Post on 06-Jul-2018
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
1/80
COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)michael.friedland@knobbe.comAli S. Razai (SBN 246922)ali.razai@knobbe.comKNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street
Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614Telephone: (949) 760-0404Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLEY, INC., a Washingtoncorporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
PR TRADING COMPANY, INC. D/B/APR SUNGLASSES, a Texas corporation,
Defendant.
))))))
))))))))
Civil Action No.
COMPLAINT FORPATENT INFRINGEMENT,TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT, TRADEDRESS INFRINGEMENT,FALSE DESIGNATION OFORIGIN AND UNFAIRCOMPETITION
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
'16CV1147 NLSAJB
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
2/80
- 1 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”) hereby complains of Defendant PR
Trading Company, Inc. d/b/a PR Sunglasses (“Defendant”) and alleges as
follows:
I. JURISDICTION
1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claims
in this action that relate to patent infringement, trademark infringement, trade
dress infringement, false designation of origin, and federal unfair competition
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338, and 15
U.S.C. §§ 1116(a), 1121(a), and 1125(a), as these claims arise under the laws of
the United States. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the claims in
this Complaint which arise under state law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a)
because the state law claims are so related to the federal claims that they form
part of the same case or controversy and derive from a common nucleus of
operative facts.
2.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because
Defendant has a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this
judicial district including by selling and offering for sale infringing products in
this judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement in this
judicial district, including but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly
to consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of
commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,
which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to
Oakley’s claim.
3.
Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)
and (d).
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
3/80
- 2 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
II. THE PARTIES
4.
Oakley is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at One Icon,
Foothill Ranch, California 92610.
5. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant PR Trading Company, Inc. d/b/a PR Sunglasses is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, having its principal
place of business at 7596 Harwin Drive, Houston, Texas 77036.
6.
Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant has committed the acts alleged herein within this judicial district.
III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Oakley is one of the world’s most iconic brands. The company and
its products, particularly in the realm of eyewear, are instantly and universally
recognized for their innovative technology and distinctive style. Since its
founding, Oakley’s engineers and designers have worked continuously to bring
new technology and breakthrough designs to the market.
8.
Oakley has been actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of
high quality eyewear since at least 1985. Oakley is the manufacturer and
retailer of several lines of eyewear that have enjoyed substantial success and are
protected by various intellectual property rights owned by Oakley.
9. On November 25, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No.
D581,443 (“the D443 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASSES COMPONENTS.”
Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D443
Patent. A true and correct copy of the D443 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit
1.
/ / /
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 3 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
4/80
- 3 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
On July 31, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
States Design Patent No. D547,794 (“the D794 Patent”), titled
“EYEGLASSES.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and
interest in the D794 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D794 Patent is
attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
11. On November 6, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
States Design Patent No. D554,689 (“the D689 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASS
FRAME.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in
the D689 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D689 Patent is attached hereto
as Exhibit 3.
12. On December 4, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
States Design Patent No. D556,818 (“the D818 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASS
COMPONENTS.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and
interest in the D818 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D818 Patent is
attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
13.
On February 5, 2013, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
States Design Patent No. D675,664 (“the D664 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASS.”
Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D664
Patent. A true and correct copy of the D664 Patent is attached hereto as
Exhibit 5.
14. On January 28, 2003, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
States Design Patent No. D469,458 (“the D458 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASS
FRONT.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in
the D458 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D458 Patent is attached hereto
as Exhibit 6.
15. On December 29, 2009, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued
United States Design Patent No. D607,039 (“the D039 Patent”), titled
“EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENT.” Oakley is the owner by
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 4 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
5/80
- 4 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D039 Patent. A true and correct
copy of the D039 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 7.
16.
Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its
patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §287.
17. Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports
into the United States eyewear that infringe the D443 Patent, D794 Patent, D689
Patent, D818 Patent, D664 Patent, D458 Patent and D039 Patent (“Asserted
Patents”), including offering products for sale on the website
www.prsunglasses.com.
18.
In order to protect Oakley’s investment in the development of its
proprietary technology, Oakley has obtained numerous trademark registrations,
including Trademark Registration Nos. 2,146,295 and 1,984,501 (“Oakley
Marks”).
19. Oakley is the owner of Trademark Registration No. 2,146,295.
Trademark Registration No. 2,146,295 was registered with the USPTO on
March 24, 1998 on the Principal Register. Trademark Registration No.
2,146,295 is associated with the following goods: protective and/or anti-glare
eyewear, namely, sunglasses, goggles, spectacles and their parts and
accessories, namely, replacement lenses, earstems, frames, nose pieces and
foam strips; cases specially adapted for protective and/or anti-glare eyewear and
their parts and accessories. A true and correct copy of the certificate of
registration of Trademark Registration No. 2,146,295 is attached hereto as
Exhibit 8.
20.
Oakley is the owner of Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501.
Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501 was registered with the USPTO on July
2, 1996 on the Principal Register. Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501 is
associated with the following goods: protective and/or anti-glare eyewear,
namely sunglasses, goggles, spectacles and their parts and accessories, namely
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 5 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
6/80
- 5 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
replacement lenses, earstems, frames, nose pieces and foam strips; cases
specially adapted for protective and/or anti-glare eyewear and their parts and
accessories. A true and correct copy of the certificate of registration of
Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501 is attached hereto as Exhibit 9.
21. Without permission or consent from Oakley, Defendant is offering
for sale, distributing, marketing, and/or selling eyewear bearing the Oakley
Marks.
Infringing Mark
22.
Oakley is informed, and on that basis alleges, that Defendant did
not begin using its infringing mark in connection with eyewear until long after
Oakley began using the Oakley Marks.
23. Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
Defendant’s unauthorized use of its infringing mark is intended to trade upon
the goodwill and substantial recognition associated with Oakley and the Oakley
Marks.
24.
Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
Defendant is using its infringing mark in an attempt to associate its eyewear
products with Oakley and the Oakley Marks, to cause mistake or deception as to
the source of Defendant’s eyewear products, and/or to otherwise trade upon
Oakley’s valuable reputation and customer goodwill in the Oakley Marks.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 6 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
7/80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
8/80
- 7 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30.
As a result of Oakley’s widespread use and display of the
STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress in association with its eyewear, (a) the
public has come to recognize and identify eyewear bearing the STRAIGHT
JACKET® Trade Dress as emanating from Oakley, (b) the public recognizes
that products bearing the STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress constitute high
quality products that conform to the specifications created by Oakley, and (c)
the STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress has established strong secondary
meaning and extensive goodwill.
31. Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
Defendant’s acts complained of herein are willful and deliberate.
32.
Defendant’s acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to
suffer irreparable injury to its business. Oakley will suffer substantial loss of
goodwill and reputation unless and until Defendant is preliminarily and
permanently enjoined from its wrongful actions complained of herein.
IV. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Patent Infringement)
(35 U.S.C. § 271)
33.
Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1–32 of
this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
34. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
35. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D443
Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear
having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially
similar to the claim of the D443 Patent, including for example, Defendant’s
eyewear model 5173 as shown below.
/ / /
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 8 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
9/80
- 8 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accused Product Oakley’s Patent
5173 U.S. Patent No. D581,443
36. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D443 Patent were
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and
belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakley’s rights in the design claimed
in the D443 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout
the eyewear industry, and Defendant’s eyewear model 5173 is a nearly identical
copy of Oakley’s design. Accordingly, Defendant’s actions constitute willful
and intentional infringement of the D443 Patent. Defendant infringed the D443
Patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant knew, or it
was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted
infringement of the D443 Patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D443
Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
37.
Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D794
Patent, the D689 Patent, and the D818 Patent by making, using, selling, offering
for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a design that would appear to an
ordinary observer to be substantially similar to the respective claims of the
D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and the D818 Patent, including for example,
Defendant’s eyewear models 6608 and 6053 as shown below.
