2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

download 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

of 7

Transcript of 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    1/7

    ANSWER KEY 

    Research and Application 5-34

    1. The income statement on page 50 is prepared using anabsorption format. The income statement on page 33 isprepared using a contribution format. The annual reportsays that the contribution format income statementshown on page 33 is used for internal reporting purposes;nonetheless, Benetton has chosen to include it in theannual report. The contribution format income statementtreats all cost of sales as variable costs. The selling,general and administrative epenses shown on theabsorption income statement have been bro!en down intovariable and "ed components in the contribution formatincome statement.

    #t appears the $istribution and Transport epenses and

    the %ales &ommissions have been reclassi"ed as variableselling costs on the contribution format income statement.

     The sum of these two epenses according to theabsorption income statement on page 50 is '103,5(1 and'11),30* in +00) and +003, respectively. #f thesenumbers are rounded to the nearest thousand, they agreewith the variable selling costs shown in the contributionformat income statements on page 33.

    +. The cost of sales is included in the computation of

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    2/7

    p

     The brea!even point in +00) is lower than in +003because Benettons "ed costs in +00) are lower than in+003 and its contribution margin ratio in +00) is higher

    than in +003.

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    3/7

    Research and Application 5-34 continued2

    ). The target pro"t calculation is as follows

    in millions; "gures are rounded2   2004 Total "ed costs 7 target pro"t......... '3(&ontribution margin ratio.................. 4 0.36%ales needed to achieve targetpro"t.................................................

    '1,*0+

    5. The margin of safety calculations are as follows

    in millions; "gures arerounded2

    2003 2004

    8ctual sales............................ '1,65*

    '1,(6(

    Brea!even sales..................... 1,+)1 1,1+9argin of safety..................... '(16 '55*

     The margin of safety has declined because the drop insales from +003 to +00) '132 eceeds the decrease inbrea!even sales from +003 to +00) '11)2.

    (. The degree of operating leverage is calculated as follows

    in millions; "gures are rounded2   2004

    &ontribution margin............................ '(53#ncome from operations...................... 4 '+1$egree of operating leverage d d2

    3

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    4/7

    operations, the computation could be performed asfollows

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    5/7

    Research and Application 5-34 continued2

    in millions; "gures are rounded2   20048ctual sales.................................................... '+1@ercentage increase in income fromoperations......................................................

    1.16

    @ro/ected income from operations.................. '+5(

    . The income from operations in the "rst scenario would becomputed as follows

    in millions; "gures are rounded2   2004%ales 1,(6( < 1.032................................. '1,3

    &ontribution margin ratio.......................... 0.36&ontribution margin.................................. (+=ied general and administrative

    epenses..................................................

     ))(

    #ncome from operations............................ '++(

     The second scenario is more complicated becausestudents need to brea! the variable selling costs into itstwo componentsA$istribution and Transport and %ales&ommissions. sing the absorption income statement onpage 50, students can determine that %ales &ommissions

    are about ).): of sales '3,53 4 '1,(6(,3512. #f %ales&ommissions are raised to (:, this is a 1.(: increase inthe rate. This 1.(: should be deducted from the

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    6/7

  • 8/18/2019 2009-10-06_033858_5-34_(1)

    7/7

    Research and Application 5-34 continued2

    6. The income from operations using the revised product mi is calculated as follows the

    contribution margin ratios for each sector are given on pages 3( and 3 of the annualreport2

    in millions2Casu

    al

    Sportswear &

    Equipment Manufacturin

    g & Other Total%ales........................... '1,55

    )')5 '6 '1,(6(.

    0&9 ratio...................... 0.)16 0.+06 0.06* D0.3*5

    &9.............................. ' ()*.(

    ' *.) ' . (((.

    =ied costs.................. )3(.0#ncome from

    operations.................' +30.

    D3*.5: is the weighted average contribution margin ratio. Eotice, it is higher than the36.: shown on page 33 of the annual report.

     The income from operations is higher under this scenario because the product mi has

    shifted towards the sector with the highest contribution margin ratioAthe &asual sector.