محاضرة تمهيدية في إعداد و تحليل المطالبات الزمنيةEot

هشام عبد الخالق. د.أ

أستاذ هندسة و إدارة التشد

جامعة االسكندرة -كلة الهندسة

Lecture Contents

Types of Contracts.

FIDIC Claims, Dispute and Arbitration.

Types of Claims.

Claims Life Cycle.

Claim Analysis

Case Study

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

Classified by Method of Evaluating Contract Cost.

(تصنف حسب تقم التكلفة)

Classified by Method of Bidding.

(تقم حسب طرقة الطرح)

Special Contracts

Contract types according to Contract Cost1. Fixed Price Contracts عقود السعر الثابت

a) Lump Sum / Stipulated Price

b) Unit Price / Bill of Quantity (BOQ)

c) Fixed Price with Escalation / Price Adjustable

Day one Dollar one Escalation (Inflation)

Significant Increase Escalation

Delay Escalation

Escalation can be measured by

Index formula

Percentage

Contract types according to Contract Cost2. Cost Reimbursement Contracts عقود التكلفة المستردة

Sometimes called Cost Plus or Prim Cost

a) Cost Plus Fee

b) Cost Plus Percentage

c) Cost Plus percentage with guaranteed maximum

d) Cost plus percentage with guaranteed. max. with bonus

e) Cost Plus target

Contract types according to Method of Bidding

Competitive Contracts

Negotiated Contracts

Combination between Comptetivness and Negotiation

Special Contracts Partnering Contracts

PPP Contracts

Package Contract

Turnkey Contract

Continuous Contract

Serial Contract

Running Contract

Service/maintenance Contract

FIDIC “ Claims, Disputes and Arbitration ”

