Elizabeth Kneebone Brookings Institution. 1 The geography of poverty and opportunity has changed...

Post on 16-Dec-2015

218 views 0 download

Transcript of Elizabeth Kneebone Brookings Institution. 1 The geography of poverty and opportunity has changed...

Elizabeth KneeboneBrookings Institution

Confronting Suburban Poverty

1The geography of poverty and opportunity has changed

Current policies are not aligned to this new geography2

3We need a new agenda for metropolitan opportunity

The geography of poverty and opportunity has changed1

Much of our work focuses on the country’s 100 largest metropolitan statistical areas, which house two-thirds of the nation’s population

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Metropolitan areas are statistical representations of “commuter sheds” and, by extension, labor markets

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of Census 2000 data

PRIMARY CITY in the 100 largest metro areas: First city in the MSA name; Any other named city with a population over 100,000

SUBURBS in the 100 largest metro areas: Remainder of the MSA outside the primary city or cities

SMALL METRO AREA: Any other MSA not in the top 100

RURAL: Any county not in an official MSA

Today, suburbs are home to the largest and fastest growing poor population

Source: Brookings analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data

1970 1980 1990 2000 2013

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000Suburbs Cities Small Metros Rural

NOTE: The federal poverty threshold for a family of four was $23,834 in 2013

This shift was well under way before the Great Recession

Percent change in poor population, central cities versus suburbs, 1970 to 2012. Source: Brookings analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data

2000 to 2013

1990 to 2000

1980 to 1990

1970 to 1980

66%

19%

18%

10%

29%

8%

16%

12%

% Change City Poor % Change Suburban Poor

Between 2000 and 2013, the suburban poor population increased in 92 of the top 97 metros

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS and decennial census data

Change in the Suburban Poor Population, 2000 to 2013Under

50%50% to 75% 75% to 100% 100% to

150%Above 150%

By 2013, 65 of the top 97 metros found the majority of their region’s poor located in the suburbs

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS data

Share of 2013 Poor Population Living in SuburbsUnder 50%

Above 50%

4,129,453

3,560,143

1,655,630

793,369

4,884,981 4,473,073

2,205,355

1,126,139

20002005-09

Suburb Type

Thou

sand

s of p

oor

Poverty has grown beyond dense, inner-ring suburbs

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS and decennial census data

Even as it has spread, poverty has become more concentrated

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS and decennial census data

2000 2008-12

23.3%

32.0%

4.0%

6.3%

Share of Suburban Poor in High Poverty and Distressed Neighborhoods

20 to 40% Poverty Rate Tracts 40% or More Poverty Rate Tracts

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of decennial census and American Community Survey data

Poor residents of color in the suburbs are more likely to live in higher poverty neighborhoods

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS and decennial census data

Share of Suburban Poor in High-Poverty Tracts by Race, 2008-12

All Poor White Poor Black Poor Hispanic Poor

38%

23%

53% 54%

White, non-Hispanic Less than a high school diploma

Own a home Female-headed, with children

24%

36%

20%

50%

44%

30%

36%

43%

Cities Suburbs

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS data

Some differences exist between urban and suburban poor residents

But in many ways, the suburban and urban poor are strikingly similar

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS data

In deep poverty With a disability Under 18 Foreign born At least one worker in family

46%

15%

34%

22%

64%

44%

16%

35%

20%

66%Cities Suburbs

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Population Change Immigration Housing

Job Location Regional Economy

City Suburbs

9%

17%

Cities Suburbs

Population Growth, 2000 to 2013

Population Change

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS and Decennial Census data

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Contribution to Growth in Suburban Poor Population,

2000 to 2013

Foreign-born population

Native-born population

18%

82%Immigration

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of ACS and Decennial Census data

2000 2013

502,615

800,900

Housing Voucher Recipients in Suburbs

Housing

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of HUD “Picture of Subsidized Housing” data

Subprim

e Loan

s

Loan

s in Fo

reclosu

re or L

ost

73% 74%

Share of Loans in Suburbs

Housing

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Source: Chris Shildt, Naomi Cytron, Elizabeth Kneebone and Carolina Reid, “The Subprime Crisis in Suburbia: Exploring the Links between Foreclosures and Suburban Poverty”

2000 2010

40.9%43.1%

Share of Jobs Located 10 to 35 Miles from Downtown

Job Location

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Source: Elizabeth Kneebone, “Job Sprawl Stalls: The Great Recession and Metropolitan Employment Location”

Number of Unemployed in Suburbs

Regional Economy

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Dec. 2007 Dec. 2010

3,116,548

6,193,048

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics LAUS data

Middle-Wage Jobs Low-Wage Jobs

22%

58%

Share of Employment Gains During Recovery

(2010 Q1 to 2012 Q1)

Types of Jobs

Many factors drive suburbanizing poverty

Source: National Employment Law Project, “The Low Wage Recovery and Growing Inequality”

