Post on 08-Apr-2018
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 1/27
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 2/27
Contents
Title Page No.
Introduction 1
Empowerment: Meaning &Methods
3
Benefits of Empowerment 6
Empowerment as aMotivational Strategy
9
Delegation vsEmpowerment
11
Significance of Trust 15
Participation & it’sMethods
18
Conclusion 23
Bibliography 24
2Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 3/27
Introduction
Employee empowerment is one of those terms that everyone thinks they
understand, but few really do. Ask a dozen different people and you'll get a
dozen different answers to the question, "What is employee empowerment?”
This paper seeks to answer that question in a simplistic way that it can be
understood by a greater number of people. Some writers indicate that
empowerment consists of sharing power and authority. Others say that
empowerment occurs when the organization's processes are set-up to allow for
it. If you keep in mind the secondary dictionary definition of "to give faculties
or abilities to: enable" (Grove, 1971, p.744), with all that this word implies,
then you will be on the right track for the purposes of this paper.
This paper also seeks to answer the question above in such a way that people
who work within organizations can apply the information to enhance employee
empowerment. "Why would we want to enhance employee empowerment?"
The detailed answer is provided in the in the paper under the heading "benefits
of employee empowerment". However, it has been shown that employee
empowerment results in increased employee satisfaction, increased
productivity, and increased customer satisfaction.
"Aren't there some strong objections to the implementation of an empowerment
program which must be overcome if we are to receive these benefits?" The
short answer is yes. Empowerment, if it is to be implemented effectively, calls
3Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 4/27
for a culture change for the typical organization. Leaders must learn to be
visionaries who can provide an idea to which employees will want to dedicate
themselves. Supervisors must change their ways of supervising and learn to be
coaches and mentors. All members of the organization must dedicate
themselves to sharing information and to training. Each of these issues will be
addressed in turn.
Since this is an academic paper, I would be remiss if I did not include a section
on the theoretical foundations upon which the concepts of employee
empowerment are built. While there are few theorists who have delved very
deeply into what makes up empowerment, what they have mined is rich.
Taking cues from their ideas, I have tried to put up a detailed report.
Implementation of empowerment programs seems to be the biggest challenge
organizations face. The popular press often writes about "failed" empowerment
efforts. What has become evident to me is that there are some speed bumps on
the road to empowerment; often these so called failures are only rough patches
which will be overcome. However, it is also evident that the implementation
often takes years, especially if the organization has a bureaucratic culture. It
also seems that empowerment implementation efforts are often haphazard. By
providing an easily understood definition of empowerment, some information
about what must take place, an assessment of how empowering a workplace is, I
hope to address unmet needs with this paper.
4Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 5/27
Employee Empowerment
Meaning and Features
Employee empowerment is creating a working environment where an employee
is allowed to make his own decisions in specific work-related situations. The
decisions can be big or small, and the size and effect of the decision is up to the
employer. The logic behind employee empowerment is to increase the
employee's responsibility, to build employee morale and to improve the quality
of your employee's work life. Ideally, when an employee feels vested in an
organization, he will be more productive, loyal and more confident.
The common dictionary definition of empowerment, "to give official authority
to: delegate legal power to: commission, authorize" (Grove, 1971, p. 744) is
the one most understood by most people. Bowen and Lawler (1992) indicate,
"We define empowerment as sharing with front-line employees four
organizational ingredients: [the first being] information about the organization's
performance. . . .[another is] knowledge that enables employees to understand
and contribute to organizational performance" (p. 32). The other two
ingredients Bowen and Lawler note are, "rewards based on the organization's
performance [and] power to make decisions that influence organizational
direction and performance." In a later article these authors conclude that,
"research suggests that empowerment exists when companies implement
5Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 6/27
practices that distribute power, information, knowledge, and rewards throughout
the organization." (Bowen & Lawler, 1995, p. 73)
The features of employee empowerment are as follows,
Open management - team members participate actively in meetings, diagnose
issues, analyze and identify solutions. Managers believe in their capacity and
have less or no control in processes that involve finding of solutions, decision
making etc.
Team spirit - high morale, enthusiasm
Decentralized control - each team member functions relatively autonomously:
interlinking job descriptions; clarity on individual roles.
