香港特別行政區政府 Hong Kong SAR Government

1

香港特別行政區政府香港特別行政區政府Hong Kong SAR GovernmentHong Kong SAR Government

Commission on Poverty Commission on Poverty 扶貧委員會扶貧委員會會議會議

二零零七年六月一日二零零七年六月一日1 June 20071 June 2007

2

貧窮指標貧窮指標- - 二零零二零零六六年的最新情況年的最新情況 --

Indicators of PovertyIndicators of Poverty- An Update for 2006 -- An Update for 2006 -

3

二十四個貧窮指標的覆蓋範圍二十四個貧窮指標的覆蓋範圍Scope of the 24 Poverty IndicatorsScope of the 24 Poverty Indicators

• 扶貧委員同意貧窮指標應着眼於下列四個社會組別 CoP agreed that the poverty indicators should focus on the following 4 social groups:1. 兒童／青少年 Children/youth2. 在職人士／成人 Working people/adults3. 長者 Older people4. 社區 Community

• 及涵蓋以下六個範疇 and cover the following 6 areas:1. 入息／收入支援 Earnings / income support2. 就業 Employment3. 教育／培訓 Education / training4. 健康 Health5. 居住環境 Living conditions6. 社區／家庭支援 Community / family support

4

1818 個以人生不同階段為基礎的個以人生不同階段為基礎的貧窮指標的表現貧窮指標的表現

Performance of the Performance of the 18-life-cycle-based poverty indicators18-life-cycle-based poverty indicators

5

以下以下 88 組的組的 1010 個指標有所改善個指標有所改善 8 Groups of 10 Indicators Exhibited Improvements8 Groups of 10 Indicators Exhibited Improvements

• 失業人士 ( 第 11 個指標 ) Unemployed persons (Indicator 11)

• 失業 6 個月或以上及 12 個月或以上的人士 ( 第 12 個指標 ) Persons unemployed for 6 months or longer, and 12 months or longer (Indicator 12)

• 無業家庭 ( 第 1 及第 9 個指標 ) Persons living in workless households (Indicators 1 & 9)

• 入息低於平均綜援金額的家庭的人士 ( 第 2 及第 10 個指標 ) Persons living in households with income below average CSSA payment (Indicators 2 & 10)

• 單親及入息低於平均綜緩金額的家庭的 0 至 5 歲及 6 至 14 歲兒童 ( 第 3 個指標 ) Children aged 0-5 and 6-14 with single parent and in households with income below average CSSA payment (Indicator 3)

• 16 至 19 歲青少年的就學比率 ( 第 5 個指標 ) School attendance rate of youth aged 16-19 (Indicator 5)

• 20 至 24 歲具專上教育程度人士 ( 第 6 個指標 ) Persons aged 20-24 with tertiary education (Indicator 6)

• 公立醫院及診所的醫療收費減免機制下的年長病人 ( 第 17 個指標 ) Elderly patients under the medical fee waiver mechanism of public hospitals and clinics (Indicator 17)

6

以下以下 44 組的組的 88 個指標指標的表現參差個指標指標的表現參差

Different Performance for Different Performance for 4 Groups4 Groups of 8 Indicators of 8 Indicators

7

29.0%

42.7%

36.3%39.9%

33.2%

41.9%

7.0%11.0% 9.1% 9.5% 8.2%

11.9%

6.4% 7.7% 6.3% 6.0% 5.3% 7.2%

10,000 10,000 10,00011,000

10,300 10,500

0

10

20

30

40

50

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

每月就業收入少於中位數每月就業收入少於中位數 50%50% 的全職受僱人士的全職受僱人士 (( 第第 1313 個指標個指標 ))Full time employed persons with monthly employment earnings less tFull time employed persons with monthly employment earnings less than 50% of the median (Indicator 13)han 50% of the median (Indicator 13)