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

Transit Access Strained Local Services

Limited Philanthropic Resources Change in School Populations

Transit Access

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

45 Minute Commute

90 Minute Commute

4%

25%

Share of Jobs Accessible from Suburban Low-Income

Neighborhoods via TransitSource: Tomer et al, “Missed Opportunity”

Transit Access

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

Low-Skill Jobs High-Skill Jobs

22%

29%

Share of Jobs Accessible from Suburban Low-Income

Neighborhoods Within 90 MinutesSource: Tomer et al, “Missed Opportunity”

59% 58%

45% 43%

20%

Share of Suburban Municipalities in Chicago, DC, and LA with Registered

Nonprofit

Strained Local Services

Substance Abuse

Mental Health

Food Assistance

Human Services

Employment Services

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

Source: Allard and Roth, “Strained Suburbs”

Grants Dollars per Poor Person, Chicago Metro Area 2008

Limited Philanthropic Resources

City Suburbs

$68

$2

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

Source: Reckhow and Weir, “Building a Stronger Regional Safety Net”

Percent Change in Number of Students Enrolled in Free and

Reduced Price Lunch, 2005-06 to 2009-10

Change in School Populations

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

City Suburbs

8%

22%

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of Common Core data

Share of students meeting proficiency standards in 2009-10

Access to Quality Schools

Suburban poverty brings added challenges

65%45%

Source: Brookings Institution analysis of Common Core data

Current policies are not aligned to this new geography2

Substance Abuse Treatment

Block Grant; Social Services

Block Grant; Substance

Abuse Prevention Block

Grant; Community Mental

Health Services Block Grant

(MHSBG); Access to

Recovery (ATR)

Social Services

The legacy system of place-based anti-poverty programs developed over decades does not map easily onto the suburban landscape

Child and Adult Care Food

Program; The Emergency

Food Assistance Program

(TEFAP); Summer Food

Service Program; Commodity

Supplemental Food Program;

WIC Farmers’ Market

Nutrition Program (FMNP)

Food Assistance

Job TrainingJob Corps; WIA Dislocated Worker

Employment and Training Activities;

WIA Youth Appropriation; WIA Adult

Program; WIA Dislocated Worker

National Emergency Grants;

YouthBuild; Learn and Serve America:

School and Community Based

Programs; Supported Employment

State Grants; Work Opportunity Tax

Credit; Child Care and Development

Block Grant

Education

Title I — Improving The Academic Achievement Of The

Disadvantaged; Head Start and Early Head Start; Improving

Teacher Quality State Grants; Adult Basic and Literacy Education

State Grants; TRIO: Upward Bound; Gaining Early Awareness and

Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP); Teacher

Incentive Fund; TRIO: Student Support Services; College Access

Challenge Grant Program; Mathematics and Science Partnerships;

TRIO:Talent Search; Race to the Top -- Early Learning Challenge;

TRIO: Educational Opportunity Centers; TRIO: Upward Bound

Math Science; Parental Information and Resource Centers;

Advanced Placement Program (Advanced Placement Test Fee;

Advanced Placement Incentive Program Grants); School

Leadership Program; Innovative Approaches to Literacy; Assets

for Independence (AFI); IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance

(VITA); 21st Century Community Learning Centers; Child Care

Access Means Parents in School Program; Advanced Placement

Incentive Program Grants; Qualified zone academy bonds (QZAB);

Charter Schools Program

HealthConsolidated Health Centers

(Community Health Centers, Migrant

Health Centers, Health Care for the

Homeless, Public Housing Primary

Care, and School Based Health

Centers); Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Grants for Capital Development in

Health Centers; Title V Maternal and

Child Health Services Block Grant

Program; Maternal, Infant, and Early

Childhood Home Visiting Program

Economic Development

New Markets Tax Credit ; Renewal

Community Tax Incentives; Community

Development Financial Institutions Program;

ARRA- Investments for Public Works and

Economic Development Facilities; Recovery

Zone Bonds; ARRA- Economic Adjustment

Assistance; Economic Development: Support

for Planning Organizations; Community

Economic Development; Technical Assistance;

Bank Enterprise Award; Economic

Development: Technical Assistance;

Community Services Block Grant; Community

Services Block Grant: Discretionary Awards

Housing

Emergency Food and Shelter

Program; Tenant-based Rental

Assistance; Sustainable

Communities Regional

Planning Grant Program;

Housing Choice Voucher

(HCV) Family Self-Sufficiency;

