Quantised Conductance in Self Breaking Nanowires

Post on 14-Jun-2015

419 views 3 download

description

PY4116 Final Report Presentation. Phelim BradleyMarch 21 2012

Transcript of Quantised Conductance in Self Breaking Nanowires

www.tyndall.ie

Phelim Bradley

Quantised Conductance in Self-Breaking

Nanowires

Mentor: John MacHale

Supervisor: Dr. Aidan Quinn

www.tyndall.ie

2

• Quantised Conductance• Feedback controlled Electromigration.• MCBJ and previous research.• Analysis of self-breaking region of nanobridges.• Degree of variability in traces.• Isolation of the contribution from individual

conductance channels.• Preferred and stable conductance levels.• Favorable transitions.• Differences between Au and Pt.

Contents

www.tyndall.ie

3

Quantised Conductance

• When the wire length is less than the Fermi Wavelength, quantised conductance can be observed. The wire behaves like an electron wave guide with each ballistic channel contributing a maximum conductance:

• However, this does not necessarily mean that the conductance will be an integer multiple of G0.

• A quantum channel with transmission T<1 contributes < G0

www.tyndall.ie

4

Motivation

• To understand the fabrication and properties of nanoscale metallic structures.

• Vital importance in next generation of sub 10nm electronics.

• Intellectual pursuit of understanding the quantum world.

www.tyndall.ie

• Electromigration is the transport of material due to the electronic wind force.[1]

• Occurs at a critical power dissipation in the neck.[2]

“Unzipping” of bridge via FCE-assisted diffusion, Strachan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 056805 (2008)

Feedback Controlled Electromigration5.

[1.] Rous, P.J., Driving force for adatom electromigration within mixed Cu/Al overlayers on Al(111). J. Appl. Phys., 2001. 89: p. 4809.

www.tyndall.ie

7

Self-Breaking Regime

• At room temperature is can be high enough to break the bridge entirely without even applying a bias once the conductance has fallen below a certain value

• When the conductance reaches a certain level is unstable even when the current is reduced to 0.

2. Strachan, D.R., et al., Clean electromigrated nanogaps imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Nano Letters, 2006. 6(3): p. 441-444.

3. Van der Zant, H.S.J., et al., Room-temperature stability of Pt nanogaps formed by self-breaking. Applied Physics Letters, 2009. 94(12).

• Gold (Au) nanobridges with diameters – ~5G0 can be stable on the order of

days.– ~20G0 can be stable for months. [2]

• In Platinum (Pt) the activation energy is higher so self breaking at room temperature is uncommon. [3]

• A tunnelling regime is entered once G falls below G0 accompanied by formation of a nanogap.

www.tyndall.ie

Pt Au

Variation in Traces

• Data from John MacHale Tyndall.• 40 Gold traces, 91 Platinum. ~15000 data points per trace.

www.tyndall.ie

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

What we want to know?

www.tyndall.ie

Single levels

• Single stable plateau

• Usually single Gaussian histogram – normal distribution.

• Little or no fine structure in histogram

www.tyndall.ie

Step Traces

• Conductance Plateuas

• Staircase like drops in conductance ~G0

• Structure in the histogram

www.tyndall.ie

Multi-Level Systems

• Multi-level systems can be viewed as a double potential with an energy difference Δ between the two (or more) configurations. [4]

• A group of atoms can have a transmission between these two states either by tunnelling or at higher temperatures thermal excitation over the barrier .

A two-level system as a double well potential with an energy difference between the two positions, and a tunnelling probability T for crossing the barrier between the two metastable states. W and d denote the width of the barrier and the distance between the minima, respectively.

[4] Halbritter, A., L. Borda, and A. Zawadowski, Slow two-level systems in point contacts. Advances in Physics, 2004. 53(8): p. 939-1010.

www.tyndall.ie

n-Level systems

• Both “slow and fast” n-level systems• Slow = transition rate between the two states can be of the order

of seconds or longer. Tunnelling case. • Fast = oscillations between metastable states at a rate faster or

equal to the measuring rate

www.tyndall.ie

Previous Research

• Mechanically controllable break junctions (MCBJ)• Slowly stretch the wire and measure conductance

throughout.• Mostly low temperature ~4K experiments.• Frozen atomic configurations.

