1. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 12.03.2013 -

2. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU : : 1 Rio+20 3. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 4. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU Industrial Ecology, IE White 1994 5. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 70 kg CO2-eq 60 kg CO2-eq 55 kg CO2-eq 6. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 7. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 8. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 1 From Giljum et al. 2012. Green economies around the world ? Implications of resource use for development and the environment 30810 Giljum et al. (2012) 20505 9. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2 embedded impact 10. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 1 11. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2 12. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 3 13. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 14. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 1 15. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2 16. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (%) ( g/m3) () 37 54 0.3 59 46 3.5 100 22 11.4 World Bank, 2013 Little Green Data book 3 17. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU World Bank No nation will be immune to the impacts of climate change, However, the distribution of impacts is likely to be inherently unequal and tilted against many of the worlds poorest regions, which have the least economic, institutional, scientific and technical capacity to cope and adapt. 18. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (1) 19. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (2) 20. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (3) 21. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (4) http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/?q=home 22. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (4) http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/?q=home 23. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (5) 23% 19922004 5% 18% 24. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 25. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 1 [ ] [ ] T p pp dp ip p d pd dd id d i pi di ii i T h h B A A A F E B A I A A F B A A I A F B F Dynamic Hybrid Multi-Region Inventory analysis(DHMRI) : (time-dependent) R C, M 26. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2%; 40% 50% 23.6%, 6.4% : 18.7% 40% GDP4.3 % 1.5830.10% 68.32% 20052020 20202010 27. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (1) 41% 56% (1000 ) () 28. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (2) ( ) (CO2-eq) 28% 14% : 32%23% () 29. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2005 2020 2005 2020 2005 2020 2005 2020 2005 2020 56% 44% 11% 7% 23% 19% 1% 1% 3% 6% 20% 21% 9% 7% 18% 19% 0% 1% 1% 1% 24% 35% 80% 85% 58% 62% 99% 99% 96% 93% () 13% 22% 50% 60% 36% 44% 49% 49% 60% 49% 1% 30. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 10% GDP5%Erickson et al. 2012 31. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU - 32. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 20075.98 (2008) OECDOECD, 2008 2006Honduras 0.553 33. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU / = // 34. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (1) environmental equity USEPA,1992 35. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (2) A LorenzCurve (%) ( ) (%) Gini Coefficient Lorenz Curve 20% 20% 36. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU Dioxin 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 (3) 37. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU (4) Consumption to Loading Ratio) = 38. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 23 (TSP PM10SOxNOxNMHC) CO2(DioxinPbCdHg As) 2007 39. 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 TSP PM10 SOx NOx CO2 Dioxin Pb Cd Hg As 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 SOxCO2DioxinPbCdHgAs CdAs 40. TSP PM10 SOx NOx NMHC CO2 Dioxin Pb Cd Hg As 13,907 5,327 1,678 17,158 37,615 9,263,679 1.608 62 0.000 0.003 0.009 2,632,242 49,887 17,161 46,864 75,585 46,888 60,116,853 34.307 178 0.104 0.155 0.384 1,514,706 77,364 29,472 14,113 47,438 91,460 21,163,297 2.181 101 0.063 0.071 0.593 3,767,095 24,909 12,991 6,062 19,059 8,226 2,697,700 1.023 250 0.004 0.054 0.154 460,426 77,230 27,786 17,987 52,662 88,779 30,326,868 2.845 1,142 0.007 0.016 0.042 1,911,161 20,623 10,373 4,007 17,275 19,257 5,696,051 2.868 92 0.006 0.018 0.027 487,692 34,478 19,890 8,432 20,206 19,471 12,517,934 3.162 143 0.025 0.016 0.106 559,986 51,572 23,896 18,639 53,905 40,024 60,004,720 16.511 259 0.355 0.235 2.777 1,543,436 39,874 16,234 3,909 27,446 36,599 9,439,707 2.818 134 0.006 0.014 0.034 1,315,034 37,909 18,228 894 10,159 12,576 2,254,612 1.427 45 0.002 0.014 0.028 535,205 34,203 16,613 5,218 23,726 30,287 7,228,962 1.322 75 0.002 0.011 0.032 728,490 25,944 11,580 2,245 16,055 23,158 4,355,110 2.712 57 0.004 0.031 0.068 553,841 45,366 17,353 11,022 29,777 39,135 10,891,601 8.267 200 0.016 0.037 0.042 1,106,690 66,231 29,965 20,983 53,481 48,966 40,928,005 14.291 593 0.152 0.140 1.152 1,245,474 36,228 17,351 1,408 13,712 17,750 7,214,999 3.341 15 0.004 0.010 0.023 893,544 19,548 9,424 385 4,321 4,570 1,083,142 0.447 2 0.001 0.009 0.025 235,957 28,710 14,383 5,407 18,599 6,355 2,328,899 6.883 13 0.014 0.046 0.072 345,303 10,621 5,359 1,188 3,360 1,444 524,616 0.003 0 0.000 0.000 0.001 91,785 7,138 3,627 13,521 13,369 4,548 10,771,200 0.464 12 0.002 0.014 0.044 390,633 4,988 2,057 2,003 6,671 6,421 1,369,177 0.974 8 0.002 0.005 0.006 394,757 30,962 8,690 739 13,473 23,024 2,708,393 0.309 33 0.001 0.004 0.010 1,044,392 5,614 1,916 366 3,464 4,986 932,340 0.344 11 0.001 0.001 0.001 272,364 14,277 4,376 408 5,606 14,207 1,838,535 0.628 5 0.003 0.002 0.011 760,037 0.659 0.539 0.372 0.602 0.867 0.461 0.218 0.322 0.295 0.315 0.298 TSPPM10NMHC (0.659~0.965 PM10 49% NMHC 26%,19% DioxinPbCdAs (0.218~ 0.322 Dioxin: 41. MCIS Microsoft 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 1 (/) national average 3.5 CO21.8 , As30 42. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU ; ; -; - (Heynen et al. 2006) 43. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU - 44. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 205050%~70% IEA 60%~80% Worldwathch, 2007 Metabolism battleground for sustainability 45. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU security; intrinsic value ; ; ; ; ; 46. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 21 Local Agenda 21 2121 LA21 ; ; 47. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 48. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU ; ; 49. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 50. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU social form 51. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU LA21 52. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU / 53. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 54. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2000 64 55. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 200421 TAAS 56. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 5.89 2.51 40.6 39.76% 26.09/ 10.38 PM10 74.55 g/m3 56g/m3 0.075pg I-TEQ/m3 0.054pg I-TEQ/m3 (As) 2.99 ng/m3 0.96 ng/m3 ; ; ; ; 57. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU Consumption to Loading Ratio) = 1. 58. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2. Su Cumulative Environmental Hazard Inequality Index USEPA 59. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 2020 ECFA - gdp - 60. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU 61. EnvSALab, GIEE, NTU