Employee empowerment is a process whereby: a culture of empowerment is
developed; information—in the form of a shared vision, clear goals, boundaries
for decision making, and the results of efforts and their impact on the whole—is
shared; competency—in the form of training and experience—is developed;
resources, or the competency to obtain them when needed to be effective in
their jobs, are provided; and support—in the form of mentoring, cultural
support, and encouragement of risk-taking—is provided.
Every employer uses employee empowerment to some extent, though it is often
thought of as delegation. No organization of more than one person can survive
without some employee empowerment. When the owner of a Mail Boxes, etc.
hires someone to work the weekends, that person is empowered. When a
6Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 7/27
manager hires an accounting graduate to maintain the departmental ledger, that
person is empowered. When the director of advertising chooses which slogan
should go on the web banner, that person is empowered. In each of these
instances the empowered person has been provided with the training and
experience they need to be effective in their position. Each has the information
to know how their decisions will impact the larger whole. Each has access to
the resources he or she needs to be effective. And the assumption is that each
will be supported in the decisions they make.
Empowerment is a process of becoming, not a task or end result in and of
itself, Just as with continuous improvement, no organization is ever done with
its empowerment implementation; no person is ever "completely empowered".
Empowerment becomes part of the culture of the organization. Empowering
others becomes a transparent act, nobody within the organization notices when
an act of empowerment is exercised. It may be noticeable in the extreme to
outsiders, but, if the implementation effort has been successful, it will be second
nature to those accculturated within the organization.
Benefits of Employee Empowerment
7Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 8/27
Employee empowerment has been defined in many ways but generally means
the process of allowing employees to have input and control over their work,
and the ability to openly share suggestions and ideas about their work and the
organization as a whole. Empowered employees are committed, loyal and
conscientious. They are eager to share ideas and can serve as strong
ambassadors for their organizations.
The benefits of Empowerment are,
Employee Retention
By acknowledging each employee's opinion, you create an atmosphere of
respect, honor and contentment. If you respect your subordinates' views, they
will respect yours. Companies noted for this style of leadership attract loyal
employees who stay with them for a long time. There is a higher chance of
losing employees in a centralized, authoritative organization. According to
CNN, McCormick and Company, with a turnover rate of just three percent,
encourages employees at all levels to participate in company decision making.
Improve Productivity - Reduce Costs
John Zink of the PHCC Educational Foundation says that employees have great
ideas about how to improve productivity and reduce costs, but companies need
to know how to ask for these ideas and listen. "Sometimes it takes an employee
8Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 9/27
stepping outside of their authority to show the benefits of employee
empowerment an owner," he says. Employees who feel confident that their
input will be valued, listened to and acted upon will be more likely to share
those ideas, benefiting employee and employer.
Better Customer Service
Simon Sinek, a blogger who writes "The Empowered Employee", says that
empowered employees provide exceptional service and he's experienced this
first-hand. "Empowered employees have the power to make decisions without a
supervisor. They are entitled to go off script, bend the rules, do what they see fit
if they believe it is the right thing to do for the customer. More than any other
kind of employee, the empowered employee is able to create a feeling of true
customer service that ultimately yields much greater customer loyalty," he says.
Companies that give employees the freedom to make decisions on the spur of
the moment, that may even sometimes fly in the face of established rules and
protocol, often find that service to internal and external customers is improved.
In addition, empowered employees take pride and ownership in their jobs when
they know that they can exercise independent judgment when necessary.
Embracing Change
9Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 10/27
Empowered employees feel free to challenge the status quo, which is critical for
companies in today's fast-changing, technology-driven environment, says Lin
Grensing-Pophal, author of "Human Resource Essentials". Employees and the
companies they work for can become too complacent, doing things the way
they've always done them. Unless employees feel comfortable questioning the
status quo, those companies are likely to stagnant as competitors move swiftly
past them. Establishing an environment when employees feel free to question,
challenge and offer new ideas can help to avoid this problem and benefit
employees and employers in the process.
Empowerment as a Motivational Strategy10
Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 11/27
Empowerment occurs when individuals in an organization are given autonomy,
authority, trust, and encouragement to accomplish a task. Empowerment is
designed to unshackle the worker and to make a job the worker's responsibility.
In an attempt to empower and to change some of the old bureaucratic ideas,
managers are promoting corporate
intrapreneurships. Intrapreneurship encourages employees to pursue new ideas
and gives them the authority to promote those ideas. Obviously,
intrapreneurship is not for the timid, because old structures and processes are
turned upside down.