24.7 19.5 21.5 18.8

141.4 140.4

13.811.514.116.412.8 12.4

17.126.4

147.5

178.5

125.5

173.3

0

50

100

150

200

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

( 甲 ) 數目(a) Numbers

( 乙 ) 比例(b) Proportion

(%)

( 千人 Thousand) ($)

15-19 ( 左標線 left scale)20-24 ( 左標線 left scale)25-59 ( 左標線 left scale)收入中位數 (右標線 )Median employment earnings (right scale)

15-1920-2425-59

8

2.4%2.3%

2.8%2.9%

3.6%

4.3%

2.4%2.3%

2.7%2.9%

3.5%4.2%

0

1

2

3

4

5

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

24.023.227.328.3

34.4

41.3

18.718.220.821.5

25.4

29.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006



在私人臨時房屋及私人樓宇共住單位居住的人士在私人臨時房屋及私人樓宇共住單位居住的人士 (( 第第 88 及第及第 1818 個指標個指標 ))Persons living in private temporary housing and private shared uPersons living in private temporary housing and private shared units (Indicators 8 & 18)nits (Indicators 8 & 18)

0-56-14≧60≧65

(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

0-56-14≧60≧65

9

2.3%2.4%

2.5%2.6%

2.5% 2.5%

2.5%

2.3% 2.3%

2.5%

2.6%2.5%

2.1%

2.3%

2.5%

2.7% 2.7% 2.6%

1

2

3

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

11.0 11.2

9.7 10.4

21.5 21.422.521.620.820.3

11.2

9.99.810.8

9.1

11.511.7 11.7

0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006



1515 至至 1919 歲及歲及 2020 至至 2424 歲的待業待學青少年歲的待業待學青少年 (( 第第 77 個指標個指標 ) ) Non-engaged youth aged 15-19 and 20-24 (Indicator 7)Non-engaged youth aged 15-19 and 20-24 (Indicator 7)

(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

總數 Total15-1920-24

總數 Total15-1920-24

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

綜援受助人士綜援受助人士 (( 第第 4, 14, 154, 14, 15 及及 1616 個指標個指標 ) ) CSSA recipients (Indicators 4, 14, 15 & 16)CSSA recipients (Indicators 4, 14, 15 & 16)

0

50

100

150

200

250

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006



兒童 Children健全成人 Able-bodied傷殘 /健康欠佳人士 Disabled/ill health長者 Old-aged


(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

11

1.1 %1.0%1.0 %0.9 %0.9 %0.8 %0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

50.949.847.644.140.335.9

0

50

100

150

200

250

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006






(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

12

0.3 %0.4 %0.5 %0.8 %0.8 %

0.5 %

2.3 %2.5 %2.5 %

2.2 %

1.7 %1.4%

0

1

2

3

4

5

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006


116.5

140.0 142.8 138.4128.2

86.4

0

50

100

150

200

250

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006




≦ 一年 1 year＞一年 1 year

(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

13

8.5 %9.1 %9.3 %8.6 %7.2 %

5.5 %

12.8 %13.6 %13.6 %12.8 %

11.4 %9.4 %

7.6 %7.6 %7.3 %6.5 %5.4 %

4.2 %

0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006


139.7154.7164.0166.9159.1

115.2

0

50

100

150

200

250

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006




0-56-1415-21

(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

14

16.7 %17.3 %17.4 %17.2 %16.6 %

15.8 %

19.0 %19.4 %19.4 %19.3 %18.9 %18.2 %

0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006


170.5187.7184.8179.3

187.8

160.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006




(%)

( 千人 Thousand)

≧60≧65

15

66 個以地區為本的貧窮指標的表現個以地區為本的貧窮指標的表現 Performance of 6 district-based Performance of 6 district-based

poverty indicatorspoverty indicators

16

全港各區普遍均有改善全港各區普遍均有改善 Widespread Improvements across DistrictsWidespread Improvements across Districts

2005 年及 2006 年的貧窮指標比較 A Comparison of the Poverty Indicators between 2005 and 2006