/ / /
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 9 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
10/80
- 9 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accused Product Oakley’s Patent
6608
6053
U.S. Patent No. D547,794
U.S. Patent No. D554,689
U.S. Patent No. D556,818
38.
Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D818
Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear
having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially
similar to the claim of the D818 Patent, including for example, Defendant’s
eyewear model 6133 as shown below.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 10 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
11/80
- 10 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accused Product Oakley’s Patent
6133 U.S. Patent No. D581,443
39.
Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689
Patent, and the D818 Patent were undertaken without permission or license from
Oakley. Upon information and belief, Defendant had actual knowledge ofOakley’s rights in the designs claimed in the D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and
the D818 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout the
eyewear industry, and Defendant’s eyewear models 6608, 6053 and 6133 are
nearly identical copies of Oakley’s designs. Accordingly, Defendant’s actions
constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689
Patent, and the D818 Patent. Defendant infringed the D794 Patent, the D689
Patent, and the D818 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights.
Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that
its actions constituted infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and the
D818 Patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689
Patent, and the D818 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce
for its industry.
40.
Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D664
Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear
having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially
similar to the claim of the D664 Patent, including for example, Defendant’s
eyewear model 5121 as shown below.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 11 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
12/80
- 11 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accused Product Oakley’s Patent
5121 U.S. Patent No. D675,664
41.
Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D664 Patent were
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and
belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakley’s rights in the design claimed
in the D664 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout
the eyewear industry, and Defendant’s eyewear model 5121 is a nearly identical
copy of Oakley’s design. Accordingly, Defendant’s actions constitute willful
and intentional infringement of the D664 Patent. Defendant infringed the D664
Patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant knew, or it
was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted
infringement of the D664 Patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the
D664Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
42.
Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D458
Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear
having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially
similar to the claim of the D458 Patent, including for example, Defendant’s
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 12 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
13/80
- 12 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
eyewear models 7223, 7260, 7261, CH228, CH11, CH422, and CH433 as
shown below.
Accused Product Oakley’s Patent
7223
7260
7261
CH228
CH11
U.S. Patent No. D469,458
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 13 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
14/80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
15/80
- 14 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
45.
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Oakley is entitled to damages for
Defendant’s infringing acts and treble damages together with interests and costs
as fixed by this Court.
46.
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Oakley is entitled to Defendant’s total
profits from the sale of eyewear that infringe Oakley’s design patent rights.
47. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Oakley is entitled to reasonable
attorneys’ fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.
48.
Due to the aforesaid infringing acts, Oakley has suffered great and
irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.
49.
Defendant will continue to directly and/or indirectly infringe
Oakley’s patent rights to the great and irreparable injury of Oakley, unless
enjoined by this Court.
V. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Federal Trademark Infringement)
(15 U.S.C. § 1114)
50.
Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32 of
this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
51.
This is a claim for trademark infringement arising under 15 U.S.C.
§ 1114.
52. Upon information and belief, Defendant is involved in the
manufacture, sale, offer for sale, distribution, import and/or export of sunglasses
that bear one or more of the Oakley Marks without Oakley’s consent.
53.
Upon information and belief, long after Oakley’s adoption and use
of each of the Oakley Marks, after the federal registration of each of the Oakley
Marks, and after each of the Oakley Marks had become famous, Defendant has
affixed and used one or more of the Oakley Marks without Oakley’s consent in
a manner that infringes upon Oakley’s rights in the Oakley Marks in violation of
15 U.S.C. § 1114.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 15 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
16/80
- 15 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
54.
Without Oakley’s consent, Defendant uses in commerce marks that
are confusingly similar to the Oakley Marks in connection with the sale,
offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods in a manner which is
likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.
55. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant did so with the intent to unfairly compete with Oakley, to trade upon
Oakley’s reputation and goodwill by causing confusion and mistake among
customers and the public, and to deceive the public into believing that
Defendant’s products are associated with, sponsored by, originate from, or are
approved by Oakley, when they are not.
56. Defendant’s activities constitute willful and intentional
infringement of the Oakley Marks in total disregard of Oakley’s proprietary
rights, and were done despite Defendant’s knowledge that the use of the Oakley
Marks was and is in direct contravention of Oakley’s rights.
57.
Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,
gains, profits, and advantages from the use of the Oakley Marks in an amount
that is not presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendant’s actions,
constituting unauthorized use of the Oakley Marks, Oakley has been damaged
and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.
58. Due to Defendant’s actions, constituting unauthorized use of the
Oakley Marks, Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable
injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.
VI. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Federal Trade Dress Infringement)
(15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))
59. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32 of
this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 16 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
17/80
- 16 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
60.
This is a claim for trade dress infringement under 15 U.S.C. §
1125(a).
61.
As a result of the widespread use and display of Oakley’s HALF
JACKET® Trade Dress, the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning to
potential purchasers, in that potential purchasers have come to associate
sunglasses bearing the design of the HALF JACKET® Trade Dress with
Oakley.
62.
Subsequent to Oakley’s use and adoption of the HALF JACKET®
Trade Dress, Defendant has developed, advertised, and sold sunglasses that use
trade dress that is confusingly similar to the HALF JACKET® trade dress. For
example, the frame of Defendant’s eyewear model CAMO11 uses trade dress
that is confusingly similar to Oakley’s HALF JACKET® Trade Dress.
63. As a result of the widespread use and display of Oakley’s
STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress, the trade dress has acquired secondary
meaning to potential purchasers, in that potential purchasers have come to
associate sunglasses bearing the design of the STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade
Dress with Oakley.
64. Subsequent to Oakley’s use and adoption of the STRAIGHT
JACKET® Trade Dress, Defendant has developed, advertised, and sold
sunglasses that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the STRAIGHT
JACKET® trade dress. For example, the stems of Defendant’s eyewear model
CAMO11 uses trade dress that is confusingly similar to Oakley’s STRAIGHT
JACKET® Trade Dress.
65.
Upon information and belief, Defendant’s acts of trade dress
infringement were undertaken willfully with full knowledge and with the
express intent to cause confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing
public.
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 17 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
18/80
- 17 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
66.
Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,
gains, profits and advantages from Defendant’s trade dress infringement in an
amount that is not presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendant’s
actions, constituting trade dress infringement, Oakley has been damaged and is
entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.
67. Due to Defendant’s actions, constituting trade dress infringement,
Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for
which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.
VII. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(False Designation of Origin and Federal Unfair Competition)
(15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))
68. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32
and 51-67 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
69.
This is a claim for false designation of origin and unfair
competition and arising under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
70.
Defendant’s use of Oakley’s trademarks and Oakley’s trade dress
without Oakley’s consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false or
misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact,
which is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the
affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as
to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods or commercial
activities by another person in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
71.
Defendant’s use of Oakley’s trademarks and Oakley’s trade dress
without Oakley’s consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false or
misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact,
which in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature,
/ / /
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 18 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
19/80
- 18 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s
goods or commercial activities in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
72.
Such conduct by Defendant is likely to confuse, mislead, and
deceive Defendant’s customers, purchasers, and members of the public as to the
origin of the Oakley’s trademarks and trade dress or cause said persons to
believe that Defendant and/or its products have been sponsored, approved,
authorized, or licensed by Oakley or are in some way affiliated or connected
with Oakley, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
73.
Upon information and belief, Defendant’s actions were undertaken
willfully with full knowledge of the falsity of such designation of origin and
false descriptions or representations.
74. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,
gains, profits, and advantages from Defendant’s false designation of origin, false
or misleading statements, descriptions of fact, or false or misleading
representations of fact in an amount that is not presently known to Oakley. By
reason of Defendant’s actions, constituting false designation of origin, false or
misleading statements, false or misleading descriptions of fact, or false or
misleading representations of fact, Oakley has been damaged and is entitled to
monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.
