Post on 11-Jan-2022
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
RADON REMEDIAL MEASURES
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS
Martin JiránekCZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITYFaculty of Civil EngineeringDepartment of Building StructuresThákurova 7, 166 29 Praha 6E-mail: jiranek@fsv.cvut.cz
IAEA
CONTENT
1. Purpose of corrective actions2. Factors influencing the design3. Principles of corrective actions4. Rules for selecting corrective actions5. Sealing of radon entry routes6. Ensuring air-tightness of the substructure7. Sub-slab depressurization8. Air gap depressurization9. Measures for houses on crawl spaces/cellars10. Ventilation measures11. Measures against radon from building materials12. Thermal retrofitting and indoor radon
IAEA
1. PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
The purpose of radon corrective actions is to ensure that radon concentration in every room of the habitable space decreases below the reference level or design value.
Reference level is prescribed by legislation within the range 100 – 300 Bq/m3.
Design value is prescribed by the owner (determined for example on the basis of ALARA principle).
Fulfilment of this objective is verified by measurement of radon concentration under the ventilation rate satisfying the minimum hygiene requirements.
CTU
IAEA
2. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DESIGN
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Results of diagnostic
measurements
Existing conditionof the building
Climatic conditions
Applicability of the measure
Workmanship, experience of the contractor
Effectiveness of the measure
CTU
IAEA
The goal is to determine the sources of radon and gamma radiation, and the way that radon spreads throughout the building.
Examples of suitable diagnostic measurements are: • Determining the average radon concentrations in all rooms in the
floor in contact with the ground
• Determining the continual courses of radon concentrations
• Measurement of radon concentration in air samples taken from possible radon entry points
• Measurement of radon concentration in the soil and soil permeability around and under the building
• Determining the gamma dose rate
• Determining the radon concentration in the supply water
2.1 Results of diagnostic measurements
CTU
IAEA
2.2 Existing condition of the building
The goal of the building survey is to prepare a basis for the design of applicable and effective corrective actions with minimum negative impact on the house construction.
Building survey should focus on: • Location of habitable and non-habitable rooms;• Airtightness of the building envelope;• Predominant type of the building material;• Method of ventilation;• Defects and failures of the structure;• Condition and composition of structures in contact with the
soil (cracks, humidity, air-tightness of pipe penetrations, presence of installation channels and ducts).
CTU
IAEA
2.3 Climatic conditions
Climatic conditions (average annual wind speed, typical thickness of snow cover, temperature differences, amount of rainfall, etc.) influence the design of corrective actions as follows:
• Location of outlets of ventilation pipes;• Applicability of ventilation systems (natural x mechanical,
balanced systems x overpressurization);• Problems with condensation of water vapour (inside
ventilation pipes or on their surface, inside the building envelope, etc.).
CTU
IAEA
2.4 Effectiveness of corrective actions
Effectiveness (%)Corrective actionTypical range Max
New floors with radon-proof insulation 35 - 45 50
New floors with radon-proof insulation + passive sub-slab or floor air gap ventilation 45 - 55 60
New floors with radon-proof insulation + active sub-slab or floor air gap depressurization 80 - 90 95
Active sub-slab depressurization installed without the floor reconstruction 80 - 95 99
Sealing of radon entry points (cracks, pipe penetrations, etc.) 10 - 40 60
Increased natural ventilation of the habitable space 20 - 40 50
Improving ventilation rate by mechanical ventilation 50 - 70 75
CTU
IAEA
3.1 Sealing of radon entry routes
This method is often used in combination with other methods.
Effectiveness is usually lower than 40 %!
Sealing is usually applied for:• cracks in contact structures• services penetrations• gaps between walls and floors
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
3.2 Ensuring air-tightness of the substructure
Effectiveness is usually lower than 45 %!
It is usually not possible to place radon barrier material continuously over the entire surfaces of walls and floors in contact with the soil
Use only if the reconstruction of floors is necessary due to their bad technical condition.
It is recommended to use this measure in combination with sub-slab or air gap depressurization!
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
3.3 Creating underpressure in the subsoil
Effectiveness is around 95 %.
Can be ensured by:• radon sumps• drilled tubes• perforated pipes• radon well
The preference should be given to systems that can be installed without the reconstruction of floors.
