Post on 04-Jun-2018
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
1/8
1
Exploring the association between social media, narcissism, empathy, the desire for fame
and well-being.
Sandra Gountas, Curtin University; John Gountas, Murdoch University
Abstract
The use of social media is increasing across all ages and particularly in the young. At thesame time, research indicates an increase in narcissism which may have negative impacts onindividuals and society in general, for example, narcissism has a negative association withempathy and may lower satisfaction with life. Many researchers are concerned withincreasing narcissism, particularly in the young, and the use of social media. The researchexplores the association between various Social Networking Sites and variance in levels ofnarcissism. Social Networking Sites provide communications platforms that are widely used
by young people. Findings suggest that there are differences in usage and individualcharacteristics that could be used to improve social marketing communications.
Background
According to Greek Mythology, Narcissus fell in love with his own reflection and was soabsorbed by it that he could not move away and starved to death as a result. In modern times,narcissism is regarded as a clinical personality disorder causing a high level of self-absorption, exploitative, manipulative tendencies and lack of empathy (Wallace andBaumeister, 2002). At the lower level, sub-clinical narcissism is found in varying degrees innormal, mentally healthy people who share similar characteristics (Bergman et al. 2011).
Narcissists are characterised by their tendency to boast, eagerness to talk about themselvesand boost their self esteem through public glory. This has implications for personal and
business relationships. Narcissists have difficulty in developing and maintaining closerelationships associated with genuine emotional warmth and empathy. Narcissists are apt touse relationships for self-serving effects reasons and are often aggressive in their interactionwith others (Buffardi and Campbell, 2011). Furthermore, well established research indicatesthat business students are higher in narcissism than others, lower in empathy, more likely tocheat and find unethical business behaviours acceptable (Brown, Sautter, Littvay, Sautter andBearnes, 2010). A major concern indicated by longitudinal studies suggests narcissism inyoung people is increasing with each generation (Twenge, Konrath, Foster, Campbell andBushman, 2008). This may be attributed to an increased focus on self-esteem boosting and
greater opportunities to self-promote through media (Buffardi and Campbell, 2008; Youngand Pinsky, 2006). Narcissists are fame seeking and are more likely to do enjoy seeingthemselves in mass media. Narcissists are more likely to have a sense of entitlement, be self-serving and less likely to contribute to others; they are social loafers who look for fame andglory through minimal effort (Twenge et al., 2008; Wallace and Baumeister, 2002). Interest infame is increasing with around 16% of 16-19 year olds in the UK believing that they will
become famous regardless of talent (Maltby, 2010). Previous studies have indicated that ahigh desire for fame is associated with extrinsic aspirations which eventually lead todysfunctional behaviour and lower satisfaction with life (Gountas, Gountas and Moran, in
press). Technology has enabled mass communication and broadcasting via television, radioand the internet and has allowed individuals to believe that they too have a reasonable chance
at becoming famous (Learning and Skills Council 2006). Existing desires to be famous havebeen magnified and implemented by the use of technology (Choi and Berger, 2009). Reality
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
2/8
2
television programs offer everyday people the opportunity to appear on television, and theprospect of gaining, at a minimum, their 15 minutes of fame. Prospective contestants auditionin the thousands for such programs (Maltby, Giles, Day, Quick, Linley & Langcaster-James,2008; The Age, 2005).
Social networking sites (SNS) are one such means used in attempts at gaining fame, and insome cases it has been used successfully to do so. Popular music singer Lilly Allen used thesocial networking siteMySpaceto aid in becoming a recognized singer, using the resultingattention to push herself into the spotlight. You tube has flourished as a social networking sitefor individuals to share video clips, with over 65,000 clips uploaded daily within sevenmonths of its official launch. SNSs provide an opportunity for their users to self-promote and
present themselves in a grandiose, exaggerated manner (Bergman et al. 2011; Buffardi andCampbell, 2008). The use of social network sites is a normal part of life for many these timeswhen social networking attracts millions of users worldwide (Buffardi and Campbell, 2008).Various SNSs have large numbers of active users worldwide. Facebook currently has around687 million, Twitter more than 100 million and YouTube more than two billion hits
worldwide each day (Bradshaw, 2011; Gelles, 2010). Social networking offers theopportunity for ordinary people to interact with others, for self-presentation and even a way ofconstructing a new or adapted identity (Mehdizadeh, S., 2010; Kramer and Winter, 2008;Buffardi and Campbell, 2008). Although rapid and widespread communication with othershas obvious benefits there are many concerns about potentially negative impacts associatedwith social networking; fearing that SNSs may not only provide an outlet for narcissists butmay also cause or exacerbate the condition (Bergman, Fearrington, Davenport and Bergman,2011; Twenge et al., 2008).The negative outcomes associated with narcissism previouslymentioned, including lower self-esteem, healthy self-efficacy and increased materialism(Mehdizadeh, 2010; Twenge et al., 2008; Bushman and Baumeister, 1998), which imply
potential individual and wider social impacts such as disregard for others at an individual andsocietal level. This study, explores the association between increasing narcissistic tendencies,the desire for fame and the use of social networking sites; and how these relate to selfism(narcissism), empathy, self-efficacy and satisfaction with life.
