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

2 - Somewhat dissatisfied

1 - Completely dissatisfied

Alumni

2010

Alumni

2011

Alumni

2011

B0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

54321

• has gone down from an average of 4.0 to 3.4


RarePlanet.org CommentsPlease feel free to give any specific feedback you may have about the support you have received from Rare, RarePlanet.org, or the alumni mentor in the space below. (these quotes have been pulled specific to RarePlanet)

I think, I was uploading all campaign activities in Rare blog, and people wrote some reactions and comments to me. That is good feedback to me after evaluate my work in Future too.~ Bolortsetseg Sanjaa (CM PEP 2)

RarePlanet.org has not been accessible on-site for much of the campaign due to very limited internet access~ Kame Westerman (Supervisor PEP 1)

I am very satisfied with the Rare supports, and Rareplanet.org. All of the supports and helps from Rare are very productive and useful with our community, organizations and for me personally. Thank you very much to Rare~ Gankhuyag Balbar (CM PEP 2)

As programs are super, I am not satisfied because I can not access them due to problems with the system~ Maribel Sánchez García (CM Guad 2)


Needs for Continued Impact


i Post Campaign Resources“What was needed to reach conservation impact after your official

Pride campaign completed?”

Additional Training for CM and Organization

Alternative Income/Livelihoods for Stakeholders

Support for Stakeholders/Greater Stakholder Engagement

Technology

Training/Workshops for Stakeholders

Greater Regulation/Government Support

Additional Conservation Methods

Additional Logistical/Technical Support

Rule of Law/Law Enforcement

Campaign Materials

Maintain Awareness/Media Presence

Money

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

• Need for additional funding and community awareness


Post Campaign Resources Comments

In the upcoming year, how else do you expect the post-campaign impact to develop?

We think, and increase in BC brings success and influence to other hunters. In future, we will more find some solution for conservation education project when work on proposal in maybe next year.~ Bolortsetseg Sanjaa (CM PEP 2)

management of resources to establish more organic plots, promote synergies insitutionalism, community and social organization to the attention of the projects established~ Martin Castillo (CM Guad 4)

District and provincial government support of community governance area (Forest Mukim) in kemukiman Leupung, Aceh Besar~ Zakiah Najdy (CM Bogor 1)

Looking for funding to conduct survey to use for decisions when the moratorium lapse in 2015.~ Yalap P Yalap (CM Kent 1)


Non-conservation Organizations


i Non-Conservation Organizations

Extremely important

Very important

Moderately important

Slightly important

Not at all important

Alumni 2010 Alumni 2011 Alumni 2011B0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

54321

How important are partnerships with non-conservation organizations to the success of your organization's mission?

Importance of partnerships with non-conservation organizations tends towards “very important” (3.5), but: - Opinions vary greatly between campaigns- This score is lower than last years (3.8)


Non-conservation Organizations CommentsPlease feel free to elaborate on your organization’s experiences working with non-conservation organizations in the space below.

Personal experience, relationships with other institutions, especially the media becomes very important because together they make the work we do to be seen by others~ Edy Sutrisno (CM Bogor 2)

We partner with Population Services International & Marie Stopes International for our family planning and reproductive health activities, an extremely important component to our conservation work.~ Kame Westerman (Supervisor PEP 1)

Conservation (the rational management of resources including Conservation, Preservation and Restoration) is everybody's business. Making people understand the economic impact of positive conservation programs is critical to success.~ Patricia Scharr (CM Kent T)

Being a small island, we need to integrated everyone to be involved to support conservation campaigns. Also conservation is rooted in Palauan culture but with the western influence, people are forgetting.~ Yalap P Yalap (CM Kent 1)


Expectations of the Alumni Community


Alumni Comments Summary

! actions

• As alumni, they want:o Regional alumni reunions and trainingo More opportunities for sharing experiences

• Many have expressed interest in participating and helping with current campaign and Pride activities, each region could benefit from their knowledge and time


Alumni CommentsWhat do you expect from the alumni community in the coming year?

There are occasions where we can meet each other and sharing experiences, which may be scheduled into the annual agenda.~ Ade Yuliani (CM Bogor 5)

Graduate seminars or online learning for the rest of the staff~ Ana Luisa Figueroa Carranza (ED Guad 7)

Training and finance opportunities~ German Montero (CM Guad 7)

Courses, online workshops, financial support to promote knowledge and new tools for conservation~ Justo Camargo (CM Guad 5)



Alumni CommentsWhat other opportunities would you like to see in the alumni community?

The opportunity to exchange experiences.~ Weidong Zhao (Supervisor China 1)

Alumni community meeting/ conference for each member will introduce their great work around the world. Agus Wiyono (CM Bogor 1)

Indonesian alumni reunion ade yuliani (CM Bogor 4)



Response Rate


Response Rate Summary

Δ deltas

• Low response rate limits the ability to draw fine tuned conclusions

+plusses

• All regions have a higher response rate than last surveyo Based on actions from last survey, we gave the survey at a

different time of year possibly resulting in the higher responseo This is the first time that every region had the option to use

Surveymonkey, also possibly resulting in higher responses

!actions

•Make sure benefits of survey to Rare and them is known• Incentivize• Repeat the 2011B process in order to streamline and maximize the benefits found this time around


+ Responses Compared to Last Year

*Years are fiscal years **Some alumni from Traditional and Kent cohorts have been shifted to other regions.

Kent/PEP Alumni

Guad Alumni Bogor Alumni

China Alumni

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40



Alumni Survey Results: Winter FY12 Results from FY 2011B Alumni Surveys

Documents

Transcript of Alumni Survey Results: Winter FY12 Results from FY 2011B Alumni Surveys