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
3.4 Creating overpressure in the subsoil
Known also as air cushion method.
The principle is that indoor air is forced in the sub-floor region, in order to dilute radon concentration under the building.
Used rarely, when sub-slab depressurization is not effective.
Effectiveness can be as high as 85 - 95 %.
From UK and USA experience this works best in highly permeable soils.CTU
IAEA
3.5 Creating underpressure in the air gaps formed over the contact structures
Effectiveness is around 90 %.
The gap can be formed also along walls made of uranium rich materials. In this case the method serves for removing radon exhaled from the wall.
Suitable also for radon from building materials!
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
3.6 Increasing ventilation rate of the habitable space
Can be ensured by:• improving natural
ventilation
• installation of hybrid or mechanical ventilation
Effectiveness is usually lower than 40% (natural
ventilation) or 70% (mechanical ventilation).
Suitable not only for radon from the soil, but also for radon from building materials!
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
3. PRINCIPLES OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
3.7 Increasing ventilation rate of crawl spaces or non-habitable spaces
Can be ensured by:
• improving natural ventilation
• installation of mechanical ventilation
Effectiveness is usually around 50% (natural ventilation) or 75% (mechanical ventilation).
CTU
IAEA
• Measure must have sufficient efficiency according to the measured radon concentration
• It must be easily applicable• It should not worsen the technical state and the quality of
the building• It should not disturb the occupants by higher noise levels
and other adverse effects• Operating costs must be at a reasonable level (it should
not induce large thermal losses)• It is advantageous, if other problems and defects of the
building are solved together with radon
4. RULES FOR SELECTING ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
• sealing of radon entry routes (cracks, pipe penetrations, etc.)
• improving the cellar/crawl space – outdoor ventilation
• preventing the air movement from the cellar/crawl space into the first floor
• improving the indoor – outdoor (natural) ventilation• creating a slight overpressure within the building (not
applicable in countries with cold climates)
Measures applied in case of just above the reference level (C < 600 Bq/m3)
4. RULES FOR SELECTING ACTIONS
CTU
IAEA
• The most effective solution is a sub-slab depressurization installed without the reconstruction of floors
• Replacement of existing floors by new ones in which the radon-proof insulation is combined with the soil or air gaps ventilation is selected, when the reconstruction of floors is necessary
• Installation of mechanical ventilation is suitable in houses with low ventilation rate (below 0,3 h-1), or where radon problem is caused by radon from building materials
4. RULES FOR SELECTING ACTIONS
Measures applied in case of well above the reference level (C > 600 Bq/m3)
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.1 Sealing of cracksPassive cracks (without any movement) – polymercement mortars and compounds, epoxy resins, etc.
Active cracks (dilatation movements can occur in the crack) –permanently elastic sealants (acrylic, silicone, bitumen) and PU foams.
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.2 Sealing of pipe penetrations
Penetrations without dilatation movements
Concrete slab
Subsoil Subsoil
Concrete slab
Gap Groove
Permanently elastic jointing
compound
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.2 Sealing of pipe penetrations
Penetrations with greater dilatation movements
Concrete slab
Subsoil
Permanently elastic jointing compound
PU foam
Concrete filler
Sealing cord from PE foam
Protective pipe
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.3 Sealing of covers of inspection chambers
Steel angle
Sealing strip
Silicone/rubber sealing strip
Cover with tiles
Cover from steel plate
Sewage pipe with inspection fitting
Untightbottom
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.4 Sealing of pipe penetrations through the floor above the cellar/crawl space
Concrete slab
PU foamPlaster
Floor layers
Permanently elastic jointing compound
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.5 Sealing of doors to the cellar
Wall
Door leaf
Door frame
Silicone/rubber strip sealant
Additional sealant (not necessary)
Rotten and disintegrated door frames and sills and twisted doors must be replaced with new ones.
Doorsteps can reduce air leakage beneath the door.
CTU
IAEA
5. SEALING OF RADON ENTRY ROUTES
5.6 Sealing of the timber staircase
When sealing timber stairs above the cellar be careful about the water vapour condensation
CTU
IAEA
Additionally applied radon-proof insulation
In existing houses not so effective (less then 45 %), because it usually cannot be applied under the walls and thus radon can be still transported through wall-floor joints. Therefore combination with a soil ventilation system is recommended.
