射频工程基础 Fundamentals of RF Engineering 学时 :60/20 学分 : 3.5 孙利国...
-
Upload
dulce-sharick -
Category
Documents
-
view
402 -
download
6
Transcript of 射频工程基础 Fundamentals of RF Engineering 学时 :60/20 学分 : 3.5 孙利国...
射频工程基础
Fundamentals of RF Engineering
学时 :60/20学分 : 3.5
孙利国中国科技大学信息学院电子工程与信息科学系
教材:以课堂讲义为主。主要参考书:[1]“Microwave and RF Design: A System Approach”, Michael Steer, SciTech Publishing, 2010其它参考书:[2] “ 射频电路设计 - 理论与应用”, Reinhold Ludwig 等著,王子宇等译,电子工业出版社, 2002[3] “ 射频微电子学”,拉扎维著,余志平等译,清华大学出版社, 2006[4] “RF and Microwave Circuit Design for Wireless Communications”, Lawrence Larson, Artech House, 1997[5]” 无线网络 RF 工程:硬件、天线和传播“, Daniel M.Dobkin 著 ,科学出版社 , 2007[6] “Radio Propagation for Modern Wireless System”, Henry L. Bertoni, Prentice Hall PTR, 2000[7]”Microwave and millimeter wave propagation”, Xie Yixi, etal. International Academic Publishers, 1995[8]”Wireless Communications -Principle and Practice”, T.S. Rappaport, Prentice Hall PTR, 2002
第五讲 射频电波传播( Session 5 RF Radio-wave propagatio
n )
“Microwave and RF Design: A System Approach”,
Chapter 2Antenna and RF linkReading: §2.6 to §2.8
Reference
Goal of This Lecture The goal here is to understand propagation in
wireless systems. You will be able to calculate loss in a radio link. You will also develop an understanding of fading and the schemes to overcome it.
Outline• Propagation• Fading
InformationSource
Channel InformationDestination
Three types of wave propagation
When dealing with radio signals, transmission-reception takes 3 types of wave propagation. Space wave: Line of sight (LOS) Ground wave Sky wave
Line of sight (LOS) propagation is very useful in RF frequencies, especially VHF and UHF.
Earth
Ionosphere
Sky-wave
Ground-wave
Space wave: Line of sight
6
Transmitter Receiver
Earth
Sky wave
Space wave
Ground waveTroposphere
(0 - 12 km)
Stratosphere (12 - 50 km)
Mesosphere (50 - 80 km)
Ionosphere (80 - 720 km)
Three types of wave propagation
7
Classification Band
Initials Frequency Range Characteristics
Extremely low ELF < 300 Hz
Ground waveInfra low ILF 300 Hz - 3 kHz
Very low VLF 3 kHz - 30 kHz
Low LF 30 kHz - 300 kHz
Medium MF 300 kHz - 3 MHz Ground/Sky wave
High HF 3 MHz - 30 MHz Sky wave
Very high VHF 30 MHz - 300 MHz
Space waveUltra high UHF 300 MHz - 3 GHz
Super high SHF 3 GHz - 30 GHz
Extremely high EHF 30 GHz - 300 GHz
Tremendously high THF 300 GHz - 3000 GHz
Three types of wave propagation
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Free space - wave travels in a straight line atmospheric absorption (loss) refraction in the atmosphere reflections from the ground
reflected wave
direct (free space) wave
refracted waveTxRx
r
Free Space “Spreading” Loss energy intercepted by the red square is proportional to 1/r2
Free Space Path LossLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
22
2D
T
in
22
2D
2D
4
)(4/)(
)/(PG
by defined is antennaer transmitt theofgain
antenna theinput topower P
antennaer transmitt theof efficiency the
where
antennalossy aFor
antenna thefrompower ed transmittthe
4
)(4/)(
)/(P)(
antennaer transmitt theofy directivit the,definition the toAccording
.)/(P is antenna theofdensity power thed distance aAt
d
GPPD
mdWP
mW
The
the
PP
P
d
DPP
mdWP
mWunitlessD
mW
TinDTT
in
T
inT
T
TTD
T
T
The antenna gain G is the factor by which the power density is increased compared with the isotropic case.
G is very large for antennas used in microwave point-to-point systems 100 (20 dB) to 10,000,000 (70 dB).
