Post on 30-Jan-2016
description
Finding the Higgs boson
Sally Dawson, BNL
XIII Mexican School of Particles and Fields
Lecture 1, Oct, 2008
Properties of the Higgs boson
Higgs production at the Tevatron and LHC
Discovery vs spectroscopy
Tevatron LHC LHC L Upgrade ILC
2007 2008 2015
Collider Physics Timeline
Planned shut-down in 2010
First collisions in Spring, 2009
e+e- @ 500 GeV, earliest possible date, 202x
15+ billion $’s
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
• proton-proton collider at CERN (2008)
• 14 TeV energy– 7 mph slower than the
speed of light– cf. 2 TeV @ Fermilab
( 307 mph slower than the speed of light)
• Typical energy of quarks and gluons 1-2 TeV
Detectors of Unprecedented Scale
• Two large multi-purpose detectors
• CMS is 12,000 tons (2 x’s ATLAS)
• ATLAS has 8 times the volume of CMS
Standard Model Synopsis
• Group: SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1)
• Gauge bosons:– SU(3): G
i, i=1…8– SU(2): W
i, i=1,2,3– U(1): B
• Gauge couplings: gs, g, g• SU(2) Higgs doublet:
ElectroweakQCD
Gauge symmetry forbids gauge boson masses
The Problem of Mass
• Why are the W and Z boson masses non-zero?
• U(1) gauge theory with spin-1gauge field, A
• U(1) local gauge invariance:
AAF
FFL
4
1
)()()( xxAxA
The Problem of Masses
• Mass term for A would look like:
• Mass term violates local gauge invariance
• We understand why MA = 0
AAmFFL 2
2
1
4
1
Gauge invariance is guiding principle
SM Higgs Mechanism
• Standard Model includes complex Higgs SU(2) doublet
• With SU(2) x U(1) invariant scalar potential
2 > 0, boring….. (Minimum at =0, gauge bosons stay massless)
043
21
2
1
i
i
22 )( V
SM Higgs Mechanism
• If 2 < 0, then spontaneous symmetry breaking
• Minimum of potential at:– Choice of minimum breaks gauge symmetry– Why is 2 < 0?
v
0
2
1
22 )( V
More on SM Higgs Mechanism
• Couple to SU(2) x U(1) gauge bosons
(Wi, i=1,2,3; B)
• Gauge boson mass terms from:
Bg
iWg
iD
VDDL
ii
S
22
)()()('
...)()()(8
...
...0
))((,08
1...)(
232222122
BggWWgWgv
vBggWBggWvDD bbaa
v
0
2
1
Higgs mechanism gives gauge bosons mass
More on SM Higgs Mechanism
• Massive gauge bosons:
W = (W
1 W2) /2
Z 0 = (g W3 - g'B )/ (g2+g'2)
• Orthogonal combination to Z is massless photon
A 0 = (g' W3+gB )/ (g2+g'2)
MW=gv/2MZ=(g2+g'2)v/2
More on SM Higgs Mechanism
• Weak mixing angle defined
• Z = - sin WB + cosWW3
• A = cos WB + sinWW3
MW=MZ cos W
2222sincos
gg
g
gg
gWW
Natural relationship in SM—Provides stringent restriction on Beyond the SM models
Recap
• Generate mass for W,Z using Higgs mechanism
– Higgs VEV breaks SU(2) x U(1)U(1)em
– Single Higgs doublet is minimal case• Before spontaneous symmetry breaking:
– Massless Wi, B, Complex • After spontaneous symmetry breaking:
– Massive W,Z; massless ; physical Higgs boson H
Exercise: Count degrees of freedom
Muon decay
• Consider e e
• Fermi Theory:
e
e
• EW Theory:
eF uuuugGie
2
1
2
122 55
eW
uuuugMk
ige
2
1
2
11
255
22
2
e
e
W
22
2
2
1
82 vM
gG
W
F GF=1.16637 x 10-5 GeV-2
Higgs Parameters
• GF measured precisely
• Higgs potential has 2 free parameters, 2,
• Trade 2, for v2, MH2
– Large MH strong Higgs self-coupling
– A priori, Higgs mass can be anything
22 )( V
42
23
22
2
822H
v
MH
v
MH
MV HHH
22
22
2
2
vM
v
H
22
2
2
1
82 vM
gG
W
F 212 )246()2( GeVGv F
What about Fermion Masses?• Fermion mass term:
• Left-handed fermions are SU(2) doublets
• Scalar couplings to fermions:
• Effective Higgs-fermion coupling
• Mass term for down quark
LRRLmmL
..chdQL RLdd
L
L d
uQ
..0
),(2
1chd
HvduL RLLdd
v
mdd
2
Forbidden by SU(2)xU(1) gauge invariance
Fermion Masses, 2
• Mu from c=i2* (not allowed in SUSY)
• For 3 generations, , =1,2,3 (flavor indices)
0
chcuQL RcLu v
muu
2
,
..2
)(chdduu
HvL RLdRLuY
Fermion masses, 3• Unitary matrices diagonalize mass matrices
– Yukawa couplings are diagonal in mass basis– Neutral currents remain flavor diagonal– Not necessarily true in models with extended
Higgs sectors
mRdR
mRuR
mLdL
mLuL
dVduVu
dUduUu
Exercise: Prove this!