6. AIR-TIGHT SUBSTRUCTURE
CTU
IAEA
Additionally applied RPI must be connected in an air-tight manner to the existing waterproofing below the walls. Otherwise, radon transport through the wall/floor joints is to be limited by:
6. AIR-TIGHT SUBSTRUCTURE
• installation of sub-slab depressurization with perforated pipes placed in the drainage layer along the perimeter of the existing walls,
• creating a ventilated air gap in the floor construction below or above the radon-proof insulation.
CTU
IAEA
Options suitable for existing buildings
• Radon sumps
• Perforated tubes drilled beneath existing floors without their damage
• Network of flexible perforated pipes inserted into the drainage layer
• Radon well
7. SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION
CTU
IAEA
Selection of an appropriate option depends on:
• ratio of underfloor layer and soil permeabilities kd/ks
• airtightness of floors
• type and geometry of foundations (presence of internal strip foundations)
• preferred method of ventilation (passive or active)
• necessity to reconstruct part or all of the floor area
7. SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION
CTU
IAEA
Design rules• The floors should be relatively tight• Continuous permeable layer under the slab significantly
increases the effectiveness of the sump• The sump should not be excavated in the soil layer of low
permeability• The min. diameter of the sump is 0,2 m• In existing buildings the forced ventilation is preferred
(underpressure within the sump should be from 100 to 250 Pa)
7.1 Radon sump
CTU
IAEA
Example of drilling tubes from the external trench
Indoor radon concentration before
mitigation:
1 145 Bq/m3
Fan NPV 190/125 above the terrain
Drilled pipes ∅ 60 mm, D = 5,0 m
PVC ∅110 mm
PVC ∅110 mm
PVC ∅80 mm
PVC ∅125 mm
WC
LIVING ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
HALL
BATHROOM
STOREROOM
Single family house
CTU
IAEA
Example - details of technical solution
Existing floor
Drilled pipe ∅ 60 mm
PU foam
Borehole Ø80 mmPVC pipe Ø60 mm
PVC pipe Ø 80– 125 mm
Backfill
Backfill
PVC pipe Ø80 – 125 mm
PVC pipe Ø125 mm
Wall
Fan at the height min. 600 mm above the terrain
CTU
IAEA
Example - radon concentration after the corrective action was applied
During active ventilation radon concentration decreased to the mean value 152 Bq/m3.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
6.11.10 8.11.10 10.11.10 12.11.10 14.11.10 16.11.10 18.11.10 20.11.10
Rad
on c
once
ntra
tion
(Bq/
m3)
kuchyň
obývací pokoj
ložnice
Kitchen
Living room
Bedroom
Fan in operation
Fan in operation
CTU
IAEA
Indoor radon concentration before
mitigation:
3 240 Bq/m3
LIVING ROOM+
KITCHEN
WC
BATHROOM
HALL
RESTROOM
Single family house
Example of drilling tubes from the cellar
CTU
IAEA
PVC ∅80 mm
Exhaust PVC pipe ∅ 125 mm inserted in a free flue. Fan installed
above the roof.
PVC ∅100 mm
PVC ∅125 mm
Drilled pipes ∅ 60 mm, D = 5,0 m
CELLAR
Drilled pipe∅ 60 mm, D = 2,5 m
Drilled pipe∅ 60 mm, D = 3,0 m
Example - details of technical solution
IAEA
Example - details of technical solution
CTU
Drilled pipe ∅ 60 mm
PU foamBorehole Ø 80 mm
PVC pipe Ø 60 mm
PVC pipe Ø80 – 125 mm
Existing floorBrick vault
IAEA
Fan NPV 190/125 at the top of the chimney
Exhaust PVC pipe ∅ 125 mm inserted in a free flue.
Example - details of technical solution
CTU
IAEACTU
During active ventilation radon concentration decreased to the mean value 223 Bq/m3.
Fan in operationFan in
operation
Living room Bedroom, 2nd floorRestroom Liv. room, 2nd floor
0
1500
3000
4500
6000
16.12.10 18.12.10 20.12.10 22.12.10 24.12.10 26.12.10 28.12.10 30.12.10
Rad
on c
once
ntra
tion
(Bq/
m3)
př. - pokoj s krbem př. - obýv. pokoj + kuchyň patro - obývací pokoj patro - ložnice sever
Example - radon concentration after the corrective action was applied
IAEA
Average indoor radon concentration before
mitigation:
1 130 – 1 390 Bq/m3
PVC ∅80 mm
Single family house
PVC ∅ 125 mm.Fan MRF 125
above the chimney.