9

Prof. Dr. Hisham Abd Elkhalek

Contracting

1987فيديك (53)وفق البند املطالبـات

10

نشـأة

المطالبـة

هـل ارسـل المقـاول اخطار الى المهندس

وما من حدوث 28بنته فى المطالبة خـالل

سـبب المطالبة

نهـاية المطالبـة

اصدار المهندس قراره

بمستحقات المقـاول بعـد االطالع على السجـالت

التفصله واخطار المقاول به

مع ارسال صـورة الى رب العـمل

ال تتجـاوز مستحـقات المقاول المبلغ

حـدده المهندس أو أى محكم الذى

هـل أرسل

وما 28المقاول خالل

اخرى او مدة

قبلها المهندس حسابا

تفصلا بالمبالغ المطلوبة

ال

ال

نعم

نعم

Contracting

1987فيديك االحمرمن الكتاب 67وفق البند حل المنازعات الناجمه فى مشروع التشييد

11

احالة الخالف الى المهندس كتابة وإرسال صورة الى الطرف االخر

مع االستمرار فى العمل1/ 67وفقا للبند

قراره المهندسأصدر تارخ االحالة ؟ وما من 84خالل

تسلم اخطارات بذلك

لكل من رب العمل والمقاول اخطار الطرف االخر بنة

اللجوء الى التحكم واخطار المهندس

على هل وجد اعتراض

قرار المهندس خالل

وما من تارخ 70

التسلم

إجراء محاوالت التسوة الودة

وما من تارخ اإلخطار 56خالل

الودة هـل نجحت التسوهتم تنفـذ قرار هـل

المهنـدس؟

نشــوب خــالف

اللجوء الى التحكيم

حسم الخـالف

ال

نعمنعم

نعم

الال

20بند رقم فـض المنازعـــات

12

وقوع الحدث المنشأ للمطالبة

إعداد مذكرة تفصلة

وما من 42خالل

علمه أو وجوب علمه

هل تقدم

بمطالبةالمقاول

وما 28خالل

حقلس للمقاول

له ف أة

تعوضات مدة

أو تكلفة

المهندس رد

أخرى وما 42خالل

عرض األمر

عل مجلس

فض المنازعات

هل توصل

المجلس إل قرار

وما 84خالل

خطر الطرف

المتضرر الطرف

اآلخر برغبته

ف اللجوء إل التحكم

وما 28خالل

هل ارتض الطرفان

محاولة التسوة الودـة

من تارخ القرار وما 56خالل

هل نجحت التسوة

اللجوء إل التحكم

هل ارتض

الطرفان القرار

تمت تسوة

نعمالنزاع

ال

ال

ال

نعم

نعم

نعم

نعم

ال

ال

ال

نعم

1999فيديك

20بند رقم فـض المنازعـــات

13

وقوع الحدث المنشأ للمطالبة

إعداد مذكرة تفصلة

وما من 42خالل

علمه أو وجوب علمه

هل تقدم

بمطالبةالمقاول

وما 28خالل

حقلس للمقاول

له ف أة

تعوضات مدة

أو تكلفة

المهندس رد

أخرى وما 42خالل

عرض األمر

عل مجلس

فض المنازعات

هل توصل

المجلس إل قرار

وما 84خالل

خطر الطرف

المتضرر الطرف

اآلخر برغبته

ف اللجوء إل التحكم

وما 28خالل

هل ارتض الطرفان

محاولة التسوة الودـة

من تارخ القرار وما 56خالل

هل نجحت التسوة

اللجوء إل التحكم

هل ارتض

الطرفان القرار

تمت تسوة

نعمالنزاع

ال

ال

ال

نعم

نعم

نعم

نعم

ال

ال

ال

نعم

1999فيديك

التحكيم الدولى فى المنازعات

Contracting 14

Inst

itu

tio

nal

A

rbit

rati

on

التحكيــــم :

غرف من غرفة أي ف الصادرة القواعد أحد تكون التحكم قواعد

. التحكم قوانن من قانون ألي طبقا أو التحكم

المحكمن تعن .

التحكم إجراءات .

15Contracting

Contracting 16

غرفة التجارة الدولة(ICC)

هئة التحكم األمركة(AAA)

محكمة لندن للتحكم التجارى الدولى(LCIA)

مركز القاهرة اإلقلمى للتحكم التجارى الدولى(CRCICA)

منظمة التجارة العالمة(WTO)

بنك التسوات الدولى(BIS)

هيئات التحكيم الدولية

Dr. Hesham Abdelkhalek 17

Delay Event

Types of Delay


Types of Delays and Responsibility

YesNO

Life cycle of construction claims

1. Claim identification

2. Claim notification

3. Claim examination

4. Claim documentation

5. Claim presentation

6. Claim negotiation

Claim Identification

Construction claim identification involves the accurate detection of a construction claim in time. This is the critical and important stage of the claim process.

For example, some very strong deserved construction claims are lost solely due to failure of identifying them.

Claim Notification

Construction claim notification means alerting the other party of a potential problem in a manner that is non adversarial.

This alert (notification) must be done with the Time limit that is mentioned in the contract.

Claim Examination

Construction claim examination means to establish the legal and factual basis on which the claim is to be developed.

This stage involves also an accurate estimation of the potential recovery.

This action has to be investigated by interviewing the staff who will be working in the project. The primary sources for claim examination could deal with project files, video footage, memos, etc., that must be used to prove the time and cost elements of the claim.

Claim Documentation

Construction claim documentation is the collection of the hard facts that give the actual history of a construction claim. A well-prepared defendant quickly demolishes evidence and claim costs that are not supported by accurate records.

The documented facts are the clue that holds the legal framework together. If these are insufficient the claim will not stick.

Claim Presentation

Construction claim presentation should be logically built up, well organized, and factually convincing. Thus, a claim should be written in a format that emphasizes the fact that a contract requirement is breached.

A contractor must then demonstrate the resulting harms which are caused by the owners’ acts. (Cox 1997) has fittingly said that presentation preferred to be separated into two, the entitlement and the quantum.

The former section should have the legal and factual basis while the later should provide the estimated recovery of the claim.

Claim Negotiation

According to (Easton 1989) a structured and proper negotiation preparation includes: ascertaining that all information is current and complete; minimizing the scope of negotiation beforehand so that

insignificant points should not precipitate a violent argument and disrupt progress;

knowing one’s weaknesses and trying to utilize weak points by conceding them in return from the other party;

foreseeing problems; and Anticipating the opposition’s next move. There is a saying that ‘‘it is more important to be prepared

than to be right”

Categories of Delay Analysis


Time Impact Analysis – Snapshot Analysis


Time Impact Analysis – Window Analysis


As-Planned versus As-BuiltThis method aims to compare the duration of an as-

planned activity on the program with the as-built duration

for that same activities on the as-built program. The

difference in time between these durations is taken as the

period of delay to which a Contractor is entitled to an

Extension of Time as a result of an excusable delay event.