Review of Higgs Couplings
• Higgs couples to fermion mass– Largest coupling is to heaviest fermion
– Top-Higgs coupling plays special role?– No Higgs coupling to neutrinos
• Higgs couples to gauge boson masses
• Only free parameter is Higgs mass!• Everything is calculable….testable theory
Hffffv
mfHf
v
mL LRRL
ff
....cos
HZZgM
HWWgMLW
ZW
Review of Higgs Boson Feynman Rules
• Higgs couples to heavy particles
• No tree level coupling to photons () or gluons (g)
• MH2=2v2large MH is
strong coupling regime
Higgs Decays
• Hff proportional to mf2
• Identifying b quarks important for Higgs searches
2
2
)(
)(
m
mN
HBR
bbHBR bc
For MH<2MW, decays to bb most important
Higgs Decays to Gluons
2
3
22
2
72)(
W
Hs
M
M
sggH
tt mmk
kd 1
)( 3
4
•Top quark contribution most important
•Doesn’t decouple for large mt
•Decoupling theorem doesn’t apply to particles which couple to mass (ie Higgs!)
•Decay sensitive to extra generations
Hg
gtm
Higgs Decays to Photons
• Dominant contribution is W loops• Contribution from top is small
2
2
3
22
3
...9
167
256)(
W
H
M
M
sH
topW
Higgs Decays to W/Z
• Tree level decay
• Below threshold, H→WW* with branching ratio W* →ff' implied
• Final state has both transverse and longitudinal polarizations
)()( ppgMA W
2
2
3
2 4
311
16)( WWW
W
H xxxM
M
sWWH
2
2
4H
WW M
Mx
H
W+
W-
HW+
W-
ff'
Higgs Decays to W+ W-, ZZ
• The action is with longitudinal gauge bosons (since they come from the EWSB)
• Cross sections involving longitudinal gauge bosons grow with energy
• H→WL+WL
+
• As Higgs gets heavy, decays are longitudinal
0,,1,02
1),0,0,(
i
pEp
T
VVV
W
HLLWLL M
MggMWWHA
2
)(
2
2
2)(
)(
V
V
LL
TT
x
x
VVH
VVH
2
2
4H
WW M
Mx
V
VVV
VL M
pEp
M
,0,0,1
Exercise: Prove this
Higgs decays to gauge bosons
• H W+W- ffff has sharp threshold at 2 MW, but large branching ratio even for MH=130 GeV
For any given MH, not all decay modes accessible
Data points are e+e- at s=350 GeV with L=500 fb-1
• Bands show theory errors
• Largest source of uncertainty is b quark mass
Status of Theory for Higgs BRs
Total Higgs Width
• Small MH, Higgs is narrower than detector resolution
• As MH becomes large, width also increases– No clear resonance
– For MH 1.4 TeV,
tot MH
3
2
3
2
1330
sin16)(
TeV
MGeV
M
MWWH
H
W
H
W
Higgs Searches at LEP2• LEP2 searched for e+e-ZH• Rate turns on rapidly after threshold, peaks just above
threshold, 3/s• Measure recoil mass of Higgs; result independent of
Higgs decay pattern– Pe-=s/2(1,0,0,1)– Pe+=s/2(1,0,0,-1)– PZ=(EZ, pZ)
• Momentum conservation:– (Pe-+Pe+-PZ)2=PH
2=MH2
– s-2 s EZ+MZ2= MH
2
Higgs Limits From LEP2
LEP2 limit, MH > 114.1 GeV
e+e- →ZH
Higgs production at Hadron Colliders
• Many possible production mechanisms; Importance depends on: – Size of production cross section– Size of branching ratios to observable channels– Size of background
• Importance varies with Higgs mass• Need to see more than one channel to
establish Higgs properties and verify that it is a Higgs boson
Production Mechanisms in Hadron Colliders
• Gluon fusion
– Largest rate for all MH at LHC and Tevatron
– Gluon-gluon initial state
– Sensitive to top quark Yukawa t
Largest contribution is top loop
In SM, b-quark loops unimportant
Gluon Fusion• Lowest order cross section: q=4Mq
2/MH2
– Light Quarks: F1/2(Mb/MH)2log(Mb/MH)
– Heavy Quarks: F1/2 -4/3
)ˆ()(1024
)()(ˆ 2
2
2/12
2
0 sMFv
Hgg Hq
qRs
• Rapid approach to heavy quark limit: Counts number of heavy fermions
• NLO/NNLO corrections calculated in heavy top limit
Gluon fusion, continued
• Integrate parton level cross section with gluon parton distribution functions
– z=MH2/S, S is hadronic
center of mass energy
• Rate depends on R, F
1
00 ),(),(ˆ)(z
FF x
zgxg
x
dxzHpp
NNLO, ggH
Bands show .5MH < < 2 MH
LO and NLO dependence bands don’t overlap
dependence used as estimate of theoretical uncertainty
Rates depend on renormalization scale, s(R), and factorization scale, g(F)
LO
NLOK Higher order corrections
computed in large Mt limit
Vector Boson Fusion
• W+W- X is a real process:
• Rate increases at large s: (1/ MW2 )log(s/MW