Perf. PVC ∅60 mm
Perf. PVC ∅ 60 mm
1
HALL
KITCHEN
PANTRY
WC
LIVING ROOM
Drilled pipe∅ 60 mmD=1,0 m
Drilled pipe∅ 60 mmD=1,0 m
Drilled pipe∅ 60 mmD=4,0 m
STOVE
PVC ∅125 mm
1
1
BEDROOM
BATHROOM
Example of drilling tubes from the internal pit
CTU
IAEA
Existing floor
Drilled pipe∅ 60 mm
New floor with a radon-proof insulation jointed in an airtight manner to the walls
Borehole Ø 80 mm
Interconnecting PVC pipe Ø 100 mm
Drilling of perforated pipes
Example - details of technical solution
CTU
IAEA
Fan MRF 125 at the top of the chimney
Exhaust PVC pipe ∅ 125 mm inserted in a free flue.
Fan MRF 125 and a speed regulator
Example - details of technical solution
CTU
IAEA
During active ventilation radon concentration decreased to the mean value 201 Bq/m3.
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
24.7.10 0:00 26.7.10 0:00 28.7.10 0:00 30.7.10 0:00 1.8.10 0:00 3.8.10 0:00 5.8.10 0:00
Rad
on c
once
ntra
tion
(Bq/
m3)
komora kuchyň ložnice pokojKitchen Living roomBedroomPantry
Fan in operation – max speed
Fan in operation –
medium speed
Example - radon concentration after the corrective action was applied
CTU
IAEA
• When drilling the tubes attention must be paid to existing installations (water pipes, cables) under the floor
• At least 1 tube beneath each habitable room• 1 m of the tube has the influence over the floor area:
- to 5 m2…...low tightness of floors ∧ kd/ks ≤ 1- 5–10 m2 ….low tightness of floors ∧ kd/ks > 1 or
floors are relatively tight ∧ kd/ks ≤ 10- 10-15 m2….floors are relatively tight ∧ kd/ks > 10
• Diameter of drilled tubes:- approx. 60 mm for active ventilation- approx. 100 mm for natural ventilation
7.2 Perforated drilled tubes
Design rules
CTU
IAEA
• Diameter of pipes:80 – 100 mm for natural ventilation50 – 60 mm for forced ventilation
• Minimum thickness of the drainage layer is 150 mm• Coarse gravel fraction 16/32 mm is used for the drainage
layer• Pipes are laid along walls in order to stop radon from
entering the house through the wall-floor joint or through the vertical holes within the wall
7.3 Network of flexible perforated pipes
Design rules
CTU
IAEA
Intended mainly for use in sick layers of highly permeable soils (gravel, coarse sand).
Arrangement of a Swedish radon well:1 - 0,4 – 1,0 m diameter pipe
with holes at the bottom end 2 – fan 3 – sealing plastic foil 4 – suction chamber 5 – cover 6 – vent pipe
7.4 Radon well
CTU
IAEA
Example from Finland
7.4 Radon well
• typical efficiency 70-90%• applicable to single family
houses, row houses and big industrial buildings
• effective up to 30 meters (50m)• fan power 150 W - 300 W• depth 3-5 meters• diameter 0,15 – 0,4 m
By: Hannu Arvela, STUK, Finland
CTU
IAEA
7.4 Radon well
Examples from Finland
Fan: 250 W, 60 l/s Fan: 260 W, 105l/s
By: Hannu Arvela, STUK, FinlandCTU
IAEA
7.5 Fans suitable for SSD systems
• In principle, the fans used for SSD systems in new buildings are also suitable for existing buildings
• Fans must be able to transport soil air with a relative humidity from 80 % to 100 % and to resist the flow of condensed water
• Fan sizing depends on the airtightness of floors, vertical profile of soil permeability and the geometry and length of ventilation pipes
• In-line paddle-wheel fans and roof fans are mostly used
• Fans should not be installed in the habitable zone
CTU
IAEA
Typical paddle-wheel fan installations
Vent cowl
In-line paddle-
wheel fan
Exhaust pipe inserted into a
free flue
Unused chimney
7.5 Fans suitable for SSD systems
Exhaust pipe running within the building must be airtight
CTU
IAEA
7.5 Fans suitable for SSD systems
In-line paddle-wheel fan
Thermal insulation
Dewatering of condensed water
Ventilating grille
Drip ledge for dewatering of condensed water
Typical paddle-wheel fan installations
CTU
IAEA
Fans in plumbing and inspection chambers
Fan under the ceiling of the cellar
7.5 Fans suitable for SSD systems
CTU
IAEA
7.5 Fans suitable for SSD systems
Typical roof fan installations
Exhaust pipe running in the soil outside the house must be airtight
CTU
IAEA
8. AIR GAPS DEPRESSURIZATION
• The air gap must be connected in an airtight manner to the surrounding walls.