75. Due to Defendant’s actions, constituting false designation of origin,
false or misleading statements, false or misleading description of fact, or false or
misleading representations of fact, Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer
great and irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.
VIII. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(California Unfair Competition)
76. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32
and 51-75 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 19 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
20/80
- 19 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
77.
This is a claim for unfair competition, arising under California
Business & Professions Code § 17200, et seq.
78.
Defendant’s acts of trademark infringement, trade dress
infringement, and false designation of origin complained of herein constitute
unfair competition with Oakley under the laws of the State of California,
particularly California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq.
79. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,
gains, profits and advantages from Defendant’s unfair competition in an amount
that is not presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendant’s wrongful acts
as alleged in this Complaint, Oakley has been damaged and is entitled to
restitution.
80. By its actions, Defendant has injured and violated the rights of
Oakley and has irreparably injured Oakley, and such irreparable injury will
continue unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court.
WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against
Defendant for the following relief:
A.
An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the
Asserted Patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
B. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its
respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and
those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from infringing
the Asserted Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271.
C.
That Defendant accounts for all gains, profits, and advantages
derived by Defendant’s infringement of the Asserted Patents in violation of
35 U.S.C. § 271, and that Defendant pays to Oakley all damages suffered by
Oakley and/or Defendant’s total profit from such infringement pursuant to 35
U.S.C. § 289.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 20 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
21/80
- 20 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D.
An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages
because of Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284.
E.
An award to Oakley of the attorney fees, expenses, and costs
incurred by Oakley in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285.
F. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case.
G. An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed each of
the Oakley Marks under 15 U.S.C. § 1114.
H.
An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed each of
Oakley’s HALF JACKET® Trade Dress and Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET®
Trade Dress under 15 U.S.C. § 1125.
I. An Order adjudging Defendant to have falsely designated the
origin of its goods under 15 U.S.C. § 1125.
J. An Order adjudging Defendant to have unfairly competed with
Oakley under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 and California Business & Professions Code §
17200, et seq.
K.
That Defendant accounts for all gains, profits, and advantages
derived by Defendant’s infringement of the Oakley Marks, Oakley’s HALF
JACKET® Trade Dress and Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET, false designation
of origin, and federal unfair competition and that Defendant pays to Oakley all
damages suffered by Oakley and/or Defendant’s total profit from such
infringement pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117.
L.
An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages
because of Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117.
M.
A preliminary and permanent injunction against Defendant, its
officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors, and assigns,
and all persons, firms, or corporations in active concert or participation with
Defendant, enjoining them from engaging in the following activities and from
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 21 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
22/80
- 21 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
assisting or inducing, directly or indirectly, others to engage in the following
activities:
1.
using any of the Oakley Marks, or any other mark, symbol, or
logo that is confusingly similar to any of the Oakley Marks on
or in connection with any goods, including but not limited to,
eyewear and replacement parts;
2. using Oakley’s HALF JACKET® Trade Dress, Oakley’s
STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress, or any other trade dress
that is confusingly similar to either Oakley’s HALF JACKET®
Trade Dress or Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress;
3. manufacturing, using, displaying, distributing, or selling any
goods that infringe any of the Oakley Marks, Oakley’s HALF
JACKET® Trade Dress or Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET®
Trade Dress.
4.
falsely designating the origin of Defendant’s goods;
5.
unfairly competing with Oakley in any manner whatsoever;
6.
making false or misleading statements, descriptions of fact, or
false or misleading representations of fact; and
7. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Oakley’s
business reputation.
N. That Defendant be required to account to Oakley for any and all
profits derived by its acts of trademark infringement, trade dress infringement,
false designation of origin and unfair competition complained of in this
Complaint.
O.
That Defendant’s acts of trademark infringement, trade dress
infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition complained of
in this Complaint be deemed willful, that this be deemed an exceptional case,
and that Oakley be entitled to enhanced damages.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 22 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
23/80
- 22 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P.
That Oakley have and recover the costs of this civil action,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees.
Q.
An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of
this action against Defendant.
R. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and
proper.
Respectfully submitted,
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Dated: May 12, 2016 By: /s/ Ali S. Razai Michael K. Friedlandmichael.friedland@knobbe.comAli S. Razaiali.razai@knobbe.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 23 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
24/80
- 23 - COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so
triable.
Respectfully submitted,
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Dated: May 12, 2016 By: /s/ Ali S. Razai Michael K. Friedlandmichael.friedland@knobbe.comAli S. Razaiali.razai@knobbe.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.23303966
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 24 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
25/80
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
Page #
Exhibit 1 ................................................................................................................ 1
Exhibit 2 ................................................................................................................ 5
Exhibit 3 .............................................................................................................. 10
Exhibit 4 .............................................................................................................. 15
Exhibit 5 .............................................................................................................. 21
Exhibit 6 .............................................................................................................. 26
Exhibit 7 .............................................................................................................. 31
Exhibit 8 .............................................................................................................. 41
Exhibit 9 .............................................................................................................. 42
Exhibit 10 ............................................................................................................ 43
Exhibit 11 ............................................................................................................ 44
23322119
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 25 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
26/80
EXHIBIT 1
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 26 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
27/80
1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent 1 0 )
P a t e n t N 0 . :
Jannard e t a ] .
USO0D581443
US D 5 8 1 , 4 4 3 S
4 5 )
Date o f P a t e n t : * 1 ,
Nov.
2 5 , 2008
5 4 )
7 5 )
7 3 )
* * )
2 1 )
2 2 )
6 2 )
5 1 )
5 2 )
5 8 )
5 6 )
EYEGLASSES
COMPONENTS
I n v e n t o r s : James H . J a n n a r d ,
S p i e d e n
I s l a n d , WA
U S ) ;
Lek
h i x t o n , O r c a s ,
WA
U S ) ;
C o l i n B a d e n , I r v i n e ,
CA
U S ) ; P e t e r
Y e e , I r v i n e , CA U S )
A s s i g n e e : O a k l e y ,
I n c . , F o o t h i l l
R a n c h , CA
U S )
Term: 14 Years
A p p l .
N o . :
2 9 / 3 0 1 , 9 0 2
F i l e d :
Mar.
2 1 , 2008
R e l a t e d US.
p p l i c a t i o n
Data
D i v i s i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 2 9 / 2 6 6 , 5 4 7 , ? l e d
on S e p .
2 2 ,
2 0 0 6 , noW
a t .
No. D e s . 5 6 9 , 4 1 2 .
LOC
8)
Cl.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06
US l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D16/314
Field
of
Classi?cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/ 01,
D 1 6 / 3 0 0 4 3 4 2 ; D 2 9 / 1 0 9 4 1 1 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;
3 5 1 / 4 1 ,
4 4 , 5 1 4 5 2 , 6 2 , 1 5 8 , 9 2 , 1 0 3 4 1 2 3 ,
3 5 1 / 1 4 0 , 1 5 3 ; 2 / 4 2 6 4 4 3 2 ,
4 4 7 4 4 4 9 ,
4 4 1 ,
2/4344437
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e
f o r c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h h i s t o r y .
R e f e r e n c e s
C i t e d
U . S . PATENTDOCUMENTS
D 1 5 0 , 9 2 4 S 9 / 1 9 4 8
B l i g h t
D 1 7 6 , 3 1 6 S
1 2 / 1 9 5 5 F l e m i n g
D 1 7 8 , 1 7 8 S 7 / 1 9 5 6
F l e m i n g
D293,450
S 1 2 / 1 9 8 7
J a n n a r d
D323,333 S
1 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d
e t
a 1 .
