Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering

Kathmandu University

Dhulikhel, Kavre

DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF OSM MAP OF KATHMANDU

Members (Group (5))Shaswat Kafle (11)Maheshwor Karki (14)Suresh Manandhar (17)Dipesh Suwal (29)

Project SupervisorMr. Sashish MaharjanMr. Nawaraj Shrestha

Project In chargeProf. Dr. Ramesh Kumar Maskey

Mid-Term Presentation on

04/12/2023

2

PRESENTATION OUTLINES• Background• Introduction• Rationale • Study Area• Objectives• Methodology• Resources Required• Project Schedule• Outcomes• Limitations• Conclusions• References

04/12/2023

3

BACKGROUND

• OSM is open source map can be prepared by anybody• Higher the accuracy of map, higher the use of that map• On the basis of quality of map they are used in various

project• In Nepal the accuracy of OSM map has not been mentioned.

04/12/2023

4

INTRODUCTION

• Data quality assessment means to check the accuracy in various quality aspects of the map and gives the knowledge how much that map can be trusted.

• Aspects• Positional accuracy• Logical consistency• Temporal accuracy• Thematic accuracy• Purpose• Usage• Lineage(how data was collected and evolved)

04/12/2023

5

RATIONALE

• The use of OSM map has been increasing day by day.

• But we aren’t aware about the quality of map.

04/12/2023

6

STUDY AREA

04/12/2023

7

STUDY AREA

04/12/2023

8

STUDY AREA

• Kathmandu is the capital and largest metropolitan city of Nepal

• Our project deals within Ringroad of Kathmandu valley.

• Length of ringroad is approximately 27 km.

04/12/2023

9

OBJECTIVES

• To find the accuracy of OSM map of our project site

Sub-Objective• Use of map in other projects such as disaster risk management ,

planning, tourism, navigation and others.

04/12/2023

10

METHODOLOGY

Data Validation

Data Analysis

Road Network Analysis• Positional Accuracy• Attribute Accuracy

Building Analysis• Positional Accuracy• Attribute Accuracy

Data Preparation

OSM in .shp file Coordinate system

Data Collection

OSM Digital Map

04/12/2023

11

METHODOLOGY

DATA COLLECTION• Openstreesmap and Survey Department map • Downloaded map from Openstreetmap Bulidings and Road

shape file from http://BBBike.orgosmium2shape on Wed Apr 3 2013 08:19:41

• Survey Department map from Survey Department of Nepal

04/12/2023

12

METHODOLOGY

Openstreetmap Survey Department MapRoad Map

04/12/2023

13

METHODOLOGY

Openstreetmap Survey Department MapBuilding Map

04/12/2023

14

METHODOLOGY

Meta Data of Survey Department Map• Topographic map of Nepal• Datum: Everest Bangladesh• projection system :MUTM

Meta Data of Openstreetmap• Volunteered geographic information• Datum:WGS84• projection System: Geographic Coordinate System

04/12/2023

15

METHODOLOGY

DATA PREPARATION• Change of projection system of OSM from WGS_84 to MUTM.• Parameters used in transformation are

ΔX=-293.17m

ΔY=-726.18m

ΔZ=-245.36m

(obtained from Survey department document)

04/12/2023

16

METHODOLOGY

Before TransformationAfter Transformation

OSM

SD

04/12/2023

17

METHODOLOGYDATA ANALYSIS

Positional Accuracy of Road• Calculate the percentage intersect with the buffer of SD map.• Classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium,

Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval.

Road Centerline in SD

Road in OSM

Road Buffer of SD

04/12/2023

18

METHODOLOGYPositional Accuracy of Building

1.Near Distance Method• distance between centroid of OSM and SD buildings is

calculated• classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium,

Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval.

Building in OSM

Distance Between Centroid of Buildings

Building in OSM

Fig.:

04/12/2023

19

METHODOLOGY2. Area difference

• difference of area of OSM and SD buildings is calculated• classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium,

Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval.

