83 Rhinosporidiosis
-
Upload
soledaddc329 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 83 Rhinosporidiosis
-
8/11/2019 83 Rhinosporidiosis
1/6
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd Edition
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis
M. Cecilia Castellano
Edward B. Breitschwerdt
ETIOLOGY
Rhinosporidiosis, a chronic granulomatous disease caused byRhinosporidium seeberi, induces tumorlike growths
of epithelial tissues in domestic animals, birds, and people.6,13,15
The taxonomy ofR. seeberihas long been controversial. Based on its morphologic characteristics, it has been
classified in the past few years as a fungus by most microbiologists. Phylogenetic analysis indicatesR. seeberito
be a member of a newly recognized group of human and animal pathogens that form a branch in the evolutionary
tree near the animal-fungal divergence.8,10
It has been proposed that this new phylogenetic group be referred to as
the class Mesomycetozoea (between fungi and animals) andR. seeberibe considered a monotypic genus within
this class.10,19
Genetic analysis of isolates suggests that host-specific strains of the organism may exist.22a
Like
other mesomycetozoeans,R. seeberiis associated with aquatic environments. AlthoughR. seeberiis generally
believed to be the causative agent of rhinosporidiosis, a few challenge this accepted premise. In one study, a
cyanobacteriumMicrocystis aeruginosawas isolated from water in which human patients with the disease were
bathing.2,3
The organism was also identified in clinical specimens; however, additional confirmation is needed for
this hypothesis. Microscopic findings of lesions indicate thatR. seeberi, and not a bacterium, is the cause of this
disease.
Although a few successful attempts to propagateR. seeberiin tissue culture have been described,6,14
the results
have been questioned.18
Most microbiologists considerR. seeberito be intractable to culture.8,10,19
The infective
unit is a small (7- to 15-m), round spore that once implanted in tissues progressively develops into large (100- to
450-m), spherical bodies known as sporangia. Sporangia undergo a maturation process, resulting in the
production of 16,000 to 20,000 endospores that are then discharged through an apical pore, and the cycle is
reinitiated.6
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Rhinosporidiosis is endemic in India, Sri Lanka, and Argentina and is reported sporadically from other parts of the
world. In the United States, canine rhinosporidiosis has been reported only in the southern states; however,
occurrence of the disease in a dog native to Ontario and in a cat from a suburb of Washington, DC, suggests the
possibility of a more widespread distribution in North America. In Europe, canine rhinosporidiosis has been
recognized only in northern Italy.7
Feline rhinosporidiosis has been reported in two outdoor cats, both in the United States.20,23
R. seeberiis stimulated to develop mature endospores that are released from its sporangia after exposure to water,
thus the disease is associated with wet environments and the host's moist mucous membranes. Most affected
animals are exposed to flowing or impounded water. Infection frequently involves the mucous membranes of the
83
83.1
83.2
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis Page 1 of 6
-
8/11/2019 83 Rhinosporidiosis
2/6
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd Edition
nasal cavity, but it may occasionally affect the ear, pharynx, larynx, trachea, esophagus, urogenital mucosae, and
skin. Reported cases of canine and feline rhinosporidiosis have involved only the nasal cavity.
The disease is more common in large-breed dogs with a mean age of 5 years (and a range of 1.5 to 13 years) and
seems to be more common in males, as it is in people and horses. Behavioral and biologic factors may be
responsible for this apparent predisposition. Because of the few reported cases, it is not known whether the same
tendencies are found in cats.
PATHOGENESIS
The pathogenesis of rhinosporidiosis has not been completely characterized because of the difficulties associated
with in vitro propagation of the organism.
R. seeberihas not been detected in the environment, and its natural host remains unknown. Reports from endemic
areas suggest that infection is acquired by mucosal contact with stagnant water. Mucous membrane trauma may be
a predisposing factor. In arid countries, most human infections are ocular, and dust is postulated to be a fomite. In
vitro studies suggest that endospore release from mature sporangia is stimulated by mucous secretions.
18
Onceimplanted in tissues, endospores elicit a severe, focal pyogranulomatous reaction.
Little is known about the immune response toR. seeberi. A mucoidlike layer with immunogenic properties has
been recognized beneath the sporangium's cell wall.11,18
It has been suggested that it may play a role in the
immunology of the disease.
CLINICAL FINDINGS
Clinical findings include wheezing, sneezing, unilateral seropurulent nasal discharge, and epistaxis. Polypoid
lesions may be visible in the nares (Fig. 83-1) and may also be visualized by rhinoscopy in the rostral nasal cavity
(Fig. 83-2). Single or multiple polyps ranging in size from a few millimeters up to 3 cm are pink, red, or pale gray
and covered by numerous pinpoint white-yellowish granules (sporangia). Polyps may be sessile or pedunculated,
and the superficial surface is irregular, glistening, and possibly ulcerated. Duration of clinical signs in reported
canine cases ranges between 2 weeks and 8 months.