Tx Rxd
GR, DR, ηRGT, DT, ηT
Free Space Path Loss
4
20logLossPath
as defined is losspath space free The
)()()(log10log104
20log)P
10log(LLosson Transmissi
bygiven is lossion transmissThe
equation) (Friis 4
P
4P
44P
ispower receivedThen
antennareceiver theofgain theis 4
A
A area effectivean has antenna receiving theIf
,
,R
,
2
R
2
R
2
2DR
2
R
R
dL
dBGdBGdBLGGdP
dGG
PdGGP
Gd
GPAP
DG
GG
LOSPATH
RTLOSPATHRTin
TRLINK
RTin
RTin
RTin
R
RRR
RR
Tx Rxd
GR, DR, ηRGT, DT, ηT
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Free Space Path Loss
Typical path loss: 145 dB for a 50 km link at 10 GHz (high gain antennas help offset loss ~ 60 dB)
Example:Calculate the path loss and Tr. loss for antennas 50 km apart, for a 10 GHz, system with antenna gains of 60 dB Path loss=20log(4x3.14x5x104/(3x10-2))=146 dBTr. Loss=146-60-60=26dB
Tx Rxd
GR, DR, ηRGT, DT, ηT
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
C
fddL
dBGdBGdBL
GGdP
LOSPATH
RTLOSPATH
RTin
TRLINK
420log
420log
losspath space free The
)()()(
log10log104
20log)P
10log(L
Lossion transmissThe
,
,
R,
)(log20)(log205.32
)(log20)(log2098.121)(,
MHzfkmd
cmkmddBL LOSPATH
Example: Radio Link (Transmission Loss
Calculation)
+43 dBm TX output
−3 dB line efficiency= +40 dBm to antenna
+13 dB antenna gain= +53 dBm EIRP
−158 dB path attenuation
=−105 dBm if intercepted by dipole antenna
+13 dB antenna gain= −92 dBm into line
−3 dB line efficiency= −95 dBm to receiver
Receiver
Antenna
Antenna
Trans.Line
Transmitter
Trans.Line
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Typical Cellular Link BudgetSource:
Cell TX PO Watts MS TX PO Watts
Cell TX PO dBM MS TX PO dBm
Cell Combiner Loss dB MS Combiner Loss db
Cell Cable Loss db MS Cable Loss db
Cell Antenna Gain dBd MS Antenna Gain dBd
EIRP Watts EIRP Watts
EIRP dBm EIRP dBm
MS Antenna Gain dBd Cell Antenna Gain dBd
MS RX Cable Loss dB Cell RX Cable Loss
MS Diversity Gain dB Cell Diversity Gain
MS RX Sensitivity dBM Cell RX Sensitivity dBM
FWD Link Budget, dB REV Link Budget, dB
Worst Case Link Budget
Input:
Calc:
Input:
Input:
Input:
Calc:
Calc:
Calc:
Input:
Input:
Input:
Calc:
Calc:
FWD Path
45.00
46.53
-3.00
-3.00
+10.00
113.03
50.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
-105.00
155.53
155.53
-2.00
REV Path
3.00
34.77
0.00
+5.00
5.99
37.77
10.00
-3.00
+4.00
-107.00
155.77
-0.24Imbalance, dB
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Fresnel ZonesLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
As radio waves propagate they spread out. The spreading out is understood from Huygens principle that every point of a propagating EM wave reradiates in every direction.One of the consequences of this is that an obstruction that is not in the LOS path can still interfere with signal propagation.The appropriate clearance is determined from the Fresnel zones.
Tx Rx1st Fresnel Zone
2nd Fresnel Zone
d=d1+d2
d / 2d
d1 d2
plane at right angles to path
Fresnel Zones
Note that path difference between rays at the edge of the 1st and 2nd Fresnel zones is /2
1st Fresnel Zone is the most important zone.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Tx Rx1st Fresnel Zone
2nd Fresnel Zone
d=d1+d2
d / 2d
d1 d2
plane at right angles to path
Fresnel Zones
Huygens principle: different Fresnel zones Z1,Z2,Z3,… Contribution from Fresnel zones Z1,Z2,Z3,…are B1,B2,B3,…
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Fresnel ZonesLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
B1=Contribution from Fresnel zone1 (Z1) B1=2B0
B0=received for free-spaceContribution from Fresnel zone1 is double of the total field for free space.
)0(B 2
B
...2
B)
2
BB
2
B()
2
BB
2
B(
2
B
...2
B
2
BB
2
B
2
BB
2
B
2
B
...BBBBBB
zones. Fresnel all of )(B totalhe
n1
552
332
11
552
332
11
543210
0
SumspacefreeT
Fresnel ZonesLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
21
21nF
Ppoint at zone Fresnelth -n theof radius
dd
dd
The
Example: d1=d2=5kmF1=17.66m at 2.4 GHz
d1 d2
21
211
21
21
21
21
21
2
2
12
2
1
11
2/1
2
2
12
2/1
2
1
11
211
22
21
21
2111
F
2/)11
(2
)11
(2
)2
11()
2
11()1()1(
d,
2/dFdF2/
dd
dd
ddd
Fd
dd
Fdd
d
Fd
d
Fd
d
Fd
d
Fd
dF
ddr
Fresnel ZonesLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Fresnel zones are a number of concentric ellipsoids with TX and RX in focus.Odd-numbered Fresnel zones have relatively intense field strengths, whereas even numbered Fresnel zones are nulls.
