"Adriatic Ionian Macroregion" (Irene Bianchi, Adriplan)
-
Upload
ruimte-vlaanderen -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
425 -
download
0
Transcript of "Adriatic Ionian Macroregion" (Irene Bianchi, Adriplan)
Towards effective Maritime Spatial Planning in the Mediterranean: ADRIPLAN Project Irene Bianchi – University IUAV of Venice IUAV Team: Prof. F. Musco, Dr. E. Gissi, Dr. F. Appiotti, I. Bianchi, D. Maragno, A. Innocenti.
OUTLINE
Why do we need Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP)
Towards MSP in the Adriatic-Ionian Region: ADRIPLAN The Research - Planning link in MSP
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
Barriers and bottlenecks
Future perspectives and reccommandations
│3
Why do we need Maritime Spatial Planning
Need for MSP =
“a public process of analysing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities in marine areas in order to achieve
ecological, economic and social objectives that have been specified through a political process” (UNESCO-IOC 2009).
overexploitation of marine/coastal resources
increasing conflicts for the use of marine/coastal spaces +
│4
Towards MSP in the Adriatic-Ionian Region: ADRIPLAN
IMPTIMELINE
ICZM
IMP
MSFD
CISE
BLUEGROWTH
IMPPRO-POSAL
MSP/ICM PRO-POSAL
2002 2006 2007 2008 2010 2012 2013
Green Paper
Blue Paper
MSPROADMAP
2014 – MSP Directive (2014/89/EU) 2016 – Competent authorities 2021 – Maritime Spatial Management Plans ADRIPLAN (DG MARE 2012/25)
│5
Commonly-agreed approach to cross-border MSP
MSP methodology and tools
MSP priorities based on the best available knowledge
Pilot actions
Recommendations for the implementation of MSP
Towards MSP in the Adriatic-Ionian Region: ADRIPLAN Project Goals
│6
The Research - Planning link in MSP Ecosystem-Based Approach
Ecosystem-based Integrative
Place-based and multiscalar
Adaptive
Strategic and anticipatory
Participatory
UNEP 2006, UNESCO-IOC 2009, MSP Directive 2014
│7
The Research - Planning link in MSP Ecosystem-Based Approach
Ecosystem-based Integrative
Place-based and multiscalar
Adaptive
Strategic and anticipatory
Participatory
Need to enhance the science /policy interface Need to include expert, scientific
and local knowledge Need to acquire socio-economic
and environmental data and information
Need to involve stakeholders in all the phases of the planning process
│8
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN Consortium
9 PUBLIC BODIES
6 RESEARCH
BODIES
1 PRIVATE
BODY
PARTNERS
+ 17 OBSERVERS
│9
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN Consortium
9 PUBLIC BODIES
6 RESEARCH
BODIES
1 PRIVATE
BODY
PARTNERS
+ 17 OBSERVERS
TOWARD TRANSBOUNDARY COORDINATION
│10
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN Consortium
9 PUBLIC BODIES
planning, environment, tourism, transportation,
energy
6 RESEARCH
BODIES planning, GIS,
ecology, marine biology
1 PRIVATE
BODY
EXTERNAL EXPERTS
marine biology, economics,
law, etc.