D324,394 S 3 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d
D329,442
S 9 / 1 9 9 2
J a n n a r d
D330,035 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d
D331,587 S 1 2 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d
e t
a 1 .
5 , 2 4 9 , 0 0 1
A 9 / 1 9 9 3
J a n n a r d
D344,742 S 3 / 1 9 9 4
J a n n a r d
D346 814 S
* 5 / 1 9 9 4
Iida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D16/314
D354,501 S 1 / 1 9 9 5
J a n n a r d
5 , 6 1 0 , 6 6 8 A 3 / 1 9 9 7 Mage
D384,364 S
9 / 1 9 9 7
Yee
5 , 7 6 0 , 8 6 8 A 6 / 1 9 9 8 J a n n a r d e t
a 1 .
D399,519
S
1 0 / 1 9 9 8
Yee
D399,866 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 8 Yee
D401,607 S
1 1 / 1 9 9 8
M i n i u t t i
D410,484 S 6 / 1 9 9 9 J a n n a r d e t
a 1 .
6 , 2 3 3 , 3 4 2
B1
5 / 2 0 0 1 F e r n a n d e z
D452 522 S * 1 2 / 2 0 0 1 Chiou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D16/330
D 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 S 6 / 2 0 0 2 S o p e r
D473,892 S 4 / 2 0 0 3 T h i x t o n
e t a 1 .
D529 066 S
*
9/2006
Matera
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. D16/315
OTHER
PUBLICATIONS
U . S . A p p l . N o . 2 9 / 2 6 6 , 5 4 7 ,
? l e d
S e p .
2 2 ,
2 0 0 6 .
US. p p l . N o . 2 9 / 2 8 8 , 6 0 4 , ? l e d J u n . 1 5 , 2 0 0 7 .
U . S . A p p l .
N o .
2 9 / 2 8 8 , 6 0 5 , ? l e d J u n . 1 5 , 2 0 0 7 .
U . S . A p p l . N o . 2 9 / 2 8 8 , 6 0 6 , ? l e d J u n . 1 5 , 2 0 0 7 .
*
c i t e d by
examiner
P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i R a p h a e l B a r k a i
7 4 )
A t t o r n e y ,
A g e n t , o r Firm4Gregory K . N e l s o n
5 7 ) CLAIM
The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n
f o r
e y e g l a s s c o m p o n e n t s , a s shoWn
and d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
F I G . 1 i s a f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e
v i e W
o f t h e e y e g l a s s
components
o f t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n ;
F I G .
2
i s
a
f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ;
FIG. 3 i s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
4 i s
a
l e f t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
t h e r e o f ,
t h e
r i g h t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l
v i e W
b e i n g
a
m i r r o r
i m a g e
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
5 i s
a t o p e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ; a n d ,
F I G . 6 i s a
bottom
p l a n
vieW
t h e r e o f .
Phantom
l i n i n g ,
W h e r e
u t i l i z e d ,
i s
f o r i l l u s t r a t i v e p u r p o s e s
o n l y and
i s
n o t i n t e n d e d t o l i m i t
t h e
c l a i m e d d e s i g n t o
t h e
f e a t u r e s shoWn n p h a n t o m .
1 C l a i m ,
3 Drawing
S h e e t s
EXHIBIT 1Page 1
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 27 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
28/80
US Patent
N o v 2 5 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 1 o f 3 US 581 443 S
EXHIBIT 1Page 2
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 28 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
29/80
US Patent
N o v 2 5 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 2 o f 3 US 581 443 S
EXHIBIT 1Page 3
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 29 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
30/80
US Patent
N o v 2 5 2 0 0 8
S h e e t
3 o f 3 US 581 443 S
EXHIBIT 1Page 4
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 30 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
31/80
EXHIBIT 2
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 31 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
32/80
1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent 1 0 )
P a t e n t N 0 . :
USO0D547794S
US
D 5 4 7 , 7 9 4
S
Jannard e t a l . 4 5 )
Date o f P a t e n t :
4 * J u l . 3 1 ,
2007
( 5 4 ) EYEGLASSES
D 4 l 4 , 7 9 6 S
1 0 / 1 9 9 9 A r n e t t e
D420 035
S
* 2/2000
Hartman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dl6/325
( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s :
James
H.
Jannard, S p i e d e n
I s l a n d , WA 1 3 4 4 9 5 4 1 5 *
1 0 / 2 0 0 1
A r n e t t eU S ) ; Hans Karsten
M o r i t z , F o o t h i l l
2 i
gage
~ a g e
§:1 Uh’S€A(US)’C°hn Baden’ Imne’ D 5 1 8 , 8 4 7 s * 4 / 2 0 0 6 T e n g . . . .
D532,033 S *
1 1 / 2 0 0 6
Mangum
D534 572 S
* 1/2007
Teng
. . . . ..
( 7 3 )
A s s 1 g n e e : Oakley, I n c . ,
F o o t h 1 l l
Ranch,
CA
US) 1 3 5 3 4 5 7 3 S * V2007 Mage
*
D 5 3 6 , 0 2 8 S * 1 / 2 0 0 7
P a u l s o n
)
Tenn?
14
Years
D537,467 s
*
2/2007
Teng
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326
2 1 )
A P P 1 - N O - 1 2 9 / 2 2 7 J 1 9
OTHE R
PUBLICATIONS
( 2 2 )
F i l e d : A p r .
1 3 , 2 0 0 5
S u n g l a s s
H u t ,
P ~ 5 , 2 0 0 2 *
( 5 1 )
LOC
8 ) C l .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16-06 *
C i t e d by examiner
( 5 2 )
US.
l .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326 Primary
ExamineriRaphael
Barkai
( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o n
Search
. . . . .
Dl6/300i330,
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n l , 0 1 ’ FirmiGregory K -
Nelson
D l 6 / l 0 l , 3 3 2 i 3 3 8 ; D 2 9 / l 0 9 * l l 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;
3 5 1 / 4 1 ,
4 4 ,
5 1 4 5 2 ,
6 2 ,
1 5 8 ,
9 2 ,
1 0 3 4 1 1 1 ,
5 7 ) CL AI M
3 5 1 / 1 5 6 , 6 1 , 1 1 4 4 1 1 9 ,
1 2 1 4 1 2 3 ; 2 / 4 2 6 4 4 3 2 ,
_
2 / 4 4 7 i 4 4 9 ’ 4 4 1 , 4 3 6 ,
434*437
The o r n a m e n t a l
d e s l g n f o r
a n
e y e g l a s s e s , a s shown a n d
S e e a p p l i c a t i o n
? l e
f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h
h i s t o r y .
d e s c n b e d
( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d
DESCRIPTION
U . S .
PATENT
DOCUMENTS
D192 885 S * 5 / 1 9 6 2 Petitto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/329
D l 9 3 , 0 2 8 S 6 / 1 9 6 2 P e t i t t o
D199,150 S 9 / 1 9 6 4 C a r m i c h a e l
D202,658 S
1 0 / 1 9 6 5
P e t i t t o
D209,862 S l / l 9 6 8 McCracken
D210 418 S * 3/1968 Bloch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326
D218 ,569
S * 9/1970 McCracken
.
D1 6 / 3 2 5
D264 094 S * 4/1982
Morris
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/325
D 2 6 8 , 6 8 3
S 4 / 1 9 8 3
T e n n y
D285,020
S 8 / 1 9 8 6
S c h m i d t h a l e r
D372,726 S
8 / 1 9 9 6
S i m i o n i
D390,589 S 2 / 1 9 9 8 S i m i o n i
D397,351 S 8 / 1 9 9 8
S i m i o n i
D399 238 S * 1 0 / 1 9 9 8
Simioni
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326
D 4 0 7 , 0 9 9
S 3 / 1 9 9 9 Wang
F I G . 1 i s
a f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e
vieW o f
t h e
e y e g l a s s e s o f
t h e
p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n ;
F I G .