• Condensation of water vapour in the gap should be prevented.
• Active ventilation creating a slight underpressure within the gap is preferred. Active ventilation is executed without any vent holes delivering external air into the gap.
• Soil air must not be used to ventilate the air gap. When ventilating with internal air, the back flow of air from the gap to the interior must be prevented (e.g. using back-flow valves located in the vent holes).
CTU
IAEA
8. AIR GAPS VENTILATION
Air gap on the external surface of the basement wall
serves as decompression
cavity which eliminates the
pressure difference
between indoors and soil.
CTU
IAEA
8. AIR GAPS DEPRESSURIZATION
Fans suitable for air gap ventilation
• In principle, the fans used for SSD systems are also suitable for air gap ventilation
• Fan sizing depends on the airtightness of the gap andvolume of air in the gap, i.e. on the area and height of the gap and number and shape of dimples
CTU
IAEA
Indoor radon concentration before mitigation: 600 Bq/m3
LIVING ROOM
NURSERY
COAL HOME WORKS
CELLAR
KITCHENKITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATHROOM
CORRIDOR
PANTRY
Existing single family house
Example of wrong application of the floor air gap
CTU
IAEA
Example - original corrective action
1999 - 2000: new floors + passive air gap
ventilation
Indoor radon concentration after corrective action
1 150 – 2 250 Bq/m3
CTU
IAEA
Example - original corrective action
Reasons for failure:• Natural ventilation through vent holes of
insufficient dimension located in perimeter walls only (without vertical exhaust) – underpressure was not generated in the gap
• Leaky connection of the dimpled membrane to existing walls
• Leaky joints between dimpled membranes
• Underpressure generated in the house sucked radon from the gap to indoor space
CTU
IAEA
Example - additional corrective action
• Passive ventilation of the floor air gap was changed into an active one by means of connecting existing vent holes on one side of the house to a fan.
• All vent holes on the other side were blocked.
PVC ∅ 125 mm under the terrain
Fan NPV 190/125 above
the terrain
PVC ∅ 80 mm
PVC ∅ 110 mm
CTU
IAEA
During active ventilation indoor radon concentration decreased to the mean value 281 Bq/m3.
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
15000
17500
20000
22500
13.6.200712:00
15.6.200712:00
17.6.200712:00
19.6.200712:00
21.6.200712:00
23.6.200712:00
25.6.200712:00
27.6.200712:00
29.6.200712:00
Rad
on c
once
ntra
tion
(Bq.
m-3
)
ložnice - 1.NPdětský pokoj - 1.NPkoupelna - 1.NPob.pokoj - 1.NP
Active ventilation
Example - radon concentration after corr. action
CTU
IAEA
9. HOUSES ON CRAWL SPACES
• Improving the natural ventilation of the crawl space by enlargement of existing vents or adding extra vents
• Converting the natural ventilation into a forced ventilation
• Sealing the floor above the crawl space including services penetrations (in case of timber floors be careful of water vapour condensation)
• Sealing the ground surface
Suitable measures:
CTU
IAEA
9. HOUSES ON CRAWL SPACES
Example - conversion to forced ventilation
Water and wastewater pipes passing through the crawl space and the floor above the crawl space are to be fitted with thermal insulation
CTU
IAEA
10. VENTILATION MEASURES
10.1 Improving natural ventilation by installing outdoor air registers and/or adding vertical exhaust pipes
Outdoor air
registers
Vertical exhaust
pipe
CTU
IAEA
Example of window registers application
KITCHEN BATHROOM
ROOM FOR CHILDREN
HALL
LIVING ROOM STUDY ROOM
Flat on the 2nd floor of a single family house
Source of indoor radon: lightweight fly ash concrete blocks
Corrective action:
4 window registers installed in window frames
Mean indoor radon concentration before
remediation 745 Bq/m3.
