翻譯中的思想分途: 晚清梁啟超、嚴復與章炳麟所譯社會學之研究

Click here to load reader

download 翻譯中的思想分途: 晚清梁啟超、嚴復與章炳麟所譯社會學之研究

of 76

description

翻譯中的思想分途: 晚清梁啟超、嚴復與章炳麟所譯社會學之研究. 黃克武 中央研究院近代史研究所. 前言. 翻譯研究的歷史轉向 晚清翻譯史的特點 晚清「社會」與「群」的競爭,以及 「社會學」緣起. 甚麼是翻譯?. 為了溝通,而將一種文字轉變為另一種文字。 『 化 』 的功夫 字典 原著中心論:翻譯原文的重現,與原文相同、相似便好,不相似便壞。 翻譯的標準:信達雅(嚴復),翻譯界的金科玉律(郁達夫)。. 譯者易也. 翻譯者即背叛者 (義大利諺語 Tradutore, traditor 」) 信達雅之困難(天演論是達旨而非筆譯) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 翻譯中的思想分途: 晚清梁啟超、嚴復與章炳麟所譯社會學之研究

  • Tradutore, traditorWillard Van Orman Quine, 1908-2000indeterminacy of translation incommensurabilitymiddle zone

  • 1902

  • 1904-5 1904-0550A History of Politicssociety

  • 1902-3 190319021895-19192006

  • (, 1896)

    Spencer, The Study of Sociology 1903

  • First Edition

  • 6000 1908191910

  • Takebe Tongo, 1871-1945

  • 1902Franklin Giddings, 1855-19311898

  • 1907 A History of Politics 18981903

  • : great man theory

  • Yan introduced Spencers criticism of the great man theory:you must admit that the genesis of the great man depends on the long series of complex influences which has produced the race in which he appears, and the social state into which that race has slowly grown. If it be a fact that the great man may modify his nation in its structure and actions, it is also a fact that there must have been those antecedent modifications constituting national progress before he could be evolved. Before he can re-make his society, his society must make him. So that all those changes of which he is the proximate initiator have their chief causes in the generations he descended from. If there is to be anything like a real explanation of these changes, it must be sought in that aggregate of conditions out of which both he and they have arisen. (pp.34-35) (p.27)

  • 18214323

  • :: determinismvoluntarism

  • ()

  • 18

  • : 18971898Our need of it*

  • objective difficulties subjective states p. 69. 1946

  • .335-337

  • 2005

  • :

  • extreme parties:[1]Thus, the theory of progress disclosed by the study of Sociology as science, is one which greatly moderates the hopes and the fears of extreme parties. After clearly seeing that the structures and actions throughout a society are determined by the properties of its units, and that (external disturbances apart) the society cannot be substantially and permanently changed without its units being substantially and permanently changed, it becomes easy to see that great alterations cannot suddenly be made to much purpose. [1] 362

  • sociology

  • Japanese tr. of Spencer Representative GovernmentWhat is it Good For? (1857). (1878)(1883)(1890)

    Social StaticsPrinciples of SociologyPrinciples of Morality[]First Principle[]

  • 1902-03

  • 19032201211 :

  • 38-39

  • 38,391903128

  • :

  • 1904()(Kaneko Kentaro,1853-1942)(Mori Arinori,1847-1889) 1892823:

  • Kaneko and Mori

  • Society190450

  • Hofstadter 1903-4

  • Progress: Its Law and CauseManners and Fashion 1898 1898

  • It takes in not so much the reality of progress as its accompanimentsnot so much the substance as the shadow.

  • 1900

  • 1902 1902

  • F. H. Giddings, 1855-19311859-19121874-1946

  • 1902

  • Kishimotos book

  • []

  • ---

  • 1906 1907 1910: 1915

  • Compromise

  • 1910

  • compromise

  • [1]For it cannot be too emphatically asserted that this policy of compromise, alike in institutions, in actions, and in beliefs, which especially characterizes English life, is a policy essential to a society going through the transitions caused by continued growth and development. The illogicalities and the absurdities to be found so abundantly in current opinions and existing arrangements, are those which inevitably arise in the course of perpetual re-adjustments to circumstances perpetually changing.[2] [1] 358[2] Herbert Spencer, The Study of Sociology, p. 396.

  • 1914

  • 1917

  • John Morley, 1838-1932On Compromise2Yet we must not press this argument, and the state of feeling that belongs to it, further than they may be fairly made to go. The danger in most natures lies on this side, for on this side our love of ease works, and our prejudices. The writer in the passage we have just quoted is describing compromise as a natural state of things, the resultant of divergent forces. He is not professing to define its conditions or limits as a practical duty. (Morley, On Compromise, pp. 204-205)

  • 1917815Arthur Christensen, 1875-1945

  • 19171918Peter Kropotkin, 1842-1921Rudolf Christoph Eucken, 1846-1926Henri Bergson, 1859-1941