SECTORAL ORGANIZATION energy, tourism, transportation
……PUBLIC BODIES national, regional,
local
NGOs
Scientific knowledge/ data/ information
Sectoral data/ information
Local Knowledge/ information
Priorities Objectives Information
Support for MSP
│11
Methodology
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
│12
Methodology
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
Acquisition of data and information
│13
Methodology
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
Acquisition of data and information Identification of
management and planning priorities
│14
Methodology
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
Acquisition of data and information Identification of
management and planning priorities Analysis of site-
specific dinamycs
│15
Methodology
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
Acquisition of data and information Identification of
management and planning priorities Analysis of site-
specific dinamycs Interpretation of
use-use and environment-use conflicts and synergies
│16
Methodology
The Research - Planning link in ADRIPLAN
Acquisition of data and information Identification of
management and planning priorities Analysis of site-
specific dinamycs Interpretation of
use-use and environment-use conflicts and synergies Support in drafting
planning proposals
│17
Analysis
Maritime uses (2014, 2020) Environmental components
│18
Analysis – Coexistence among uses
Analysis of most intensively used maritime areas, with coexistence in space and time Baseline: 2014 Future scenario: 2020
│19
Analysis – Cumulative Impacts
Analysis of cumulative impacts on marine environmental components deriving from maritime uses and related pressures Baseline: 2014 Future scenario: 2020
│20
Analysis – Cumulative Impacts
H1- Infralittoral rock and other hard substrata
Aquaculture
Cablesand
pipelines
Coastal & Maritime Tourism
H12 - Mediterranean biocenosis of muddy detritic bottoms
Coastal Defence
Work
H13 - Mediterranean biocenosis of coastal terrigenous muds
Dumping areas for dredging
H16 - Maerl beds
Pelagic Trawling
H17 - Posidonia beds
Maritime Transport
H18 - Cymodocea beds
Military Areas
H2 - Circalittoral rock and other hard
substrata
Naval Base
Activities
H20 - Deep-sea sand
H22 - Meditteranean communities of
bathyal muds
Small Scale
Fishery
H24 - Communities of abyssal muds
Oil & Gas extraction
H3 - Mediterraneancoralligenous communities
Offshore Sand
Deposit
H4 - Fauna communities on deep moderate
energy
H5 - Infralitteral coarse sediment
ProtectedAreas
Oil & Gas research
Renewable energy
facilities
Bottom Trawling
H10 - Circalittoral sandy mud
H11 -Circalittoral fine mud
H6 - Circalitteral coarse sediment
H7 - Infralitteralfine sands
H8 -Circalitteralfine sands
H9 - Circalittoral muddy sand
Marine Birds
Marine mammals
Nursery habitats
Turtles
Sensitivity analysis through expert opinion
│21
Interpretation – Example: Energy
│22
Interpretation – Example: Energy
│23
Interpretation – Example: Fishery and Aquaculture
│24
Interpretation – Example: Fishery and Aquaculture
│25
Planning – Strategic proposal
│26
Planning – Pilot Actions
· mussel fishing;· trawling
· MPA · archaeological areas (San Bartolomeo);· marinas
· spawning area · marine environment
· overlapping with sand deposits
│27
Planning – Pilot Actions
Trieste
Koper
Archaeological sites
Protected area
Possible landing areas
Possible alternative landing areas
Eraclea
Proposal
Current project
Trieste
Koper
Eraclea
Modify the position of the cable Deploy the cable
under the seabed Modify the land-sea
connection in the eastern part
│28
Planning – Pilot Actions
Main Ports
Small Ports
Ports in expantion
Marinas
Offshore Venice port2020
Motorways of the sea
Marine traffic corridors
Ferry routes
Traffic lanes
Shipping routes (passenger + commercial)
Offshore port pipeline2020
Low/med/highDensity of marine farms
Bottom Trawling
Pelagic Trawling
Small Scale Fishery
+
++
LNG terminal
· small scale fishery;· trawling
· existing and future aquaculture
· potential impacts
· overlapping with relevant ecosystems
· overlapping with relevant nursery/spawn-ing areas
· synrgies with existing and future maritimetransport
│29
Planning – Pilot Actions
Nursery area
Marine farms
Shipping routes
Traffic lanes
Existing situation
Proposal
Fishing attention areas
New offshore shipping routes
Define temporary preacutionary measures in the construction phase Identify fishing
attention areas
Consider interactions with changing routes
│30
Barriers and bottlenecks Information gaps
àdifficulties in analysing present/future conditions àdifficulties in identifying major conflicts àdifficulties in planning proposal definition
Insufficient understanding of MSP by stakeholders/experts
à difficulties in involving scientific and sectoral stakeholders Fragmented regulatory and planning framework
à differing planning priorities à disputes
Lack of a competent authorities for MSP/ICM à difficulties in planning proposal definition and implementation
│31
Future perspectives and reccommandations MSP - a new perspective for planners!
Update planning competences
Manage land-sea interactions
Promote knowledge mix within the planning process
Integrate MSP with existing planning schemes
Promote flexible solution, with variable intensities and scales
Thank you!
For further information, please visit: adriplan.eu (website) data.adriplan.eu (data portal)
│33
Additional Info – Coexistence scores
│34
Additional Info – Types of management areas
Type 1: areas where multiple maritime uses coexist in sensitive marine environments, located in high waters. Management options to be based on transboundary governance according future demand of space.
Type 2: same of type 1, but located in territorial waters. Governance system and management options should consider national legal framework.
Type 3: areas which assume a great importance for the delivery of ecosystems goods and services for the AIR.