Methodology
The questionnaire was developed using existing constructs. Forty six items measureSelf-efficacy (Schwarzer and Born, 1997),Selfism (Narcissism) and Empathy (Phares andErskine, 1984) and Desire for Fame, (Gountas, Gountas and Moran, in press), Satisfactionwith Life (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, Griffin, 1985). The items were measured on a five-point
Likert scale, five representing strongly agree and one representing strongly disagree. Inaddition to gender and age, the participants were asked about their social media behaviour:whether they are regular users, which social sites they use, the time they spend each weekupdating personal pages, the importance of social networks to them and if they are happy forothers to see information about them on social networking sites.
Sample
The sample was collected online, using an existing consumer panel. The participants receiveda $5 reward for participation. The sample comprises 421 participants aged 18-30 years;180males, 242 females; 380 respondents use social media regularly with 220 spending less than
one hour per week to update their personal pages, 102 spending up to two hour 51 up to fivehours and 49 more than five hours. 266 participants agree that participating in social networks
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
3/8
3
is very important to them, and 293 are happy for others to see their personal information.Facebook is the most popular site with 389 users, followed by YouTube with 246; LinkedInhas 35regular users, My Space 43 and Twitter 76. The questionnaire took approximately 15minutes to complete.
Findings
The data are analysed using correlations and analysis of variance to examine the relationshipsbetween the variables, motives for social network usage and if there difference in responsesaccording to the social networks used. As shown in Table 1 there is a positive correlation
between Selfism and the Desire for Fame but no significant relationship with empathy andsatisfaction with life. Empathy is positively correlated with Satisfaction with Life.
Table 1. Correlation Analysis
** sig at 0.01 level
As shown in Tables 2 and 3, there are significant differences between age groups in respect ofthe desire for fame with the youngest group 18-20 having the highest score of mean at 2.61.For gender, males score more highly than females for fame and selfism (mean = 2.95 and 3.19
respectively) than females (mean = 2.77, and 3.06 respectively). Females have a significantlyhigher mean score in empathy (mean = 3.72) than males (mean = 3.32). The respondents whoregularly use social media appear to have a higher desire for fame and empathy. Facebookusers have a higher significant score in desire for fame (mean = 2.87, and 2.33 respectively)than non-users (mean = 2.57 and 1.84 respectively). Linkedin users have higher desire forfame (mean = 2.78) than non-users (mean=2.25). My Space users have a higher significantscore in desire for fame and Selfism (mean = 3.21and 3.37 respectively) than non-users (mean= 2.81, 2.22 and 3.09 respectively). Twitter have a higher significant score in desire for fameand Selfism (mean = 3.07, 2.61 and 3.27 respectively) than non-users (mean =2.80, 2.22 and3.08 respectively).
