1. Ph.D., Political Science, NTU 2010.03.19 98

2. A B C D E 3. 4. I

5. II

ECFA

6. 7.

ECFA

8. 9.

10. 11. Ex.

1978-2008

1983-2006

2009 13 1 12.

2000

2009 13 2 13.

Waltz

2009 40 14.

2008 38 15.

:

2009 27 3-4 16. 17. Source:www.wretch.cc/blog/oolong1001/5219735 18.

Dye 1999 47-49 19. I

Huntington 1994 35-123 20. I Source:http://hi.baidu.com/%B5%D4%CE%B0%C6%E6/blog/item/2ff157feeea7cf3a5c6008f6.html 21. II Source:http://photo.blog.sina.com.cn/blogpic/50e5b33601008r0u/50e5b3364477edb3f9b7c 22. II

• 1969 35-36

23. Source: http://www.dadalos.org/politik_int/politik/systemtheorie.htm 24. III

• Theodore Lowi

• 1992 1

25. 26. 19001997 27.

Ex.

28. -> 29. I

30. II

• (Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.)

Federalist Papers , No. 51 31.

• Single Non-Transferable Vote, SNTV)

1992 16-23 32.

->

• ->

1992 131-136 33.

Source: 2009 2009 6 12 15 34.

35.

1995:172-178 36.

• Ex.

• Ex.

37.

• Everything is political

38.

39.

40. 41.

42. Source: item.eachnet.com/prd/1260097796043433_prd.html 43.

44.

45.

46.

47. 48. The End 49.

1981

http://www.eoenet.com/manage/login.aspx?durl=0100188303856

50.

2002 , , : 21-55

1999

2007

51.

Dye, Thomas R. (1999)

Huntington, Samuel (1994)

Lowi, Theodore J. (1992). "The State in Political Science: How We Become What We Study."The American Political Science Review86, 1:1-7.

Wootton, David. (2003).The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers . Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co. ( Federalist Papers )

(1969)

(1995)

1992