CTU
IAEA
0,0
20 ,0
40 ,0
60 ,0
80 ,0
100,0
120,0
140,0
2.6.11
15:00
2.6.11
23:00
3.6.11
7:00
3.6.11
15:00
3.6.11
23:00
4.6.11
7:00
4.6.11
15:00
4.6.11
23:00
5.6.11
7:00
5.6.11
15:00
5.6.11
23:00
6.6.11
7:00
6.6.11
15:00
6.6.11
23:00
7.6.11
7:00
7.6.11
15:00
7.6.11
23:00
8.6.11
7:00
8.6.11
15:00
8.6.11
23:00
9.6.11
7:00
9.6.11
15:00
9.6.11
23:00
10.6.
11 7:
00
Time
Rad
on c
once
ntra
tion
(Bq/
m3)
- liv
ing
room
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Rad
on c
once
ntra
tion
(Bq/
m3)
- st
udy
room
Air inlets opened Air inlets closed
Living room
Study room
Mean indoor radon concentration after corr. action 94 Bq/m3.
Example - radon concentration after corr. action
CTU
IAEA
10.2 Increasing air exchange rate by installing mechanical exhaust air ventilation
Exhaust fan
Outdoor air
registers
10. VENTILATION MEASURES
CTU
IAEA
10.3 Mechanical supply air ventilation (positive ventilation, house pressurization)
10. VENTILATION MEASURES
Not suitable for attached houses
CTU
Increased risk of water vapour condensation within
the building envelope construction.
Supply fan + filter + heater
Indoor air escapes through leakages around window
frames and between window frames and casements
IAEA
10.4 Mechanical supply and exhaust air ventilation -local ventilation units with heat recovery
Intended for application in particular rooms with the floor area < 45 m2.
Typical characteristics:Power: 4 – 25 WAir flow: 15 – 60 m3/hNoise level: 17 – 49 dB(A)Efficiency of heat recovery: < 75 %
10. VENTILATION MEASURES
CTU
IAEA
Effectiveness: 55 – 75 %
Air exchange rate: vent. off 0,1 h-1, vent. on 0,4 h-1
Small ventilation unit with heat recovery installed in the living room
Vent
ilatio
n
Time
Ventilation OFFStove closed
Ventilation ON
Stove closed
Ventilation ONStove opened
Ventilation OFFStove opened
Example of local units application
IAEA
10.5 Mechanical supply and exhaust air ventilation forthe whole house
Ventilation unit with filters, heat exchanger, heater and fans.
Due to energy costs the ventilation rate should not exceed 1,0 h-1, otherwise supplementary measures (sealing of the substructure) should be adopted.
All rooms with radon concentration above 400 Bq/m3 should be ventilated.
10. VENTILATION MEASURES
CTU
IAEA
11. RADIUM-RICH BUILDING MATERIALS
• Lightweight concrete made of uranium-rich alum shale (Sweden)
• Clinker and clinker concrete products• Brick and concrete products containing slag from iron ore• Products containing coal ash• Materials containing radium-rich phosphate gypsum• Waste materials from uranium mining• Radium-rich granite used as aggregate or building
stones
Materials that may contain larger amounts of radium
CTU
IAEA
11. RADIUM-RICH BUILDING MATERIALS
Radium-rich building materials are the source of:• gamma radiation• radon
The level of gamma radiation is directly proportional to the radium content. It is a time independent quantity.
Radon exhalation rate is directly proportional to the radium content, radon emanation coefficient, bulk density and thickness of the material. It is a relatively constant quantity - it does not depend on pressure differences, ventilation rates etc.
CTU
IAEA
11. RADIUM-RICH BUILDING MATERIALS
The best way of determining whether the building material contains increased amount of radium is to measure the gamma dose rate from wall and floor structures.