2
i s a l e f t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l
vieW o f t h e e y e g l a s s e s , t h e
r i g h t s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l
v i e W b e i n g a m i r r o r i m a g e t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
3
i s
a
f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ;
FIG.
4
i s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
5 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W
t h e r e o f ;
a n d ,
F I G .
6
i s
a
bottom
p l a n
vieW
t h e r e o f .
Phantom l i n i n g ,
W h e r e
u t i l i z e d , i s f o r
i l l u s t r a t i v e
p u r p o s e s
o n l y
and
i s n o t i n t e n d e d
t o
l i m i t
t h e c l a i m e d
d e s i g n
t o t h e
f e a t u r e s shoWn n p h a n t o m .
1 C l a i m , 4 Drawing S h e e t s
EXHIBIT 2Page 5
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 32 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
33/80
U.S.
Patent
J u l . 3 1
2 7
S h e e t 1
o f 4
U D547 794 S
EXHIBIT 2Page 6
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 33 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
34/80EXHIBIT 2
Page 7
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 34 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
35/80
U S
atent J u l
3 1
2 7 S h e e t 3 of4
EXHIBIT 2Page 8
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 35 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
36/80
U.S.
Patent
J u l . 3 1
2 7
S h e e t
4 o f 4
U D547 794 S
FIG.
6
EXHIBIT 2Page 9
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 36 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
37/80
EXHIBIT 3
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 37 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
38/80
1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent 1 0 )
P a t e n t N 0 . 2
USO0D554689S
US
D 5 5 4 , 6 8 9
S
Jannard
e t
a ] . 4 5 )
Date o f P a t e n t : 4 *
Nov.
6 , 2007
(54) EYEGLASSFRAME
D399,238
S * 10/1998 Simioni . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D16/326
D 4 0 7 , 0 9 9
S 3 / 1 9 9 9 Wang
( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : James H.
J a n n a r d , S p i e d e n
I s l a n d , WA
1 3 4 1 4 3 9 6
5 1 0 / 1 9 9 9 A f n e t t e
(US);
Hans
Karsten
Moritz,
Foothill
2
i
21mg“
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
ne
e . . . .
. .
221E265‘ms ’ Coll“
Baden’ Imne’
D488,499
s
*
4 / 2 0 0 4
Mage
. . . . . . . . .
. . Dl6/326
D500,781
S
* 1 / 2 005 Mage
.
. . . .
.. D16/326
. _ . D518 847
S
*
4/2006
Teng . . . . . . . . . .. D16/326
( 7 3 )
A s s i g n e e . Oakley,
I n c . , F o o t h i l l
Ranch, CA
US) 1353293
S *
1 1 / 2 0 0 6
Mangum _ _ _ _
_ _
B16626
** D534 572
S
1/2007 Teng . . . . . . . . .
..
D16/326
( )
Tenn?
14 Years D534,573
s
* 1/2007
Mage
. . Dl6/326
D536,028 S *
1/2007
Paulson .. . . . . . . D16/326
( 2 1 )
Appl. No.:
29/272,776 D537,467 s * 2 / 2 0 0 7 Teng
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326
( 2 2 ) F i l e d :
F e b .
15,2007 OTHER UBLICATIONS
_ _
Sunglass Hut,
p. 5 , 2002
R e l a t e d
U - S -
A P P I I C a t I O I I
Data US.
A p p l . N 0 . 2 9 / 2 2 7 , 71 9 , ? l e d A p r . 1 3 , 2 0 0 5 , J a n n a r d , P e n d i n g
( 6 2 )
D i v i s i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n
N o .
2 9 / 2 2 7 , 7 1 9 ,
? l e d o n
A p r .
a p p h c a n o n
1 3 ,
2 0 0 5 . *
c i t e d by
e x a m i n e r
( 5 1 ) LOC
s ) C ] .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06 Primary
ExamineriRaphael
Barkai
( 5 2 ) us. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1)16/326
(74)A”0r @y~4g@”’10rFirm*Greg°1'Y
K- Nelson
(58) Field of
Classi?cation
Searc h
. . . . .
. .
Dl6/300i330,
D 1 6 / 1 0 1 , 3 3 2 * 3 3 8 ;
D 2 9 / l 0 9 i l l 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;
5 7 )
CLAIM
351/41
44
51452 62
158
92 1034111 -
’ ’ ’ ’ ’ _ ’ ’ The rnamental design for a n
eyeglass
frame, as shown nd
3 5 1 / 1 5 6 , 6 1 ,
1 1 4 4 1 1 9 ,
1 2 1 4 1 2 3 ,
2 / 4 2 6 4 4 3 2 , d e s c r i b e d
2 / 4 4 7 4 4 4 9 ,
4 4 1 , 4 3 6 , 4 3 4 4 4 3 7
S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e
f o r
c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y .
DESCRIPTION
( 5 6 )
R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d
F I G .
1
i s a
f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e
v i e W o f t h e e y e g l a s s
f r a m e o f
US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D192,885 S * 5/ 1 962 Petitto ..................... . D16/329
D193,028 S 6 / 1 9 6 2 P e t i t t o
D199,150
S 9 / 1 9 6 4 C a r m i c h a e l
D202,658
S
1 0 / 1 9 6 5
P e t i t t o
D209,862 S
1 / 1 9 6 8
McCracken
D210,418 S
*
3/1968
Bloch ......................
. D16/326
D218,569 S * 9/1970 McCracken
.
D16/325
D264,094
S *
4/1982
Morri s ....................
.
D16/325
D 2 6 8 , 6 8 3
S 4 / 1 9 8 3
T e n n y
D285,020 S 8 / 1 9 8 6
S c h m i d t h a l e r
D372,726 S 8 / 1 9 9 6
S i m i o n i
D390,589 S 2 / 1 9 9 8
S i m i o n i
D397,351 S 8 / 1 9 9 8
S i m i o n i
t h e
p r e s e n t
i n v e n t i o n ;
F I G . 2 i s
a l e f t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ,
t h e r i g h t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W b e i n g
a
m i r r o r
i m a g e
t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 3 i s a f r o nt e l e v a t i o n a l
vieW
t h e r e o f ;
FIG. 4
i s
a r e a r e l e v a t i o na l
vieW
t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 5 i s
a t o p e l e v a t i o na l
vieW
t h e r e o f ; a n d ,
F I G . 6 i s a bottom p l a n
vieW
t h e r e o f .
Phantom l i n i n g ,
W h e r e
u t i l i z e d , i s f o r
i l l u s t r a t i v e
p u r p o s e s
o n l y
and
i s n o t i n t e n d e d
t o
l i m i t
t h e
c l a i m e d d e s i g n
t o t h e
f e a t u r e s shoWn n p h a n t o m .
1 C l a i m , 4 Drawing S h e e t s
EXHIBIT 3Page 10
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 38 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
39/80
U.S.
Patent
N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t 1 o f 4 U
D554 689
S
EXHIBIT 3Page 11
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 39 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
40/80
U.S.
Patent
N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t
2
o f 4 U
D554 689
S
EXHIBIT 3Page 12
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 40 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
41/80
U.S.
Patent
N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t
3
o f 4 U
D554 689
S
FIG. 5
EXHIBIT 3Page 13
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 41 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
42/80
U.S.
Patent
N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t 4 o f 4 U
D554 689
S
F I G
6
EXHIBIT 3Page 14
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 42 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
43/80
EXHIBIT 4
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 43 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
44/80
1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent 1 0 )
P a t e n t N 0 . :
USO0D556818S
US
D 5 5 6 , 8 1 8
S
Jannard
e t a ] . 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : 4 * D e c . 4 , 2007
54) EYEGL SS
COMPONENTS
D481,063 S *
10/2003
Lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326
D500,781
S
* 1/ 2 005 Mage .