指標 Indicator 19 20 21 22 23 24

無業家庭的比例

Proportion of workless hou

seholds

低收入家庭的比例

Proportion of low-income h

ouseholds

單親低收入家庭的比例

Proportion of single-parent

low-income households

每月家庭入息中位數

Median monthly household inco

me

每月就業收入中位數

Median monthly employmen

t earnings失業率 Unempl

oyment rate

中西區 Central & Western 灣仔 Wan Chai 東區 Eastern 南區 Southern

油尖旺 Yau Tsim Mong 深水埗 Sham Shui Po

九龍城 Kowloon City

黃大仙 Wong Tai Sin 觀塘 Kwun Tong

葵青 Kwai Tsing

荃灣 Tsuen Wan

屯門 Tuen Mun

元朗 Yuen Long 北區 North 大埔 Tai Po 沙田 Sha Tin

西貢 Sai Kung

離島 Islands 總數 Total 9 14 8 13 9 16

17



指標 Indicator 19 20 21 22 23 24



seholds



ouseholds






me




oyment rate





葵青 Kwai Tsing

荃灣 Tsuen Wan

屯門 Tuen Mun


西貢 Sai Kung


18



指標 Indicator 19 20 21 22 23 24



seholds



ouseholds






me




oyment rate





葵青 Kwai Tsing

荃灣 Tsuen Wan

屯門 Tuen Mun


西貢 Sai Kung


19



指標 Indicator 19 20 21 22 23 24



seholds



ouseholds






me




oyment rate





葵青 Kwai Tsing

荃灣 Tsuen Wan

屯門 Tuen Mun


西貢 Sai Kung


20

不同地區的表現參差不同地區的表現參差Mixed Performance for Different DistrictsMixed Performance for Different Districts

• 最高無業家庭的比例 The largest proportion of workless households:元朗 Yuen Long (12.1%) 及深水埗 Sham Shui Po (11.7%)

• 最高低收入家庭的比例 The largest proportion of low income households:元朗 Yuen Long (17.0%) 及屯門 Tuen Mun (15.8%)

• 最高單親低收入家庭的比例 The largest proportion of single parent low income households:元朗 Yuen Long (1.9%) 及屯門 Tuen Mun (1.9%)

• 最低家庭入息中位數 The lowest median household income:深水埗 Sham Shui Po ($13,100) 及元朗 Yuen Long ($13,700)

• 最低就業收入中位數 The lowest median employment earnings:黃大仙 Wong Tai Sin ($9,000) 及葵青 Kwai Tsing ($9,000)

• 最高失業率 The highest unemployment rate:葵青 Kwai Tsing (6.5%) 及北區 North (5.9%)

• 全部六個指標都低於平均表現水平 All the 6 indicators showed below average performance黃大仙 Wong Tai Sin, 葵青 Kwai Tsing, 屯門 Tuen Mun, 元朗 Yuen Long 及北區 North

21

結語結語 Concluding RemarksConcluding Remarks• 編製及更新是一項持續的工作

Compilation and updating is a continual process

• 旨在概括地顯示貧窮情況的變化，可幫助指出值得研究的範疇，從而為政策制訂和檢討提供參考。Provide a broad indication of how the poverty situation evolves over time. By identifying the key areas for more focused study, these indicators provide useful reference in policy formulation and evaluation

• 各決策局及部門在制訂和評估政策時，亦需要同時參考其他相關資料，包括更詳細及具體的地區特定指標、相關的研究和分析，以及諮詢結果等 Bureaux and departments will also draw reference to other relevant information for policy formulation and evaluation, including more detailed and specific indictors at district level, relevant researches and analyses and feedbacks from consultation, etc.

22

謝謝謝謝Thank YouThank You

香港特別行政區政府 Hong Kong SAR Government

Documents

Transcript of 香港特別行政區政府 Hong Kong SAR Government