Selecting the suitable analysis method


Accurate baseline

Accurate As-built

Selecting the suitable analysis method


Accurate baseline and Updates

Accurate baseline and As-built

PEC-EG-11012 51

THERMAL POWER PLANTUNITS 6&7 - 2X650 MW GAS/OIL FIRED UNITS

INTAKE, DISCHARGE AND RELATED WORKS

POSITION PAPER

In respect ofTHE ENTITLEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

no Event start1 Site Mobilization Allocation and bechmarks 5-Oct-092 Re-rout of gas pipelines 6-Sep-093 Providing Offshore permit 6-Sep-094 Off Site Area 30-Dec-095 protection plane approval for Dewatering 16-Mar-106 permanent cofferdam soil investigation 30-Jun-107 Excavation of Intake Pipes 12-Jul-108 Stopping work due to Petroleum company helicopter runway 29-Sep-10

9 25 Jan force majour 28-Jan-1110 Fuel Shortage (May 2011) 11-May-1111 Site Close Off 15-Jun-1112 Contaminated Discharge Water 21-Jul-1113 Intake Filling Delay 18-Aug-1114 Disturbance of off-shore works 27-Aug-1115 Bad Weather Conditions 10-Dec-1116 Fuel Shortage (Jan 2012) 22-Jan-1217 CP-102 Caused Delays fragmented18 Truck Drivers Strike 9 Dec 11

PEC-EG-11012 52

Major Events

New events marked

Site Mobilization Allocation

Activity Affected:Mobilization activity( 1000000290)

53PEC-EG-11012

Off-site area delivery

Activities Affected

Affect directly on delivery of RCC pipes activity (SUBMT00020& SUBMT00030) which effect directly on Installing ofDischarge pipes (1000001681) in discharge area and StartConstruction of intake basin & inlet pipes (1000000530) inintake area.

54PEC-EG-11012

Re-rout of gas pipelines

Activities Affected Earth work for rough grading activity (SPECS00250)that leads to channel (1-4) diversion activities andcause delay of discharge and intake area.

55

16” gas pipeline

24” gas pipeline

PEC-EG-11012

Providing Offshore permit

Activities Affected

Execution of cofferdam protection (1000000630) andDemolish shoreline protection (1000000940) that lead todelay of channel (1-4) diversion activities.

56PEC-EG-11012

protection plan approval for Dewatering

Activities Affected Mobilization of dewatering equipment activity(1000000900) which is the first activity in DiversionChannel (1-4) on critical path. 57PEC-EG-11012

Stoppage due to petroleum company helicopter runway

• Affect directly on the production all discharge structure activities that starts in (Start Const. of the new Disch& Seal Well) milestone (1000000460).

• After the stoppage ends WDEPC Project instructed AC should reduce its working hours from (63-hours per week) to (31 hours per week) from (Saturday to Thursday).

• Accordingly, AC worked on reduced productivity, based on the work was not continuous.

58PEC-EG-11012

25th January force Majeure.

Full Stoppage: The work at job site was completely suspended from 28th of

Jan 2011 till 16th of Feb 2011.

This suspension affected All in progress activities in February update.

Curfew Effect: The curfew was imposed by the supreme council of the

military after the uprising event.

Impact on supplies: The delivery of earth products as sand, gravel, stones….etc. are usually taken place from late evening to early morning hours.

Curfew Impact from 16 Feb till end of June that made disruption of work

59PEC-EG-11012

Sep 2009Sep 2010

Change order No.20

Project start

8 Periods

Stage 1 Stage 2

Mar 2012Jan 2011

3 Periods

Last Update

Delay Analysis and EOT Entitlement

60

W1 start W1 PCD W1 imp PCD

EOTEntitlement = 47 days

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT

Entailment Mitigation

Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 6-Sep-09 18-Mar-11

Window

End W2 17-Jan-10 28-Jun-10

Impacted

Programme

(W1 with events – DD is

as W1) 6-Sep-09 4-May-11

47 0 7

Events:

• Off-site area delivery• Re-rout of gas pipelines • Providing Offshore permit• Providing site benchmark• Site Mobilization allocation

Project Duration

Period 1: from Sep 2009 (project start) to Jan 2010

Site Mobilization allocation

61

EOT Entailment = W1 Impacted PCD - W1 PCDMitigation= W1 Impacted PCD – W2 PCD Non Progress = W2 PCD - W1 Impacted PCD