Building in OSM

Building in SD

04/12/2023

20

METHODOLOGY3. Circulatory Ratio Difference (CRD)

• CRD=4*pi*Area /Perimeter2

• Difference of ratio of OSM and SD buildings is calculated• Checks the variation in shape• Classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium, Bad and

Very Bad) using equal interval.

Building in OSM

Building in SD

04/12/2023

21

METHODOLOGY

• Attribute Accuracy

-name, one way ,bridge of road map

-verify attributes from field survey

04/12/2023

22

RESOURCES REQUIRED

• ArcGis Software• OSM map• Survey Department Map• Microsoft Excel 2007

04/12/2023

23

WORK SCHEDULES.No Weeks

Works1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1 Concept paper

2 Proposal Defense

3 Data Collection

4 Data Preparation

4 Data Analysis

5 Mid term Presentation

6 Report preparation and Final Presentation

Proposed schedule Work Accomplished

04/12/2023

24

OUTCOMES

04/12/2023

25

04/12/2023

26

PROVISIONAL OUTCOMES

04/12/2023

27

04/12/2023

28

PROVISIONAL OUTCOMES

04/12/2023

29

OUTCOMESBuilding Analysis (Ward 12)

Fig: Near Distance Analysis

Near Distance

QUALITY Class(m) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0-6.4 56 82.35294

GOOD 6.4-12.8 8 11.76471

AVERAGE 12.8-19.2 2 2.941176

BAD 19.2-25.6 0 0

VERY BAD 25.6-32 2 2.941176

04/12/2023

30

Fig.: Circulatory Ratio Difference Analysis

Ciculatory Ratio Difference

QUALITY Class Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0-0.06 56 82.35294

GOOD 0.06-0.12 7 10.29412

AVERAGE 0.12-0.18 3 4.411765

BAD 0.18-0.24 0 0

VERY BAD 0.24-0.31 2 2.941176

OUTCOMES

04/12/2023

31

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

10

20

30

40

50

60

54

82 2 2

Fig.: Area Difference Analysis

Area Difference

QUALITY Class(sq.m.) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0-0.06 54 79.41176

GOOD 0.06-0.12 8 11.76471

AVERAGE 0.12-0.18 2 2.941176

BAD 0.18-0.24 2 2.941176

VERY BAD 0.24-0.31 2 2.941176

OUTCOMES

04/12/2023

32

OUTCOMES

COMBINED RESULT

QUALITY Class(Score) Frequency in %

VERY GOOD 84-100 63 92.64706GOOD 68-84 5 7.352941

AVERAGE 52-68 0 0

BAD 36-52 0 0VERY BAD 20-36 0 0

04/12/2023

33

OUTCOMESBuilding Analysis (Ward 11)

Fig: Near Distance Analysis

Near DistanceQuality Class(m) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0.06 - 4.64 117 71.34GOOD 4.64 - 9.21 34 20.73

AVERAGE 9.21 - 13.78 9 5.49BAD 13.78 - 18.35 2 1.22

VERY BAD 18.35 - 22.92 2 1.22

VERY GOOD

GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

20

40

60

80

100

120

117

34

92 2

Near Distance Bar Diagram

Quality

Fre

quen

cy

04/12/2023

34

OUTCOMES

Fig.: Circulatory Ratio Difference Analysis

Circulatory Ratio Difference

Quuality Class Frequency In %VERY GOOD 0.00 - 0.08 114 69.51

GOOD 0.08 - 0.17 34 20.73

AVERAGE 0.17 - 0.25 8 4.88

BAD 0.25 - 0.33 6 3.66

VERY BAD 0.33 - 0.42 2 1.22

VERY GOOD

GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

20

40

60

80

100

120

114

34

8 6 2

Circulatory Ratio Bar Diagram

Quality

Freq

uenc

y

04/12/2023

35

OUTCOMES

Fig.: Area Difference Analysis

Area Difference

Quality Class(m2) Frequency in %

VERY GOOD 0.19 - 133.88 134 81.71

GOOD 133.88 - 267.57 14 8.54

AVERAGE 267.57 - 401.26 9 5.49

BAD 401.26 - 534.96 4 2.44

VERY BAD 534.96 - 668.65 3 1.83

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

134

14 9 4 3

Area Difference Bar Diagram

Quality

Fre

quen

cy

04/12/2023

36

OUTCOMES

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

140

155 1 3

Combined Result Bar Diagram

Quality

Freq

uenc

y

Combined Result

QUALITY Class(Score) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 84-100 140 85.366