Considerations
Although employee empowerment may appear to be a good thing for an
organization, managers who welcome and choose to usher this movement in
should also bear in mind that not all employees want to be empowered. There
are people who like being led, and they do not welcome new responsibilities.
There are employees who can't be empowered because they are not motivated,
and they will require micromanagement at all times.
Precaution
No two employees are alike. Managers should get to know their employees in
order to make better individual assessments. While some employees may be
more motivated and welcome change, others may not be as accommodating.
11Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 12/27
However, that does not mean that those employees are not productive. In these
types of situations, managers may have to find alternative ways to engage these
employees.
Delegation Vs. Empowerment
12Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 13/27
One of the most influential books on my thinking right now is “Tribes” but Seth
Godin. Godin does a good job showing the difference between leading and
managing. The ideas that he brings to the table have caused me to think about
leadership. Do I lead? Or do I manage?
The difference between empowering and delegation is the difference between
managing and leading. Central to the idea of managing is the idea of survival,
while central to the idea of leading is movement. Management builds monoliths
and fortresses, while leadership is more or organic and more nomadic.
Delegation seems to have more to do with this idea of management/survival and
empowerment seems to follow more of the idea of leading/movement. At the
heart of delegation is a task that needs to be accomplished. In delegation a
person is found for the task and success is measure on how well the task is
done.
Empowerment is different. At the heart of empowerment is a person. A task is
found for the development of the person. The goal is not necessarily to complete
the task but to develop and empower a person. The measure of success has more
to do with the person, so failure in the task can be a means to develop the
person.
I think many churches are more concerned about management and survival then
it is about leading and movement. As well, leaders of the church often delegate
13Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 14/27
tasks to people and it is masked in language of empowerment but in reality the
task takes greater importance than the development of the person. If the task is
completed well then leaders often assume that the person is developing, when
that might not be the case at all.
When a leader empowers another they are in a sense giving the other person
permission to live/create/move. Once again, for the sake of this blog I’m
defining leading has having to do with movement. Part of participating in a
movement involves making mistakes, fighting battles, taking risks, and the
movement grows as the people grow. As people become inspired or begin to
adopt a certain ethos, they seem to be empowered to take that same inspiration
and ethos and apply it to their given context by their giving abilities.
When people are empowered they take on the task of creating. When people are
delegated they take on the task of finishing with no conviction.
To delegate means to choose or elect a person to act as a representative for
another. To empower someone means to give power or authority to someone
else. Do you hear the difference? To delegate something to someone is to only
give them enough leash to act on your behalf-as you would for yourself. to
empower another means you give them enough power and authority to act on
their own behalf.
14Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 15/27
This is not good versus bad. There is a proper time for delegation. I can think
of two: when someone is truly new to the ways of leadership and in times of
crisis. When someone is cutting their teeth on leadership then you want to teach
them how to handle responsibility. It is the principle of seeing if they will be
faithful in little so that they might grow in to being faithful with much. In times
of crisis there needs to be an authoritative decision maker and those who are
willing to simply carry out those decisions to meet the critical need of the
moment. But these two scenarios leave a whole lot of opportunity for
empowerment.
In my mind there are three critical aspects to empowerment. To truly empower
someone you must grant them authority, you must give them proper resources,
and you must hold them accountable to organizational values and principles.
They have to have enough authority to make some significant and important
decisions-you have to give power away. They have to have resources that are
truly theirs to steward-people, money and tools. Yet it is not a free for all-there
should be an accountable aspect that helps them stay within the playing field of
organizational boundaries. You tell them the “what” but the “how” is left up to
them. They have to have enough of all three things to truly have the freedom to
fail on their own efforts-and learn.
While there is a proper time for both things I am pushing the action point
towards empowerment. Here are some reasons why:
15Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 16/27
• Delegation largely raises up followers-empowerment raises up leaders.
• Delegation is less work for you in the short run-empowerment is more
work for you in the short run.
• Delegation is more work for you in the long run-empowerment is less
work for you in the long run.
• Delegation keeps you in the center of leadership activity-empowerment
places someone else at the center of leadership activity.
• Delegation ensures that you are your own leadership legacy-for good or
for bad. Empowerment ensures that more leaders are your leadership
legacy-which is almost always good.
16Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 17/27
Significance of Trust
When we talk of trust in correspondence with employee empowerment, then we
need to understand that trust is the stepping stone of employee empowerment.
The best companies not only understand how important their employees are to
them, but they find innovative ways to demonstrate their support. Amazingly
some businesses don’t get it. I predict many of those same companies will soon
find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.
The foundational principle for every leadership level is trust. Techniques are
relatively less important, as compared to trust. When trust is high, we
communicate easily, instantaneously and effortlessly; but when trust is low
communication is exhaustive, time-taking, and ineffective.
The empowering manager must be able to help maintain and establish not only
the technical side of the information, but also an open climate to trust that
results in the information being transferred smoothly to the employees and sub-
ordinates.
A new Maritz® Poll conducted by Maritz Research, a leader in employee
satisfaction research, paints a dire outlook of American workforce attitudes
toward employers. Employees’ trust toward their workplace has taken a severe
17Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 18/27
hit, with employees across all industry segments citing a lack of trust in not only
senior leaders, but direct managers and co-workers as well.
According to the poll, few (11 percent) employees strongly agree their
managers show consistency between their words and actions. In addition, only
seven percent of employees strongly agree they trust senior leaders to look out
for their best interest, and only seven percent strongly agree they trust their co-
workers to do so. Approximately one-fifth of respondents disagree that their
company’s leader is completely honest and ethical, and one-quarter of
respondents disagree that they trust management to make the right decisions in
times of uncertainty. While workplace trust has been dwindling since the Enron,
WorldCom, and Tyco scandals of the earlier part of the decade, threats of
layoffs and downsizing have only exacerbated the problem.
“In times like these, trust is an especially critical issue. Companies need their
best people more than ever to be engaged and productive. But, often, this
process starts at the top,” says Rick Garlick, Ph.D., senior director of consulting
and strategic implementation, Hospitality Research Group, Maritz Research.
“You’ve got to maintain credibility with your workforce as a means of getting
them to totally buy in to the mission and vision of your company. Anything less
fosters a disengaged workforce that puts self-interest at the top of its list of
priorities.”
18Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 19/27
In cases where management trust was strong, the study found that employees
were significantly more committed to working for their companies. More than
half of respondents (58 percent) with strong trust in their management were
completely satisfied with their job, while only four percent of respondents with
weak trust in management cited they were completely satisfied with their job.
The study also revealed:
• Nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of respondents with strong trust in management
would be happy to spend the rest of their career with their present company.
This compares to only seven percent of respondents who have weak trust in
management.
• More than half of those surveyed (51 percent) with strong management trust
would invest money in their company if they could versus only six percent of
those surveyed with weak management trust.
• Only three percent of respondents with weak management trust look forward
to coming to work everyday. For those with strong management trust, 50
percent responded they look forward to coming to work everyday.
Thus, we can easily note the difference that trust in an organization creates.
19Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 20/27
Participation and its Methods
Employee participation is the process whereby employees are involved in
decision making processes, rather than simply acting on orders. Employee
participation is part of a process of empowerment in the workplace.
Individual employees are encouraged to take responsibility for quality in terms
of carrying out activities, which meet the requirements of their customers. The
internal customer is someone within the organisation that receives the 'product
of service' provided by their 'supplier' within the organisation. External
customers are buyers and users outside of the organisation. Employee
participation is also part of the move towards human resource development in
modern organisations. Employees are trusted to make decisions for themselves
and the organisation. This is a key motivational tool.
Employee participation is also referred to as employee involvement (EI)
Examples of employee participation include:
i. Project teams or quality circles in which employees work on projects or tasks
with considerable responsibility being delegated to the team.
ii. Suggestion schemes - where employees are given channels whereby they can
suggest new ideas to managers within the organisation. Often they will receive
20Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 21/27
rewards for making appropriate suggestions.
iii. Consultation exercises and meetings whereby employees are encouraged to
share ideas.
iv. Delegation of responsibility within the organisation. In modern organisations
ground level employees have to be given considerable responsibility because
they are dealing with customers on a day-to-day basis often in novel situations.
Such employees need to be trusted to make decisions for themselves.
v. Multi-channel decision making processes. In such situations decisions are not
only made in a downward direction, they also result from communications
upwards, sideways, and in many other directions within the organisation.