Fresnel ZonesLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
If the 1st Fresnel zone is clear, it can be thought as free-space propagation (LOS).If the 1st Fresnel zone is not clear, then free-space loss (LOS) does not apply and an adjustment term must be included. To avoid this :
Use an antenna with a narrower lobe pattern, usually a higher gain antenna will achieve this.Raise the antenna mounting point on TX and/or RX.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Absorption by atmospheric gases Attenuation due to
molecular absorption, for example, water vapour and O2
Important bands at frequencies >10 GHz, especially at 22 GHz (water vapor) and 60GHz (O2)
Atmospheric Absorption (clear air)
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Attenuation due to precipitationsRain: usually at frequency >10GHzSnow, cloud, fog, sand
Atmospheric Attenuation (not clear air)
Atmospheric Absorption
- rainfall (snow/fog)- water vapour (molecular res. at 22 GHz)
- oxygen (molecular res. at 60 GHz)
Typical path loss:140 dB for a 50 km link at 10 GHz(high gain antennas help offset loss ~ 60 dB)
Atmospheric AttenuationLine of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Refraction effect- ray bending Refractive index n of
atmosphere changes with height and temperature
This leads to beam bending . Normally n decreases with
increasing height. n1
n2
n3
n4
n n n n1 2 3 4
beam bending
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
θ2
θ1
n1
n2
y
x 122
1
1
2
2211220110
x2x1
1sin
sin
law) Snell sinsinsinksink
kk
0)(y
zone2 and zone1between interface At the
n
n
nnnn (
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio waves get “bent” downwards.
Be able to propagate beyond the geometric horizon, which extends range.
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
sinn
cos0cosnsin
cosnsinnsinnsin
cosnsinnsin
coscosnsinnsin
)cos)(sinn(
)sin( and 1)cos( that so small very is
)cos)sin()cos()(sinn(
))sin(n(nsin
law Snell the toAccording
dndddn
ddn
ddn
dndddn
ddnright
dddd
dddnright
ddn
cos
AC
cosAC)cos(AC
ABC
AC
curvature of adius
dh
ddh
in
d
R
)dh
1/(1 1sin
2mostly
sindh
n
sinn
cos
dn
n
dndndh
d
dh
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
3 case issituation common most The happen. seldom 2 and 1 ase
00dh
dn
refraction positive.3
case). sexcept thi curve isray (the linestraight isray the:eatomospher niform
0dh
dn
refraction zero .2
00dh
dn
refraction negative 1.
as classified is refraction theray, theof curvature to
dh
11
C
U
According
dn
n
negative refraction zero refraction
positive refraction
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
ducting. examplefor n,propagatio anomalous toleadst
1037.6m 107.15dh
dn
refractionc.super
earth. theof that as same isray theof curvature The earth. theof radius the toequal is
1037.6m 107.15dh
dn
refraction catomosheri critical b.
105.2m 104dh
dn
refraction catomosheri standard a.
casesspecially threeare there,refraction positiveIn dhn
11
71-8
61-8
71-8
I
m
m
m
dn
standard refraction
super refraction
critical refraction
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
ducting. examplefor
/ 157
refractionc.super
/ 157
refraction catomosheri critical b.
/ 40
refraction catomosheri standard a.
10)1( 6
kmunitsN
kmunitsN
kmunitsN
nN
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Earth curvature Radio wave go behind the
geometrical horizon due to refraction :the air refractivity changes with height, temperature, water vapor contents, etc.
In standard conditions the radio wave travels along arc bent slightly downward 。
An equivalent Earth radius Re=K Rearth
is introduced to “makes “the path straight.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
1111
eRR
Except zero refraction, the ray is curve. We can “make” it a straight line by pretending the Earth has a larger radius which we call the equivalent Earth radius Re.
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
RR
RR
RR
e
e
1)
11/(1
1111
dhn11
dn
dhdn
nR
K
RK
dhdn
nRR
R
e
ee
1
1
1 An equivalent Earth radius K Rearth “makes “the path straight. K-factor is a scaling factor of the ray path curvature. K=1 means a straight line. For standard atomsphere K=4/3.
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
equationlinear a isequation Above
line.straight a isray
cos)r
1(cos
cos)r
1(cosr
rcoscosrrcos
shomogeneou is atmosphere theIf
r
cosrnnrcos
eg.
onstantnrcos
is atomsphere layeredy sphericallin law Snell the
ray theory to
radiusearth equivalent of derivationfor nother way
00
00000
0
000
The
h
h
hr
c
According
A
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
cos]rn
)r
1
n(1[
cos)r
1)(n
1(cos
cosrncosrn)r
1)(n
1(
cos)r)(n(nrcos
nn
atmosphere uniform-non is atmosphere theIf
2
0000
000
0000000
00
0
hg
hg
hgh
hgh
hgh
gh
Refraction in the Atmosphere
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
0 e
000
00
0
00
0
0000
r of r earth with equivalent theabove
atomsphere uniform in the linestraight a isray
equation linear a isequation the
cos)1(cos with cos)1(cos
curvaturepath ray theof r
n1
1
r
r1
n
1
cos)1(cos
cos)1(cos])r
1
n(1[cos rh
instead
the
r
h
r
hComparing
factorg
k
radiusearthequivalentkg
r
r
h
r
hh
gIf
e
e
ee
e
e
36
Other Propagation Mechanisms Reflection
Propagation wave impinges on an object which is large as compared to wavelength
- e.g., the surface of the Earth, buildings, walls, etc.
Diffraction Radio path between transmitter and receiver obstructed by surface
with sharp irregular edges Waves bend around the obstacle, even when LOS (line of sight) does
not exist Scattering
Objects smaller than the wavelength of the propagation wave
- e.g. foliage, street signs, lamp posts
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
37
Transmitterd
Receiver
hb
hm
Diffracted Signal
Reflected Signal
Direct Signal
Building
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationOther Propagation Mechanisms
Any object which is half a wavelength ( /2) long can interfere with signal.