Gamma dose rates 3 times higher than background indicate increased content of radium.
CTU
IAEA
Examples of radium-rich materials from CZ
• Waste materials from silver and uranium ore processing in Jáchymov
floor fillings, mortars, plasters, stuccoaRa ≈ 1 000 – 100 000 Bq/kg
• Clinker concrete panels (1956 – 60, 1965 – 83)prefabricated single family houses + prefabricated blocks of flatsaRa ≈ 1 000 – 4 000 Bq/kg
• Lightweight fly ash concrete blocks produced before 1984bearing walls for single-family housesaRa ≈ 800 Bq/kg
11. RADIUM-RICH BUILDING MATERIALS
CTU
IAEA
11.1 Measures against radon from BM
Suitable measures• Removing building materials• Increasing the ventilation rate• Creating ventilated air gaps around building
constructions
Unsuitable measures• Impermeable surface coatings (low
effectiveness, very sensitive to puncturing and surface condensation)
CTU
IAEA
• Removing building materials (non-bearing walls, floor fillings, plasters etc.)
• Application of a shielding on the surface of radium-rich building materials (it must be verified that the structure is able to carry the additional load from the shielding)
• Limiting human presence in the proximity of radium-rich building materials
11.2 Measures against gamma radiation from BM
CTU
IAEA
Effectiveness of shielding materialsAttenuation – ratio between the gamma dose rate with shielding
material to the rate without it
Tabl
e fr
omSa
fety
Gui
de D
S421
11.2 Measures against gamma radiation from BM
Shielding material
Thickness of shielding material (mm) for indicated attenuation
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
Lead 11 300 kg/m3 0.9 2.3 4.0 6.3 9.3 13 18 26 38
Iron 7 800 kg/m3 6.1 11 17 23 29 37 46 59 81
Barite concrete 3 300 kg/m3 12 24 37 50 65 83 100 130 180
Barite concrete 2 800 kg/m3 18 34 50 66 84 100 130 160 220
Ordinary concrete 2 300 kg/m3 30 50 69 89 110 130 160 200 270
Solid brick 1 800 kg/m3 46 72 100 130 160 190 230 280 370
CTU
IAEA
Testing of shielding effectiveness
Brick lining (sand-lime brick, bulk density 1800 kg/m3, thickness 65 mm) – reduction of the gamma dose rate to 66 % of the initial value.
Brick lining (sand-lime brick, bulk density 1800 kg/m3, thickness 140 mm) – reduction of the gamma dose rate to 54 % of the initial value.
Dry walling – without using a mortar
CTU
IAEA
Repeated measurement of the gamma dose rate in air
Example of removing radium-rich materials
CTU
IAEA
12. THERMAL RETROFITTING AND RADON
Energy need of existing buildings is usually reduced by:
• installing ETICS (the external thermal insulation composite system) on the external walls,
• increasing the thickness of the thermal insulation in the roof structures,
• adding thermal insulation in the ceiling below the loft spaces or above the cellars,
• replacing existing windows and entrance doors by new ones with negligibly small infiltration.
CTU
IAEA
12. THERMAL RETROFITTING AND RADON
Energy-saving measures increase the air-tightness of the above-ground building shell. As a consequence,
the house ventilation becomes less intense. Ventilation rates can decrease up to 4 times.
Negative effects:• impaired quality of the indoor environment• increased indoor radon concentration
Thermal retrofitting modifies also the indoor - outdoor pressure difference and thus changes radon supply rate from the soil.
CTU
IAEA
12. THERMAL RETROFITTING AND RADON
Replacing windows has the greatest effect on the indoor radon level.
Energy –saving measures are rarely applied to floors and walls in contact with soil. Air-tightness of these structures is usually not improved – radon can still penetrate indoors.
CTU
IAEA
12. THERMAL RETROFITTING AND RADON
When installing energy-saving measures the following precautions should be undertaken:• measure indoor radon concentration before and after
thermal retrofitting,
• improve ventilation system,
• increase the air-tightness of floors and walls in contact with soil or adopt another suitable radon countermeasure.Energy consumption cannot be reduced at the
expense of the quality of indoor air.