Table 2. One-Way ANOVA: Demographic and Social Media Choice Results
Demographic and
SM Choice
Factors Sum of
Squares
df Mean
sq
F P
Age Desire for
fame
Betweengroups
7.967 2 3.983 3.521 .030
Withingroups
473.980 419 1.131
Total 481.947 421
Desire for
fameBetweengroups
12.773 1 12.773 11.434 .001
Withingroups
469.174 420 1.117
Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 51. Desire for fame 2.29 1.07 12. Selfism 3.12 .659 .287** 13. Empathy 3.55 .700 -.065 .060 14. Satisfaction with life 3.09 .842 -.063 .093 .395** 15. Self-efficacy 3.41 .676 .007 .187 .326 .502** 1
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
4/8
4
Gender
Total 481.947 421
Selfism Betweengroups
1.736 1 1.736 4.031 .045
Withingroups
180.864 420 .431
Total 182.600 421Empathy Between
groups16.224 1 16.224 35.903 .000
Withingroups
189.784 420 .452
Total 206.008 421
Satisfaction
with life
Betweengroups
2.766 1 2.766 3.927 .048
Withingroups
295.785 420 .704
Total 298.551 421
Facebook Desire forfame
Betweengroups
7.291 1 7.291 6.452 .011
Withingroups
474.655 420 1.130
Total 481.947 421
Satisfaction
with life
Betweengroups
6.890 1 6.890 9.923 .002
Withingroups
291.660 420 .694
Total 298.551 421
Linkedin Desire forfame
Betweengroups
8.954 1 8.954 7.951 .005
Withingroups
472.992 420 1.126
Total 481.947 421
My Space Desire forfame
Betweengroups
17.002 1 17.002 15.359 .000
Withingroups
464.945 420 1.107
Total 481.947 421
Selfism Between
groups
3.038 1 3.038 7.105 .008
Withingroups
179.562 420 .428
Total 182.600 421
Twitter Desire forfame
Betweengroups
9.702 1 9.702 8.629 .003
Withingroups
472.244 420 1.124
Selfism Total 481.947 421Betweengroups
2.062 1 2.062 4.797 .029
Withingroups
180.538 420 .430
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
5/8
5
Table 3. Mean Scores of Social Media Users and Non Users
The results in Table 4 indicate that regular users of social media have a significantly higherdesire for fame than non-users (mean = 2.34 and 1.89 respectively), significantly higherempathy than non-users (mean = 3.57 and 3.34respectively), and significantly higher
satisfaction with life than non-users (mean = 3.13 and 2.72 respectively). Those who spendmost time updating their web pages have a higher desire for fame (mean for more than fivehours = 2.78 and less than one = 2.09). Where participation in social media is important thereis a higher a higher desire for fame than no importance (mean = 2.42 and 2.07 respectively);higher empathy (mean = 3.62 and 3.43 respectively) and satisfaction with life (mean = 3.16and 2.96 respectively). Those who are happy with others seeing them on SNSs have a higherdesire for fame and empathy than those who are not happy (mean = 2.41 and 2.03 andrespectively and mean = 3.60 and 3.43 and respectively).
Table 4. One-Way ANOVA: Usage
Regular SocialMedia use Desire forfame Betweengroups 7.589 1 7.589 6.720 .010
Withingroups
474.358 420 1.129
Total 481.947 421
Empathy Betweengroups
2.107 1 2.107 4.341 .038
Withingroups
203.90 420
Total 421
Satisfaction
with life
Between
groups
6.322 1 6.322 9.086 .003
Withingroups
292.229 420 .696
Total 298.551 421
Time updating
pagesDesire for
fame
Betweengroups
24.223 3 8.074 7.373 .000
Withingroups
457.724 418 1.095
Total 481.947 421
Importance of
Participation
Desire for
fame
Betweengroups
12.247 1 12.247 10.951 .001
Withingroups
469.700 420 1.118
Variable
Facebook Linkedin My Space Youtube TwitterUsers Non-
usersUsers Non-
usersUsers Non-
usersUsers Non-
usersUsers Non-
usersDesire forfame
2.33 1.84 2.78 2.25 2.89 2.22 - - 2.61 2.22
Selfism - - 3.37 3.09 - - 3.27 3.08Empathy - - - - - - - -Satisfactionwith life
3.12 2.65 - - - - - - - -
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
6/8
6
Total 481.947 421
Empathy
Betweengroups
3.817 1 3.817 7.930 .005
Withingroups
202.190 420 .481
Total 206.008 421
Satisfaction
with life
Betweengroups
4.069 1 4.069 5.804 .016
Withingroups
294.481 420 .701
Total 298.551 421
Public exposureDesire for
fame
Betweengroups
13.003 1 13.003 11.646 .001
Withingroups
466.943 420 1.117
Total 481.947 421
Empathy Betweengroups
2.658 1 2.658 5.490 .020
Withingroups
203.349 420 .484
Total 206.008 421
Discussion
Social networking sites serve two key purposes: the opportunity to promote oneself and tointeract with others. They are extremely popular and their popularity is still growing (Buffardiand Campbell, 2011).In spite of their usefulness there are potentially negative side effects,namely the impact and contribution to the increase in narcissism, lower self-esteem andsatisfaction with life (Mehdizadeh, 2010). This study examines these important concerns withSNS usage.