/2 = 7.0 in., cellular radio (860 MHz) /2 = 3.2 in., PCS (1.9 GHz)
d
h
r
d
hth
MULTIPATH
ht
d
hrh
MULTIPATH
d
hthr
h
KNIFE-EDGEDIFFRACTION
hthr
h
TREE
SCATTERING
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Other Propagation Mechanisms
Ground Reflections - Path Clearances and Antenna Heights
If the ground is in the 1st Fresnel zone, the ground reflection needs to be considered.
There are two kinds of reflections Smoth surface- specular reflection Rough surface -diffuse reflection
Tx Rxdirect
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Ground Reflections - Path Clearances and Antenna Heights Smoth surface- specular reflection
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
d
HH
dHHdHHd
dHHdHHd
dHHdHHrrr
eEEEE rjk
21
212
212
2/1212
2/1212
2212
221212
121
2
]})/)((2
11[])/)((
2
11{[
}])/)((1[])/)((1{[
)()(
)1(
2
2
2
2
cos)60(sin)60(
cos)60(sin)60(on polarizati vertical
cos)60(sin
cos)60(sinon polarizati horizontalfor
cy.coefficien reflection is
jj
jjfor
j
j
rr
rrH
r
rH
Ground Reflections - Path Clearances and Antenna Heights Smoth surface- specular reflection
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
According to image theory, the ground reflection can be thought as field radiated from image point A’.
The 1st Fresnel zone due to image point A’ is shown in the figure. It is called efficient reflection zone.
Ground Reflections - Path Clearances and Antenna Heights
Rough surface -diffuse reflection
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
hsin2
hsin2sin2sin
h )2cos1(kCC
)2cosCCk(CC)k(CCrk
bygiven is b and aray between difference
2'
''1
'
k
kk
CC
Phase
decreases. field on total reflection ofeffect that theso
occurs reflection diffuse therough, is surface when the
rough as thought is surface the, 8sin
hor 2
smooth as thought is surface the, 8sin
hor 2
hsin2
criterion
when
when
k
Rayleigh
Direct propagation –curvature of the Earth
Propagation: curvature of the Earth is considered.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
))()((12.4)(
refraction catomspheri standard
))()((57.3)(
km 6370R radius
)(2
2 and 2
,R
2)(
2)(
212010
212010
212010
220110
21
222
22220
211
22110
mHmHrrkmr
For
mHmHrrkmr
Earth
HHRrrr
RHrRHr
HHwhen
HRHRHRr
HRHRHRr
zone. shadow-halfin isreceiver the,2.1d75.0when
zone. shadowin isreceiver the,2.1dwhen
zone.bright in isreceiver the,75.0dwhen
distance.ion communicat actual is d If
)H (H antenna ofheight the torelated is d toingcorrespond r
ion.communicatfor distance limited is
00
0
0
2100
0
rr
r
r
and
d
Knife-Edge Diffraction
Sometimes a single well-defined obstruction blocks the path. This case is fairly easy to analyze and can be used as a manual tool to estimate the effects of individual obstructions.
First calculate the parameter from the geometry of the path
Next consult the table to obtain the obstruction loss in db Add this loss to the otherwise-determined path loss to
obtain the total path loss. Other losses such as reflection cancellation still apply,
but computed independently for the path sections before and after the obstruction.
21
112
ddHv
Tx Rxd1 d2
H
Atten.(dB)
0
+5
+10
+15
+20
+25
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-5
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Knife Edge Diffraction Example 1/3
What is the total path loss at 1 GHz?
Tx Rxd1 d2
H5 m
100 m 150 m
AB
• Loss = (Path Loss, no diffraction) + (Diffraction Loss)
• Path Loss (dB) (no diffraction)
= 20 log10 (4d/)
= 20 log10 (4250/
dB
• Diffraction Loss
Atten.(dB)
0
+5
+10
+15
+20
+25
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-5
Use
= -5 sqrt[2/0.3 * (1/100 + 1/150)]= -1.667
Loss = 80.4 + 17.5 = 97.9 dBAdd atmospheric absorption loss to this.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Diff. Loss = 17.5 dB
Atten.(dB)
0
+5
+10
+15
+20
+25
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-5
-1.68
17.5 dB
Diffraction Loss = 17.5 dB
Knife Edge Diffraction Example 2/2Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Effect of mobilityChannel varies with user location and timeRadio propagation is very complex
Multipath scattering from nearby objects Shadowing from dominant objectsAttenuations effects
Results in rapid fluctuations of received power
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Large scale modelPath lossnSlow fading(long term fade)
Small scale model fast fading(short term fade)
49
Signal Strength
(dB)
Distance
Path Loss
Slow Fading (Long-term fading)
Fast Fading (Short-term fading)
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
50
The received signal power:
where Gr is the receiver antenna gain,
L is the propagation loss in the channel, i.e.,
L = LP LS LF
L
PGGP trt
r
Fast fading
Slow fading
Path loss
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
51
Definition of path loss LP
,r
tP P
PL
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
)](log[20)](log[20])/(
4log[20
)]()()/(
4log[20
420log(dB) L
as defined is losspath space free The
PF
kmdMHzfuskmC
kmdMHzfuskmC
d
Path Loss in Free-space:
52
dBdBI
dBdBF
kmdMHzfdBLPF