GOOD 68-84 15 9.146

AVERAGE 52-68 5 3.049

BAD 36-52 1 0.610

VERY BAD 20-36 3 1.829

04/12/2023

37

OUTCOMES

Fig: Near Distance Analysis

Building Analysis (Ward 10)

Near Distance

QUALITY Class(m) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0.12 - 2.29 366 44.80

GOOD 2.29 - 4.45 383 46.88

AVERAGE 4.45 - 6.61 62 7.59

BAD 6.61 - 8.77 5 0.61

VERY BAD 8.77 - 10.94 1 0.12

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

366 383

62

5 1

Near Distance Bar Diagram

Quality

Fre

quen

cy]

04/12/2023

38

OUTCOMES

Fig.: Circulatory Ratio Difference Analysis

Circulatory Ratio Difference

QUALITY Class Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0.00 - 0.05 554 67.81

GOOD 0.05 - 0.11 144 17.63

AVERAGE 0.11 - 0.16 63 7.71

BAD 0.16 - 0.22 35 4.28

VERY BAD 0.22 - 0.27 21 2.57

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

100

200

300

400

500

600

554

144

6335 21

Circulatory Ratio Difference Bar Diagram

Quality

Fre

quen

cy

04/12/2023

39

OUTCOMES

Fig.: Area Difference Analysis

Area Difference

QUALITY Class(m2) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 0.02 - 43.61 639 78.21

GOOD 43.61 - 87.19 145 17.75

AVERAGE 87.19 - 130.78 24 2.94

BAD 130.78 - 174.36 7 0.86

VERY BAD 174.36 - 217.95 2 0.24

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

639

145

24 7 2

Area Difference Bar Diagram

Quality

Fre

quen

cy

04/12/2023

40

OUTCOMES

VERY GOOD

GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

649

151

14 2 1

Combined Rseult Bar Diagram

Quality

Freq

uenc

y COMBINED RESULTQUALITY Class(Score) Frequency In %

VERY GOOD 84-100 649 79.43696GOOD 68-84 151 18.48225

AVERAGE 52-68 14 1.713586BAD 36-52 2 0.244798

VERY BAD 20-36 1 0.122399

04/12/2023

41

OUTCOMES

04/12/2023

42

• Analysis of positional accuracy of building on other wards

WORKS REMAINING

04/12/2023

43

LIMITATIONS

• Accuracy of OSM depends on the map of Survey Department.

04/12/2023

44

SNAPSHOTS DURING PROJECTS

04/12/2023

45

04/12/2023

46

04/12/2023

47

Building Overlap in Ward 12

04/12/2023

48

District Road Intersection of OSM and SD

04/12/2023

49

12

1110

Building Map of Kathmandu ward no. 10,11 &12

04/12/2023

50

REFERENCES• Koundai, Quorinia.(2009), Assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap data, Msc

thesis, London, University College London.• O’Brien.Oliver.(2010).Openstreet map Quality issue

(http://www.oliverobrien.co.uk/ )• Helbitch,Marco,Amelunxen,Christof.Neis,Pascal.Zipf.Alexnader(2010),

Comparative Spatial Analysis of Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap and Proprietary Geodata

• Haklay, M. (2010), datasets.Environment anHow good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey d Planning B, 37, 682-703.

• OpenStreetMap (2013), The free wiki world map. http://www.openstreetmap.org/ (last date accessed June, 2013).

• Zielstra, D. & Zipf, A. (2010), A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. 13th AGILE International Conference On Geographic Information Science. Guimaraes, Portugal.

• Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team (2012), Evaluation of OpenstreetMap Data in Indonesia (A Final Report), Department of Geodetic & Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering UGM

04/12/2023

51

THANK YOU