Housing Counseling

Assistance

$82 billion10 agencies

81 federal programs

These programs typically address place-based poverty in one of three ways

Service Provision

Neighborhood Improvement

Expanding Choice

Need dispersed geographically

Program stigma/ lack of familiarity

Market failures not neighborhood based

Areas may lack needed locational advantages

Families have already “made it” to suburbs

Opportunities may lie in very different part of region

Suburbs face additional challenges

Lack of Capacity

Inflexible, Unreliable Funding

Extensive Fragmentation

Chicago’s south suburbs encountered these challenges during the housing crisis

Cook County

Chicago’s south suburbs encountered these challenges during the housing crisis

Cook County

19 communities submitted a joint NSP application

Chicago’s south suburbs encountered these challenges during the housing crisis

Cook County

11 municipalities received individual awards

HealthConsolidated Health Centers

(Community Health Centers, Migrant

Health Centers, Health Care for the

Homeless, Public Housing Primary

Care, and School Based Health

Centers); Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Grants for Capital Development in

Health Centers; Title V Maternal and

Child Health Services Block Grant

Program; Maternal, Infant, and Early

Childhood Home Visiting Program

Food Assistance

Child and Adult Care Food

Program; The Emergency Food

Assistance Program (TEFAP);

Summer Food Service

Program; Commodity

Supplemental Food Program;

WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition

Program (FMNP)

Housing

Emergency Food and Shelter

Program; Tenant-based Rental

Assistance; Sustainable

Communities Regional

Planning Grant Program;

Housing Choice Voucher

(HCV) Family Self-Sufficiency;

Housing Counseling

Assistance

Job Training

Job Corps; WIA Dislocated Worker

Employment and Training Activities;

WIA Youth Appropriation; WIA Adult

Program; WIA Dislocated Worker

National Emergency Grants;

YouthBuild; Learn and Serve America:

School and Community Based

Programs; Supported Employment

State Grants; Work Opportunity Tax

Credit; Child Care and Development

Block Grant

Title I — Improving The Academic Achievement Of The

Disadvantaged; Head Start and Early Head Start; Improving

Teacher Quality State Grants; Adult Basic and Literacy Education

State Grants; TRIO: Upward Bound; Gaining Early Awareness and

Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP); Teacher

Incentive Fund; TRIO: Student Support Services; College Access

Challenge Grant Program; Mathematics and Science Partnerships;

TRIO:Talent Search; Race to the Top -- Early Learning Challenge;

TRIO: Educational Opportunity Centers; TRIO: Upward Bound

Math Science; Parental Information and Resource Centers;

Advanced Placement Program (Advanced Placement Test Fee;

Advanced Placement Incentive Program Grants); School

Leadership Program; Innovative Approaches to Literacy; Assets

for Independence (AFI); IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance

(VITA); 21st Century Community Learning Centers; Child Care

Access Means Parents in School Program; Advanced Placement

Incentive Program Grants; Qualified zone academy bonds (QZAB);

Charter Schools Program

Education

Economic Development

New Markets Tax Credit ; Renewal

Community Tax Incentives; Community

Development Financial Institutions Program;

ARRA- Investments for Public Works and

Economic Development Facilities; Recovery

Zone Bonds; ARRA- Economic Adjustment

Assistance; Economic Development: Support

for Planning Organizations; Community

Economic Development; Technical Assistance;

Bank Enterprise Award; Economic

Development: Technical Assistance;

Community Services Block Grant; Community

Services Block Grant: Discretionary Awards

Social Services

Substance Abuse Treatment

Block Grant; Social Services

Block Grant; Substance

Abuse Prevention Block

Grant; Community Mental

Health Services Block Grant

(MHSBG); Access to Recovery

(ATR)

Achieve Scale

Neighborhood Centers Inc.• Has an annual budget of more than $275 million,

70 different sites, and a staff of over 1,000• Coordinates resources from 35 federal programs,

state, local, and private sources to provide a seamless continuum of services

• Collaborates with other area providers

Support smart consolidation

Improve systems and networks

Promote high-performance organizations

Collaborate and Integrate

Identify and reduce barriers

Catalyze regional capacity

Reward collaborative approaches

Neighborhood Opportunity Network• A collaboration between the County,

nonprofits, faith based community, and local philanthropy

• Targets high need areas with integrated and culturally competent services

• Builds awareness and community networks through door knocking, Neighbors Exchange, and Neighbor Circles

Fund Strategically• HPN created the REIT with an investment

of $100 million from a range of private and philanthropic investors

• Acquires “naturally affordable” multifamily rental properties for low-income residents without subsidies

• Works with 12 high-performing nonprofits across the country who own, operate, and provide wraparound services at sites

Commit to enterprise-level funding

Promote tools that leverage public & private resources

Develop consistent, comparable data sources

The Housing Partnership Equity Trust

Creating a Metropolitan Opportunity Challenge could help bring these solutions to scale in regions across the country

Federal Place-Based Anti-Poverty Programs

$82 Billion; 81 Programs; 10 Agencies

Re-purpose 5% : $4 billion

www.ConfrontingSuburbanPoverty.org

You can find additional resources and sign up for updates on suburban poverty research and best practices on the book’s website:

The website provides a host of helpful resources:

Profiles of the top 100 metros Case studies of innovators

Tips for taking action Video

Infographic

www.ConfrontingSuburbanPoverty.org

ekneebone@brookings.edu