45.32)(L 1kmd and 1MHzf f
45.32)(L 1kmd and 1MHzfor
)(log20)(log2045.32)(
PF
PF
1010
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
)](log[20)](log[2045.32
)](log[20)](log[20]3.0
4log[20)(
skm/ 3.0/103
)](log[20)](log[20])/(
4log[20)(
8
kmdMHzf
kmdMHzfdBL
smC
kmdMHzfskmC
dBL
PF
PF
Path Loss in Free-
space:
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
d
d
mW
Wddbmd
or
d
ddd
dGGPd
d
dGGPd
RTin
RTin
00RR
2
00RR
2
00R
0
2
R
log201
))((Plog10 )(P
)(P)(P
4)(P
point referencepower receivedknown a as
used is d distancein -close a modelsn propagatio scale-largeIn zero. benot can
4)(P
space freeIn
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
er. transmitt the tocloset measuremen from determined is which distance referencein -close theisd
distance, with increase losspath heat which t rate theindicatehich exponent w losspath theis
log10)()(
)()(
:losspath scale-large average The
0
00
00
n
d
dndBPLdBPL
or
d
ddPLdPL
n
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Most radio propagation models are derived using a combination of analytical and empirical methods. Both theoretical and measurement-based propagation models indicate that average received signal power decreases logarithmically with distance, whether in outdoor or indoor radio channelLong distance path loss model is as following
55
In general a simplest Formula is given:
where
d : distance between transmitter and receiver
α and β : propagation constants which are determined experimentally for different environments
β : value of 2 for free space
value of 3 ~ 4 in typical urban area
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
dLp
17 March 1999 Radio Propagation56
Value of characterizes different environments
Environment Exponent
Free Space 2Urban area 2.7-3.5Shadowed urban area 3-5Indoor LOS 1.6-1.8Indoor no LOS 4-6
Rappaport, Table 3.2, pp. 104
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Reflection with Partial Cancellation
Analysis: physics of the reflection cancellation
predicts signal decay approx. 40 db per decade of distance
twice as rapid as in free-space! observed values in real systems
range from 30 to 40 db/decade
TX EIRPDBM
HTFT HTFT
DMILES
Comparison of Free-Space and Reflection Propagation ModesAssumptions: Flat earth, TX EIRP = 50 dBm, @ 870 MHz. Base Ht = 200 ft, Mobile Ht = 5 ft.
FS Link Loss Free-SpaceDBMFS Link Loss using ReflectionDBM
DistanceMIL
ES -45.3-69.0
1-51.4-79.2
2-55.3-89.5
4
-57.4
-95.4
6
-63.4
-99.7
8
-65.4-103.0
10
-68.9-109.0
15
-71.4-113.2
20
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Pass Loss in a Mobile System
Power of a signal drops off as 1/Dn
n ranges from 2 to 4 n = 4 dense urban area n = 3 suburban area n = 2 rural area
(dBm)
StrengthSignalReceived
0 4 16 20 24 28 32128
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
-110
-120
Distance from cell site (km)
SignalMeasured
Free-Space 20 dB per decade of distance
Reflection Cancellation 40 dB per decade of distance
Real-life cellular propagation decay rates are typically somewhere between 30 and 40 dB per decade of distance.
F = 1900 MHz TowerHeight
(meters)
EIRP(watts)
Range(km)
Dense Urban 30 200 1.05Urban 30 200 2.35Suburban 30 200 4.03Rural 50 200 10.3
Example:
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Outdoor propagation modelsThere are lots of out-door models to predict signal strength at a particular receiving point or in a specific local area. The methods vary widely in their approach, complexity, and accuracy.Okumura’s model is one of the most widely used models for signal prediction in urban areas. The more common form is a curve fitting of Okumura’s original results, which is called Okumura-Hata model.
61
Urban area:
where
Suburban area:
Open area:
)(log)(log55.69.44
)()(log82.13)(log16.2655.69)(
1010
1010
kmdmh
mhmhMHzfdBL
b
mbcPU
citymediumsmallfor
MHzfformh
MHzfformh
cityelforMHzfmhMHzf
mh
cm
cm
cmc
m &,400,97.4)(75.11log2.3
200,1.1)(54.1log29.8
arg,8.0)(log56.1)(7.0)(log1.1
)(2
10
210
1010
4.528
)(log2)()(
2
10
MHzfdBLdBL c
PUPS
94.40)(log33.18)(log78.4)()( 102
10 MHzfMHzfdBLdBL ccPUPO
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Okumura-Hata Model
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Okumura-Hata Model
Path loss in decreasing order: Urban area (large city) Urban area (medium and small
city) Suburban area Open area
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
indoor propagation models
Indoor models are less generalized Environment
comparatively more dynamic Significant
features are physically smaller
Shorter distances are closer to near-field
More clutter, scattering, less LOS
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Indoor propagation modelsPhysical effects:
Signal decays much fasterCoverage contained by walls, etc.Walls, floors, furniture attenuate/scatter radio signalsPeople moving around:
Path loss formula:
onModificatid
dndBPLdBPL
0
0 log10)()(
Fading The result of variation (with time)
of the amplitude or relative phase, or both, or one or more of the frequency components of the signal.