2)• Integral of cross section over final state phase space
has contribution from W boson propagator:
• Outgoing jets are mostly forward and can be tagged
22222 ))cos1('2()( WW MEE
d
Mk
d
k=W,Z momentum
Peaks at small
)()(/
zsdz
dLdzs XWW
WWppXWWpp
H
Vector Boson Fusion
• Idea: Tag 2 high-pT jets with large rapidity gap in between
• No color flow between tagged jets – suppressed hadronic activity in central region
W(Z)-strahlung
• W(Z)-strahlung (qqWH, ZH) important at Tevatron– Same couplings as vector boson fusion– Rate proportional to weak coupling
• Theoretically very clean channel– NNLO QCD corrections: KQCD1.3-1.4
– Electroweak corrections known (-5%)– Small scale dependence (3-5%)– Small PDF uncertainties
Improved scale dependence at NNLO
Producing the Higgs at the Tevatron
NNLO or NLO rates
MH/2 < < MH/4
Aside: Tevatron analyses now based on 3 fb -1
Tevatron
Higgs at the Tevatron
• Largest rate, ggH, H bb, is overwhelmed by background
(ggH)1 pb << (bb)
Looking for the Higgs at the Tevatron
• High mass: Look for HWWll Large ggH production rate
• Low Mass: Hbb, Huge QCD bb background Use associated production with W or Z
Analyses use more than 70 channels
SM Higgs Searches at Tevatron
95% CL exclusion of SM Higgs at 170 GeV
SM Higgs Searches at Tevatron
Expected sensitivity of CDF/DØ combined with 3 fb-1:
< 3.0xSM @ 115 GeV
Production Mechanisms at LHC
Bands show scale dependence
All important channels calculated to NLO or NNLO
Search Channels at the LHC
• ggH– Small BR (10-3 – 10-4)– Only measurable for MH < 140 GeV
• Largest Background: QCD continuum production of
• Also from -jet production, with jet faking , or fragmenting to 0
• Fit background from data
ggHbb has huge QCD background: Must use rare decay modes of H
H→
MH=120 GeV; L=100 fb-1
S/B = 2.8 to 4.3
Golden Channel: H→ZZ→4 leptons
• Need excellent lepton ID
• Below MH 130 GeV, rate is too small for discovery
H→ZZ→(4 leptons)
CMS:
Possible discovery with < 10 fb-1
Heavy Higgs in 4-lepton Mode
H ZZ l+l- l+l-200 GeV < MH < 600 GeV: - Discovery in H ZZ l+l- l+l-
•Background smaller than signal
•Higgs width larger than experimental resolution (MH > 300 GeV)
Confirmation in H ZZ l+l- jj
MH > 600 GeV:
4 lepton channel statistically limitedLook for:
H ZZ l+l- H ZZ l+l- jj H WW l jj
-150 times larger BR than 4 lepton channel
Heavy Higgs
Vector Boson Fusion
• Outgoing jets are mostly forward and can be tagged– Little jet activity in central rapidity region
• Idea: Look for different H decay channels in Vector boson fusion– Ratio will have smaller errors than total rate
H
Vector Boson Fusion for light Higgs
105
1
mHiggs (GeV) 200 100 120 140 160 180 200
Sig
nal
sig
nif
ican
ce
ATLAS
qqH qq qqH qqWWAll channels
Vector boson fusion effective for measuring Higgs couplings
Higgs Discovery Reach at LHC
•Improvement in channel from earlier studies
Early Higgs Physics
ATLAS
Higgs Discovery at ATLAS
ATLAS
If we find a “Higgs-like” object, what then?
• We need to:– Measure Higgs couplings to fermions & gauge
bosons– Measure Higgs spin/parity– Reconstruct Higgs potential– Is it the SM Higgs?
• Reminder: Many models have other signatures:– New gauge bosons (little Higgs)– Other new resonances (Extra D)– Scalar triplets (little Higgs, NMSSM)– Colored scalars (MSSM)
Is it a Higgs?
• How do we know what we’ve found? • Measure couplings to fermions & gauge bosons
• Measure spin/parity
• Measure self interactions
2
2
3)(
)(
m
m
H
bbH b
0PCJ
42
23
22
822H
v
MH
v
MH
MV HHH
Absolute Measurements of Higgs Couplings
• Ratios of couplings more precisely measured than absolute couplings
• 10-40% measurements of most couplings
Can we reconstruct the Higgs potential?
4433
22
42HvHH
MV H
• Fundamental test of model!
2
2
43 2:
v
MSM H
• We have no idea how to measure 4
Reconstructing the Higgs potential
3 requires 2 Higgs production• MH<140 GeV, Hbbbb• Overwhelming QCD background
Can determine whether 3=0 at 95% cl with 300 fb-1 for 150 <MH <200 GeV
Conclusions
• If a SM Higgs exists, the LHC will find it
• But there will still be questions…..