W1 start W1 imp PCD

Non-Progress= 7 days

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 6-Sep-09 18-Mar-11

Window

End W2 17-Jan-10 28-Jun-10

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 6-Sep-09 4-May-11

47 0 7

Events:

• Off-site area delivery• Re-rout of gas pipelines • Providing Offshore permit• Providing site benchmark• Site Mobilization allocation

Project Duration

Period 1: from Sep 2009 (project start) to Jan 2010

W2 PCD

Site Mobilization allocation

62



EOTEntitlement = 10

days

Events:

• Off-site area delivery• Re-rout of gas pipelines• Providing offshore permit

Project Duration

Period 2: from Jan 2010 to Feb 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 17-Jan-10 11-May-11

Window

End W2 7-Feb-10 1-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 17-Jan-10 21-May-11 10 0 11

Re-rout of gas pipeline

63


Events:


Period 2: from Jan 2010 to Feb 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window


Window

End W2 7-Feb-10 1-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 17-Jan-10 21-May-11 10 0 11

W1 start W1 imp PCD


Project Duration

W2 PCD

Re-rout of gas pipeline

64

W1 start

W1 PCD

W1 imp PCD

EOTEntitlement = 0

days

Events:


Project Duration

Period 3: from Feb 2010 to Mar 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 7-Feb-10 1-Jun-11

Window

End W2 7-Mar-10 18-May-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 7-Feb-10 1-Jun-11 0 14 0

65

Events:


Period 3: from Feb 2010 to Mar 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 7-Feb-10 1-Jun-11

Window

End W2 7-Mar-10 18-May-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 7-Feb-10 1-Jun-11 0 14 0

W1 start W1 PCD

Mitigation= 14 days

Project Duration

W2 PCD

66


W1 startW1 PCD

W1 imp PCD

EOTEntitlement = 0

days

Events:

• Off-site area delivery• protection plan approval for

Dewatering

Project Duration

Period 4: from Mar 2010 to Apr 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 7-Mar-10 18-May-11

Window

End W2 11-Apr-10 11-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 7-Mar-10 18-May-11 0 0 24

67

Events:

• Off-site area delivery• protection plan approval for

Dewatering

Period 4: from Mar 2010 to Apr 2010

W1 start W1 PCD

Non-progress = 24 days

Project Duration

W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 7-Mar-10 18-May-11

Window

End W2 11-Apr-10 11-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 7-Mar-10 18-May-11 0 0 24

68


EOTEntitlement = 27

days

Events:

• protection plan approval for Dewatering

Project Duration

Period 5: from Apr 2010 to Jun 2010


Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 11-Apr-10 11-Jun-11

Window

End W2 6-Jun-10 28-May-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 11-Apr-10 8-Jul-11 27 41 0

69

Events:


Period 5: from Apr 2010 to Jun 2010

W1 start W1 imp PCD

Mitigation= 41 days

Project Duration

W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 11-Apr-10 11-Jun-11

Window

End W2 6-Jun-10 28-May-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 11-Apr-10 8-Jul-11 27 41 0


70

W1 startW1 PCD

W1 imp PCD

EOTEntitlement = 0

days

Events:


Project Duration

Period 6: from Jun 2010 to July 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 6-Jun-10 28-May-11

Window

End W2 4-Jul-10 13-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 6-Jun-10 28-May-11 0 0 16

71

Events:


Period 6: from Jun 2010 to July 2010

W1 start W1 PCD


Project Duration

W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 6-Jun-10 28-May-11

Window

End W2 4-Jul-10 13-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 6-Jun-10 28-May-11 0 0 16

72

Events:


• Excavation of Intake Pipes

Period 7: from July 2010 to Aug 2010

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 4-Jul-10 13-Jun-11

Window

End W2 1-Aug-10 19-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 4-Jul-10 13-Jun-11 0 0 6

73

W1 start W1 imp PCD

EOT= 6 days

Project Duration

W2 PCD

Excavation of Intake Pipes

Events:


• Excavation of Intake Pipes

Period 7: from July 2010 to Aug 2010

W1 start W1 PCD


Project Duration

W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 4-Jul-10 13-Jun-11

Window

End W2 1-Aug-10 19-Jun-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 4-Jul-10 13-Jun-11 0 0 6