Cause: changes in the characteristics of the propagation path with time.
There are slow fading and fast fading
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
66
Signal Strength
(dB)Distance
Path Loss
Slow Fading (Long-term fading)
Fast Fading (Short-term fading)
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
67
Area-mean power (pass loss) is determined by path loss is an average over 100 m - 5 km
Local-mean power (slow fading) is caused by local 'shadowing' effects has slow variations is an average over 40 λ (few meters)
Instantaneous power (fast fading) fluctuations are caused by multipath reception depends on location and frequency depends on time if antenna is in motion has fast variations (fades occur about every half a wave length)
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
68
Slow Fading The long-term variation in the mean level is known as slow
fading(shadowing or log-normal fading). This fading caused by shadowing. Example of Shadow: Local obstacles cause random shadow attenuation
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
69
Slow Fading The long-term variation in the mean level is known as slow fading
(shadowing or log-normal fading). Received power in dB follows normal distribution. Log-normal distribution:
- The pdf of the received signal level is given in decibels by
where M is the true received signal level m in decibels, i.e., 10log10m, M is the area average signal level, i.e., the mean of M,
is the standard deviation in decibels
,2
1 2
2
2
MM
eMp
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
70
Log-normal Distribution
MM
2
p(M)
The pdf of the received signal level
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
71
Fast Fading The signal from the transmitter may be reflected from objects such
as hills, buildings, or vehicles. When MS far from BS, the envelope distribution of received signal is
Rayleigh distribution. The pdf is
where is the standard deviation. Middle value rm of envelope signal within sample range to be satisfied by
We have rm = 1.777
0,2
2
22
rer
rpr
.5.0)( mrrP
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
72
The pdf of the envelope variation
r
2 4 6 8 10
P(r)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
=1
=2
=3
Rayleigh Distribution
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
73
Proof of Rayleigh Distribution
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
There are many objects in the environment that scatter the radio signal.
If the electric field is divided into Ex and Ey, the total fields as superposition of scattering field are given by
N
iyiy
N
ixix
EE
EE
1
1
If there are sufficiently much scatters, the Ex and Ey obey Gauss distribution respectively according to the central limit theorem.
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
74
Rayleigh Distribution
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
PDF of Ex and Ey are given by
)2
exp(2
1)(
)2
exp(2
1)(
2
2
2
2
y
yg
xxg
y
x
E
E
Because Ex and Ey are independent with each other, the joint PDF is
)2
exp(2
1),(
2
22
2 , yx
yxgyx EE
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
75
Rayleigh Distribution
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
PDF of E is given by
22yx EEE
The magnitude ( envelop) of the field is defined as
)2
exp(1)2
exp()2
exp(2
1
)2
exp(2
1)()(
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
02
2
2
2
22
222
Rrdrrd
r
dxdyyx
REPRF
RR
Ryx
E
The probability of E<R is
x
y
Rφ
)2
exp()(
)(2
2
2 xx
x
xdFxg E
E
It is Rayleigh distribution
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
76
Fast Fading (Continued) When there is a dominant stationary(no fading) signal
component (direct signal), the envelope distribution of received signal is Ricean distribution. The pdf is
where is the standard deviation,
I0(x) is the zero-order Bessel function of the first kind, is the amplitude of the direct signal
0,02
2
2
22
rr
Ier
rpr
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
77
Ricean Distribution
r
p(r)
r86420
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
= 2
= 1
= 0 (Rayleigh)
= 1
= 3
The pdf of the envelope variation
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
78
Characteristics of Instantaneous Amplitude Level Crossing Rate:
Average number of times per second that the signal envelope crosses the level (some threshold) in positive going direction.
Fading Rate: Number of times signal envelope crosses middle
value in positive going direction per unit time. Depth of Fading:
Ratio of mean square value and minimum value of fading signal.
Fading Duration: Time for which signal is below given threshold.
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
79
Doppler Effect: When a wave source and a receiver are moving towards each other, the frequency of the received signal will not be the same as the source. When they are moving toward each other, the frequency of the received signal is higher
than the source. When they are opposing each other, the frequency decreases.
Thus, the frequency of the received signal is
where fC is the frequency of source carrier,
fD is the Doppler frequency. Doppler Shift in frequency:
where v is the moving speed, is the wavelength of carrier.
C
vf
vf CD
coscos
DCR fff
MS
Signal
Moving speed v
Doppler Shift
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
80
Moving Speed Effect
Time
V1 V2 V3 V4
Sig
nal s
tren
gth
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
81
Delay Spread When a signal propagates from a transmitter to a
receiver, signal suffers one or more reflections. This forces signal to follow different paths. Each path has different path length, so the time of
arrival for each path is different. This effect which spreads out the signal is called
“Delay Spread”.