Importance of Resources
In many organizations access to resources is controlled by
supervisory staff. If employee empowerment is to be
implemented successfully, those controls must be removed and
resources placed under empowered employees' control.
"Resources include items such as funding, access to support
staff, or experts who have knowledge on which the employee
can draw." (Ward, 1996, p. 22) Typically restriction of access
to resources is in place to avoid employee abuse. However, if
information about the costs and effect on the bottom line
procurement of resources has is shared with employees they
21Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 22/27
are not likely to abuse them. Caudron (1995) notes, "Once
both employees and managers have received proper training,
the next step is to give employees control of the resources
needed to make improvements. Nothing is more demotivating
or disempowering than being stopped in your tracks because
you either don't know how to proceed or lack the tools
necessary to do a good job." (p. 31).
Bowen and Lawler (1995) describe what happens if insufficient
resources are provided. Relying on people to provide service
improvements without resources is called the human resources
trap. "The HR trap occurs when managers expect their front-
line people to provide better and better service without
simultaneously trying to improve the core service offering
itself, enhance the tangibles, make available state-of-the-art
technology and market research, and so on. It can result in
unreasonable responsibility for damage control placed on the
front-line workers in a poorly designed, inadequately
coordinated service system." (Bowen & Lawler, 1995, p. 82)
Release of control to employees demonstrates management
trust and confidence in their competence. This is very
empowering.
22Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 23/27
Management Role
If a manager does not perceive her or his role is to help those she or he
supervises to grow, then any empowerment implementation effort will not be
successful. A change in role perception is called for in this instance when
implementing employee empowerment. The supervisor must see potential in
the employee and work to bring that potential out. The process is best described
as mentoring or coaching and it entails:
• determining the skill level of the employee
• sharing information about the goal to be achieved and why it is important
to the organization as a whole
• providing for employee training as needed
• depending upon the employee's skill level, providing appropriate
supervisory support
• a directing style for those tasks for which the employee has a low skill
level
• coaching for those tasks with which the employee has some skills but is
lacking experience or motivation
• a supporting style for those tasks where the employee knows what to do
but is still lacking confidence in their abilities
23Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 24/27
• a delegating style for those tasks where the employee is motivated and
fully capable. (Blanchard, Zigarmi & Zigarmi,1985)
• ensuring that the employee is consistently growing in skill by providing
new responsibilities for which a higher level of supervision is needed
• mentoring the employee such that they absorb both the organizational
culture and the value of empowerment
• removing barriers to empowerment present in the organizational structure
• ensuring that appropriate resources are available for the employee, or
ensuring that the employee has the appropriate skills to obtain needed
resources
• providing support for the continued empowerment of the employee
• and sharing information about the employee's and the organization's
effectiveness.
24Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 25/27
Conclusion
Not all performance problems are caused by personal ones, and
many factors affect performance decline. Work-related causes
are the responsibility of the
manager. Performance management requires clear standards
and managers to be trained in interview techniques. It does not
25Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 26/27
require managers to be taught counselling or pseudo-
psychological skills.
The EAP model provides managers with a framework for
appropriate work performance intervention. It allows managers
to show concern without getting
involved in employee ‘counselling’ or losing focus on the
performance decline. The primary role of the manager remains
the management of employees and their work performance.
Bibliography
1. Blanchard, K., Zigarmi, P. & Zigarmi, D.
(1985). Leadership and the One Minute Manager:
26Pratik Mohapatra, 46, FB2
Empowerment
8/7/2019 OB Empowerment
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ob-empowerment 27/27
Increasing Effectiveness Through Situational Leadership.
New York: William Morrow.
2. Bowen, D.E. & Lawler, E.E. (1995). Empowering service
employees. Sloan Management Review, Summer 1995,
p.73.
3. Caudron, S. (1995). Create an empowering environment.
Personnel Journal, 74-9, p.28.
4. Grove, P.B. (ed.), (1971). Webster's Third New
International Dictionary of the English Language
Unabridged. Springfield, MA: G&C Merriam.
5. Ward, B. (1996). How to empower. Canadian Manager,
21-4, p. 20.
6. Employee counselling and performance management -
Tony Buon
7. Employee Empowerment - Nick Nykodym, Jack L.
Simonetti, Warren R. Nielsen and Barbara Welling, Volume
2, 1994
27