Build tight – Ventilate right CTU
IAEA
Single family house of the „START“ type built in 1975
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
LVING ROOM
KITCHEN BA
TH
GARAGE
CORRIDOR
HOBBY ROOM
BOILER
UN
DER
GR
OU
ND
FLO
OR
FIR
ST F
LOO
R
IAEA
Prefabricated structure – wall and ceiling panels
WALL PANELS = SOURCE OF RADON AND GAMMA RADIATION
Clinker concreteRadium content:1 000 – 4 000 Bq/kg
Emanation coefficient:0,02
Radon exhalation rate:35 – 150 Bq/m2h
Gamma dose rate:0,5 – 1,5 μSv/h
300
2 50
0
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
IAEA
New air-tight plastic windows
ETICS – 100 mm polystyrene
ROOF – 100 mm polystyrene 2008 – energy-saving measures undertaken
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
IAEA
Indoor radon concentration before and after adoption of energy –saving measures (track detectors exposed for 1 year)
Radon concentration [Bq/m3]Roombefore Cbefore after Cafter
Ratio [-] Cbefore/Cafter
Living room + kitchen – 1st
floor 302 753 2,5
Children`s bedroom -2nd floor 296 1 165 3,9Main bedroom - 2nd floor 312 1 524 4,9Kitchen - 2nd floor 438 1 025 2,3Mean values 337 1 117 3,4
Possible reasons•a decrease in the ventilation rate (higher air-tightness)•an increase in the radon exhalation rate (ETICS) – not confirmed
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
IAEA
Thermal performance before and after adoption of energy - saving measures – EN ISO 13790:2008
Parameter Before After Ratio Bef/AfIntensity of ventilation n 0,36 h-1 0,106 h-1 3,4Contribution of ventilation to the total energy loss 8,6 % 5,6 % 1,5
Mean thermal transmittance of the building envelope U,em
1,42 W/m2K 0,66 W/m2K 2,2
Specific annual energy need for heating E,A
311 kWh/m2a 110 kWh/m2a 2,8
Total annual energy need for heating EN,H
47,7 MWh 16,9 MWh 2,8
Annual energy savings = 30,8 MWhAnnual costs savings = 1 540 EUR (price of natural gas 50 EUR/MWh)
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
IAEA
Health consequences of energy – saving measures
Additional risk of lung cancer16 x (1117 – 337) / 100 = 125 %
(risk increases by16% per 100 Bq/m3 – Darby S. et.al.)
125 % higher risk of lung
cancer
Savings of at least
1 540 EUR/year
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
IAEA
Ensuring the same risk as before energy conversion = increasing the ventilation rate
Forced ventilation with heat recovery
Window registers
5 – 35 m3/h
LVING ROOM
KITCHEN BA
TH
Improved natural ventilation
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
105428.106,0.1337
1117..1..
=⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ −=⎟
⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−=⎟
⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−= Vn
CC
VnC
nCQ after
before
afterafter
before
afterafterm3/h
CTU
IAEA
Thermal performance after increasing the ventilation rateIntensity of ventilation nafterParameter 0,36 h-1 0,106 h-1
Ratio n0,36/n0,106
[-]Mean thermal transmittance of the building envelope U,em
0,66 W/m2K 0,66 W/m2K 1,0
Specific annual energy need for heating E,A
133 kWh/m2a 110 kWh/m2a 1,2
Total annual energy need for heating
20,4/17,4 MWh 16,9 MWh 1,2/1,03
Natural ventilation Forced ventilation with 85% efficiency of heat recovery
Annual energy savings = 27,3 / 30,3 MWhAnnual costs savings = 1 365 / 1 515 EUR
(price of natural gas 50 EUR/MWh)
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU
IAEA
Recovery of investments
47,7 MWh/year, 337 Bq/m
3
17,4 MWh/year, 337 Bq/m3
16,9 MWh/year, 1 117 Bq/m320,4 MWh/year, 337 Bq/m3
Comparison of long-term costs
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTUCosts included: installation costs, heating costs, costs for maintenance
and operation of ventilation systems. Annual increase in prices of energy sources is also considered.
IAEA
Not only energy needs, but also indoor air quality should be considered when planning energy conversion of buildings
It is almost always possible to find an optimal solutionOptimal solution = energy needs are kept to a reasonably low level and the indoor radon concentration is kept to an acceptable level (i.e. below the reference level)
Example – consequences of thermal retrofitting
CTU