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
82
Delay Spread
Delay
Sig
nal S
tren
gth
The signals from close by reflectors
The signals from intermediate reflectors
The signals from far away reflectors
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
83
Intersymbol Interference (ISI) Caused by time delayed multipath signals Has impact on burst error rate of channel Second multipath is delayed and is received
during next symbol For low bit-error-rate (BER)
R (digital transmission rate) limited by delay spread d.
dR
21
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
84
Intersymbol Interference (ISI)
Time
Time
Time
Transmission signal
Received signal (short delay)
Received signal (long delay)
1
0
1
Propagation timeDelayed signals
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
85
Coherence Bandwidth
Coherence bandwidth Bc: Represents correlation between 2 fading signal
envelopes at frequencies f1 and f2. Is a function of delay spread. Two frequencies that are larger than coherence
bandwidth fade independently. Concept useful in diversity reception
Multiple copies of same message are sent using different frequencies.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
86
Cochannel Interference Cells having the same frequency interfere with each other. rd is the desired signal
ru is the interfering undesired signal is the protection ratio for which
rd ru (so that the signals interfere the least)
If P(rd ru ) is the probability that rd ru ,
Cochannel probability Pco = P(rd ru )
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Fixed Wireless System: Due to rapidly changing atmosphere
with small regions of different values of refractive index.
Varies over a few seconds.
Mobile Wireless System:• Principally due to movement of mobile
terminal unit or moving reflect objects.• Slow variations come from blockage
and shadowing by large objects such as hills and buildings as for fixed wireless systems.
• Time interval between fades depends on speed.
Rayleigh Fading• Named after the statistical model
that describes it.• Due to cancellation resulting from
individual paths drifting in and out of phase.
• Varies over distances of roughly /2 apart. Amplitude
Time
10-15 dB
Line of Sight (LOS) PropagationRadio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Diversity Techniques Multipath fading is minimised by using
Diversity Techniques Many different methods for diversity. Major diversity methods:
Frequency signal transmitted at 2 or more frequencies.
Space 2 spaced Rx antennas used.
Polarization two antenna polarizations (not very effective because
the paths are still similar).
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Space DiversityMethod for Combating Rayleigh Fading
Fortunately, Rayleigh fades are very short and last a small % of the time Two antennas separated by several wavelengths generally will not fade
concurrently. Switch instant-by-instant to whichever is best. Required separation D for good decorrelation is 10-20 12-24 ft. @ 800 MHz, 5-10 ft. @ 1900 MHz. Space Diversity can be applied only on the receiving end of a link. On the downlink the only way to overcome fading (in TDMA and narrow
band CDMA) is to boost the transmit power by 10–15 dB.
Signal received by Antenna 1
Signal received by Antenna 2
Combined Signal
D
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Coding Technologies that Overcome Multipath Fades
OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access)In OFDM a channel is subdivided in frequency and independent bit streams transmitted in each subchannel. Rapid fading tends to affect only a portion of the channel and so only a fraction of the symbols are affected by multipath. In commercial wireless OFDM investigations the total spectrum utilized is a small fraction of the operating frequency.
Wideband CDMA (WCDMA)Fades tend to have an instantaneous bandwidth of ½ MHz independent of the carrier frequency. In CDMA the information is spread out of the operating bandwidth. The bandwidth of WCDMA is around 5 MHz and with error correcting codes the bit errors due to the 10% loss due to fading can be recovered.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Space-Time Coding (for combating fading)
Space-time coding techniques exploit the presence of multiple transmit antennas to improve performance on multipath radio channels. Commercial space-time modulation methods use accurate channel estimates at the receiver.The information is transmitted by two or more antennas using different codes but at the same frequency. The terminal unit has one but preferably two or more receive antennas. The antenna sets (Tx and Rx) can be as little as λ/2 apart and yet we can overcome fading.
D
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Radio Link: Reciprocity in Cellular?
Between two antennas, on the same exact frequency, path loss is the same in both directions
But things aren’t exactly the same in cellular -- Different transmit and receive frequencies. antenna: gain/frequency slope different Rayleigh fades up/downlink often, different TX & RX antennas RX diversity
Notice also the noise/interference environment may be substantially different at the two ends.
-148.21 db@ 870.03 MHz
-148.21 db@ 870.03 MHz
-151.86 db@ 835.03 MHz
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Propagation AnalysisWhat is needed, and when?
Initial System Planning how many cells required?
statistical models for average propagation, along with traffic and link budget requirements
actual measurement data for example sites to fine-tune models number of cells is whatever needed for coverage & capacity
Cell Planning, Frequency Planning, Interference Planning where should the site(s) be placed?
propagation software tool: coverage, interference analysis possible test measurements for specific
problem sites Ongoing Growth Planning, Interference Control
example: what can I do to solve the interference along the highway?
test measurements propagation software tool iterative interactive changes to frequency plan, cell configuration
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Statistical Propagation Model
Power of a signal drops off as 1/Dn
n ranges from 2 to 4 n = 4 dense urban area n = 3 suburban area n = 2 rural area
SignalMeasured
(dBm)
StrengthSignalReceived
dB V/mStrengthField
0 4 16 20 24 28 32128
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
-110
-120
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Distance from cell site (km)Okumura-HataPropagation Model
Deterministic Propagation Prediction Models:Use of terrain data for construction of path profilePath analysis (ray tracing) for obstruction, reflection analysis.Commonly-required Inputs:Frequency , Station Height , Distance , Obstacle Height , Geometry , Separation ,Radius of first Fresnel zone , Forest/Roof Height , Loss allowances based on: land use; building/vehicle penetration
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Statistical Propagation Models : Okumura-Hata Model
A (dB) = 69.55 + 26.16 log (F) – 13.82 log(H) + (44. 9 – 6.55 log(H) )*log (D) + C
Where:AFDHC
C
=====
=
Path lossFrequency in MHz Distance between base station and terminal in kmEffective height of base station antenna in mEnvironment correction factor
0 dB- 5 dB
- 10 dB- 17 dB
====
Dense UrbanUrbanSuburbanRural
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Statistical Propagation Models
Walfisch-Ikegami Model
Useful in dense urban environments, but often superior to other methods in this environment.