. . . .
. .
D16/335
7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : James H.
Jannard, Spieden
I s l a n d , W 13534572 5 * 1 / 2 0 0 7 Teng ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 3 1 6 / 3 3 7
US);
Hans
Karsten
Moritz, Foothill
2
i Ting ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
- ~
uang
.. ....
.
221E265‘
ms)’
C o l l “ Baden’ Imne’ D 5 3 6 , 0 2 6 s
* 1 / 2 0 0 7 B r u c k
. . . . . . D 1 6 / 3 2 6
D537,467
S * 2/2007 Teng
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D16/326
7 3 )
A s s i g n e e : O a k l e y , I n c . , F o o t h i l l R a n c h ,
CA U S ) OTHER PUBLICATIONS
* * ) T e r m : 1 4 Y e a r s
P e n d i n g U . S . A p p l .
N o .
2 9 / 2 2 7 , 7 1 9 ,
? l e d A p r .
1 3 , 2 0 0 5 , J a n n a r d .
*
c i t e d by
examiner
21) Appl. No.: 29/272,777
P r i m a r y E x a m m e r i R a p h a e l B a r k a i
2 2 )
F i l e d ; Feb
1 5 ,
2 0 0 7
7 4 )
A t t o r n e y ,
A g e n t ,
o r
FirmiGregory K .
N e l s o n
R e l a t e d US. A p p l i c a t i o n
Data 5 7 )
CLAIM
6 2 ) D i v i s i o n O f a P Pl i C a t i O n N O - 2 9 / 2 2 7 , 7 1 9 ,
? l e d On
AP1 The o r n a m e n t a l
d e s i g n
f o r a n
e y e g l a s s
c o m p o n e n t s , a s
1 3 ,
HOW P a t . NO.
D e s . Shown
and d e s c r i b e d _
51) LOC 8 )
Cl.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
16-06 DESCRIPTION
5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326;
D16/335
FIG
1
i s a from p e r s p e c t i v e View of h e e y e g l a s s COmpO_
5 8 ) F i e l d of
Classi?cation
Search . . . . . . . Dl6/300i330, Helm of h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n ;
D16/101,332*338; D29/l09ill0; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ; FIG 21S a
e r s
e c t i v e
View t h e r e o f
351/41,
44, 51452, 62,
158,
92, 1034111,
_
p p
_ _ ’
3 5 1 / 1 5 6 , 6 1 ’
1 1 4 E 1 1 9 ’
1 2 1 E 12 3 ; 2 / 4 2 6i 4 3 2 ’
F I G .
3
1 5
a
f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l VleW t h e r e o f ;
2 / 4 4 7 i 4 4 9 , 4 4 1 , 4 3 6 ,
4344437
F I G . 4 i s
a l a t e r a l
l e f t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f , t h e
S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r C o m p l e t e
S e a r c h
h i s t o r y . l a t e r a l
r i g h t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l
V i e w
b e i n g
a m i r r o r i m a g e
5 6 )
R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d t h e r e o f ;
U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS
D193,028 S 6 / 1 9 6 2
P e t i t t o
D199,150
S 9 / 1 9 6 4 C a r m i c h a e l
D202,658 S
1 0 / 1 9 6 5
P e t i t t o
D209,862
S
1 / 1 9 6 8
McCracken
D 2 6 8 , 6 8 3 S 4 / 1 9 8 3 T e n n y
D285,020 S 8 / 1 9 8 6
S c h m i d t h a l e r
D372,726
S 8 / 1 9 9 6
S i m i o n i
D390,589 S 2 / 1 9 9 8 S i m i o n i
D397,351 S 8 / 1 9 9 8
S i m i o n i
D 4 0 7 , 0 9 9
S 3 / 1 9 9 9 Wang
D414,796 S
1 0 / 1 9 9 9
A r n e t t e
F I G . 5 i s a m e d i a l l e f t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l
View
t h e r e o f , t h e
m e d i a l r i g h t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l
V i e w
b e i n g
a
m i r r o r
i m a g e
t h e r e o f ;
FIG.
6 i s a
r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l
View t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
7
i s a
b o t t o m
p l a n
View
t h e r e o f ; a n d ,
F I G .
8
i s a
t o p
e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f .
Phantom
l i n i n g ,
W h e r e
u t i l i z e d , i s f o r
i l l u s t r a t i v e
p u r p o s e s
o n l y and
i s
n o t i n t e n d e d
t o
l i m i t
t h e
c l a i m e d d e s i g n
t o t h e
f e a t u r e s
shoWn n p h a n t o m .
1 C l a i m ,
5
Drawing S h e e t s
EXHIBIT 4Page 15
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 44 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
45/80
U.S. Patent D e c 4
2 0 0 7
S h e e t 1 0 f 5 U
D556 818
S
EXHIBIT 4Page 16
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 45 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
46/80
U.S. Patent D e c
4
2 0 0 7
S h e e t 2 0 f 5 U
D556 818
S
EXHIBIT 4Page 17
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 46 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
47/80
U.S. Patent
D e c
4
2 0 0 7 S h e e t 3 0 f 5 U
D556 818
S
EXHIBIT 4Page 18
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 47 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
48/80
U.S. Patent D e c
4
2 0 0 7
S h e e t 4 0 f 5 U
D556 818
S
FIG.
7
EXHIBIT 4Page 19
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 48 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
49/80
U.S. Patent D e c
4
2 0 0 7
S h e e t 5 0 f 5 U
D556 818
S
FIG.
8
EXHIBIT 4Page 20
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 49 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
50/80
EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 50 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
51/80
1 2 )
United
States
Design Patent
1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . :
USO0D675664S
US
D 6 7 5 , 6 6 4
S
Moritz
4 5 )
Date
o f
P a t e n t :
* 9 : Feb.
5 ,
2013
( 5 4 )
EYEGLASS D 5 4 5 , 8 6 8
S 7 / 2 0 0 7 C h u a n g
D553,173 S 1 0 / 2 0 0 7
Baden
t
a 1 .
D553,177
10/ 2007
Ch
7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : Hans M o r i t z , F o o t h l l l
R a n c h ,
CA U S ) 1 3 5 6 4 5 6 8 S 3 / 2 0 0 8 M o i r i l t z
_ _ D564,571 S 3/2008 Jannard
e t
a 1 .
( 7 3 ) A s s 1 g n e e :
O a k l e y ,
I n c . , F o o t h i l l R a n c h ,
CA
U S ) D 5 6 9 , 4 1 2 S 5 / 2 0 0 8 J a n n a r d e r a 1 ,
D575,324 S * 8/2008 MoritZ . . . . . . . . D16/326
(**)
Term:
1 4 Years
D581,444 s *
ll/2008 Jannard
et
a 1 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/314
D581,449 S 1 1 / 2 0 0 8 Yee
D583,851 S
1 2 / 2 0 0 8
Lane
( 2 1 )
A p p l . N o . :
2 9 / 3 9 6 , 2 6 7
1 3 5 8 4 3 3 0 S V 2 0 0 9
C h e n
_ 7,497,569 B2 3/2009 Webb
( 2 2 ) F 1 l e d : J u n . 2 8 , 2011 D 5 9 0 , 4 3 2 S 4 / 2 0 0 9 Y e e
D591,787 S
5 / 2 0 0 9
Yee
( 5 1 )
LOC 9 ) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06 13600269 S
90009
Masui
(52) U . S . C 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/315;D16/335 D622’755 S g/2010 Yee
( 5 8 )
F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o n Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D 1 6 / 1 0 1 , g * ? o f i t Z e t a 1 ~
B16614
Dl6/300i342,
900;
D29/109*110;
D24/110.2; OntZ
3 5 1 / 4 1 ’ 4 4 ’ 5 1 * 5 2 ’ 6 2 ’ 1 5 8 ’ 9 2 ’ 1 0 3 * 1 2 3 , 2 0 0 6 / 0 2 3 8 7 0 0 A 1 1 0 / 2 0 0 6
D e l
V e c c h i o
3 5 1 / 1 4 0 ,
1 5 3 , 4 5 * 4 6 ; 2 / 4 2 6 i 4 3 2 , 4 4 7 * 4 4 9 ,
*
c i t e d b y
e x a m i n e r
2 / 4 4 1 , 4 3 4 * 4 3 7 , 1 3 , 1 5 ; D 2 1 / 4 8 3 , 6 5 9 * 6 6 1 ;
D14/372 Primary
Examiner
aphael
Barkai
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r
c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h h i s t o r y .