Halbritter, A., S. Csonka, et al. (2002). "Connective neck evolution and conductance steps in hot point contacts." Physical Review B 65(4).

www.tyndall.ie

Diffusion argument

• Based on the MCBJ data it would be nice to assume each atom gives a contributions of G0 to the conductance.

• However, we can see in individual trace histograms peaks at non integer multiples of Go with structure - 0.1G0

www.tyndall.ie

Orbital Contributions and Shell Effects

• Below are theoretical models for contributions of given orbitals to transmission.

• Calculations done at 0K• Long chain = contributions dominated by single orbital.• Short chain = contributions from many orbitals.

Pauly, F., M. Dreher, et al. (2006). "Theoretical analysis of the conductance histograms and structural properties of Ag, Pt, and Ni nanocontacts." Physical Review B 74(23): 235106.

www.tyndall.ie

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

What we want to know?

www.tyndall.ie

Histogram Analysis

• Fit multiple Gaussians to histogram.

• Isolate position and size of a quantum conductance channel.

www.tyndall.ie

• Fine structure of histograms varied hugely so finding a consistent fitting regime without over constraining the fits was non-trivial.

• Some of the traces had particularly complex structure and fitting large number of Gaussians to involved minimising large search space.

Difficulties in Histogram analysis.

www.tyndall.ie

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

What we want to know?

www.tyndall.ie

Gold Platinum

Histogram Conductance Levels

• Distribution of peak conductance levels.• Shows lots of structure Pt 4-5Go and in tunnelling

regime.• Some indictation of preferred values visible.

www.tyndall.ie

• Can see evidence of recurring levels.

Overview of histogram Analysis

Au

www.tyndall.ie

What we want to know?

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

www.tyndall.ie

Cumulative Histogram

www.tyndall.ie

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

What we want to know?

www.tyndall.ie

Correlation Analysis

i

j

i

j

i

j

Positive correlationPlateaus at both bin i and j

Or no plateaus at i or j

i

j

Negative correlation

A plateau at i or jbut not both

Independent

Anticorrelated

Ni and Nj

Correlated

Every bin is correlated with itself, the diagonal

Ci,i = 1

Slide adapted from presentation by Prof. Halbritter, Budapest University

www.tyndall.ie

GoldPlatinum

Correlation Analysis

www.tyndall.ie

• Ran n-1 correlation analysis.

Is there actually correlation?

www.tyndall.ie

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

What we want to know?

www.tyndall.ie

• Pt more stable as expected.– Pt ~1% break (1/90) Au 40% (16/40) break– Pt ~40% (37/90) Au 55% (22/40) enter tunneling

regime. – Gold tends to have more peaks in a trace.

Gold Platinum

Au vs Pt

www.tyndall.ie

• Can we give an idea of the expected degree of variability?

• Can we isolate contributions from individual conductance channels?

• Are there preferred conductance levels?

• Which levels are more stable?

• Are there favourable transitions?

• Differences between Au and Pt.

• Is there a “Typical Behaviour”?

• If so, what is it and can we describe the outliers?

What we want to know?

www.tyndall.ie

• Predicting the behaviour of an individual trace is extremely difficult.

• Can only really give a statistical evaluation of the life time of a state.

Typical behaviour?

www.tyndall.ie

Summary and Future Research

• Evolution of conductance in self-breaking nanowires is a complex statistical process.

• Diffusion model 1G0=1atom too simple. Lots of interesting sub-structure.

• Can identify indications of preferred levels and transitions.

• Further Research• Apply some of this analysis to pre-break data.• Correlation beyond just conductance-conductance• Physical model to explain “magic numbers” – potentially

orbital contributions

www.tyndall.ie

Questions?

Questions?

www.tyndall.ie

• Enables to distinguish “fast” and “slow” n-level states.

• Both would show similar histograms.

• Fast will have multi “level” differential histograms.

• Slow will have close to Lorentzian differential histograms

Differential Histogram Analysis

www.tyndall.ie

Conductance Level Jumps

GoldPlatinum

www.tyndall.ie

Outliers