Based on “urban canyon” assumption a “carpet” of buildings divided into
blocks by street canyons Uses diffraction and reflection
mechanics and statistics for prediction Input variables relate mainly to the
geometry of the buildings and streets
Useful for two distinct situations: macro-cell - antennas above building
rooftops micro-cell - antennas lower than most
buildings© 2009 by Remcom, Inc. Used with permission.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Practical Application of Distribution Statistics Technique:
use a model to predict RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indication)
compare measurements with model
obtain median signal strength obtain standard deviation now apply correction factor to obtain
field strength required for desired probability of service
Applications: Given a desired signal level the standard deviation of signal
strength measurements a desired percentage of locations
which must receive that signal level
We can compute a “cushion” in dB which will give us that % coverage
RSSI, dBm
Distance
10% of locations exceed this RSSI
50%90%
Percentage of Locations where Observed RSSI exceeds Predicted RSSI
Median Signal Strength ,
dB
Occurrences
RSSI
Normal Distribution
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Statistical TechniquesExample of Application of Distribution Statistics
Suppose you want to design a cell site to deliver at least -95 dBm to at least 90% of the locations in an area
Measurements you’ve made have a 10 db. standard deviation above and below the average signal strength
On the chart: to serve 90% of possible
locations, we must deliver an average signal strength 1.29 standard deviations stronger than -95 dbm
-95 + ( 1.29 x 10 ) = -82 dbm
Design for an average signal strength of -82 dbm!
Cumulative Normal Distribution
Standard Deviations from Median (Average) Signal Strength
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Deterministic Propagation Prediction Models
Based on deterministic methods use of terrain data for construction of path profile path analysis (ray tracing) for obstruction, reflection analysis appropriate algorithms applied for best compliance with radio physics.
Commonly-required Inputs: Frequency, Distance from transmitter to receiver, Effective Base Station
Height Obstacle Height & Geometry, Radius of the first Fresnel zone, Forest
Height / Roof Height , Distance between buildings, Arbitrary loss allowances based on land use (forest, water, etc.), Arbitrary loss allowance for penetration of buildings/vehicles
© 2009 by Remcom, Inc. Used with permission.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Propagation in a Rural Area
© 2009 by Remcom, Inc. Used with permission. Calculated using Wireless Insight®.
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Propagation in an Urban Area
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Propagation: Indoor
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Propagation: Diffraction
Line of Sight (LOS) Propagation
Radio Propagation in Mobil Communication
Free Space Communications
3–30 kHz VLF Long distance, low fading, military& Navigation.
Earth-ionosphere waveguide (sky wave).
30–300 kHz LF LW band, small fadinghigh atmospheric noise.
Ground Wave, some sky wave. 300 kHz–3 MHz MF MW band, more fading , less a
atmospheric noise. Ground wave & sky wave. 3–30 MHz HF Fading severe, less noise, 3-6 MHz
continental, 6-30 intercontinental mobile land comms. Sky wave
30–300 MHz VHF Line-of-sight VHF links, fading problems. Space Wave.
300 MHz–3 GHzUHF Line-of-sight, fading a problem. Space wave + scatter wave.
3–30 GHz SHF Line-of-sight, satellite links, radio relay, atmospheric absorption at higher
frequencies. Space wave. 30–300 GHz EHF Line-of-sight. Satellite links, local
distribution networks.Atmospheric absorption is a problem.
RF Link and Calculations
Diversity Techniques for overcoming fading.
Propagation Fading, Diffraction, Refraction, Scattering
Summary
1. A transmitter and receiver operating at 2 GHz are at the same level, but the direct path between them is blocked by a building and the signal must diffract over the building for a communication link to be established. This is a classic knife-edge diffraction situation. The transmit and receive antennas are separated from the building by 4 km and the building is 20 m higher than the antennas (which are at the same height). Consider that the building is very thin. It has been found that the path loss can be determined by considering loss due to free-space propagation and loss due to diffraction over the knife edge.(a) What is the additional attenuation (in decibels) due to diffraction?(b) If the operating frequency is 100 MHz, what is the attenuation (in decibels) dueto diffraction?(c) If the operating frequency is 10 GHz, what is the attenuation (in decibels) dueto diffraction?
2. A transmit antenna and a receive antenna are separated by 10 km.(a) What is the radius of the first Fresnel zone?(b) What is the radius of the second Fresnel zone?(c) To ensure LOS propagation, what should the clearance be from the direct linebetween the antennas and obstructions such as hills and vegetation?
Exercises