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t ,
o r
Firm nobbe M a r t e n s Olson
B e a r ,
LLP
( 5 6 )
R e f e r e n c e s
C i t e d
U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS
Dl96,000 S
8 / 1 9 6 3
M c N e i l l
4 , 7 8 7 , 7 3 0
A l l / l 9 8 8 B r i s t o l
D398,02l S 9 / 1 9 9 8 B o l l e
D469,459
S
l / 2 0 0 3
M o r i t z
D474,223
S
5 / 2 0 0 3
Chen
D476,354 S
6 / 2 0 0 3 Chen
D483,392 S
1 2 / 2 0 0 3
Chen
D508,5l5 S
8 / 2 0 0 5 Yee t
a 1 .
D5ll,540 S
l l / 2 0 0 5
Hsu
D5 4 , 6 1 3 S 2 / 2 0 0 6 J a n n ar d
e t
a 1 .
D529,066 S 9 / 2 0 0 6 Matera
D539,83l
S 4 / 2 0 0 7
Hsu
D543,572
S 5 / 2 0 0 7 Yee t a 1 .
D543,574 S 5 / 2 0 0 7 J a n n a r d
e t
a 1 .
7 , 2 2 2 , 9 5 8 B1
5 / 2 0 0 7
Chiou
D544,020
S 6 / 2 0 0 7
T h i X t o n
e t
a 1 .
5 7 ) CLAIM
The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a n
e y e g l a s s ,
a s shoWn and
d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
F I G .
1
i s
a
f r o n t
p e r s p e c t i v e vieW
o f an
y e g l a s s o f h e p r e s e n t
i n v e n t i o n ;
F I G . 2 i s a
f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
o f t h e
e y e g l a s s
o f
F I G .
1 ;
F I G .
3 i s a
r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW o f
t h e
e y e g l a s s of I G .
1 ;
F I G . 4 i s a l e f t
s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l
vieW o f
h e e y e g l a s s
o f I G . 1 ,
t h e r i g h t s i d e e l ev a t i o n a l
v i e W
b e i n g a m i r r o r
i m a g e
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
5
i s
a t o p
p l a n
v i e W
o f
t h e e y e g l a s s
o f F I G .
1 ;
a n d ,
F I G . 6 i s a
bottom
p l a n
vieW
o f t h e
e y e g l a s s
o f F I G . 1 .
1 C l a i m ,
4
Drawing S h e e t s
EXHIBIT 5Page 21
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 51 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
52/80
US Patent
F e b 5
2 0 1 3
S h e e t 1
o f 4
US
675 664 S
EXHIBIT 5Page 22
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 52 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
53/80
US Patent
F e b
5 2 0 1 3
S h e e t 2 o f 4 US
675 664
S
F I G ;
3
x 3
EXHIBIT 5Page 23
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 53 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
54/80
US Patent
F e b 5
2 0 1 3
S h e e t 3 o f 4 US
675 664 S
EXHIBIT 5Page 24
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 54 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
55/80
US Patent
F e b
5 2 0 1 3
S h e e t 4
o f 4
US
675 664 S
EXHIBIT 5Page 25
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 55 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
56/80
EXHIBIT 6
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 56 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
57/80EXHIBIT 6
Page 26
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 57 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
58/80EXHIBIT 6
Page 27
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 58 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
59/80EXHIBIT 6
Page 28
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 59 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
60/80EXHIBIT 6
Page 29
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 60 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
61/80EXHIBIT 6
Page 30
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 61 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
62/80
EXHIBIT 7
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 62 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
63/80
1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent 1 0 )
P a t e n t N 0 . :
Yee
USO0D607039S
US
D 6 0 7 , 0 3 9
S
4 5 )
Date o f P a t e n t : * 1 , D e c . 2 9 , 2009
5 4 )
EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS
COMPONENT
7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : P e t e r Y e e , I r v i n e , CA U S )
7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : O a k l e y , I n c . ,
F o o t h i l l
R a n c h ,
CA U S )
* * )
T e r m :
1 4 Years
2 1 )
A p p l . N o . :
2 9 0 8 8 5 8 5
2 2 ) F i l e d :
J u n . 1 5 ,
2 0 0 7
51) LO 9 ) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06
52) US Cl.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D16/315;
D16/314
58) Field of Classi?cation Sea rch . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
D16/101,
D l 6 / 3 0 0 i 3 4 2 ; D 2 9 / l 0 9 i l l 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;
3 5 1 / 4 1 , 4 4 , 5 1 4 5 2 , 6 2 , 1 5 8 , 9 2 , 1 0 3 4 1 2 3 ,
3 5 1 / 1 4 0 ,
1 5 3 ,
4 5 4 4 6 ,
1 5 7 ;
2 / 4 2 6 i 4 3 2 ,
4 4 7 4 4 4 9 ,
2 / 4 4 1 , 4 3 4 4 4 3 7 , 1 3 , 1 5 ; D 2 1 / 4 8 3 , 6 5 9 4 6 6 1
S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e
f o r
c o m p l e t e s e a r c h
h i s t o r y .
5 6 )
R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d
U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS
9 4 6 , 5 9 6 A 1 / 1 9 1 0 Cook
D 1 3 5 , 1 4 1 S 3 / 1 9 4 3
R e y n o l d s
D 1 3 7 , 7 5 3
S
4 / 1 9 4 4 Rey
D145,288
S 7 / 1 9 4 6
D i C i c c o
D 1 4 6 , 5 3 8
S
4 / 1 9 4 7
Gagnon
D 1 5 0 , 9 2 4 S 9 / 1 9 4 8
B r i g h t
D 1 6 8 , 9 0 3
S 2 / 1 9 5 3
N e a r y
D169,724 S 6 / 1 9 5 3
Bauer
t a l .
2 , 7 0 9 , 2 5 6 A 5 / 1 9 5 5
B a r a t e l l i
2 , 7 5 9 , 3 9 4 A
8 / 1 9 5 6
Evans
D182,459 S 4 / 1 9 5 8 E i s l e r
D200,391 S 2 / 1 9 6 5
B a r a t e l l i
D 2 0 1 , 9 1 9 S 8 / 1 9 6 5 S i m p s o n
D228,026 S 7 / 1 9 7 3 S h i n d l e r
3 , 8 3 8 , 9 1 4 A
1 0 / 1 9 7 4 F e r n a n d e z
4 , 6 9 2 , 0 0 1
A
9 / 1 9 8 7 A n g e r
4 , 7 8 6 , 1 5 8 A 1 1 / 1 9 8 8 B a r f u s - S h a n k s e t
a 1 .
C o n t i n u e d )
OTHER
PUBLICATIONS
B . B . S o l ,
“Mode 7 2 ” ,
1 9 7 2 , p .
4 M o d e l
2 7 3 .
