1- Understanding democratic transitions 2- Typology of transitions 3- Prerequisites and conditions.
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 1- Understanding democratic transitions 2- Typology of transitions 3- Prerequisites and conditions.
• 1- Understanding democratic transitions
• 2- Typology of transitions
• 3- Prerequisites and conditions
• 1- Conceptual issues
• 2- Explaining ‘transition’
• 3- Problems of ‘transition’
1- Conceptual Issues
• ‘Transition’ transition from authoritarian rule
• ‘regime’ formal & informal structure of governmental roles & processes
distinguish b/w regime & Govt = 3 Q
• 1- methods of inauguration?
• 2- formal & informal representative mechanisms?
• 3- patterns of coercion?
• ‘Authoritarian’ a system with significant procedural proscriptions on political contestation or inclusiveness
• ‘Democracy’ “an essentially contested concept”
• Robert Dhal ‘polyarchy’
“Regimes that have been substantiallypopularised and liberalised, that ishighly inclusive and extensively opento public contestation”
Preface to Democracy (1971, 8)
• ‘Liberalisation’
• easing of repression +
• restoration of civil liberties part of a process
liberalisation precedes ‘democratisation’
• ‘Democratisation’ creation of institutions & procedures that allow for all 3 aspects of Dahl’s polyarchy
• Huntington (The Third Wave) :
• Democratisation alternation of power
2- Explaining ‘Transition’
• Complex term = variety of meanings:
• 1- erosion of authoritarianism
• 2- conditions for democratic transitions
• 3- process of democratic regime change
• 4- consolidation of new democracies
• 5-consolidation of ‘established’ democracies
• Concern two decades of inquiry
• Two issues =
• 1- difficulties of dealing with democratic rule
• 2- the nature & causes of its breakdown
context of inquiry
• I. Mid-1960s-early 1970s: breakdown of democratic rule in developing nations (e.g. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay)
• Scholarly attention international constraints obstructing democracy (e.g. dependency) = internal & external forms of political economic domination
• II. Early to late 1970s:
• renewed interest in democratisation (e.g. Portugal, Spain, Greece)
• III. Late 1980s-early 1990s:
• a) democratising trends in long-authoritarian regimes (El Salvador, S/Korea, Guatemala;
• b) breakdown of communism (E. Europe)
3- Problems of Transition
• 1- defining chronological parameters of T
• Three Questions:
• Does it have its roots within the process of transformation of an authoritarian R?
• Does it begin after the fall of such R?
• How do you account for reverses?
• 2- Difficulty of defining its end point:
• Two Questions:
• When democratic procedures, rights and rules of the game have been clearly defined and accepted by elites and citizens?
• Is it complete with the first alternation of power?
Democratisation byregime
Democratisationagainst regime
Consensual Non-consensual
Gradual Rapid ThroughRupture
1- Incrementaldemocratisation
Or2- Protractedrevolutionarystruggle
Transition throughtransaction
1- Coups2- Collapse3- Extrication
1- UK & Sweden2- France (1789) &Nicaragua (1979)
Spain (1975-1978)Chile (1989)Korea (1988)
1-Portugal (1974)2- Germany, Italyand Japan (postWWII)3- Argentina & E.Europe
• Diverse explanations
• Example: Lipset Hypothesis
• “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development & Political Legitimacy”, American Political Science Review 53 (1959), pp. 69-105.
• Dhal agrees economic development expands the range of people with capacities to get involved politically:
• “A modern dynamic pluralist society disperses power, influence, authority and control away from any single centre toward a variety of individuals, groups, associations and organisations”
• R. Dhal, Democracy and its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), p. 252.
• Lipset High level of economic development is a precondition for building and maintaining democracy
• Inquiry focus = pinpoint causes
• International system, class structure, economic performance, political institutions
• New Writings on democracy pay attention to the warning of Dankwart Rustow
• Draws attention to correlation not cause
• Stresses that there is no single road to democracy + history, context
• “Transitions to Democracy,” Comparative Politics 2 (1970)
• 1- Divide in two or three groups
• 2- List what you consider to be essential prerequisites for democratic transition
• 3- Think about culture & external variables
• 4- Apply these requisites to the Middle East in your next tutorial