74


EOTEntitlement = 19

days

Events:


• Stoppage due to petroleum company helicopter runway

Project Duration

Period 8: from Aug 2010 to Sep 2010


Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 1-Aug-10 19-Jun-11

Window

End W2 19-Sep-10 24-Jul-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 1-Aug-10 8-Jul-11 19 0 16

75

Events:


• Stoppage due to petroleum company helicopter runway

Period 8: from Aug 2010 to Sep 2010

W1 start W1 imp PCD


Project Duration

W2 PCD


Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 1-Aug-10 19-Jun-11

Window

End W2 19-Sep-10 24-Jul-11

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 1-Aug-10 8-Jul-11 19 0 16

76

Events:

• Complete work suspension from 28th of January to 16th Feb

• Curfew Impact from 16 Feb till end of June

• Fuel Shortage (May 2011)• Site Close Off

Period 9: from Jan 2011 to Jun 2011

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window


Window

End W2 30-Jun-11 11-May-12

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 28-Jan-11 24-Jul-12 59 74 0

77

W1 start W1 imp PCD

Project Duration

Complete work suspension from 28th of January to 16th Feb Curfew Impact from

16 Feb till end of June

EOT =59 days

W2 PCD

Fuel Shortage (May 2011)

Site Close Off

Events:

• Complete work suspension from 28th of January to 16th Feb

• Curfew Impact from 16 Feb till end of June

• Fuel Shortage (May 2011)• Site Close Off

Period 9: from Jan 2011 to Jun 2011

W1 start W1 imp PCD

Project Duration

Complete work suspension from 28th of January to 16th Feb Curfew Impact from

16 Feb till end of June

Mitigation =74 days

W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window


Window

End W2 30-Jun-11 11-May-12

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 28-Jan-11 24-Jul-12 59 74 0

78

Fuel Shortage (May 2011)

Site Close Off

Events:

• Contaminated Discharge Water

• Intake Filling Delay• Disturbance of off-shore works• CP-102 Caused Delays• Truck Drivers Strike

Period 10: from Jun 2011 to Oct 2011

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window

Start W1 30-June-11 11-May-12

Window

End W2 30-Oct-11 15-Jul-12

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 30-June-11 11-May-12 0 0 65

79

W1 start W1 imp PCD

Project Duration

EOT =32 days

W2 PCD

• Intake Filling Delay

• CP-102 Caused Delays

• Disturbance of off-shore works


• Truck Drivers Strike

Period 10: from Jun 2011 to Oct 2011

W1 start W1 PCD


W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window


Window

End W2 30-Oct-11 15-Jul-12

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 30-June-11 11-May-12 0 0 65

80

Events:


• Intake Filling Delay• Disturbance of off-shore works• CP-102 Caused Delays• Truck Drivers Strike

• Intake Filling Delay

• CP-102 Caused Delays

• Disturbance of off-shore works


• Truck Drivers Strike

Period 11: from Oct 2011 to Mar 2011

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window


Window

End W2 30-Oct-11 15-Jul-12

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 30-June-11 11-May-12 0 0 65

81

W1 start W1 imp PCD

Project Duration

EOT =12days

W2 PCD

Events:• Bad Weather Conditions• Fuel Shortage (Jan 2012)

• Fuel Shortage (Jan 2012)

• Bad Weather Conditions

W1 start W1 PCD


W2 PCD

Programmes

DATA

DATE PCD

EOT


Non

Progress

Window


Window

End W2 30-Oct-11 15-Jul-12

Impacted

Programme


as W1) 30-June-11 11-May-12 0 0 65

82

Events:• Bad Weather Conditions• Fuel Shortage (Jan 2012)

Period 11: from Oct 2011 to Mar 2011

• Fuel Shortage (Jan 2012)

• Bad Weather Conditions

83

Total EOT Entitlement

Stage Period EOT

Mitigation Non

Progress Entailment

On

e

1 47 0 7

2 10 0 11

3 0 14 0

4 0 0 24

5 27 41 0

6 0 0 16

7 0 0 6

8 19 0 16

Tw

o

9 59 74 0

10 0 0 65

Sum 162 129 145

محاضرة تمهيدية في إعداد و تحليل المطالبات الزمنيةEot

Engineering

Transcript of محاضرة تمهيدية في إعداد و تحليل المطالبات الزمنيةEot