The findings indicate that the use of Twitter has the strongest relationship with the desire forfame and narcissism, followed by Facebook users. This is not to suggest that all SNS use isassociated with negative characteristics or behaviours. Narcissism is generally found to benegatively associated with empathy, yet this study indicates that SNS use is associated withempathy for some. Therefore, it is very likely that an individuals motive for SNS use is animportant factor. For example, SNSs may be an efficient way to communicate in business and
education with no intention of excessive self-promotion or absorption but with a genuineinterest in sharing information with others. For some people, participating in SNSs has apositive impact on satisfaction with life and an association with empathy, which is usuallynegatively associated with narcissism, which may reflect a benefit of greater social interactionavailable using this platform. However, there is sufficient evidence that SNSs may promotenarcissism and therefore, negative subsequent attitudes and behaviours in some which needsto be further understood (Bergman et al., 2011).
SNSs are widely used in mainstream marketing activities and are a very useful platform formany health and social marketing issues as well as profit making activities. The findings fromthis study indicate that certain concerns about social networking sites are probably well
founded and these may have wider social implications. Young males seem to have higherdesire for fame and narcissism. Therefore, further research that examines the cause and effect
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
7/8
7
relationships between social networking motives and behaviours, impacts on individuals andsociety in general would be useful to increase existing knowledge and to develop guidelinesfor appropriate use. In spite of the many concerns about the use of SNSs, there areopportunities. Greater knowledge of SNS usage and subsequent behaviours may help socialmarketers to develop more successful communications through SNSs to address social
problems such as binge drinking, speeding and such like that are particularly high in youngpeople.
References
Bergman, S.M., Fearrington, M.E., Davenport; S.W, Bergman, J.Z. (2011). Millenials,narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social network sites and why.
Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 706-711.
Brown, T.A., Sautter, J.A., Littvay, L., Sautter, A.C., & Bearnes, B. (2010). Ethics andPersonality: Empathy and Narcissism as Moderators of Ethical Decision Making in Business
Students.Journal of Education for Business,85, 203-208.Buffardi, L.E.; Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34, 1303-1314.
Bushman, B.J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998), Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, anddirect and displaced aggression: Does Self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,75(1) 219-229.
Choi, C.G., & Bergman, R. (2010). Ethics of Celebrities and Their Increasing Influence in21st Century Society.Journal of Business Ethic,91 (3), 313-318.
Diener, E, Emmons, R A, Larsen, R J,& Griffin, S (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment,49 (1), 71-75.
Gountas, J., Gountas, S., and Moran, L. (In Press). The Desire for Fame: Scale Developmentand Association with Personal Goals and Aspirations,Psychology and Marketing.
Kramer, N.C.; Winter, S. (2008). The Relationship of Self-Esteem, Extraversion, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Presentation Within Social Networking Sites.Journal of Media
Psychology, 20 (3), 106-116.
Maltby, J. (2010). An interest in fame: Confirming the measurement and empiricalconceptualization of fame interest.British Journal of Psychology,101, 411-432.
Maltby, J., Day, L., Giles, D., Gillett, R., Quick, M., Langcaster-James, H.,James; Linley, P. A. (2008). Implicit Theories of a Desire for Fame. Brittish Journalof Psycholog,99, 279-92.
Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on Facebook.Cyberpsychology,Behaviour and Social Networking,13(4), 357-364.
Phares, E. J.; Erskine, N. (1984). The Measurement of Selfism. Educational andPsychological Measurement, 44, 597-608.
Schwarzer, R.; Born, A. (1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceivedself-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology,3(1-2), 177-190.
8/13/2019 Gountas_ Sandra Paper 298
8/8
8
Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K.; Bushman, B. J. (2008). EgosInflating Over Time: A Cross Temporal Meta-Analysis of the Narcissistic PersonalityInventory.Journal of Personality,76(4), 875-901.
Wallace, H.M.; Baumeister, R.F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls withperceived opportunity for glory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82, 819-34.
Young, S.M.; Pimksy, D. (2006). Narcissism and Celebrity.Journal of Research inPersonality,40, 463-471.