C o n t i n u e d )
P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i R a p h a e l
B a r k a i
7 4 )
A t t o r n e y ,
A g e n t , o r Firm4Gregory K . N e l s o n
5 7 )
CLAIM
The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a n
e y e g l a s s
a n d
e y e g l a s s
compo
n e n t ,
a s
shoWn
and
d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
F I G . 1
i s
a
f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e v i e W o f t h e e y e g l a s s and t h e
e y e g l a s s c o m p o n e n t
o f
h e p r e s e n t
i n v e n t i o n ;
F I G . 2 i s a f r o n t
e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
t h e r e o f ;
FIG.
3
i s
a
r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
4 i s
a l e f t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ,
t h e r i g h t - s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l
v i e W
b e i n g
a
m i r r o r
i m a g e
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
5 i s
a bottom
l a n vieW
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
7 i s a f r o n t
p e r s p e c t i v e
vieW of an a l t e r n a t i v e embodi
m e n t o f t h e e y e g l a s s a n d e y e g l a s s c o m p o n e n t
o f
t h e p r e s e n t
i n v e n t i o n ;
F I G . 8 i s
a f r o n t
e l e v a t i o n a l vieW o f
t h e
e y e g l a s s and
y e g l a s s
c o m p o n e n t
o f F I G .
7 ;
F I G . 9 i s a
r e a r
e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
o f
t h e ey e g l a s s and e y e g l a s s
c o m p o n e n t o f F I G .
7 ;
F I G .
1 0
i s a l e f t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW o f t h e ey e g l a s s and
e y e g l a s s
c o m p o n e n t o f F I G . 7 , t h e i g h t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W
b e i n g a
m i r r o r
i m a g e t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 1 1
i s
a
t o p
p l a n v i e W o f t h e
e y e g l a s s
a n d
e y e g l a s s
c o m p o n e n t
o f F I G . 7 ;
a n d ,
F I G .
1 2
i s
a b o t t o m
p l a n
v i e W o f t h e
e y e g l a s s
a n d
e y e g l a s s
component o f F I G . 7 .
Phantom
l i n i n g , W h e r e u t i l i z e d ,
i s f o r
i l l u s t r a t i v e
p u r p o s e s
o n l y and i s n o t i n t e n d e d
t o
l i m i t
t h e
c l a i m e d d e s i g n
t o t h e
f e a t u r e s
shoWn
n p h a n t o m .
1 C l a i m ,
8 Drawing
S h e e t s
EXHIBIT 7Page 31
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 63 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
64/80
US D 6 0 7 , 0 3 9
S
D 3 2 0 , 4 0 2
D 3 4 2 , 5 3 4
D 3 4 2 , 9 5 9
D 3 4 3 , 1 8 2
5 , 3 8 7 , 9 4 9
D 3 5 6 , 3 2 3
D 3 5 6 , 3 2 4
D 3 5 9 , 3 0 2
D 3 5 9 , 7 4 8
D 3 5 9 , 7 4 9
D 3 6 5 , 5 9 1
D 3 6 9 , 3 7 7
D 3 7 1 , 1 5 2
5 , 5 5 0 , 5 9 9
D 3 7 3 , 7 8 1
D 3 7 4 , 8 8 4
D 3 7 5 , 1 1 2
D 3 7 6 , 1 6 3
D 3 7 6 , 3 8 1
D 3 7 7 , 4 9 8
D 3 8 3 , 1 4 9
5 , 8 0 5 , 2 6 1
D 3 9 9 , 2 4 0
D 3 9 9 , 8 6 5
U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS
S
1 0 / 1 9 9 1
J a n n a r d e t a l .
S 1 2 / 1 9 9 3 J a n n a rd
e t
a l .
S
1 / 1 9 9 4 J a n n a r d
e t a l .
S
1 / 1 9 9 4
J a n n a r d
A
2 /
1 9 9 5
T a c k l e s
S
3 / 1 9 9 5
Yee
S
3 / 1 9 9 5
Yee
S 6/1995
Yee
t
a l .
S 6 / 1 9 9 5
Yee
S 6 / 1 9 9 5
Yee
S 1 2 / 1 9 9 5 J a n n a rd
e t
a l .
S 4/1996 Brune
S 6/1996
S i m i o n i
e t a l .
A 8 / 1 9 9 6 J a n n a rd
S 9/1996
S i m i o n i
e t a l .
S 1 0 / 1 9 9 6 J a n n a rd
S 1 0 / 1 9 9 6 J a n n a rd
S 12/1996 J a n n a r d e t a l .
S 12/1996 J a n n a r d
e t a l .
S
1 / 1 9 9 7 J a n n a r d
e t a l .
S
9/ 1997
S i m i o n i
A
9/
1 9 9 8 Houston
t
a l .
S 10/1998 J a n n a r d
e t a l .
S 10/1998 J a n n a r d
e t a l .
P a g e
2
5 , 9 6 3 , 2 9 3
A
1 0 / 1 9 9 9 J a n n a r d
D418 533
S *
1 / 2 0 0 0
Herald t a l. . . . . . . . . . . . .
D16/314
D420,036 S 2 / 2 0 0 0
Yee
t
a l .
D423,035 S 4 / 2 0 0 0
Yee
t a l .
D425,541
S 5 / 2 0 0 0 P o l l a n d
D437 871
S 2 / 2 0 0 1 Tortorella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/314
D446,804
S 8 / 2 0 0 1 T h i X t o n
e t
a l .
D454 905
S *
3 / 2 0 0 2 Lueking
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D16/314
D462,375 S 9 / 2 0 0 2 Baden t a 1 .
D 4 8 1 , 0 5 9 S * 1 0 / 2 0 0 3 Egbert e t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D 1 6 / 3 1 5
D 5 4 2 , 3 2 9 S * 5 / 2 0 0 7 He ste r D 1 6 / 3 1 5
D567 839 S 4/2008 Fuchs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/315
D579 968
S * 1 1 / 2 0 0 8 Yee t a l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D16/320
D 5 9 7 , 1 2 3
S
*
7/2009
S t r e c k e r
D 1 6 / 3 1 5
D601 181
S
9 / 2 0 0 9
Fuchs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D16/315
OTHER
PUBLICATIONS
B . B . S o l . 1 9 7 1 , p . 3 M o d e l s 4 4 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 7 3 ) , p . 4 m o d e l o n b o t t o m
o f p a g e ) , p . 7
m o d e l s
2 5 0 , 2 5 6 ,
2 6 8 ,
a n d . 1 4
m o d e l 3 0 0 .
M a c y ’ s C a t a l o g , J u l .
1 9 9 7 .
A s i a
P a c i ? c T r a d i n g
c o m p a n y , I n c . ,
“ A s i a P a c i ? c 1 9 9 9 - 2 0 0 0 ” ,
unknown month
n 1 9 9 9 , p . 7 , p . 1 1 , p . 1 3 , p . 1 8 , p . 3 5 .
A l p i n a ,
“ S k i
a n d S p o r t s
G l a s s e s
b y A l p i n a 9 6 /
7 ” , unknown
month
n
1 9 9 7 ,
p p .
9 , 1 2 ,
a n d
1 3 .
*
c i t e d by
examiner
EXHIBIT 7Page 32
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 64 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
65/80
US
Patent D e c 2 9
2 0 0 9
S h e e t 1 o f 8 US 607 039 S
FIG.
1
EXHIBIT 7Page 33
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 65 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
66/80
US Patent
D e c 2 9 2 0 0 9 S h e e t 2 o f 8 US 607 039 S
EXHIBIT 7Page 34
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 66 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
67/80
US Patent
D e c 2 9 2 0 0 9
S h e e t
3
o f 8
US 607 039 S
FIG.
5
EXHIBIT 7Page 35
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 67 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
68/80
US Patent
D e c 2 9 2 0 0 9 S h e e t
4
o f 8 US 607 039 S
EXHIBIT 7Page 36
Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 68 of 80
8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint
69/80
U