DIAGNOSIS
The organism can be demonstrated by several stains: hematoxylin-eosin, Wright, Gridley's, toluidine blue,
periodic acidSchiff, and Grocott's. Cytologic examination of nasal exudate and of scrape or brush samples
obtained from the surface of the polyp usually allows diagnosis through identification of single or clusters ofR.
seeberispores. Although less common, sporangia may be observed (Fig. 83-3). Sporangia and spores should be
easily recognized by histologic examination.
794
83.3
83.4
83.5
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis Page 2 of 6
-
8/11/2019 83 Rhinosporidiosis
3/6
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd Edition
Fig 83-1 Two-year-old male dog of mixed German shepherd breeding from
Argentina, with a bright red sessile growth in the right nostril.
Rhinosporidiosis was diagnosed after histologic examination.
Fig 83-2 Rostral rhinoscopy in dog with rhinosporidiosis. Polyp is attached to nasal
mucosa. (Courtesy University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.)
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis Page 3 of 6
-
8/11/2019 83 Rhinosporidiosis
4/6
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd Edition
Fig 83-3 Scrape smear of nasal polyp. A, Numerous single endospores of R.
seeberidispersed in epithelial-cell background (PAS stain, 200). B,
Juvenile sporangium of R. seeberi. Note transparent capsules andnumerous endospores with internal globular bodies (Wright stain, 200).
A polymerase chain reaction assay specific forR. seeberihas been developed.8
PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS
Microscopic examination reveals that polyps are composed of fibrovascular tissue lined by squamous or columnar
epithelium that is frequently ulcerated.6Sporangia at different stages of maturation can be seen (Fig. 83-4) and
may be releasing spores through the epithelium to the superficial surface. A superficial exudate most prominent inareas of spore extrusion is composed of spores, neutrophils, epithelia, and erythrocytes. A mixed inflammatory
response consisting predominantly of plasma cells and lymphocytes and to a lesser extent, macrophages, is
scattered throughout the tissue.
794
795
83.6
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis Page 4 of 6
-
8/11/2019 83 Rhinosporidiosis
5/6
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd Edition
Fig 83-4 Nasal polyp. Note larger mature sporangium (arrow)and smaller trophic
stages throughout stroma (H and E stain, 160). (From Gardiner CH,
Fayer R, Dubey JP. 1988.An atlas of protozoan parasites in animal tissues,Beltsville, Md, USDA, Agriculture Handbook No 651.)
THERAPY
Surgical excision remains the treatment of choice and may be curative when a single polyp is excised. Because of
the frequent rostral location of the polyps, surgical excision through the nares or by anterolateral approach to the
nares generally is possible, negating the necessity for the more invasive dorsonasal flap procedure. In four dogs
treated with surgery alone, no recurrence was noted after 1 to 2 years.7Recurrence has been reported 2 to 12
months after surgery in dogs with single or multiple lesions. Dapsone has been used to treat human
rhinosporidiosis with variable success12,6
and might be considered as an adjunct to surgical removal of lesions in
dogs or cats. Light and electron microscopic studies have demonstrated that dapsone induces degenerative changes
inR. seeberiby inhibiting division of the organism.22
Treatment with dapsone (1 mg/kg every 8 hours for 2
weeks, followed by 1 mg/kg every 12 hours for 4 months) likely cured a dog that developed polyps after surgical
extirpation.6,17
Ketoconazole (8.7 mg/kg every 8 hours for 21 days) eliminated nasal discharge in a dog after 4
days, and visual and cytologic resolution of the polyps occurred after 21 days of therapy.6Although treatment
continued for an additional 21 days, the disease recurred 6 months later, necessitating surgical excision of a large
polyp. Medical therapy of rhinosporidiosis may be improved by screening antiparasitic drugs that have an effect
on other members of the Mesomycetozoea class.
PUBLIC HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS
Although people are also affected with this disease, no evidence supports the possibility of transmission ofR.
seeberifrom animals to people. Dogs and people appear to become infected from common environmental sources.
83.7
83.8
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis Page 5 of 6
-
8/11/2019 83 Rhinosporidiosis
6/6
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd Edition
Suggested Readings*
* See the CD-ROM for a complete list of references.
7. Caniatti, M, Roccabianca, P, Scanziani, E, et al.: Nasal rhinosporidiosis in dogs: four cases from Europe
and a review of literature. Vet Rec. 142, 1998, 334338.
19. Mendoza, L, Taylor, JW, Ajello, L: The class Mesomycetozoea: a heterogeneous group of
microorganisms at the animal-fungal boundary.Annu Rev Microbiol. 56, 2002, 315344.
20. Moisan, PG, Baker, SV: Rhinosporidiosis in a cat.J Vet Diagn Invest. 13, 2001, 352354.
23. Wallin, LL, Coleman, GD, Froeling, J, et al.: Rhinosporidiosis in a domestic cat.Med Mycol. 39, 2001,
139141.
Uncited references
9. Fredricks, DN, Jolley, JA, Lepp, PW, et al.:Rhinosporidium seeberi: a human pathogen from a novel
group of aquatic protistan parasites.Emerg Infect Dis. 6, 2000, 273282.
83.9
83.10
CHAPTER 83 Rhinosporidiosis Page 6 of 6